Acheilara, L. (2004), ἐν τῶ ἴρω τῶ ἐμ Μέσσω, Mytilene.Google Scholar

Adkins, A. W. H. (1977), ‘Callinus 1 and Tyrtaeus 10 as poetry’, HSCP 81: 59–97.Google Scholar

Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.) (2012), Reading the Victory Ode, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahlberg-Cornell, G. (1992), Myth and Epos in Early Greek Art: Representation and Interpretation, Jonsered.Google Scholar

Alden, M. J. (2000), Homer Beside Himself: Para-Narratives in the Iliad, Oxford.Google Scholar

Allan, W. (2019), Greek Elegy and Iambus: A Selection, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Allen, T. W. (1924), Homer: The Origins and the Transmission, Oxford.Google Scholar

Aloni, A. (2001), ‘The proem of Simonides’ Plataea Elegy and the circumstances of its performance’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001): 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ampolo, C. and Rosamilia, E. (2021), ‘Novità sulla cultura Achea e sui culti a Kaulonia: la Tabula Cauloniensis, editio minor’, 55–125 in Gli altri Achei: Kaulonia e Terina: contesti e nuovi apporti, Taranto.Google Scholar

Andersen, Ø. (2019), review of Currie (2016), Gnomon 91/2: 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, Ø. and Haug, D. (eds.) (2012), Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. J. (1997), The Fall of Troy in Early Greek Poetry and Art, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andolfi, I. (2017), ‘An ambiguous literary genre. The origins of early Greek mythography’, Mnemosyne 70.2: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andolfi, I. (2018), ‘Rhapsody in prose? The contribution of Hecataeus of Miletus to archaic Greek literature’, QUCC 120: 77–106.Google Scholar

Andolfi, I. (2019), Acusilaus of Argos’ ‘Rhapsody in Prose’: Introduction, Text, and Commentary, Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrington, N. (2015), Ashes, Images and Memories: The Presence of the War Dead in Fifth-Century Athens, New York.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1975), ‘Simonide moraliste’, REG 88: 20–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagordo, A. (2003), Reminiszenzen früher Lyrik bei den attischen Tragikern: Beiträge zur Anspielungstechnik und poetischen Tradition, Munich.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (2013), The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (2016), ‘Archaic epigram and the seal of Theognis’, in Sistakou, E. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Dialect, Diction and Style in Greek Literary and Inscribed Epigram, Berlin: 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, E. J. and Kahane, A. (eds.) (1997), Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance and the Epic Text, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.) (2002), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakola, E. (2010), Cratinus and the Art of Comedy, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bakola, E., Prauscello, L., and Telò, M. (eds.) (2013), Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballabriga, A. (1990), ‘La Question Homérique: pour une réouverture du débat’, Revue des Etudes Grecques 103: 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balaudé, J.-F. (2006), ‘Hippias les passeur’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.), La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, Pisa: 287–304.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2012), ‘Returning to Troy: Herodotus and the mythic discourse of his own time’, in Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus’ Histories, Oxford: 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1984), La traccia del modello, Pisa.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993), ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and the Heroides’, HSCP 95: 333–65.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2001a), ‘Simonides and Horace on the death of Achilles’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001): 255–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2001b), Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets, London.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2015), Homeric Effects in Vergil’s Narrative, tr. I. Marchesi and M. Fox, Princeton.Google Scholar

Barker, E. (2009), Entering the Agon: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography and Tragedy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barringer, J. M. (2001), The Hunt in Ancient Greece, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Barringer, J. M. (2005), ‘The temple of Zeus at Olympia: heroes and athletes’, Hesperia 74: 211–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barringer, J. and Lissarrague, F. (2021), Images at the Crossroads: Media and Meaning in Greek Art, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Barron, J. P. (1961), ‘The son of Hyllis’, CR 11: 185–7.Google Scholar

Barron, J. P. (1969), ‘Ibycus: to Polycrates’, BICS 16: 119–49.Google Scholar

Barron, J. P. (1972), ‘New light on old walls: the murals of the Theseion’, JHS 92: 20–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, J. P. (1984), ‘Ibycus: Gorgias and other poems’, BICS 31: 13–24.Google Scholar

Battezzato, L. (1995), Il monologo nel teatro di Euripide, Pisa.Google Scholar

Baumbach, M. (ed.) (2019), Die Seele im Kosmos: Porphyrios, Über die Nymphengrotte in der Odyssee, Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A., and Petrovic, I. (2010a), ‘Archaic and classical Greek epigram: an introduction’, in Baumbach, Petrovic, and Petrovic (2010b): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I. (eds.) (2010b), Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bažant, J. (1984), ‘Les vases athéniens et les réformes démocratiques’, in Bérard, C., Bron, C., and Pomari, A. (eds.), Images et société en Grèce ancienne: L’iconographie comme méthode d’analyse, Lausanne: 33–40.Google Scholar

Bažant, J. (1985), Les citoyens sur les vases athéniens du 6e au 4e siècle av. J.-C., Prague.Google Scholar

Beck, B. (2020), ‘Reassessing the scholiastic evidence for the Cretan Odyssey theory’, TAPA 150: 357–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benelli, L. (2017), Sapphostudien zu ausgewählten Fragmenten, Paderborn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bérard, C. et al. (1984), La cité des images, Lausanne.Google Scholar

Bérard, C. (1989), A City of Images, tr. D. Lyons, Princeton.Google Scholar

Bernabé, A. (1996), Poetarum epicorum Graecorum: Testimonia et fragmenta, 2nd ed., Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertelli, L. (2001), ‘Hecataeus: from genealogy to historiography’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s’ Craft in the Age of Herodotus, Oxford: 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bierl, A. and Lardinois, A. (eds.) (2016), The Newest Sappho: P. Sapph. Obbink and P. GC inv. 105, frs. 1–4, Leiden.Google Scholar

Biles, Z. (2011), Aristophanes and the Poetics of Competition, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bing, P. (2009), The Scroll and the Marble: Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bing, P. (2014), ‘Inscribed epigrams in and out of sequence’, in Harder, A., Regtuit, R., and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Hellenistic Poetry in Context, Leuven: 1–24.Google Scholar

Biondi, F. (2015), Teagene di Reggio rapsodo e interprete di Omero, Pisa and Rome.Google Scholar

Bittlestone, R. (2005), Odysseus Unbound: The Search for Homer’s Ithaca, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1973), The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar

Blümer, W. (2001), Interpretation archaischer Dichtung: Die mythologischen Partien der Erga Hesiods, 2 vols., Münster.Google Scholar

Boardman, J. (1972), ‘Herakles, Peisistratos and sons’, Revue Archéologique 1972: 57–72.Google Scholar

Boardman, J. (1983), ‘Symbol and story in Geometric art’, in Moon, W. G. (ed.), Ancient Greek Art and Iconography, Madison: 15–36.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2000), ‘Herodotus’ genre(s)’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Matrices of Genre. Authors, Canons, and Society, Cambridge, MA: 97–114.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2002), ‘Epic heritage and mythical patterns in Herodotus’, in Bakker, de Jong, and van Wees (2002): 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) (2001), The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boeke, H. (2007), The Value of Victory in Pindar’s Odes: Gnomai, Cosmology and the Role of the Poet, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boler, M. (2011), Gnomes in Bacchylides, PhD diss. Fordham.Google Scholar

Bölte, F. (1934), ‘Ein pylisches Epos’, RhM 83: 319–47.Google Scholar

Bona, G. (1988), Pindaro. I peani, Cuneo.Google Scholar

Bonanno, M. G. (1980–2), ‘Sul secondo epodo di Colonia’, MCr 15–17: 19–26.Google Scholar

Bonnafé, A. (1983), ‘Le rossignol et la justice en pleurs (Hésiode ‘Travaux’ 203–212)’, BAGB 4: 260–4.Google Scholar

Borg, B. E. (2010), ‘Epigrams in archaic art’, in Baumbach, Petrovic, and Petrovic (2010b): 81–99.Google Scholar

Borthwick, E. K. (1968a), ‘The dances of Philocleon and the sons of Carcinus in Aristophanes’ Wasps’, CQ 18: 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borthwick, E. K. (1968b), ‘Two unnoticed Euripidean fragments?’, CQ 18: 198–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowie, A. M. (1993), Aristophanes: Myth, Ritual and Comedy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowie, A. M. (2013), Homer Odyssey Books XIV and XV, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (1986), ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival’, JHS 106: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowie, E. (2008), ‘Sex and politics in Archilochus’ poetry’, in Katsonopoulou, D., Petropoulos, I., and Katsarou, S. (eds.), Sex and Politics in Archilochus’ Poetry, Athens: 133–43.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1964), Pindar, Oxford.Google Scholar

Braswell, B. K. (1982), ‘The song of Ares and Aphrodite: theme and relevance to Odyssey 8’, Hermes 110: 129–37.Google Scholar

Braswell, B. K. (1988), A Commentary on the Fourth Pythian Ode of Pindar, Berlin.Google Scholar

Brown, C. G. (1995), ‘The parched furrow and the loss of youth: Archilochus fr. 188 West’, QUCC 50: 29–35.Google Scholar

Brown, C. G. (2016), ‘Warding off a hailstorm of blood’, in Carey and Swift (2016): 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. G. (2019), ‘Phrasikleia: playing with signs’, in Harrisson, J. (ed.), Imagining the Afterlife in the Ancient World, Abingdon: 33–48.Google Scholar

Brügger, C., Stoevesandt, M., and Visser, E. (2003), Homers Ilias. Gesamtkommentar. Band II: Zweiter Gesang (B). Faszikel 2: Kommentar, Munich.Google Scholar

Brügger, C., Stoevesandt, M., and Visser, E. (2017), Homer’s Iliad: The Basel Commentary. Book XXIV, tr. Millis, B. W. and Strack, S. and ed. Olson, S. D., Boston and Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruit, L. (1984), ‘Sacrifices à Delphes: sur deux figures d’Apollon’, RHR 201: 339–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchner, G. and Russo, C. F. (1955), ‘La Coppa di Nestore e un’insrizione metrica da Pitecusa dell’VIII Secolo Av. Cr.’, RAL 10, 215–34.Google Scholar

Budelmann, F. (2018), Greek Lyric: A Selection, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budelmann, F. and Phillips, T. (eds.) (2018), Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulloch, A. W. (1985), Callimachus: The Fifth Hymn, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Burgess, J. S. (2001), The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Burgess, J. S. (2006), ‘Neoanalysis, orality, and intertextuality: an examination of Homeric motif transference’, Oral Tradition 21: 148–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, J. S. (2009), The Death and Afterlife of Achilles, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, J. S. (2012), ‘Intertextuality without text in early Greek epic’, in Andersen and Haug (2012): 168–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, J. S. (2017), ‘The apologos of Odysseus: tradition and conspiracy theories’, in Tsagalis, C. and Markantonatos, A. (eds.), The Winnowing Oar: New Perspectives in Homeric Studies: Studies in Honour of Antonios Rengakos, Berlin: 95–120.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1976), ‘Das hunderttorige Theben und die Datierung der llias’, WS 89: 5–21 [= (2001) 59–71].Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1987), ‘The making of Homer in the sixth century B.C.: rhapsodes versus Stesichoros’, in Papers on the Amasis Painter and his World: Colloquium Sponsored by the Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities and Symposium Sponsored by the J. Paul Getty Museum, Malibu: 43–62. [= (2001) 198–217 and Cairns (2001): 92–116].Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (2001), Kleine Schriften I. Homerica, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (2004), ‘Mikroskopie der Geistesgeschichte: Bruno Snells “Entdeckung des Geistes” im kritischen Rückblick’, Philologus 148: 168–82.Google Scholar

Burnett, A. P. (1998), ‘Spontaneity, savaging, and praise in Pindar’s sixth paean’, AJP 119: 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burris, S., Fish, J., and Obbink, D. (2014), ‘New Fragments of Book 1 of Sappho’, ZPE 189: 1–28.Google Scholar

Burzacchini, G. (1995), ‘Note al nuovo Simonides’, Eikasmos 6: 21–38.Google Scholar

Caciagli, S. (2016), ‘Wishing Charaxos a safe trip?’, in Bierl and Lardinois (2016): 424–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, D. L. (ed.) (2001), Oxford Readings in Homer’s Iliad, Oxford.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2017), ‘Beauty, fame and politics in Ibycus S151 PMGF’, Prometheus 43: 43–55.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (1977), Les chœurs de jeunes filles en Grèce archaïque, Rome.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (2012), ‘La memoria poetica nei canti di Saffo: performance musicale e creazione sociale’, in Riu and Pòrtulas (2012): 45–97.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. A. (1976), ‘The language of the new Archilochus’, Arethusa 9: 151–7.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1962), An Introduction to Virgil, Oxford.Google Scholar

Canevaro, L. G. (2015), Hesiod’s Works and Days: How to Teach Self-Sufficiency, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canevaro, L. G. (2017), ‘Fraternal conflict in Hesiod’s Works and Days’, in Bassino, P., Canevaro, L.-G., and Graziosi, B. (eds.), Conflict and Consensus in Early Greek Hexameter Poetry, Cambridge: 173–89.Google Scholar

Cannatà Fera, M. (1986), ‘Pindaro interprete di Omero in Pyth. 3, 81–2’, GIF 38: 85–9.Google Scholar

Cannatà Fera, M. (2020), Pindaro: Le Nemee, Milan.Google Scholar

Cantieni, R. (1942), Die Nestorerzählung im XI. Gesang der Ilias (V 670–762), PhD diss. Zurich.Google Scholar

Capra, A. and Curti, M. (1995), ‘Semidei Simonidei: note sull’elegia di Simonide per la battaglia di Platea (P.Oxy. 3965 frr.1–2 + 2327 fr. 6 + 27 col. i)’, ZPE 107: 27–32.Google Scholar

Carey, C. (1981), A Commentary on Five Odes of Pindar: Pythian 2, Pythian 9, Nemean 1, Nemean 7, Isthmian 8, New York.Google Scholar

Carey, C. and Swift, L. (eds.) (2016), Greek Iambus and Elegy: New Approaches, Oxford.Google Scholar

Carpenter, T. H. (1991), Art and Myth in Ancient Greece: A Handbook, London.Google Scholar

Carpino, A. A. (1996), ‘The delivery of Helen’s egg: an examination of an Etruscan relief mirror’, EtrStud 3: 33–44.Google Scholar

Carty, A. (2015), Polycrates, Tyrant of Samos: New light on Archaic Greece, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Cassio, A. C. (1977), Aristofane: Banchettanti, Pisa.Google Scholar

Catenacci, C. (2002), ‘Simonide, fr. 11, 17 W.2 (Elegia per la battaglia di Platea)’, in Celentano (2002): 29–33.Google Scholar

Cave, T. (1988), Recognitions: A Study in Poetics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Ceccarelli, P. (2013), Ancient Greek Letter Writing: A Cultural History (600 BC–150 BC), Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Celentano, M. S. (ed.) (2002), ΤΕΡΨΙΣ: in ricordo di Maria Laetitia Coletti, Alessandria.Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. (1958), Grammaire homérique. Tome I. Phonetique et Morphologie, Paris.Google Scholar

Chapouthier, F. (1942), ‘Léda devant l’oeuf de Némésis’, BCH 66 : 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiasson, C. (2003), ‘Herodotus’ use of Attic tragedy in the Lydian Logos’, CA 22: 5–35.Google Scholar

