Albert the Great (Albertus Magnus). Opera Omnia. Edited by Borgnet, Auguste. 38 vols. Paris: Vivès, 1890–1899.Google Scholar

Albert the Great (Albertus Magnus). Opera Omnia. Edited by Geyer, Bernhard and Gubel, Wilhelm. Monasterium Westfalorum: Aschendorff, 1951–.Google Scholar

Alvarez, Diego. Disputationes Theologicae in Iam-IIae S. Thomae. Trani: Per Costantinum Vitalem, 1617.Google Scholar

Ambrose of Milan (Ambrosius Mediolanensis). De Spiritu Sancto. Edited by Faller, Otto. CSEL 79. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1964.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo (Augustinus Hipponensis). Confessionum Libri XIII. Edited by Verheijen, L.. CCSL 27. Turnhout: Brepols, 1981.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo (Augustinus Hipponensis). De Civitate Dei Libri XXII. Edited by Dombart, B. and Kalb, A.. 2 vols. CCSL 47–48. Turnhout: Brepols, 1955.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo (Augustinus Hipponensis). De Diversis Quaestionibus Octoginta Tribus. Edited by Mutzenbecher, Almut. CCSL 44A. Turnhout: Brepols, 1975.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo (Augustinus Hipponensis). De Libero Arbitrio Libri Tres. Edited by Green, W. M.. CCSL 29. Turnhout: Brepols, 1970.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo (Augustinus Hipponensis). De Moribus Ecclesiae Catholicae et De Moribus Manichaeorum Libri Duo. Edited by Bauer, J. B.. CSEL 90. Vienna: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1992.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo (Augustinus Hipponensis). De Sermone Domini in Monte. Edited by Mutzenbecher, Almut. CCSL 35. Turnhout: Brepols, 1967.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo (Augustinus Hipponensis). De Trinitate Libri XV. Edited by Mountain, W. J.. 2 vols. CCSL 50–50a. Turnhout: Brepols, 1968.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo (Augustinus Hipponensis). Retractationum Libri Duo. Edited by Mutzenbecher, Almut. CCSL 57. Turnhout: Brepols, 1984.Google Scholar

Boethius. In Categoria Aristotelis Libri IV. Edited by Migne, J.-P.. PL 64. Paris: Migne, 1847.Google Scholar

Bonaventure (Bonaventura). Opera Omnia. 10 vols. Quaracchi and Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas, 1882–1902.Google Scholar

Cicero (Marcus Tullius Cicero). Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Translated by Margaret Graver. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Cicero (Marcus Tullius Cicero). Hortensius. Edited by Grilli, Albertus. Testi e Documenti per lo Studio dell’Antichita. Milan and Varese: Instituto Editoriale Cisalpino, 1962.Google Scholar

Collegium Salmanticense Fr. Discalceatorum B. Mariae de Monte Carmeli. Cursus Theologicus. 20 vols. Paris: Palme, 1870–1883.Google Scholar

Conradus Koellin. Scholastica Commentaria in Primam Secundae. Venice: Apud R. Meiettum, 1602.Google Scholar

Durandus of Saint-Pourçain (a Sancto Porciano). In Petri Lombardi Sententias Theologicas Commentariorum Libri IIII. 2 vols. Venice: Typographica Guerrae, 1571; repr. Ridgewood, NJ: Gregg Press, 1964.Google Scholar

John (Johannes) Capreolus. Defensiones Theologiae Divi Thomae Aquinatis. Edited by Paban, Ceslaus and Pègues, Thomas. 7 vols. Tours: Alfred Cattier, 1900–1907; repr. Minerva: Frankfurt, 1967.Google Scholar

John (Johannes) Capreolus. On the Virtues. Translated by Kevin White and Romanus Cessario. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2001.Google Scholar

John (Joannes) Duns Scotus. Opera Omnia. Edited by the Scotistic Commission. Vatican City: Typis Vaticanis, 1950–.Google Scholar

John of St. Thomas (Joannes a Sancto Thoma). Cursus Theologicus In I-II: De Donis Spiritus Sancti. Edited by Mathieu, Armand and Gagné, Hervé. Québec: Les Presses Universitaires Laval, 1948.Google Scholar

John of St. Thomas (Joannes a Sancto Thoma). Cursus Theologicus In I-II: De Virtutibus. Edited by Mathieu, Armand and Gagné, Hervé. Québec: Les Presses Universitaires Laval, 1952.Google Scholar

Macrobius. Ambrosii Theodosii Macrobii Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis. Edited by Willis, James. Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana. Leipzig: Teubner, 1963.Google Scholar

Medina, Bartholomew. Expositio in Tetiam Divi Thomae Partem. Renaut: Salamanca, 1596.Google Scholar

Medina, Bartholomew. Scholastica Commentaria in D. Thomae Aquinatis Doct. Angelici Primam Secundae. Cologne: Sumptibus Petri Henningij, 1618.Google Scholar

Aureol, Peter (Petrus Aureoli). Commentarium in Primum Librum Sententiarum, pars prima. Rome: Zannetti, 1605.Google Scholar

Lombard, Peter (Petrus Lombardus). Sententiae in IV Libris Distinctae. Spicilegium Bonaventurianum, 4–5. Rome: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1971, 1981.Google Scholar

Philip the Chancellor (Philipus Cancellarius Parisiensis). Summa de Bono. 2 vols. Edited by Wicki, Nikolaus. Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi Opera Philosophica Mediae Aetatis Selecta, 2. Bern: Francke, 1985.Google Scholar

Suarez, Francisco. Opera Omnia. 26 vols. Paris: Vivès, 1856–1878.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Expositio et Lectura super Epistolas Paul Apostoli. 2 vols. Edited by Cai, Raphael. Turin: Marietti, 1953.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In Duodecim Libros Metaphysicorum Expositio. Edited by Catala, M.-R. and Spiazzi, R.. Turin: Marietti, 1964.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In Librum Beati Dionysii de Divinis Nominibus Expositio. Edited by Pera, Ceslaus. Turin: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Opera Omnia. Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1884–.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Opuscula Theologica, vol. 1: De Re Dogmatica et Morali. Edited by Verardo, Raymund A.. Turin: Marietti, 1954.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones Disputatae. Edited by Bazzi, P. et al. 2 vols. Turin: Marietti, 1953.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Sancti Thomae Aquinatis, Doctoris Angelici, Ordinis Praedicatorum Opera Omnia, ad fidem optimarum editionum accurate recognita. 25 vols. Parma: Typis Petri Fiaccadori, 1852–1873.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super Libros Sententiarum. Edited by Mandonnet, Pierre and Moos, M. F.. 4 vols. Paris: Lethielleux, 1927–1947.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Contra Gentiles. Editio Leonina Manualis. Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1934.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Somme Théologique: La prudence. Translated by T.-H. Deman. Paris, Tournai, and Rome: Desclée, 1949.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Somme Théologique: La vertu. 2 vols. Translated by R. Bernard. Paris, Tournai, and Rome: Desclée, 1933.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Super Evangelium S. Matthaei Lectura [Reportatio Petri de Andria]. Edited by Cai, R.. 5th ed. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1951.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Treatise on the Virtues. Translated by John A. Oesterle. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar

William of Auxerre (Gulelmus Altissodorensis). Summa Aurea. 5 vols. Edited by Ribaillier, Jean. Spicilegium Bonaventurianum, 26–20. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Rome: Collegium Bonaventurae, 1980–87.Google Scholar

William (Gulielmus) of Ockham. Opera Theologica. 10 vols. Edited by Gál, G. et al. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, 1967–1986.Google Scholar

William (Gulielmus) Peraldus. Summa aurea de virtutibus et vitiis. Venice: P. de Paganinis, 1497.Google Scholar

Allers, Rudolf. “The Vis Cogitativa and Evaluation.” New Scholasticism 15 (1941): 195–221.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia. “Virtue Ethics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, 515–540. Edited by Copp, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33 (1958): 1–19; repr. in Virtue Ethics, 26–44. Edited by Roger Crisp and Michael Slote. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. “Under a Description.” Nous 13 (1979): 219–233; repr. in Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe, vol. 2: Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind, 208–219. Oxford: Blackwell; Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Austin, Nicholas. Aquinas on Virtue: A Causal Reading. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio. “Defending Adam after Darwin: On the Origin of Sapiens as a Natural Kind.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2018): 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, Irena and Goudriaan, Aza. “‘Semipelagianism’: The Origins of the Term and Its Passage into the History of Heresy.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 65 (2014): 25–46.Google Scholar

Bejcvy, Istvan. “The Problem of Natural Virtue.” In Virtue and Ethics in the Twelfth Century, 133–154. Edited by Bejcvy, Istvan and Newhauser, Richard. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Bejcvy, Istvan. “The Cardinal Virtues in the Medieval Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, 1250–1350.” In Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, 1200–1500, 199–221. Edited by Bejcvy, Istvan. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Bielinski, Maureen. “At the Crossroads of Epistemology and Ethics: Aquinas and the Impact of Moral Perception on Prudence and the Moral Virtues.” PhD diss. University of St. Thomas (Houston), 2021.Google Scholar

de Blic, Jacques. “Pour l’historie de la théologie des dons avant Saint Thomas.” Revue d’ascétique et de mystique 22 (1936): 117–179.Google Scholar

Bouillard, Henri. Conversion et grâce chez S. Thomas d’Aquin. Aubier: Montaigne, 1944.Google Scholar

Bourke, Vernon J. “The Background of Aquinas’s Synderesis Principle.” In Graceful Reason: Essays in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy Presented to Joseph Owens, CSSR, 345–360. Edited by Gerson, Lloyd. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983.Google Scholar

Boyle, Leonard. “The Setting of the Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas – Revisited.” In The Ethics of Aquinas, 1–16. Edited by Pope, Stephen J.. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Brock, Steven L. Action and Conduct: Thomas Aquinas and the Theory of Action. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998.Google Scholar

Brock, Steven L. The Philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas: A Sketch. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2015.Google Scholar

Budziszewski, J. A Commentary on Thomas Aquinas’s Virtue Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Bullet, Gabriel. Vertus morales infuses et vertus morales acquises selon Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires, 1958.Google Scholar

Butera, Giuseppe. “On Reason’s Control of the Passions in Aquinas’s Theory of Temperance.” Medieval Studies 68 (2006): 133–160.Google Scholar

Cacouros, Michel. “Le traité pseudo-Aristotélicien De virtutibus et vitiis.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Supplément, 506–546. Edited by Goulet, Richard et al. Paris: CNRS, 2003.Google Scholar

Caldera, Rafael Tomás. Le jugement par inclination chez Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Vrin, 1980.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caulfield, Joseph. “Practical Ignorance in Moral Actions.” Laval théologique et philosophique 7 (1951): 69–122.Google Scholar

Cessario, Romanus. “The Theological Virtue of Hope (IIa IIae, qq. 17–22).” In The Ethics of Aquinas, 103–115. Edited by Pope, Stephen J.. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cessario, Romanus. The Moral Virtues and Theological Ethics. 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Chappell, Timothy. “Virtue Ethics in the Twentieth Century.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics, 149–171. Edited by Russell, Daniel C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Cleveland, W. Scott and Dahm, Brandon. “The Virtual Presence of Acquired Virtues in the Christian.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2019): 75–100.Google Scholar

Coerver, Robert Florent. The Quality of Facility in the Moral Virtues. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1946.Google Scholar

Coope, Christopher Miles. “Modern Virtue Ethics.” In Values and Virtues: Aristotelianism in Contemporary Ethics, 20–52. Edited by Chappell, Timothy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Copp, David and Sobel, David. “Morality and Virtue: An Assessment of Some Recent Work in Virtue Ethics.” Ethics 144 (2004): 514–554.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Stanley. Reclaiming Moral Agency: The Moral Philosophy of Albert the Great. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Dahm, Brandon. “The Acquired Virtues Are Real Virtues: A Response to Stump.” Faith and Philosophy 32 (2015): 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Decosimo, David. Ethics as a Work of Charity: Thomas Aquinas and Pagan Virtue. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Decosimo, David. “More to Love: Ends, Ordering, and the Compatibility of Acquired and Infused Virtues.” In The Virtuous Life: Thomas Aquinas on the Theological Nature of Moral Virtues, 47–72. Edited by Goris, Harm and Schoot, Henk. Leuven, Paris, and Bristol, CT: Peeters, 2017.Google Scholar

Deman, T.-H. Review of Surnaturel: Études Historiques, by Henri de Lubac. Bulletin Thomiste 7 (1943–46, pub. 1950): 422–446.Google Scholar

Deman, T.-H. “Le ‘précepte’ de la prudence chez Saint Thomas d’Aquin.” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 20 (1953): 40–59.Google Scholar

DeSpain, Benjamin. “Quaestio Disputata: Aquinas’s Virtuous Vision of the Divine Ideas,” Theological Studies 8 (2020): 453–466.Google Scholar

De Hart, Paul. “Quaestio Disputata: Divine Virtues and Divine Ideas of Virtues,” Theological Studies 8 (2020): 467–477.Google Scholar

Dupré, John. The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Farrell, Dominic. The Ends of the Moral Virtues and the First Principles of Practical Reason in Thomas Aquinas. Rome: Gregorian & Biblical Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Ferry, Leonard. “Sorting Out Reason’s Relation to the Passions in the Moral Theory of Aquinas.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 88 (2015): 227–244.Google Scholar

Flood, Anthony T. The Metaphysical Foundations of Love: Aquinas on Participation, Unity, and Union. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Foot, Philippa. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Foot, Philippa. “Virtues and Vices.” In her Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, 1–18. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Frede, Michael. “The Stoic Doctrine of the Affections of the Soul.” In The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, 93–110. Edited by Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gallagher, David M. “Aquinas on Goodness and Moral Goodness.” In Thomas Aquinas and His Legacy, 37–60. Edited by Gallagher, David M.. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Gallagher, David M. “The Will and Its Acts.” In The Ethics of Aquinas, 69–89. Edited by Pope, Stephen J.. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. “La prudence: sa place dans l’organisme des vertus.” Revue Thomiste 31 (1926): 411–426.Google Scholar

Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. “L’instabilité dans l’état de péché mortel des vertus morales acquises.” Revue Thomiste 42 (1937): 255–262.Google Scholar

Gauthier, René-Antoine. “Comptes Rendus” of Psychologie et morale aux xii^e et xiii^e siècles, vols. 2–3, by Odon Lottin. Louvain: Mont César; Gembloux: Duculot, 1948–49. Bulletin Thomiste 8 (1947–1953): 60–86.Google Scholar

Gauthier, René-Antoine. “Saint Maxime le Confesseur et la psychologie de l’acte humain.” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 21 (1954): 51–100.Google Scholar

George, Marie I. “Aquinas’s Teachings on Concepts and Words in His Commentary on John contra Nicanor Austriaco, OP.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2020): 357–378.Google Scholar

Gillon, L.-B. “Aux origines de la ‘Puissance Obédientielle.’” Revue Thomiste 48 (1947): 304–310.Google Scholar

Glenn, Mary Michael. “A Comparison of the Thomistic and Scotistic Concepts of Hope.” The Thomist 20 (1957): 27–74.Google Scholar

Gondreau, Paul. The Passions of Christ’s Soul in the Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Graf, Th. De subiecto psychico gratiae et virtutum. 2 vols. Rome: Herder, 1934.Google Scholar

De Haan, Daniel. “Moral Perception and the Function of the Vis Cogitativa in Thomas Aquinas’s Doctrine of Antecedent and Consequent Passions.” Documenti e studi sulla traditione filosofica medievale 25 (2014): 289–330.Google Scholar

Harvey, John. “The Nature of the Infused Moral Virtues.” Catholic Theological Society of America Proceedings 10 (1955): 172–217.Google Scholar

Hause, Jeffrey. “Aquinas on the Function of Moral Virtue.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2007): 1–20.Google Scholar

Herdt, Jennifer. “Aquinas’s Aristotelian Defense of Martyr Courage.” In Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics, 110–128. Edited by Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hibbs, Thomas. “The Fearful Thoughts of Mortals: Aquinas on Conflict, Self-Knowledge, and the Virtue of Practical Reasoning.” In Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and Critics, 273–312. Edited by Cunningham, Lawrence. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Joshua. “Porphyry, Bonaventure, and Thomas Aquinas: A Neo-Platonic Hierarchy of Virtues, and Two Christian Appropriations.” In Medieval Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 245–259. Edited by Inglis, John. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hoenen, Petrus. “De origine primorum principiorum scientiae.” Gregorianum 14 (1933): 153–184.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Tobias. “Prudence and Practical Principles.” In Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics, 165–183. Edited by Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Tobias. “Aquinas on Moral Progress.” In Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae: A Critical Guide, 131–149. Edited by Hause, Jeffrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Houser, Rollen Edward, Trans and Ed. The Cardinal Virtues: Aquinas, Albert, and Philip the Chancellor. Toronto: Pontifical Institute for Mediaeval Studies, 2004.Google Scholar

Hursthouse, Rosalind. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Hursthouse, Rosalind and Pettigrove, Glen. “Virtue Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition). Edited by Zalta, Edward N., URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue/>..>Google Scholar

Inagki, Bernard. “Habitus and Natura in Aquinas.” In Studies in Medieval Philosophy, 159–175. Edited by Wippel, John F.. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Inglis, John. “Aquinas’s Replication of the Acquired Moral Virtues. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1999): 3–27.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence. “Who Discovered the Will?” Philosophical Perspectives 6 (1992): 453–473.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence. “Practical Reason Divided: Aquinas and His Critics.” In Ethics and Practical Reason, 189–214. Edited by Cullity, Garrit and Gaut, Berys. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence. The Development of Ethics, vol. 1: From Socrates to the Reformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Jenkins, John. “Expositions of the Text: Aquinas’s Aristotelian Commentaries.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5 (1996): 39–62.Google Scholar

Jenkins, John. Knowledge and Faith in Thomas Aquinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jensen, Steven. “Of Gnome and Gnomes: The Virtue of Higher Discernment and the Production of Monsters.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2008): 411–428.Google Scholar

Jensen, Steven. “The Error of the Passions,” The Thomist 73 (2009): 349–379.Google Scholar

Jensen, Steven. “Virtuous Deliberation and the Passions.” The Thomist 77 (2013): 193–227.Google Scholar

Jensen, Steven. Sin: A Thomistic Psychology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. “St. Thomas, Obediential Potency, and the Infused Virtues: De virtutibus in communi, a. 10, ad 13.” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale, suppl. 1: Thomistica (1995): 27–34.Google Scholar

Kahm, Nicholas. Aquinas on Emotion’s Participation in Reason. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Kemp, Kenneth W. “Science, Theology, and Monogenesis.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2011): 217–236.Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. Aquinas on Mind. New York and London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Kent, Bonnie. “Transitory Vice: Thomas Aquinas on Incontinence.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1989): 199–223.Google Scholar

Kent, Bonnie. Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth Century. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kent, Bonnie. “Habits and Virtues.” In The Ethics of Aquinas, 116–130. Edited by Pope, Stephen J.. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Kent, Bonnie. “Losable Virtue: Aquinas on Character and Will.” In Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics, 91–109. Edited by Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Keys, Mary M. Aquinas, Aristotle, and the Promise of the Common Good. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

King, Peter. “Aquinas on the Passions.” In Aquinas’s Moral Theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann, 101–132. Edited by MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999; repr. in Thomas Aquinas: Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives, 353–384. Edited by Brain Davies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Klima, Gyula. “What Ever Happened to Efficient Causes?” In Skepticism, Causality and Skepticism about Causality, 31–42. Edited by Klima, Gyula and Hall, Alexander W.. Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics 10. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar

Knobel, Angela McKay. “Prudence and Acquired Moral Virtue.” The Thomist 69 (2005): 535–565.Google Scholar

Knobel, Angela “Two Theories of Christian Virtue.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2010): 599–618.Google Scholar

Knobel, Angela “Can the Infused and Acquired Virtues Coexist in the Christian Life?” Studies in Christian Ethics 23/4 (2010): 381–396.Google Scholar

Knobel, Angela “Aquinas and the Pagan Virtues.” International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2011): 339–354.Google Scholar

Knobel, Angela “Relating Aquinas’s Infused and Acquired Virtues: Some Problematic Texts for a Common Interpretation.” Nova et Vetera, English Edition 9 (2011): 411–431.Google Scholar

Knobel, Angela “A Confusing Comparison: Interpreting DVC A. 10 AD 4.” In The Virtuous Life: Thomas Aquinas on the Theological Nature of Moral Virtues, 97–115. Edited by Goris, Harm and Schoot, Henk. Leuven, Paris, and Bristol, CT: Peeters, 2017.Google Scholar

Knuuttila, Simo. Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon, 2004.Google Scholar

De Letter, P. “Hope and Charity in St. Thomas.” The Thomist 13 (1950): 204–324, 325–352.Google Scholar

van Lieshout, H. La théorie Plotinienne de la vertu: Essai sur la genèse d’un article de la Somme théologique de Saint Thomas. Freiburg: Studie Friburgensia, 1926.Google Scholar

Lisska, Anthony. Aquinas’s Theory of Perception: An Analytic Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Lombardo, Nicholas. The Logic of Desire: Aquinas on Emotion. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lonergan, Bernard. Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas. Edited by Burrell, David B.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Lonergan, Bernard. Grace and Freedom: Operative Grace in the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas. Edited by Patout Burns, J.. London: Darton, Longman and Todd; New York: Herder and Herder, 1971.Google Scholar

Long, Steven. Natura Pura: On the Recovery of Nature in the Doctrine of Grace. New York: Fordham University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Long, Steven. “Creation ad imaginem Dei: The Obediential Potency of the Human Person to Grace and Glory.” Nova et Vetera 14 (2016): 1175–1192.Google Scholar

Lopez, Timothy J. “United Acquired Virtue in Traditional Thomism: Distinguishing Necessities, Efficient Causes, and Finalities.” In The Virtuous Life: Thomas Aquinas on the Theological Nature of Moral Virtues, 183–199. Edited by Goris, Harm and Schoot, Henk. Leuven, Paris, and Bristol, CT: Peeters, 2017.Google Scholar

Lottin, Odon. Psychologie et morale aux xii^e et xiii^e siècles. 6 vols. Louvain: Mont César; Gembloux: Duculot, 1942–1960.Google Scholar

Lottin, Odon. Études de Morale: Histoire et Doctrine. Gembloux: Duculot, 1961.Google Scholar

De Lubac, Henri. Surnaturel: Études Historiques. Paris: Aubier, 1946.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Richard K. “Antecedent Passion and the Moral Quality of Human Act.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 71 (1997): 221–231.Google Scholar

Maritain, Jacques. Science et sagesse: Suivi d’eclaircissements sur la philosophie morale. Paris: Labergerie, 1935.Google Scholar

McGinnis, Jon. Avicenna. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

McGrath, Alister. Iustitia Dei: A History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

MacKendrick, Paul. The Philosophical Books of Cicero. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Mattison, William. “Thomas’ Categorizations of Virtue: Historical Background and Contemporary Significance.” The Thomist 74 (2010): 189–235.Google Scholar

Mattison, William. “Can Christians Possess the Acquired Cardinal Virtues?” Theological Studies 72 (2011): 558–585.Google Scholar

McCluskey, Colleen. Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Miller, Marianne Therese. “The Problem of Action in the Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas on the Physics of Aristotle.” The Modern Schoolman 23 (1945–46): 135–167.Google Scholar

Miner, Robert. “Non-Aristotelian Prudence in the Prima Secundae.” The Thomist 64 (2000): 401–422.Google Scholar

Miner, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on the Passions: A Study of Summa Theologiae 1a2ae 22–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Miner, Robert. “Aquinas on Habitus.” In A History of Habit: From Aristotle to Bourdieu, 67–87. Edited by Sparrow, Tom and Hutchinson, Adam. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Mirkes, Renée. “Aquinas’s Doctrine of Moral Virtue and Its Significance for Theories of Facility.” The Thomist 61 (1997): 189–218.Google Scholar

Mirkes, Renée. “Aquinas on the Unity of Perfect Moral Virtue.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (1998): 589–605.Google Scholar

Morriset, Paul. “Prudence et fin selon Saint Thomas.” Sciences ecclésiastique 15 (1963): 73–98, 439–458.Google Scholar

Mulcahy, Bernard. Aquinas’s Notion of Pure Nature and the Christian Integralism of Henri de Lubac. New York: Peter Lang, 2011.Google Scholar

Müller, Jörn. Natürliche Moral und philosophische Ethik bei Albertus Magnus. Münster: Ashendorff, 2001.Google Scholar

Murphy, Claudia Eisen. “Aquinas on Our Responsibility for Our Emotions.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (1999): 163–205.Google Scholar

Naus, John E. The Nature of the Practical Intellect according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. Rome: Analecta Gregoriana, 1959.Google Scholar

Nicolas, J.-H. Les profondeurs de la grace. Paris: Beauchesne, 1969.Google Scholar

O’Daly, Gerard. Augustine’s Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “The Augustinianism of Thomas Aquinas’ Moral Theory.” The Thomist 67 (2003): 279–305.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. Love of Self and Love of God in Thirteenth-Century Ethics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “Perfect and Imperfect Virtues in Aquinas.” The Thomist 71 (2007): 39–64.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “The Separation of Interior and Exterior Acts in Scotus and Ockham.” Mediaeval Studies 69 (2008): 111–139.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “The Threefold Referral of Acts to the Ultimate End in Thomas Aquinas and His Commentators.” Angelicum 85 (2008): 715–736.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “Thomas and Scotus on Prudence without All the Major Virtues: Imperfect or Merely Partial?” The Thomist 74 (2010): 1–24.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “Unbelief and Sin in Thomas Aquinas and the Thomistic Tradition.” Nova et Vetera, English Edition 8 (2010): 613–626.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus on Individual Acts and the Ultimate End.” In Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages: A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown, 351–374. Edited by Emery, Kent Jr., Friedman, Russell L., and Speer, Andreas. Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “Natura Pura: Two Recent Works.” Nova et Vetera, English Edition 11 (2013): 265–279.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. Human Action in Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2014.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “What Is at Stake in the Question of whether Someone Can Possess the Natural Moral Virtues without Charity?” In The Virtuous Life: Thomas Aquinas on the Theological Nature of Moral Virtues, 117–130. Edited by Goris, Harm and Schoot, Henk. Leuven, Paris, and Bristol, CT: Peeters, 2017.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “Natural Reason and Supernatural Faith.” In Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae: A Critical Guide, 188–203. Edited by Hause, Jeffrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “Spanish Thomists on the Need for Interior Grace in Acts of Faith.” In Beyond Dordt and De Auxiliis: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, 66–86. Edited by Ballor, Jordan, Gaetano, Matthew, and Sytsma, David. Brill: Leiden, 2019.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. Aquinas’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

OsborneJr., Thomas M. “Thomas, Scotus, and Ockham on the Object of Hope.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 87 (2020): 1–26.Google Scholar

Papineau, David. “Naturalism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition). Edited by Edward N., Zalta, forthcoming URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/naturalism/>..>Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa Theologiae 1a 75–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Pinckaers, Servais. “Comptes Rendus – Deman et Gauthier.” Bulletin Thomiste 9 (1955): 345–362.Google Scholar

Pinckaers, Servais. “Le vertu est tout autre chose q’une habitude.” Nouvelle Revue Théologique 82 (1960): 387–403.Google Scholar

Pinckaers, Servais. “L’instinct de l’Esprit au coeur de l’éthique chrétienne.” Novitas et Veritas vitae: aux sources du renouveau de la morale chrétienne: mélanges offerts au professeur Servais Pinckaers à l’occasion de son 65e anniversaire, 213–224. Edited by Oliveira, Carlos Pinto de and Aubert, Jean Marie. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires; Paris: Cerf, 1991. Translated by Craig Steven Titus as “Morality and the Movement of the Holy Spirit” in The Pinckaers Reader, 385–395. Edited by John Berkman and Craig Steven Titus. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pinckaers, Servais. “La voie spirituelle du bonheur selon Saint Thomas.” In Ordo Sapientiae et Amoris: Image et message de Saint Thomas d’Aquin, 267–284. Edited by Pinto de Oliveira., Carlos-Josaphat Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires, 1993. Translated by Mary Thomas Noble as “Aquinas’s Pursuit of Beatitude: From the Commentary on the Sentences to the Summa Theologiae.” In The Pinckaers Reader, 93–114.Google Scholar

Pinckaers, Servais. The Sources of Christian Ethics. 3rd ed. Translated by Mary Thomas Noble. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Pinckaers, Servais. The Pinckaers Reader. Edited by Berkman, John and Titus, Craig Steven. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pinsent, Andrew. The Second-Person Perspective in Aquinas’s Ethics: Virtues and Gifts. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Porro, Pasquale. Thomas Aquinas: A Historical and Philosophical Profile. Translated by Joseph G. Trabbic and Roger W. Nutt. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Porter, Jean. The Perfection of Desire: Habit, Reason, and Virtue in Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae. The Père Marquette Lecture in Theology 2018. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Ramirez, Santiago. De Actibus Humanis: In I-II Summa Theologiae Expositio (QQ. VI-XXI). Madrid: Instituto de Filosofia “Luis Vivès.” 1972.Google Scholar

Ramirez, Santiago. De Habitibus in Communi: In I-II Summae Theologiae Divi Thomae Expositio (QQ. XLIX-LIV). 2 vols. Madrid: Instituto de Filosofia “Luis Vivès.” 1973.Google Scholar

Ramirez, Santiago. De Donis Spiritus Sancti Deque Vita Mystica: In II P. Summa Theologiae Divi Thomae Expositio. Madrid: Instituto de Filosofia “Luis Vivès.” 1973.Google Scholar

Richardson, Kara. “Avicenna and Aquinas on Form and Generation.” In The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics, 251–274. Edited by Hasse, Dag and Bertolacci, Amos. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 2011.Google Scholar

Rist, John M. On Inoculating Moral Philosophy against God. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Russell, Daniel C. Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. Oxford: Clarendon, 2009.Google Scholar

Saarinen, Risto. “The Parts of Prudence: Buridan, Odonis, Aquinas.” Dialogue 42 (2003): 749–765.Google Scholar

Sanford, Jonathan J. Sanford. Before Virtue: Assessing Contemporary Virtue Ethics. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Shanley, Brian. “Aquinas on Pagan Virtue.” The Thomist 63 (1999): 553–577.Google Scholar

Sherwin, Michael. “Infused Virtue and the Effects of Acquired Vice: A Test Case for the Thomistic Theory of the Infused Cardinal Virtues.” The Thomist 69 (2005): 29–52.Google Scholar

Simon, Yves. “Maritain’s Philosophy of Science.” The Thomist 4 (1943): 85–102.Google Scholar

Simpson, William M. R., Koons, Robert C., and Teh, Nicholas J., Editors. Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science. London: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard. “Infinite Power Impressed: The Transformation of Aristotle’s Physics and Theology.” In Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, 1–198. Edited by Sorabji, Richard. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Stump, Eleonore. “The Non-Aristotelian Character of Aquinas’s Ethics: Aquinas on the Passions.” Faith and Philosophy 28 (2011): 29–34.Google Scholar

Suto, Taki. “Virtue and Knowledge: Connatural Knowledge according to Thomas Aquinas.” The Review of Metaphysics 58 (2004): 61–79.Google Scholar

Thompson, Michael. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Titus, Craig Steven. “Passions in Christ: Spontaneity, Development, and Virtue,” The Thomist 73 (2009): 53–87.Google Scholar

Titus, Craig Steven. “Moral Development and Connecting the Virtues: Aquinas, Porter, and the Flawed Saint.” In Ressourcement Thomism: Sacred Doctrine, the Sacraments, and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Romanus Cessario, O.P., 330–352. Edited by Hütter, Reinhard and Levering, Matthew. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Torrell, Jean-Pierre. St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 1: The Person and His Work, rev. ed. Translated by Robert Royal. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Uffenheimer-Lippens, Elisabeth. “Rationalized Passion and Passionate Rationality: Thomas Aquinas on the Relation between Reason and the Passions.” The Review of Metaphysics 56 (2003): 525–558.Google Scholar

Vogler, Candace. “Aristotle, Aquinas, Anscombe, and the New Virtue Ethics.” In Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics, 239–257. Edited by Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Wallace, William. The Role of Demonstration in St. Thomas Aquinas: A Study of Methodology in St. Thomas Aquinas. River Forest, IL: The Thomist Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Wallace, William. The Modeling of Nature: Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Nature in Synthesis. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Weisheipl, James A. Nature and Motion in the Middle Ages. Edited by Carroll., William E. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Westberg, Daniel. Right Practical Reason: Aristotle, Action and Prudence in Aquinas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

White, Kevin. “The Passions of the Soul.” In The Ethics of Aquinas, 103–115. Edited by Pope, Stephen J.. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

White, Leo A. “Instinct and Custom.” The Thomist 66 (2002): 577–605.Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

William, Mary. “The Relationships of the Intellectual Virtue of Science and Moral Virtue.” New Scholasticism 36 (1962): 475–505.Google Scholar

Wippel, John F. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Wolf, Raphael. Cicero: The Philosophy of a Roman Skeptic. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar