Literary text and stage-enactment

Literary versus theatrical reception

The literary historian is not always quite as sharply aware of the importance of non-verbal codes for the dramatic text as the dramatist. Poring over his printed texts, the former tends to neglect the multimedial aspect of theatrical performance, whereas the latter regards this as a crucial component of the literary text. For, in the words of Max Frisch:

Like Frisch, Ionesco is another to emphasise the unity of the multimedial dramatic text, maintaining that to strip it down to the bare minimum would be an inexcusable aberration and abbreviation:

Statements such as these seem particularly important at a time when, for various socio-cultural reasons, plays – at least the non-trivial ones – are more often read than seen in the theatre. They apply particularly to the institutionalised study of dramatic texts at schools and universities, where they are frequently stripped of their theatrical qualities. Dr Johnson's neoclassical dictum: ‘A play read affects the mind like a play acted’, can only be true of the reader who is able to bring the numerous explicit and implicit signs and signals inherent in the literary text to life in his imagination.