Cingano, E. (1989), ‘Tra epos e storia: la genealogia di Cianippo e dei Biantidi in Ibico (Suppl.Lyr.Gr. 151 Page), e nelle fonti mitografiche greche’, ZPE 79: 27–38.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (2004), Archilochos heros: The Cult of Poets in the Greek Polis, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (1983), The Wrath of Athena, Princeton.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (2001), ‘The New Simonides and Homer’s hemitheoi’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001): 182–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, J. S. (2003), Hesiod’s Cosmos, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, J. S. (2011), Homer’s Trojan Theatre: Space, Vision, and Memory in the Iliad, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clausen, W. (1987), Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (2002), Virgil’s Aeneid: Decorum, Allusion, and Ideology, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, A. (2015), ‘Divine scents and presence’, in Bradley, M. (ed.), Smell and the Ancient Senses, London and New York: 46–59.Google Scholar

Cohen, B. (2000), ‘Man-killers and their victims: inversions of the heroic ideal in classical art’, in Cohen, B. (ed.), Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art, Leiden: 98–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coldstream, J. N. (1991), ‘The Geometric Style: birth of the picture’, in Rasmussen, T. and Spivey, N. (eds.), Looking at Greek Vases, Cambridge: 37–56.Google Scholar

Colesanti, G. and Giordano, M. (eds.) (2014), Submerged Literature in Ancient Greek Culture. Volume 1: An Introduction, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collard, C., Cropp, M. J., and Gibert, J. (eds.) (2004), Euripides: Selected Fragmentary Plays II, Oxford.Google Scholar

Collinge, N. E. (1958/9), ‘Some reflections on satyr-plays’, PCPhS 5: 28–35.Google Scholar

Compton-Engle, G. (2015), Costume in the Comedies of Aristophanes, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condilo, C. (2017), ‘Agonistic intertextuality: Herodotus’ engagement with Hecataeus on genealogies’, Journal of Ancient History 5.2: 228–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986), The Rhetoric of Imitation, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2007), The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conti Bizzarro, F. (1999), Poetica e critica letteraria nei frammenti dei poeti comici greci, Naples.Google Scholar

Coo, L. (2018), ‘Sophocles’ wedding cakes (Eris fr. 199)’, Mnemosyne 71: 938–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coo, L. (2019), ‘Satyric nostalgic in the Aeschylean tetralogy’, BICS 62.2: 11–28.Google Scholar

Coo, L. (2022), ‘A judgment of parodies? ‘Momus’ on a black-figure hydria in Chicago’, Mouseion 19.2: 175–95.Google Scholar

Cook, R. M. (1983), ‘Art and epic in archaic Greece’, Bulletin van de Vereeniging tot Bevorderung der Kennis van de Antike Beschauing (BABesch) 58: 1–10.Google Scholar

Cook, R. M. (1987), ‘Pots and Pisistratan propaganda’, JHS 107: 167–9.Google Scholar

Corrêa, P. d. C. (2007), ‘A human fable and the justice of beasts in Archilochus’, in Finglass, P. J., Collard, C., and Richardson, N. J. (eds.), Hesperos: Studies in Ancient Greek Poetry Presented to M. L. West on his Seventieth Birthday, Oxford: 101–17.Google Scholar

Cousland, J. R. C. and Hume, J. (eds.) (2013), The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of Martin Cropp, Leiden.Google Scholar

Craik, E. (1990), ‘The staging of Sophokles’ Philoktetes and Aristophanes’ Birds’, in Craik, E. (ed.), ‘Owls to Athens’: Essays on Classical Subjects presented to Sir Kenneth Dover, Oxford: 81–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cropp, M. J. and Fick, G. (1985), Resolutions and Chronology in Euripides, London.Google Scholar

Cropp, M. J. et al. (eds.) (1986), Greek Tragedy and its Legacy: Papers Presented to D. J. Conacher, Calgary.Google Scholar

Currie, B. G. F. (2005), Pindar and the Cult of Heroes, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Currie, B. G. F. (2006), ‘Homer and the early epic tradition’, in Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F., and Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.), Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin by Former Pupils, Oxford: 1–46.Google Scholar

Currie, B. G. F. (2015), ‘Cypria’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015a): 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Currie, B. G. F. (2016), Homer’s Allusive Art, Oxford.Google Scholar

Currie, B. G. F. (2021), ‘Intertextuality in early Greek Poetry: the special case of epinician’, Trends in Classics 13: 347–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Currie, B. G. F. (forthcoming), ‘Theogonic allusions in the Iliad’, in Bing, P., Faulkner, A., and Höschele, R. (eds.), Arts of Allusion: Greek Intertextuality over Time.Google Scholar

Cyrino, M. S. (2010), Aphrodite, Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (1992), ‘Pindaro, Peana VIIb (fr.52 h Sn.M.)’, in El-Mosalamy (1992): I.353–73.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (1995), ‘Una via lontana dal cammino degli uomini (Parm. frr. 1+6 D.–K.; Pind. Ol. VI 22–7; pae. VIIb 10–20)’, SIFC 88: 143–81.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (2004), ‘Textual fluctuations and cosmic streams: Ocean and Acheloios’, JHS 124: 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (2005), ‘Ordered from the Catalogue: Pindar, Bacchylides, and Hesiodic genealogical poetry’, in Hunter, R. (ed.), The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women, Cambridge: 217–38.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (2018), ‘Fiction and pragmatics in ancient Greek lyric: the case of Sappho’, in Budelmann and Phillips (2018): 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (2019), ‘Textual notes on the “newest” Sappho (on Sappho, fragments 5, 9, 17 V., and the Kypris poem)’, ZPE 211: 18–31.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (forthcoming), ‘The persuasion of songs from archaic lyric to Plato’s Laws’.Google Scholar

Danek, G. (1998), Epos und Zitat: Studien zu den Quellen der Odyssee. Vienna.Google Scholar

Danek, G. (2015), ‘Nostoi’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015a): 355–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, J. F. (1990), ‘The cave of Philoctetes’, Mnemosyne 43: 307–15.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. F. (1995), ‘Homer and Sophocles’ Philoctetes’, in Griffiths, A. (ed.), Stage Directions: Essays in Ancient Drama in Honour of E. W. Handley, London: 25–35.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. F. (2012), ‘The Homer of tragedy: epic sources and models in Sophocles’, in Markantonatos, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Sophocles, Leiden: 245–61.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (1991), Sophocles: Trachiniae, Oxford.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2014), The Theban Epics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2016), The Aethiopis: Neo-neoanalysis Reanalyzed, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2019), The Cypria, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Davies, M. and Finglass, P. J. (2014), Stesichorus: The Poems, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Davison, J. A. (1955), ‘Quotations and allusions in early Greek literature’, Eranos 53: 125–40 [= (1968) 70–85].Google Scholar

Davison, J. A. (1968), From Archilochus to Pindar: Papers on Greek Literature of the Archaic Period, London.Google Scholar

Dawe, R. D. (1993), The Odyssey: Translation and Analysis, Lewes.Google Scholar

Dawe, R. D. (2006), Sophocles: Oedipus Rex, rev. ed., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Day, J. W. (1994), ‘Interactive offerings: early Greek dedicatory epigrams and ritual’, HSCP 96: 37–74.Google Scholar

Day, J. W. (2007), ‘Poems on stone: the inscribed antecedents of Hellenistic epigram’, in Bing, P. and Bruss, J. S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram, Leiden: 29–48.Google Scholar

Day, J. W. (2010), Archaic Greek Epigram and Dedication, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Day, J. W. (2019), ‘The “spatial dynamics” of archaic and classical Greek epigram: conversations among locations, monuments, texts and viewer-readers’, in Petrovic, Petrovic, and Thomas (2019): 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Kreij, M. (2020), ‘The length of Sappho fr. 44’, ZPE 214: 7–11.Google Scholar

Degani, E. (1975), ‘Πάρεξ το θεῖον χρῆμα nel nuovo Archiloco di Colonia’, QUCC 20: 229.Google Scholar

Degani, E. (1990), ‘Due note di lettura (Arch. fr. 196a, 15 W.²; Musae. 283)’, Eikasmos 1: 193–5.Google Scholar

Del Corso, L. (2003), ‘Materiali per una protostoria del libro e delle pratiche di lettura nel mondo greco’, Segno e Testo 1: 5–78.Google Scholar

Dell’Oro, F. (2013), ‘Après l’inscription de la coupe de Nestor: disposition du texte et formes de transtextualité dans les épigrammes de l’époque archaïque en Grande Grèce et Sicile’, Gaia 16: 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denniston, J. D. (1954), The Greek Particles, 2nd ed., rev. Dover, K. J., Oxford.Google Scholar

Derderian, K. (2001), Leaving Words to Remember: Greek Mourning and the Advent of Literacy, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detienne, M. (1998), Apollon le couteau à la main: une approche expérimentale du polythéisme grec, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Benedetto, V. (1991), ‘Pindaro, Pae.7b, 11–14’, RFIC 119: 164–76.Google Scholar

Di Benedetto, V. (2003), ‘Da Pindaro a Callimaco: Peana 7b, vv. 11–14’, Prometheus 29: 269–82.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1968), Der Kanon der zwei Tugenden, Cologne and Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doležel, L. (1998), Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donelli, G. (2016), ‘Herodotus and Greek lyric poetry’, in Liotsakis, V. and Farrington, S. (eds.), The Art of History: Literary Perspectives on Greek and Roman Historiography, Berlin and Boston: 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorandi, T. (ed.) (2019), Porphyre, L’antre des nymphes dans l’Odyssée, Paris.Google Scholar

Dowden, K. (1996), ‘Homer’s sense of text’, JHS 116: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dué, C. (2019), Achilles Unbound: Multiformity and tradition in the Homeric epics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Dufner, C. M. (1988), The Odyssey in the Argonautica: Reminiscence, Revision, Reconstruction, PhD diss. Princeton.Google Scholar

Dunbar, N. (1995), Aristophanes: Birds, Oxford.Google Scholar

Duplouy, A. (2006), Le prestige des élites: recherches sur les modes de reconnaissance sociale en Grèce entre les Xe et Ve siècles avant J.-C., Paris.Google Scholar

Durey, J. F. (1991), ‘The state of play and interplay in intertextuality’, Style 25: 16–35.Google Scholar

Easterling, P. E. (1982), Sophocles: Trachiniae, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Easterling, P. E. (1984), ‘The tragic Homer’, BICS 31: 1–8.Google Scholar

Eckerman, C. C. (2011), ‘Teasing and pleasing in Archilochus’ First Cologne Epode’, ZPE 179: 11–19.Google Scholar

Eckerman, C. C. (2017), ‘Pindar’s Olympian 1, 1–7 and its relation to Bacchylides 3, 85–87’, WS 130: 7–32.Google Scholar

Edmonds, R. G. (2013), Redefining Ancient Orphism: A Study in Greek Religion, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001), Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. W. (1991), The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. 5: Books 17–20, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

El-Mosalamy, A. H. S. (ed.) (1992), Proceedings of the XIXth International Congress of Papyrology, Cairo, 2–9 September 1989, 2 vols., Cairo.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. (1971), Scholia graeca in Homeri Iliadem, vol. 2, Berlin.Google Scholar

Erp Taalman Kip, A. M. van (2009), ‘Καὶ μήν, καὶ δή and ἤδη in tragedy and comedy’, in Bakker, E. J. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, Leiden: 111–33.Google Scholar

Fabiani, R. (2003), ‘Epigrafi in Erodoto’, in Biraschi, A. M., Desideri, P., Rosa, S., and Zecchini, G. (eds.), L’uso dei documenti nella storiografia antica, Naples: 163–85.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. (2010), ‘Typologies of variation on a theme in archaic and classical metrical inscriptions’, in Baumbach, Petrovic, and Petrovic (2010b): 289–310.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. (eds.) (2015a), The Greek Epic Cycle and its Ancient Reception: A Companion, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. (2015b), ‘Introduction: klyklos, the epic cycle and cyclic poetry’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015a): 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farmer, M. C. (2017), Tragedy on the Comic Stage, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farnell, L. R. (1921), Greek Hero Cults and Ideas of Immortality, Oxford.Google Scholar

Farnell, L. R. (1930–2), The Works of Pindar, 3 vols., London.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2021), Juno’s Aeneid: A Battle for Heroic Identity, Princeton.Google Scholar

Faulkner, A. (2008), The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite, Oxford.Google Scholar

Faulkner, A. (ed.) (2011a), The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faulkner, A. (2011b), ‘The collection of Homeric Hymns: from the seventh to the third centuries BC’, in Faulkner (2011a): 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearn, D. (2007), Bacchylides: Politics, Performance, Poetic Tradition, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearn, D. (ed.) (2011), Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fearn, D. (2014), ‘Kleos versus stone? Lyric poetry and contexts for memorialization’, in Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.), Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature, Oxford: 231–53.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (2016), Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. (2021), Explorations in Latin Literature, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fehling, D. (1971), Die Quellenangaben bei Herodot: Studien zur Erzählkunst Herodots, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, K. (1936), Die Mythen bei Pindar, Zurich.Google Scholar

Fenik, B. (1974), Studies in the Odyssey, Leiden.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1992), ‘Per il testo dei Peani di Pindaro’, MD 28: 143–52.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2002), ‘La carraia di Omero e la via degli dei: sul Peana VIIb di Pindaro’, SemRom 5: 197–212.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2007), Una mitra per Kleis: Saffo e il suo pubblico, Pisa.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2010), Sappho’s Gift: The Poet and her Community, tr. L. Prauscello and B. Acosta-Hughes, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2014), ‘Saffo e i suoi fratelli e altri brani del primo libro’, ZPE 192: 1–19.Google Scholar

Filser, W. (2017), Die Elite Athens auf der attischen Luxuskeramik, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finglass, P. J. (2007), ‘νῦν and νυν in Pindar’, Mnemosyne 60: 269–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finglass, P. J. (2009), ‘Unveiling Tecmessa’, Mnemosyne 62: 272–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finglass, P. J. (2018), Sophocles: Oedipus Tyrannus, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A. (eds.) (2015), Stesichorus in Context, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A. (eds.) (2021a), The Cambridge Companion to Sappho, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A. (2021b), ‘Introduction’, in Finglass, and Kelly, (2021a): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finglass, P., Rengakos, A., and Zimmerman, B. (eds.) (2020), More than Homer Knew – Studies on Homer and his Ancient Commentators in Honour of Franco Montanari, Berlin.Google Scholar

Finkelberg, M. (1987), ‘The first song of Demodocus’, Mnemosyne 40: 128–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelberg, M. (1998), The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelberg, M. and Stroumsa, G. (eds.) (2003), Homer, the Bible, and Beyond: Literary and Religious Canons in the Ancient World, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, N. and Van Wees, H. (eds.) (2011), Competition in the Ancient World, Swansea.Google Scholar

Foley, J. M. (1992), ‘Word-power, performance, and tradition’, The Journal of American Folklore 105: 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foley, J. M. (1999), Homer’s Traditional Art, University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Fontenrose, J. (1966), ‘Typhon among the Arimoi’, in Wallach, L. (ed.), The Classical Tradition: Literary and Historical Studies in Honor of H. Caplan, Ithaca, NY: 64–82.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (1992), Homer: The Poetry of the Past, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (1997), ‘The inland ship: problems in the performance and reception of Homeric epic’, in Bakker and Kahane (1997): 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, A. (2002), The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, A. (2003), ‘From letters to literature: reading the “song culture” of classical Greece’, in Yunis, H. (ed.), Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, Cambridge: 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, A. (2009), ‘Plato’s two Hesiods’, in Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J. (eds.), Plato and Hesiod, Oxford: 133–54.Google Scholar

Foster, M. (2017), The Seer and the City: Religion, Politics, and Colonial Ideology in Ancient Greece, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar

Fournier, J. and Hamon, P. (2007), ‘Les orphelins de guerre de Thasos : un nouveau fragment de la stèle des Braves (ca 360-350 av. J-C.)’, BCH 131: 309–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1997), ‘On the shoulders of giants’, in Hinds, S. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 39: Memoria, arte allusiva, intertestualità (Memory, Allusion, Intertextuality): 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (1987), The Nature of Early Greek Lyric, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (1996), ‘Herodotus and his contemporaries’, JHS 116: 62–87 (reprinted with minor revisions in R. Vignolo Munson (ed.), Herodotus 1. Herodotus and the Narrative of the Past, Oxford and New York (2013): 46–83).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (2000–13), Early Greek Mythography, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (2004), ‘The Homeric question’, in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer, Cambridge: 220–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (2009), ‘Thoughts on myth and religion in early Greek historiography’, Minerva 22: 21–39.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (2018), review of Currie (2016), AJP 139: 511–14.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1951), Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums, New York (2nd ed. 1962 Munich, 3rd ed. 1975 Munich).Google Scholar

Fries, A. (2014), Pseudo-Euripides, ‘Rhesus’: Edited with Introduction and Commentary, Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friis Johansen, K. (1967), The Iliad in Early Greek Art, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Furley, W. D. and Bremer, J. M. (2001), Greek Hymns, 2 vols., Tübingen.Google Scholar

Gagarin, M. (1974), ‘Dikē in archaic Greek thought’, CP 69: 186–97.Google Scholar

Gagné, R. (2013), ‘Dancing letters: the Alphabetic Tragedy of Kallias’, in Gagné, R. and Hopman, M. G. (eds.), Choral Mediations in Greek Tragedy, Cambridge: 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallavotti, C. (1949), ‘Archiloco’, PP 11: 130–53.Google Scholar

Garner, R. (1990), From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry, London.Google Scholar

Garner, R. S. (2005), ‘Epic and other genres in the ancient Greek world’, in Foley, J. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epic, Oxford: 386–96.Google Scholar

Garner, R. S. (2011), Traditional Elegy: The Interplay of Meter, Tradition, and Context in Early Greek Poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar

Garvie, A. E. (1994), Homer: Odyssey Books VI–VIII, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Garvie, A. E. (2009), Aeschylus: Persae, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gelzer, T. (1960), Der epirrhematische Agon bei Aristophanes, Munich.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1982), Palimpsestes : la littérature au second degré, Paris.Google Scholar

Gentili, B., Bernadini, P. A., Cingano, E., and Giannini, P. (1995), Pindaro: Le Pitiche, Milan.Google Scholar

Gentili, B. and Prato, C. (2002), Poetae elegiaci: testimonia et fragmenta, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gerber, D. E. (1970), Euterpe: An Anthology of Early Greek Lyric, Elegiac, and Iambic Poetry, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Gherchanoc, F. (2014), ‘Le jugement de Pâris et les jeux de vêtement dans la céramique attique aux VI^e et V^e siècles avant notre ère’, in Huet, V. and Gherchanoc, F. (eds.), De la théâtralité du corps aux corps des dieux dans l’Antiquité, Brest: 125–41.Google Scholar

Gherchanoc, F. (2016), Concours de beauté et beautés du corps en Grèce ancienne : discours et pratiques, Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Giangiulio, M. (ed.) (2005), Erodoto e il ‘modello erodoto’: formazione e trasmissione delle tradizioni storiche in Grecia, Trento.Google Scholar

Giangrande, G. (1967), ‘“Arte allusiva” and Alexandrian epic poetry’, CQ 17: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giannini, P. (1973), ‘Espressioni formulari nell’elegia arcaica’, QUCC 16: 7–78.Google Scholar

Gibert, J. (2013), ‘Euripides’ Antiope and the quiet life’, in Cousland and Hume (2013): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, R. (2002), ‘“Cf. e.g.”: a typology of “parallels” and the role of commentaries on Latin poetry’, in Gibson and Kraus (2002): 331–58.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. and Kraus, C. S. (eds.) (2002), The Classical Commentary, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giuliani, L. (2003), Bild und Mythos: Geschichte der Bilderzählung in der griechischen Kunst, Munich.Google Scholar

Giuliani, L. (2013), Image and Myth: A History of Pictorial Narration in Greek Art, tr. J. O’Donnell, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glei, R. F. (2019), ‘Littérature au troisième degré – Beispiele kreativer Rezeption von De antro nympharum’, in Baumbach (2019): 141–63.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1991), The Poet’s Voice, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2020), Preposterous Poetics: The Politics and Aesthetics of Form in Late Antiquity, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (1994), ‘Introduction: programmatics and polemics’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture, Cambridge: 1–11.Google Scholar

González, J. M. (2013), The Epic Rhapsode and his Craft: Homeric Performance in a Diachronic Perspective, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

González González, M. (2019), Funerary Epigrams of Ancient Greece: Reflections on Literature, Society and Religion, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graf, F. and Johnston, S. I. (2007), Ritual Texts for the Afterlife, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grand-Clément, A. (2010), ‘Dans les yeux d’Athéna Glaukôpis’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 12: 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granger, H. (2004), ‘Heraclitus’ quarrel with polymathy and “historiê”’, TAPhA 134.2: 235–61.Google Scholar

Granger, H. (2007), ‘The theologian Pherecydes of Syros and the early days of natural philosophy’, HSCP 103: 135–63.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2002), Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2009), ‘Hesiod in classical Athens: rhapsodes, orators, and Platonic discourse’, in Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J. (eds.), Plato and Hesiod, Oxford: 111–32.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2013), ‘The poet in the Iliad’, in Marmodoro and Hill (2013): 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. (2009), ‘Greek Lyric and early Greek literary history’, in Budelmann, F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, Cambridge: 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, E. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) (2009), The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Gregory, J. (1999–2000), ‘Comic elements in Euripides’, ICS 24–5: 59–74.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2006a), ‘How old is Nestor?’, Eikasmos 17: 11–16.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2006b), ‘The manifold uses of the epic past: the embassy scene in Herodotus 7.153–63’, AJP 127.4: 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2010), The Greeks and their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century BC, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2017), ‘The best of the Achaeans? Odysseus and Achilles in the Odyssey’, in Tsagalis, C. and Markantonatos, A. (eds.), The Winnowing Oar: New Perspectives in Homeric Studies: Studies in Honour of Antonios Rengakos, Berlin: 121–44.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1977), ‘The Epic Cycle and the uniqueness of Homer’, JHS 97: 39–53 (= Cairns (2001): 365–84).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, J. (1991), review of Usener (1990), CR 41: 288–91.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1975), ‘Man and the leaves: a study of Mimnermos fr. 2’, CSCA 8: 73–88.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1990), ‘Contest and contradiction in early Greek poetry’, in Griffith and Mastronarde (1990): 185–207.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (2010), ‘Satyr play and tragedy, face to face’, in Taplin, O. and Wyles, R. (eds.), The Pronomos Vase and its Context, Oxford: 47–63 (= M. Griffith, Greek Satyr Play: Five Studies, Berkeley (2015): 129–45).Google Scholar

Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. (eds.) (1990), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of T.J. Rosenmeyer, Atlanta.Google Scholar

Griffith, R. D. (1993), ‘In the dark backward: time in Pindaric narrative’, Poetics Today 14: 607–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hainsworth, B. (1968), The Flexibility of the Homeric Formula, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hall, E. M. (1996), Aeschylus: Persians, Warminster.Google Scholar

Hall, E. M. (2007), ‘Greek tragedy 430–380 BC’, in Osborne (2007): 264–87.Google Scholar

Hall, J. M. (2002), Hellenicity: Between Ethnicity and Culture, Chicago.Google Scholar

Halleran, M. R. (1997), ‘It’s not what you say: unspoken allusions in Greek tragedy’, MD 39: 151–63.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. J. (1986), ‘Where three roads meet: a neglected detail in the Oedipus Tyrannus’, JHS 106: 187–90.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2008), Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampe, R. (1950), ‘Die Homerische Welt im Lichte der neuen Ausgrabungen: Nestor’, in Herbig, R. (ed.), Vermächtnis der antiken Kunst: Gastvorträge zur Jahrhundertfeier der Archäologischen Sammlungen der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg: 11–70.Google Scholar

Hanink, J. (2017), ‘Archives, repertoires, bodies and bones: thoughts on reperformance for classicists’, in Hunter and Uhlig (2017): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harden, S. and Kelly, A. D. (2014), ‘Proemic convention and character construction in early Greek epic’, HSCP 107: 1–34.Google Scholar

Harder, A. (2012), Callimachus. Aetia, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, A. (1996), ‘Pindar, Castalia and the Muses of Delphi’, PLLS 9: 219–57.Google Scholar

Hardie, A. (2013), ‘Ibycus and the Muses of Helicon’, MD 70: 9–36.Google Scholar

Hardie, C. (1967), review of Knauer (1964), CR 17: 158–61.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1989), Ancient Literacy, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, F. D. (1966), ‘Literacy in the Athenian democracy’, REG 79: 585–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, J. and Mac Sweeney, N. (2018), Homer’s Iliad and the Trojan War: Dialogues on Tradition, London.Google Scholar

Headlam, W. and Knox, A. D. (1922), Herodas: The Mimes and Fragments, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hedreen, G. (2001), Capturing Troy: The Narrative Functions of Landscape in Archaic and Early Classical Greek Art, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Hedreen, G. (2011), ‘The Trojan War, theoxenia, and Aegina in Pindar’s Paean 6 and the Aphaia sculptures’, in Fearn (2011): 323–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedreen, G. (2016), The Image of the Artist in Archaic and Classical Greece: Art, Poetry, and Subjectivity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Heiden, B. (2007), ‘The Muses’ uncanny lies: Hesiod, Theogony 27 and its translators’, AJP 182: 153–75.Google Scholar

Heiden, B. (2008), ‘Common people and leaders in Iliad book 2: the Invocation of the Muses and the Catalogue of Ships’, TAPA 138: 127–54.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1976), ‘The Cologne Epode and the conventions of early Greek erotic poetry’, Arethusa 9: 159–79.Google Scholar

Henle, J. (1973), Greek Myths: A Vase Painter’s Notebook, Bloomington.Google Scholar

Henry, W. B. (2003), ‘Contracted biceps in Pindar’, ZPE 143: 11–16.Google Scholar

Herington, C. J. (1985), Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Herwerden, H. van (1892), ‘Ad tragicos’, Mnemosyne 20: 430–48.Google Scholar

Heubeck, A. (1979), Archaeologia Homerica Band III, Kapitel X: Schrift, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Heubeck, A. (1982), ‘Zur neueren Homerforschung’, Gymnasium 89: 385–447.Google Scholar

Heubeck, A., West, S., and Hainsworth, J. B. (1988), A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey Volume I: Books 1–8, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1987), The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1995), ‘Reflexive annotation in poetic allusion’, Hermathena 158: 41–51.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998), Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hirschberger, M. (2004), Gynaikōn katalogos und Megalai ēhoiai: ein Kommentar zu den Fragmenten zweier hesiodeischer Epen, Munich.Google Scholar

Hofmann, H. and Harder, A. (eds.) (1991), Fragmenta Dramatica, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2002), ‘Herodotus and his sources of information’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, Leiden: 373–86.Google Scholar

Howie, J. G. (1983), ‘The revision of myth in Pindar Olympian 1: the death and revival of Pelops (25–27; 36–66)’, PLLS 4: 277–313 [= (2012) 161–90].Google Scholar

Howie, J. G. (1998), ‘Thucydides and Pindar: The Archaeology and Nemean 7’, PLLS 10: 75–130 [= (2012) 265–306].Google Scholar

Howie, J. G. (2012), Exemplum and Myth, Criticism and Creation: Papers on Early Greek Literature, Leeds.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. (1985), The Pindaric Mind, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2004), ‘Homer and Greek literature’, in Fowler, R. L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer, Cambridge: 235–53.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2009), Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and its Uses, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2012), Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2014), Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2015), Apollonius of Rhodes: Argonautica Book IV, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2016), ‘The Hippias Minor and the traditions of Homeric criticism’, CCJ 62: 85–107.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2018), The Measure of Homer: The Ancient Reception of the Iliad and the Odyssey, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2022), Greek Epitaphic Poetry: A Selection, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. and Laemmle, R. (2020), Euripides: Cyclops, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds.) (2017), Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurst, A. (2020), ‘Homère chez Pindare : le “paradis” de la deuxième Olympique’, in Rengakos, Finglass, and Zimmermann (2020) : 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurwit, J. (2011), ‘The shipwreck of Odysseus: strong and weak imagery in Late Geometric art’, AJA 115: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurwit, J. (2015), Artists and Signatures in Ancient Greece, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2001), Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2013), Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huxley, G. (1968), ‘Glaukos of Rhegion’, GRBS 9: 47–54.Google Scholar

Irwin, E. (1998), ‘Biography, fiction, and the Archilochean “ainos”’, JHS 118: 177–83.Google Scholar

Irwin, E. (2005), Solon and Early Greek Poetry, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, E. (2018), ‘The end of the Histories and the end of the Atheno-Peloponnesian Wars’, in Harrison, T. and Irwin, E. (eds.), Interpreting Herodotus, Oxford: 279–334.Google Scholar

Irwin, E. (2021), ‘Date of composition’, in Baron, C. (ed.), The Herodotus Encyclopedia, Oxford: 1.409–12.Google Scholar

Itsumi, K. (2009), Pindaric Metre: The ‘Other Half’, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1918), ‘Studien zu den älteren griechischen Elegikern. I. Zu Tyrtaios’, Hermes 53: 1–44.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1941), ‘The date of Archilochus’, CQ 35: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janko, R. (1982), Homer, Hesiod, and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (2012), ‘πρῶτόν τε καὶ ὕστατον αἰὲν ἀείδειν: relative chronology and the literary history of the early Greek epos’, in Andersen and Haug (2012): 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janko, R. (2015), ‘From Gabii and Gordion to Eretria and Methone: the rise of the Greek alphabet’, BICS 58: 1–32.Google Scholar

Janowski, C. (1897), Observationes in nomina vestium a tragicis Graecis prolata, PhD diss. Berlin.Google Scholar

Jauss, H. R. (1982), Ästhetische Erfahrung und literarische Hermeneutik, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Jebb, R. C. (1900), Sophocles: Antigone, rev. ed., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jeffery, L. H. (1989), The Local Scripts of Archaic Greece, 2nd ed. rev. Johnston, A. W., Oxford.Google Scholar

Jendza, C. (2015), ‘Bearing swords and razors: paracomedy in Euripides’ Orestes’, AJP 136: 447–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jennings, V. and Katsaros, A. (eds.) (2008), The World of Ion of Chios, Leiden.Google Scholar

Jensen, M. S. (2011), Writing Homer: A Study based on Results from Modern Fieldwork, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. A. (1995), ‘Oral performance and the composition of Herodotus’ “Histories”’, GRBS 35: 229–54.Google Scholar

Johnston, S. I. (2015), ‘Narrating myths: story and belief in ancient Greece’, Arethusa 48: 173–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, S. I. (2018), The Story of Myth, Cambridge, MA and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jong, I. J. F. de (1987), Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Jong, I. J. F. de (2001), A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jong, I. J. F. de (2004), Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad, 2nd ed., London.Google Scholar

Jong, I. J. F. de (2012a), ‘The Helen Logos and Herodotus’ fingerprint’, in Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus, Oxford: 127–42.Google Scholar

Jong, I. J. F. de (2012b), Homer Iliad: Book XXII, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. and Montanari, F. (eds.) (2009), Eschyle à l’aube du théâtre occidental, Geneva.Google Scholar

Junker, K. (2003), Pseudo-Homerica: Kunst und Epos im spätarchaischen Athen, Berlin.Google Scholar

Junker, K. (2012), Interpreting the Images of Greek Myths: An Introduction, tr. A. Künzl-Snodgrass and A. M. Snodgrass, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jurenka, W. (1913), ‘Zu Pindars sechstem Päan’, WS 35: 382–3.Google Scholar

Kaczko, S. (2016), Archaic and Classical Attic Dedicatory Epigrams: An Epigraphic, Literary and Linguistic Commentary, Berlin.Google Scholar

Kaempf-Dimitriadou, S. (1979), Die Liebe der Götter in der attischen Kunst des 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr., Bern.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking Fast and Slow, London.Google Scholar

Kakridis, T. J. (1966), ‘Zu Sappho 44 LP’, WS 79: 21–6.Google Scholar

Kambitsis, J. (1972), L’ Antiope d’ Euripide, Athens.Google Scholar

Kannicht, R. L. (1982), ‘Poetry and art: Homer and the monuments afresh’, Classical Antiquity 1: 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2006), ‘Neoanalysis and the Nestorbedrängnis: a test case’, Hermes 134: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2007), A Referential Commentary and Lexicon to Iliad VIII, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2012), ‘The audience expects: Odysseus and Penelope’, in Minchin, E. (ed.), Orality, Literacy, and Performance in the Ancient World (Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World Volume 9), Leiden: 3–24.Google Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2015a), ‘Ilias Parva’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015a): 318–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2015b), review of Bakker (2013), Mnemosyne 68: 677–81.Google Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2015c), ‘Stesichorus’ Homer’, in Finglass, and Kelly, (2015): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2018), ‘Homer’s rivals? Internal narrators within the Iliad’, in Ready, J. L. and Tsagalis, C. (eds.), Homer in Performance: Rhapsodes, Narrators, Characters, Austin: 351–77.Google Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2020), ‘With, or without, Homer: hearing the background in Sappho’, in Finglass, Rengakos, and Zimmermann (2020): 269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2021), ‘Sappho and Epic’, in Finglass, and Kelly, (2021b): 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2022), ‘Epic and lyric’, in Swift (2022): 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (2023), ‘Cyprias and the Cypria’, in Carvounis, K., Gavrielatos, A., Karla, G., and Papathomas, A. (eds.), Cyprus in Texts from Greco-Roman Antiquity, Leiden: 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, A. D. (forthcoming), ‘Homer and Hipponax’, in Cazzato, V. and Prodi, E. E. (eds.), The Limping Muse: Hipponax the Poet, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kerényi, K. (1939), ‘Die Geburt der Helena’, Mnemosyne 7: 161–79.Google Scholar

Kern, O. (1922), Orphicorum fragmenta, Berlin.Google Scholar

Kirk, A. (2021), Ancient Greek Lists: Catalogue and Inventory across Genres, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, G. S. (1985), The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. 1: Books 1–4, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkwood, G. M. (1982), Selections from Pindar, Chico CA.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, J. and Dunn, F. (2002), ‘Heracles, Cercopes, and paracomedy’, TAPA 132: 29–61.Google Scholar

Kleberg, T. (1992), ‘Commercio librario ed editoria nel mondo antico’, in Cavallo, G. (ed.), Libri, editori e pubblico nel mondo antico. Guida storica e critica, 2nd ed., Rome and Bari: 25–79.Google Scholar

Knauer, G. (1964), Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Virgils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Koenen, L. (1974), ‘Ein wiedergefundenes Archilochos-Gedicht?’, Poetica 6: 468–512.Google Scholar

Köhnken, A. (1974), ‘Pindar as innovator: Poseidon Hippios and the relevance of the Pelops story in Olympian 1’, CQ 24: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kõiv, M. (2011), ‘A note on the dating of Hesiod’, CQ 61: 355–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koldewey, R. (1890), Die antike Baureste der Insel Lesbos, Berlin.Google Scholar

Koller, H. (1972), ‘Ἔπος’, Glotta 50: 16–24.Google Scholar

Koning, H. H. (2010), Hesiod: The Other Poet: Ancient Reception of a Cultural Icon, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koning, H. H. (2018), ‘The Hesiodic question’, in Loney, A. C. and Scully, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hesiod, Oxford: 17–26.Google Scholar

Kowalzig, B. (2007), Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kowerski, L. M. (2005), Simonides on the Persian Wars: A Study of the Elegiac Verses of the ‘New Simonides’, New York.Google Scholar

Kripke, S. (1972), ‘Naming and necessity’, in Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht: 253–355 (rev. as Naming and Necessity, Oxford (1980)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krischer, T. (1965), ‘Die Entschuldigung des Sängers (Ilias Β 484–93)’, RhM 108: 1–11.Google Scholar

Kuhn-Treichel, T. (2021), ‘Pindar’s poetic “I” and the Muses: metaphorical role characterization in different genres’, CJ 116: 152–71.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. (1960), Die Quellen der Ilias (Troischer Sagenkreis), Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (1990), ‘Pindar’s Sixth Pythian and the tradition of advice poetry’, TAPA 120: 85–107.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (2005), ‘Choral lyric as “ritualization”: poetic sacrifice and poetic ego in Pindar’s sixth paian’, CA 24: 81–130.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (2011), Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose, Princeton.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (1999), Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamberton, R. (1992), ‘The Neoplatonists and the spiritualization of Homer’, in Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J. (eds.), Homer’s Ancient Readers, Princeton: 115–33.Google Scholar

Lämmle, R. (2013), Poetik des Satyrspiels, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Lämmle, R. (2018), ‘Zur Autor- und Stückzuweisung von P.Oxy. 1083 fr. 1 (S. **F 1130 R.)’, ZPE 208: 44–66.Google Scholar

Lanata, G. (1963), Poetica pre-platonica, Florence.Google Scholar

Langdon, S. (2008), Art and Identity in Dark Age Greece, 1100–700 B.C.E., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lardinois, A. (1995), The Use of Gnomic Statements in Archaic Greek Poetry, PhD diss. Princeton.Google Scholar

Lardinois, A. (2001), ‘Keening Sappho’, in Lardinois, A. and McClure, L. (eds.), Making Silence Speak: Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society, Princeton: 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, J. (2001), Greek Nymphs: Myth, Cult, Lore, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latacz, J. (1977), Kampfparänese, Kampfdarstellung und Kampfwirklichkeit in der Ilias, bei Kallinos und Tyrtaios, Munich.Google Scholar

Lateiner, D. (1989), The Historical Method of Herodotus, Toronto and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lattimore, R. (1958), ‘The composition of the history of Herodotus’, CP 53.1: 9–21.Google Scholar

Lauriola, R. (1998), ‘Ricerche sul nuovo Simonide’, SCO 46: 1111–64.Google Scholar

Lavigne, D. E. (2016), ‘Archilochus and Homer in the rhapsodic context’, in Swift and Carey (2016): 74–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavigne, D. E. (2019), ‘The authority of archaic Greek epigram’, in Petrovic, Petrovic, and Thomas (2019): 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazzarini, M. L. (1976), ‘Le formule delle dediche votive nella Grecia arcaica’, Mem. Lincei 19: 47–354.Google Scholar

Leaf, W. (1886–8), The Iliad: Edited with English Notes and Introduction, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar

Lee, M. M. (2015), Body, Dress, and Identity in Ancient Greece, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. R. (1976), ‘Fictions in literary biography: the new poem and the Archilochus legend’, Arethusa 9: 181–9.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. (1978), ‘Truth in fiction’, American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 37–46.Google Scholar

Lidov, J. (2016), ‘Songs for sailors and lovers’, in Bierl and Lardinois (2016): 55–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ligota, C. R. (1982), ‘“This story is not true”. Fact and fiction in antiquity’, JWI 45: 1–13.Google Scholar

Lilja, S. (1972), The Treatment of Odours in the Poetry of Antiquity, Helsinki.Google Scholar

Lissarrague, F. (1990), ‘Why satyrs are good to represent’, in Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. (eds.), Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context, Princeton: 228–36 (orig. pub. ‘Pourquoi les satyres sont-ils bons à montrer?’, in P. Ghiron-Bistagne and B. Schouler (eds.), Anthropologie et théâtre antique, Montpellier (1987), 93–106).Google Scholar

Llewellyn-Jones, L. (2003), Aphrodite’s Tortoise: The Veiled Woman of Ancient Greece, Swansea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1994), ‘Notes on the New Simonides’, ZPE 101: 1–3.Google Scholar

Lohmann, D. (1970), Die Komposition der Reden in der Ilias, Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorenzoni, A. (1995), ‘Platone “Novello Archilocho” e l’ “Aureo” Gorgia (Athen. XI 505de; Plat. Phaedr. 235d–236b)’, Eikasmos 6: 109–20.Google Scholar

Lougovaya, J. (2011), ‘The history of a motif in funerary epigrams from Karystos to the Phrygian hinterland’, in Rupp, D. and Tomlinson, J. (eds.), Euboea and Athens, Athens: 297–31.Google Scholar

Lovell, C. (2011), The Overburdened Earth: Landscape and Geography in Homeric Epic, PhD diss. Texas.Google Scholar

Lowenstam, S. (1992), ‘The use of vase-depictions in Homeric studies’, TAPA 122: 165–98.Google Scholar

Lowenstam, S. (1997), ‘Talking vases: the relationship between the Homeric poems and archaic representations of epic myth’, TAPA 127: 21–76.Google Scholar

Lowenstam, S. (2008), As Witnessed by Images: The Trojan War Tradition in Greek and Etruscan Art, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowrie, M. (1992), ‘A sympotic Achilles, Horace Epode 13’, AJP 113: 413–33.Google Scholar

Lulli, L. (2016), ‘Elegy and epic: a complex relationship’, in Swift and Carey (2016): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luppe, W. (1992), review of Cropp and Fick (1985), Mnemosyne 45: 97–8.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. (2001), ‘Local knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus, Oxford: 138–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackenzie, T. (2021), Poetry and Poetics in the Presocratic Philosophers: Reading Xenophanes, Parmenides and Empedocles as Literature, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, C. (2013), ‘Iliad 24 and the Judgement of Paris’, CQ 63: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macleod, C. W. (1982), Homer: Iliad. Book XXIV, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Magnani, M. (2009), ‘P. Oxy. LIX 3965 fr. 1 r. 6 + XXII 2327 fr. 6 r. 10 (Sim. Fr. 11,14 W.² [= 3b,10 G.-P.])’, ZPE 168: 19–26.Google Scholar

Maehler, H. (1963), Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Maehler, H. (1982), Die Lieder des Bakchylides: Die Siegeslieder, 2 vols., Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maehler, H. (2004), Bacchylides: A Selection, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Malkin, I. (1998), The Returns of Odysseus: Colonization and Ethnicity, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Mann, R. (1994), ‘Pindar’s Homer and Pindar’s myths’, GRBS 35: 313–37.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1990), ‘Fiddling the books: Heraclitus on Pythagoras (DK 22 B129)’, in Studies in the Historiography of Greek Philosophy, Assen and Maastricht: 443–8 (orig. pub. in K. J. Boudouris, (ed.), Ionian Philosophy, Athens (1989): 229–34).Google Scholar

Marconi, C. (2007), Temple Decoration and Cultural Identity in the Archaic Greek World: The Metopes of Selinus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Marg, W. (1956), ‘Das erste Lied des Demodokos’, in Navicula Chiloniensis: Studia philologa Felici Jacoby professori Chiloniensi emerito octogenario oblata, Leiden: 16–29.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1997), Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marincola, J. (2006), ‘Herodotus and the poetry of the past’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, Cambridge: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marincola, J. (2010), ‘The rhetoric of history: allusion, intertextuality, and exemplarity in historiographical speeches’, in Pausch, D. (ed.), Stimmen der Geschichte. Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie, Berlin and New York: 252–89.Google Scholar

Marks, J. (2008), Zeus in the Odyssey, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.) (2013), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, C. W. (2001), ‘The consequences of dating the Cyclops’, in Joyal, M. (ed.), In altum: Seventy-Five Years of Classical Studies in Newfoundland, St John’s: 225–41.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (1989), The Language of Heroes, Ithaca NY.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (2005), ‘Epic as genre’, in Foley, J. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epic, Malden, MA and Oxford: 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, R. P. (2009), ‘Gnomes in poems: wisdom performance on the Athenian stage’, in Karamalengou, E. and Makrygianni, E. (eds.), Ἀντιφίλησις: Studies on Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek Literature and Culture in Honour of John-Theophanes A. Papademetriou, Stuttgart: 116–27.Google Scholar

Marzullo, B. (1958), Studi di poesia eolica, Florence.Google Scholar

Maslov, B. (2015), Pindar and the Emergence of Literature, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mastromarco, G. (2006), ‘La paratragodia, il libro, la memoria’, in Medda, E., Mirto, M., and Pattoni, M. (eds.), Komoidotragoidia: intersezioni del tragico e del comico nel teatro del V secolo a.C., Pisa: 137–91.Google Scholar

Matthaiou, A. P. (2000–3), ‘Δύο νέα θραύσματα τῆς IG I³ 4’, Horos 14–16: 19–22.Google Scholar

Matthaiou, A. P. (2003), ‘Ἀθηναίοισι τεταγμένοισι ἐν τεμένεϊ Ἡρακλέος’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R., (eds.), Herodotus and his World, Oxford: 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, P. (2006), ‘Der Mann, das Mädchen und der Dichter – zur Frage der Absicht dreier Personen: eine Verführungsgeschichte (Archil. 196a W2)’, Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis 42: 5–20.Google Scholar

Mazzarino, S. (1943), ‘Per la storia di Lesbo nel VI secolo a. C.’, Athenaeum 21: 38–78.Google Scholar

McConnell, T. (2019), Chronology, Dialect and Style: Studies in the Distribution of Linguistic Archaisms in Early Greek Hexameter Poetry, DPhil diss. Oxford.Google Scholar

McDermott, E. A. (1991), ‘Double meaning and mythic novelty in Euripides’ plays’, TAPA 121: 123–32.Google Scholar

Medaglia, S. M. (1977), ‘Archiloco, Orazio e il secondo epodo di Colonia’, QUCC 25: 7–15.Google Scholar

Meisner, D. A. (2018), Orphic Tradition and the Birth of the Gods, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merkelbach, R. and West, M. L. (eds.) (1967), Fragmenta Hesiodea, Oxford.Google Scholar

Merkelbach, R. and West, M. L. (1974), ‘Ein Archilochos-Papyrus’, ZPE 14: 97–113.Google Scholar

Michelakis, P. (2002), Achilles in Greek Tragedy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mierow, H. E. (1953), ‘The amazing modernity of Euripides’, CJ 48: 247–52.Google Scholar

Mills, S. (1997), Theseus, Tragedy and the Athenian Empire, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minton, W. W. (1960), ‘Homer’s invocations of the Muses: traditional patterns’, TAPA 91: 292–309.Google Scholar

Minton, W. W. (1962), ‘Invocation and catalogue in Hesiod and Homer’, TAPA 93: 188–212.Google Scholar

Missiou, A. (2011), Literacy and Democracy in Fifth-Century Athens, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Mitchell, A. G. (2009), Greek Vase-Painting and the Origins of Visual Humour, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1978), ‘The historians of the classical world and their audiences: some suggestions’, ASNP 3.8: 59–75.Google Scholar

Mondi, R. (1983), ‘The Homeric Cyclopes: folktale, tradition, and theme’, TAPA 113: 17–38.Google Scholar

Montanari, F. (2009), ‘L’esegesi antica di Eschilo da Aristotele a Didimo’, in Jouanna and Montanari (2009): 379–422.Google Scholar

Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.) (2015), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar