References

Gilles Pisier

[1] Akemann, C., Anderson, J., and Pedersen, G., Triangle inequalities in operator algebras, Lin. Multi. Alg. 11 (1982), 167–178.Google Scholar

[2] Akemann, C. and Ostrand, P., Computing norms in group C^∗-algebras, Amer. J. Math. 98 (1976), 1015–1047.Google Scholar

[3] Anantharaman-Delaroche, C., Amenability and exactness for dynamical systems and their C^∗-algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), 4153–4178.Google Scholar

[4] Anantharaman, C. and Popa, S., “An introduction to II₁-factors”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, to appear.Google Scholar

[5] Andersen, T. B., Linear extensions, projections, and split faces, J. Funct. Anal. 17 (1974), 161–173.Google Scholar

[6] Anderson, J., Extreme points in sets of positive linear maps in B(H), J. Funct. Anal. 31 (1979), 195–217.CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Anderson, G., Guionnet, A., and Zeitouni, O., An introduction to random matrices, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.Google Scholar

[8] Ando, H. and Haagerup, U., Ultraproducts of von Neumann algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), 6842–6913.Google Scholar

[9] Ando, H., Haagerup, U., and Winsløw, C., Ultraproducts, QWEP von Neumann algebras, and the Effros–Maréchal topology, J. Reine Angew. Math. 715 (2016), 231–250.Google Scholar

[10] Archbold, R. and Batty, C., C^∗-tensor norms and slice maps, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1980), 127–138.Google Scholar

[11] Arveson, W., Analyticity in operator algebras, Amer. J. Math. 89 (1967), 578–642.Google Scholar

[12] Arveson, W., Subalgebras of C^∗-algebras, Acta Math. 123 (1969), 141–224. Part II. Acta Math. 128 (1972), 271–308.CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Arveson, W., Notes on extensions of C^∗-algebras, Duke Math. J. 44 (1977), 329– 355.Google Scholar

[14] Arzhantseva, G. and Delzant, T., Examples of random groups, unpublished preprint, 2008.Google Scholar

[15] Avitsour, D., Free products of C^∗-algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 271 (1982), 423–435.Google Scholar

[16] Bannon, J., Marrakchi, A., and Ozawa, N., Full factors and co-amenable inclusions, arXiv:1903.05395, 2019.Google Scholar

[17] Bekka, B., de la Harpe, P., and Valette, A., Kazhdan’s property (T), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google Scholar

[18] Ben-Aroya, A. and Ta-Shma, A., Quantum expanders and the quantum entropy difference problem, arXiv:quant-ph/0702129, no. 3, 2007.Google Scholar

[19] Ben-Aroya, A., Schwartz, O., and Ta-Shma, A., Quantum expanders: motivation and constructions, Theory Comput. 6 (2010), 47–79.CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Berger, C. A., Coburn, L. A., and Lebow, A., Representation and index theory for C^∗-algebras generated by commuting isometries, J. Funct. Anal. 27, no. 1 (1978), 51–99.Google Scholar

[21] Bergh, J., On the relation between the two complex methods of interpolation, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 28 (1979), 775–778.Google Scholar

[22] Bergh, J. and Löfström, J., Interpolation spaces: an introduction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976.Google Scholar

[23] Blackadar, B., Weak expectations and injectivity in operator algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1978), 49–53.Google Scholar

[24] Blackadar, B., Weak expectations and nuclear C^∗-algebras, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 27 (1978), 1021–1026.Google Scholar

[25] Blackadar, B., Operator algebras: theory of C^∗-algebras and von Neumann algebras, Encyclopaedia of mathematical sciences, 122, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006.Google Scholar

[26] Blecher, D. P. and Labuschagne, L., Outers for noncommutative H_p revisited, Studia Math. 217 (2013), 265–287.Google Scholar

[27] Blecher, D. P. and Le Merdy, C., Operator algebras and their modules: an operator space approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.Google Scholar

[28] Blecher, D. and Paulsen, V., Explicit constructions of universal operator algebras and applications to polynomial factorization, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 112 (1991), 839–850.Google Scholar

[29] Blecher, D., Ruan, Z. J., and Sinclair, A., A characterization of operator algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 89 (1990), 188–201.Google Scholar

[30] Boca, F., Free products of completely positive maps and spectral sets, J. Funct. Anal. 97 (1991), 251–263.Google Scholar

[31] Boca, F., A note on full free product C∗-algebras, lifting and quasidiagonality, operator theory, operator algebras and related topics (Timis¸oara, 1996), 51–63, Theta Found., Bucharest, 1997.Google Scholar

[32] Bordenave, C. and Collins, B., Eigenvalues of random lifts and polynomial of random permutations matrices, Ann. of Math. 190 (2019), 811–875.Google Scholar

[33] Bourgain, J., Real isomorphic complex Banach spaces need not be complex isomorphic, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 96 (1986), 221–226.Google Scholar

[34] Bo˙zejko, M., Some aspects of harmonic analysis on free groups, Colloq. Math. 41 (1979), 265–271.Google Scholar

[35] Bo˙zejko, M. and Fendler, G., Herz–Schur multipliers and completely bounded multipliers of the Fourier algebra of a locally compact group, Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. (6) 3-A (1984), 297–302.Google Scholar

[36] Brown, L., Ext of certain free product C^∗-algebras, J. Operator Theory 6 (1981), 135–141.Google Scholar

[37] Brown, L., Invariant means and finite representation theory of C∗-algebras, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 184, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006.Google Scholar

[38] Brown, L. and Dykema, K., Popa algebras in free group factors, J. Reine Angew. Math. 573 (2004), 157–180.Google Scholar

[39] Brown, N. P. and Ozawa, N., C^∗-algebras and finite-dimensional approximations, Graduate studies in mathematics, 88, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008.Google Scholar

[40] Burgdorf, S., Dykema, K., Klep, I., and Schweighofer, M., Addendum to “Connes’ embedding conjecture and sums of Hermitian squares” [Adv. Math. 217, no. 4 (2008) 1816–1837], Adv. Math. 252 (2014), 805–811.Google Scholar

[41] de Cannière, J. and Haagerup, U., Multipliers of the Fourier algebras of some simple Lie groups and their discrete subgroups, Amer. J. Math. 107 (1985), 455–500.CrossRef Google Scholar

[42] Cherix, P.-A., Cowling, M., Jolissaint, P., Julg, P., and Valette, A., Groups with the Haagerup property. Gromov’s a-T-menability, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2001.Google Scholar

[43] Ching, W. M., Free products of von Neumann algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 178 (1973), 147–163.Google Scholar

[44] Choi, M. D., A Schwarz inequality for positive linear maps on C^∗-algebras, Illinois J. Math. 18 (1974), 565–574.Google Scholar

[45] Choi, M. D. and Effros, E., Nuclear C^∗-algebras and the approximation property, Amer. J. Math. 100 (1978), 61–79.Google Scholar

[46] Choi, M. D. and Effros, E., Nuclear C*-algebras and injectivity. The general case, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 26 (1977), 443–446.Google Scholar

[47] Choi, M. D. and Effros, E., Injectivity and operator spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 24 (1977), 156–209.Google Scholar

[48] Choi, M. D. and Effros, E., Separable nuclear C^∗-algebras and injectivity, Duke Math. J. 43 (1976), 309–322.Google Scholar

[49] Choi, M. D. and Effros, E., The completely positive lifting problem for C^∗-algebras, Ann. Math. 104 (1976), 585–609.Google Scholar

[50] Christensen, E., Effros, E., and Sinclair, A., Completely bounded multilinear maps and C^∗-algebraic cohomology, Invent. Math. 90 (1987), 279–296.Google Scholar

[51] Christensen, E. and Sinclair, A., On von Neumann algebras which are complemented subspaces of B(H), J. Funct. Anal. 122 (1994), 91–102.Google Scholar

[52] Christensen, E. and Sinclair, A., Module mappings into von Neumann algebras and injectivity, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 71 (1995), 618–640.Google Scholar

[53] Christensen, E. and Wang, L., Von Neumann algebras as complemented subspaces of B(H). Internat. J. Math. 25 (2014), 1450107, 9 pp.Google Scholar

[54] McClanahan, K., C^∗-algebras generated by elements of a unitary matrix, J. Funct. Anal. 107 (1992), 439–457.Google Scholar

[55] Cohn, P. M., Basic algebra, Springer, London, 2003.Google Scholar

[56] Collins, B. and Male, C., The strong asymptotic freeness of Haar and deterministic matrices, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. 47 (2014), 147–163.Google Scholar

[57] Collins, B. and Dykema, K., A linearization of Connes’ embedding problem, New York J. Math. 14 (2008), 617–641.Google Scholar

[58] Comfort, W.W., Negrepontis, S., The theory of ultrafilters, Springer, New York, 1974.Google Scholar

[59] Connes, A., Caractérisation des espaces vectoriels ordonnés sous-jacents aux algèbres de von Neumann, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 24 (1974), 121–155.Google Scholar

[60] Connes, A., A factor not anti-isomorphic to itself, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 7 (1975), 171–174.Google Scholar

[61] Connes, A., Classification of injective factors. Cases II₁, II_∞, III_λ, λ = 1, Ann. Math. (2) 104 (1976), 73–115.Google Scholar

[62] Conway, J. H. and Sloane, N. J. A., Sphere packings, lattices and groups, Third edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999.Google Scholar

[63] Courtney, K. and Sherman, D., “The universal C^∗-algebra of a contraction”, arXiv:1811.04043, 2018, to appear.Google Scholar

[64] Cowling, M. and Haagerup, U., Completely bounded multipliers of the Fourier algebra of a simple Lie group of real rank one, Invent. Math. 96 (1989), 507–549.Google Scholar

[65] Coxeter, H. S. M. and Moser, W. O. J., Generators and relations for discrete groups, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg, 1957.Google Scholar

[66] Cwikel, M. and Janson, S., Interpolation of analytic families of operators, Studia Math. 79 (1984), 61–71.Google Scholar

[67] Davidson, K.. C^∗-algebras by example, Fields Institute publication. Toronto, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996.Google Scholar

[68] Davidson, K. and Kakariadis, E., A proof of Boca’s theorem, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 149 (2019), 869–876.Google Scholar

[69] Davie, A. M., Matrix norms related to Grothendieck’s inequality, Banach spaces (Columbia, MO, 1984), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1166, Springer, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar

[70] Devinatz, A., The factorization of operator valued analytic functions, Ann. Math. 73 (1961), 458–495.Google Scholar

[71] Diestel, J., Fourie, J. H., and Swart, J., The metric theory of tensor products. Grothendieck’s résumé revisited, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008.Google Scholar

[72] Dixmier, J., Les Algèbres d’Opérateurs dans l’Espace Hilbertien (Algèbres de von Neumann), Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1969. (In translation: von Neumann algebras, North-Holland, Amsterdam–New York 1981.)Google Scholar

[73] Douglas, R. and Howe, R., On the C^∗-algebra of Toeplitz operators on the quarterplane, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 158 (1971), 203–217.Google Scholar

[74] Douglas, R. and Pearcy, C., Von Neumann algebras with a single generator, Michigan Math. J. 16 (1969), 21–26.Google Scholar

[75] Dykema, K. and Juschenko, K., Matrices of unitary moments, Math. Scand. 109 (2011), 225–239.Google Scholar

[76] Dykema, K., Paulsen, V. and Prakash, J., Non-closure of the set of quantum correlations via graphs, Comm. Math. Phys. 365 (2019), 1125–1142.Google Scholar

[77] Effros, E. and Haagerup, U., Lifting problems and local reflexivity for C^∗-algebras, Duke Math. J. 52 (1985), 103–128.Google Scholar

[78] Effros, E., Junge, M., and Ruan, Z. J., Integral mappings and the principle of local reflexivity for noncommutative L₁-spaces, Ann. Math. 151 (2000), 59–92.Google Scholar

[79] Effros, E. and Lance, C., Tensor products of operator algebras, Adv. Math. 25 (1977), 1–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

[80] Effros, E. and Ruan, Z. J., Operator Spaces, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar

[81] Elek, G. and Szabó, E., Hyperlinearity, essentially free actions and L₂-invariants. The sofic property, Math. Ann. 332 (2005), 421–441.Google Scholar

[82] Elliott, G., On approximately finite-dimensional von Neumann algebras, Math. Scand. 39 (1976), 91–101.Google Scholar

[83] Elliott, G., On approximately finite-dimensional von Neumann algebras. II, Canad. Math. Bull. 21 (1978), 415–418.Google Scholar

[84] Elliott, G. and Woods, E., The equivalence of various definitions for a properly infinite von Neumann algebra to be approximately finite dimensional, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 60 (1976), 175–178.Google Scholar

[85] Eymard, P., L’algèbre de Fourier d’un groupe localement compact, Bull. Soc. Math. France 92 (1964), 181–236.Google Scholar

[86] Farah, I., Hart, B., and Sherman, D., Model theory of operator algebras I: stability, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 45 (2013), 825–838.Google Scholar

[87] Farah, I., Hart, B., and Sherman, D., Model theory of operator algebras III: elementary equivalence and II1 factors, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 46 (2014), 609–628.Google Scholar

[88] Farah, I., Hart, B., and Sherman, D., Model theory of operator algebras II: model theory, Israel J. Math. 201 (2014), 477–505.Google Scholar

[89] Farah, I. and Shelah, S., A dichotomy for the number of ultrapowers, J. Math. Log. 10 (2010), 45–81.Google Scholar

[90] Farenick, D., Kavruk, A., and Paulsen, V., C^∗-algebras with the weak expectation property and a multivariable analogue of Ando’s theorem on the numerical radius, J. Operator Theory 70 (2013), 573–590.Google Scholar

[91] Farenick, D., Kavruk, A., Paulsen, V., and Todorov, I., Characterisations of the weak expectation property, New York J. Math. 24A (2018), 107–135.Google Scholar

[92] Farenick, D. and Paulsen, V., Operator system quotients of matrix algebras and their tensor products, Math. Scand. 111 (2012), 210–243.Google Scholar

[93] Friedman, J., A proof of Alon’s second eigenvalue conjecture and related problems, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 195, 910 (2008).Google Scholar

[94] Friedman, J., Joux, A., Roichman, Y., Stern, J., and Tillich, J.-P., The action of a few permutations on r-tuples is quickly transitive, Random Struct. Algo. 12 (1998), 335–350.Google Scholar

[95] Fritz, T., Tsirelson’s problem and Kirchberg’s conjecture, Rev. Math. Phys. 24 (2012), 1250012, 67 pp.Google Scholar

[96] Gromov, M., Random walk in random groups, Geom. Funct. Anal. 13 (2003), 73–146.Google Scholar

[97] Gross, L., A non-commutative extension of the Perron–Frobenius theorem, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 77 (1971), 343–347.Google Scholar

[98] Grothendieck, A., Résumé de la théorie métrique des produits tensoriels topologiques, Boll. Soc. Mat. São-Paulo 8 (1953), 1–79. Reprinted in Resenhas 2 (1996), no. 4, 401–480.Google Scholar

[99] Guentner, E., Higson, N., and Weinberger, S., The Novikov conjecture for linear groups, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 101 (2005), 243–268.Google Scholar

[100] Guichardet, A., Tensor products of C^∗-algebras, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 160 (1965), 986–989.Google Scholar

[101] Guichardet, A., Tensor products of C∗-algebras (Part I. Finite tensor products. Part II. Infinite tensor products), Lecture Notes Series 12 and 13, Aarhus Universitet, 1969.Google Scholar

[102] Haagerup, U., The standard form of von Neumann algebras, Math. Scand. 37 (1975), 271–283.Google Scholar

[103] Haagerup, U., An example of a nonnuclear C^∗-algebra, which has the metric approximation property, Invent. Math. 50 (1978–1979), 279–293.Google Scholar

[104] Haagerup, U., Injectivity and decomposition of completely bounded maps, Operator algebras and their connections with topology and ergodic theory, 170– 222, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1132, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1985.Google Scholar

[105] Haagerup, U., A new proof of the equivalence of injectivity and hyperfiniteness for factors on a separable Hilbert space, J. Funct. Anal. 62 (1985), 160–201.Google Scholar

[106] Haagerup, U., On convex combinations of unitary operators in C*-algebras, Mappings of operator algebras (Philadelphia, PA, 1988), 1–13, Progr. Math., 84, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990.Google Scholar

[107] Haagerup, U., Self-polar forms, conditional expectations and the weak expectation property for C^∗-algebras, Unpublished manuscript (1993).Google Scholar

[108] Haagerup, U., Group C^∗-algebras without the completely bounded approximation property, J. Lie Theory 26 (2016), 861–887.Google Scholar

[109] Haagerup, U., Knudby, S., and de Laat, T., A complete characterization of connected Lie groups with the approximation property, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. 49 (2016), 927–946.Google Scholar

[110] Haagerup, U. and Kraus, J., Approximation properties for group C^∗-algebras and group von Neumann algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 344 (1994), 667–699.Google Scholar

[111] Haagerup, U., Junge, M., and Xu, Q., A reduction method for noncommutative L_p-spaces and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), 2125–2165.Google Scholar

[112] Haagerup, U., Kadison, R., and Pedersen, G., Means of unitary operators, revisited, Math. Scand. 100 (2007), 193–197.Google Scholar

[113] Haagerup, U. and de Laat, T., Simple Lie groups without the approximation property, Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), 925–964.Google Scholar

[114] Haagerup, U. and de Laat, T., Simple Lie groups without the approximation property II, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 368 (2016), 3777–3809.Google Scholar

[115] Haagerup, U. and Musat, M., Factorization and dilation problems for completely positive maps on von Neumann algebras, Comm. Math. Phys. 303 (2011), 555–594.CrossRef Google Scholar

[116] Haagerup, U. and Musat, M., An asymptotic property of factorizable completely positive maps and the Connes embedding problem, Comm. Math. Phys. 338 (2015), 141–176.Google Scholar

[117] Haagerup, U. and Pisier, G., Factorization of analytic functions with values in non-commutative L₁-spaces, Canadian J. Math. 41 (1989), 882–906.Google Scholar

[118] Haagerup, U. and Pisier, G., Bounded linear operators between C^∗-algebras, Duke Math. J. 71 (1993), 889–925.Google Scholar

[119] Haagerup, U. and Thorbjoernsen, S., Random matrices and K-theory for exact C^∗-algebras, Doc. Math. 4 (1999), 341–450 (electronic).Google Scholar

[120] Haagerup, U. and Thorbjørnsen, S., A new application of random matrices: Ext(C∗red(F₂)) is not a group, Ann. Math. 162 (2005), 711–775.Google Scholar

[121] Haagerup, U. and Winsløw, C., The Effros-Maréchal topology in the space of von Neumann algebras, Amer. J. Math. 120 (1998), 567–617.Google Scholar

[122] Haagerup, U. and Winsløw, C., The Effros-Maréchal topology in the space of von Neumann algebras. II, J. Funct. Anal. 171 (2000), 401–431.Google Scholar

[123] Hanche-Olsen, H. and Störmer, E., Jordan operator algebras, Pitman, Boston, 1984.Google Scholar

[124] Harcharras, A., On some “stability” properties of the full C^∗-algebra associated to the free group F_∞, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 41 (1998), 93–116.Google Scholar

[125] Harmand, P., Werner, D., and Werner, W., M-ideals in Banach spaces and Banach algebras, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1547 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.Google Scholar

[126] de la Harpe, P., Topics in geometric group theory, The University of Chicago Press, Second printing, with corrections and updates, Chicago, 2003.Google Scholar

[127] de la Harpe, P. and Valette, A., La propriété (T) de Kazhdan pour les groupes localement compacts (avec un appendice de Marc Burger). Astérisque 175 (1989), Soc. Math. France, Paris.Google Scholar

[128] Harris, S., A non-commutative unitary analogue of Kirchberg’s conjecture, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 68 (2019), 503–536.Google Scholar

[129] Harris, S. and Paulsen, V., Unitary correlation sets, Integral Equations Operator Theory 89 (2017), 125–149.Google Scholar

[130] Harrow, A., Quantum expanders from any classical Cayley graph expander, Quantum Inf. Comput. 8 (2008), 715–721.Google Scholar

[131] Harrow, A. and Hastings, M., Classical and quantum tensor product expanders, Quantum Inf. Comput. 9 (2009), 336–360.Google Scholar

[132] Hastings, M., Random unitaries give quantum expanders, Phys. Rev. A (3) 76 no. 3 (2007), 032315, 11 pp.Google Scholar

[133] Helson, H., Lectures on invariant subspaces, Academic Press, New York, 1964.Google Scholar

[134] Hiai, F. and Nakamura, Y., Distance between unitary orbits in von Neumann algebras, Pacific J. Math. 138 (1989), 259–294.Google Scholar

[135] Itoh, S., Conditional expectations in C^∗-crossed products, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 267 (1981), 661–667.Google Scholar

[136] Jolissaint, P., A characterization of completely bounded multipliers of Fourier algebras, Colloq. Math. 63 (1992), 311–313.Google Scholar

[137] Junge, M. and Le Merdy, C., Factorization through matrix spaces for finite rank operators between C^∗-algebras, Duke Math. J. 100, (1999), 299–319.Google Scholar

[138] Junge, M., Navascues, M., Palazuelos, C., Peréz-García, D., Scholz, V.B., and Werner, R.F., Connes’ embedding problem and Tsirelson’s problem, J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011), 012102, 12 pp.Google Scholar

[139] Junge, M., Palazuelos, C., Perez-García, D., Villanueva, I., and Wolf, M. M., Operator Space theory: a natural framework for Bell inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 170405 (2010).Google Scholar

[140] Junge, M. and Palazuelos, C., Large violation of Bell inequalities with low entanglement, Comm. Math. Phys. 306 (2011), 695–746.Google Scholar

[141] Junge, M. and Pisier, G., Bilinear forms on exact operator spaces and B(H) ⊗ B(H), Geom. Funct. Anal. 5 (1995), 329–363.Google Scholar

[142] Kadison, R., Isometries of operator algebras, Ann. Math. 54 (1951), 325–338.Google Scholar

[143] Kadison, R., A generalized Schwarz inequality and algebraic invariants for operator algebras, Ann. Math. 56 (1952), 494–503.Google Scholar

[144] Kadison, R. and Pedersen, G., Means and convex combinations of unitary operators, Math. Scand. 57 (1985), 249–266.Google Scholar

[145] Kadison, R. and Ringrose, J., Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras, Vol. I, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1983.Google Scholar

[146] Kadison, R. and Ringrose, J., Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras, Vol. II, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1992.Google Scholar

[147] Kadison, R. and Ringrose, J., Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras, Vol. IV, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1992.Google Scholar

[148] Kassabov, M., Symmetric groups and expanders, Inv. Math. 170 (2007), 327–354.Google Scholar

[149] Kavruk, A., Tensor products of operator systems and applications. Thesis (Ph.D.), University of Houston, 2011.Google Scholar

[150] Kavruk, A., Paulsen, V., Todorov, I., and Tomforde, M., Tensor products of operator systems, J. Funct. Anal. 261 (2011), 267–299.Google Scholar

[151] Kavruk, A., Paulsen, V., Todorov, I., and Tomforde, M., Quotients, exactness, and nuclearity in the operator system category, Adv. Math. 235 (2013), 321–360.Google Scholar

[152] Kavruk, A., The weak expectation property and Riesz interpolation, arXiv:1201.5414, 2012.Google Scholar

[153] Kavruk, A., Nuclearity related properties in operator systems, J. Operator Theory 71 (2014), 95–156.Google Scholar

[154] Kirchberg, E., C^∗-nuclearity implies CPAP, Math. Nachr. 76 (1977), 203–212.Google Scholar

[155] Kirchberg, E., On nonsemisplit extensions, tensor products and exactness of group C^∗-algebras, Invent. Math. 112 (1993), 449–489.Google Scholar

[156] Kirchberg, E., Commutants of unitaries in UHF algebras and functorial properties of exactness, J. Reine Angew. Math. 452 (1994), 39–77.Google Scholar

[157] Kirchberg, E., Discrete groups with Kazhdan’s property T and factorization property are residually finite, Math. Ann. 299 (1994), 551–563.Google Scholar

[158] Kirchberg, E., Exact C∗-algebras, tensor products, and the classification of purely infinite algebras, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Zürich, 1994), 943–954, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1995.Google Scholar

[159] Kirchberg, E., On subalgebras of the CAR-algebra, J. Funct. Anal. 129 (1995), 35–63.Google Scholar

[160] Kirchberg, E., On restricted perturbations in inverse images and a description of normalizer algebras in C^∗-algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 129 (1995), 1–34.Google Scholar

[161]E. Kirchberg, Personal communication.Google Scholar

[162] Kirchberg, E. and Phillips, N. C., Embedding of exact C^∗-algebras in the Cuntz algebra O₂, J. Reine Angew. Math. 525 (2000), 17–53.Google Scholar

[163] Klep, I. and Schweighofer, M., Connes’ embedding conjecture and sums of Hermitian squares, Adv. Math. 217 (2008), 1816–1837.Google Scholar

[164] Lafforgue, V. and De la Salle, M., Noncommutative L_p-spaces without the completely bounded approximation property, Duke Math. J. 160 (2011), 71–116.Google Scholar

[165] Lance, C., On nuclear C^∗-algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 12 (1973), 157–176.Google Scholar

[166] Lehner, F., A characterization of the Leinert property, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125 (1997), 3423–3431.Google Scholar

[167] Lindenstrauss, J. and Tzafriri, L., Classical Banach spaces, vol. I, Sequence spaces, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1976.Google Scholar

[168] Lehner, F., Computing norms of free operators with matrix coefficients, Amer. J. Math. 121 (1999), 453–486.Google Scholar

[169] Lieb, E., Convex trace functions and the Wigner–Yanase–Dyson conjecture, Adv. Math. 11 (1973), 267–288.Google Scholar

[170] Lindenstrauss, J. and Rosenthal, H. P., The L_p spaces, Israel J. Math. 7 (1969), 325–349.Google Scholar

[171] Loring, T., Lifting solutions to perturbing problems in C∗-algebras, Fields Institute Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997.Google Scholar

[172] Lubotzky, A., Discrete groups, expanding graphs and invariant measures, Progress in Math, 125. Birkhäuser, 1994.Google Scholar

[173] Lubotzky, A., What is Property (τ)? Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (2005), 626–627.Google Scholar

[174] Lubotzky, A., Expander graphs in pure and applied mathematics, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 49 (2012), 113–162.Google Scholar

[175] Lubotzky, A., Phillips, R., and Sarnak, P., Hecke operators and distributing points on S², I, Comm. Pure and Applied Math. 39 (1986), 149–186.Google Scholar

[176] Mc Duff, D., Uncountably many II₁ factors, Ann. Math. 90 (1969), 372–377.Google Scholar

[177] Malcev, A. I., On isomorphic matrix representations of infinite groups of matrices (Russian), Mat. Sb. 8 (1940), 405–422 & Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. (2) 45 (1965), 1–18.Google Scholar

[178] Monod, N., Groups of piecewise projective homeomorphisms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 (2013), 4524–4527.Google Scholar

[179] Nica, A., Asymptotically free families of random unitaries in symmetric groups, Pacific J. Math. 157 (1993), 295–310.Google Scholar

[180] Oikhberg, T. and Ricard, É., Operator spaces with few completely bounded maps, Math. Ann. 328 (2004), 229–259.Google Scholar

[181] Oikhberg, T. and Rosenthal, H. P., Extension properties for the space of compact operators, J. Funct. Anal. 179 (2001), 251–308.Google Scholar

[182] Osajda, D., Small cancellation labellings of some infinite graphs and applications, arXiv:1406.5015, 2014.Google Scholar

[183] Osajda, D., Residually finite non-exact groups, Geom. Funct. Anal. 28 (2018), 509–517.Google Scholar

[184] Ozawa, N., On the set of finite-dimensional subspaces of preduals of von Neumann algebras, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 331 (2000), 309–312.Google Scholar

[185] A non-extendable bounded linear map between C∗-algebras, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 44 (2001), 241–248.Google Scholar

[186] Ozawa, N., On the lifting property for universal C^∗-algebras of operator spaces, J. Operator Theory 46 no. 3, suppl. (2001), 579–591.Google Scholar

[187] Ozawa, N., Amenable actions and exactness for discrete groups, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 330 (2000), 691–695.Google Scholar

[188] Ozawa, N., An application of expanders to B( ₂) ⊗ (2003), 499–510.Google Scholar

[189] Ozawa, N., About the QWEP conjecture, Internat. J. Math. 15 (2004), 501–530.Google Scholar

[190] Ozawa, N., Examples of groups which are not weakly amenable, Kyoto J. Math. 52 (2012), 333–344.Google Scholar

[191] Ozawa, N., About the Connes embedding conjecture: algebraic approaches, Jpn. J. Math. 8 (2013), 147–183.Google Scholar

[192] Ozawa, N., Tsirelson’s problem and asymptotically commuting unitary matrices, J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013), 032202, 8 pp.Google Scholar

[193] Ozawa, N. and Pisier, G., A continuum of C∗-norms on B(H)⊗B(H) and related tensor products, Glasgow Math. J. 58 (2016), 433–443.Google Scholar

[194] Paterson, A., Amenability, American Mathematical Society, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 29, 1988.Google Scholar

[195] Paulsen, V., Completely bounded maps and dilations, Pitman Research Notes 146. Pitman Longman (Wiley) 1986.Google Scholar

[196] Paulsen, V., Completely bounded maps and operator algebras, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.Google Scholar

[197] Paulsen, V. and Suen, C.-Y., Commutant representations of completely bounded maps, J. Operator Theory 13 (1985), 87–101.Google Scholar

[198] Pestov, V., Operator spaces and residually finite-dimensional C^∗-algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 123 (1994), 308–317.Google Scholar

[199] Pier, J. P., Amenable locally compact groups, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1984. B( ₂), J. Funct. Anal. 198Google Scholar

[200] Pisier, G., Factorization of linear operators and the geometry of Banach spaces, CBMS (Regional Conferences of the A.M.S.) no. 60 (1986), Reprinted with corrections 1987.Google Scholar

[201] Pisier, G., Remarks on complemented subspaces of von Neumann algebras, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh 121 A (1992), 1–4.Google Scholar

[202] Pisier, G., Espace de Hilbert d’opérateurs et interpolation complexe, Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, Série I 316 (1993), 47–52.Google Scholar

[203] Pisier, G., Projections from a von Neumann algebra onto a subalgebra, Bull. Soc. Math. France 123 (1995), 139–153.Google Scholar

[204] Pisier, G., A simple proof of a theorem of Kirchberg and related results on C^∗-norms, J. Operator Theory 35 (1996), 317–335.Google Scholar

[205] Pisier, G., The operator Hilbert space OH, complex interpolation and tensor norms, Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 122 no. 585 (1996), 1–103.Google Scholar

[206] Pisier, G.. Quadratic forms in unitary operators, Linear Algebra Appl. 267 (1997), 125–137.Google Scholar

[207] Pisier, G., Similarity problems and completely bounded maps. Second, Expanded Edition, Springer Lecture Notes, 1618 (2001).Google Scholar

[208] Pisier, G., Introduction to operator space theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar

[209] Pisier, G., Remarks on B(H) ⊗ B(H), Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 116 (2006), 423–428.Google Scholar

[210] Pisier, G., Grothendieck’s theorem, past and present, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 49 (2012), 237–323.Google Scholar

[211] Pisier, G., Random matrices and subexponential operator spaces, Israel J. Math. 203 (2014), 223–273.Google Scholar

[212] Pisier, G., Quantum expanders and geometry of operator spaces, J. Europ. Math. Soc. 16 (2014), 1183–1219.Google Scholar

[213] Pisier, G., On the metric entropy of the Banach–Mazur compactum, Mathematika 61 (2015), 179–198.Google Scholar

[214] Pisier, G., Martingales in Banach spaces, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016.Google Scholar

[215] Pisier, G. and Xu, Q., Non-commutative L_p-spaces, Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces, vol. II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003.Google Scholar

[216] Popa, S., On the Russo–Dye theorem, Michigan Math. J. 28 (1981), 311–315.Google Scholar

[217] Popa, S., A short proof of “injectivity implies hyperfiniteness” for finite von Neumann algebras, J. Operator Theory 16 (1986), 261–272.Google Scholar

[218] Popa, S., Markov traces on universal Jones algebras and subfactors of finite index, Invent. Math. 111 (1993), 375–405.Google Scholar

[219] Pusz, W. and Woronowicz, S. L., Form convex functions and the WYDL and other inequalities, Lett. Math. Phys. 2 (1977/78), 505–512.Google Scholar

[220] Pusz, W. and Woronowicz, S. L., Functional calculus for sesquilinear forms and the purification map, Rep. Mathematical Phys. 8 (1975), 159–170.Google Scholar

[221] Pytlik, T. and Szwarc, R., An analytic family of uniformly bounded representations of free groups, Acta Math. 157 (1986), 287–309.Google Scholar

[222] Rădulescu, F., A comparison between the max and min norms on C^∗(F_n) ⊗ C^∗(F_n), J. Operator Theory 51 (2004), 245–253.Google Scholar

[223] Rădulescu, F., Combinatorial aspects of Connes’s embedding conjecture and asymptotic distribution of traces of products of unitaries, Operator Theory 20, 197–205, Theta Ser. Adv. Math. 6, Theta, Bucharest, 2006.Google Scholar

[224] Rankin, R. A., Modular forms and functions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977.Google Scholar

[225] Rieffel, M., Induced representations of C^∗-algebras, Adv. Math. 13 (1974), 176–257.Google Scholar

[226] Sakai, S., C^∗-algebras and W^∗-algebras, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.Google Scholar

[227] Sarnak, P., What is an expander? Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (2004), 762–763.Google Scholar

[228] Selberg, A., On the estimation of Fourier coefficients of modular forms, Proceedings of the Symposium Pure Mathematics, Vol. VIII, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1965, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

[229] Sherman, D., On cardinal invariants and generators for von Neumann algebras, Canad. J. Math. 64 (2012), 455–480.Google Scholar

[230] Slofstra, W., The set of quantum correlations is not closed, Forum Math. Pi 7 (2019), e1, 41 pp.Google Scholar

[231] Slofstra, W., A group with at least subexponential hyperlinear profile, arXiv:1806.05267, 2018.Google Scholar

[232] Smith, R. R., Completely bounded module maps and the Haagerup tensor product, J. Funct. Anal. 102 (1991), 156–175.Google Scholar

[233] Størmer, E., On the Jordan structure of C^∗-algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 120 (1965), 438–447.Google Scholar

[234] Størmer, E., Multiplicative properties of positive maps, Math. Scand. 100 (2007), 184–192.Google Scholar

[235] Størmer, E., Positive linear maps of operator algebras, Springer, Heidelberg, 2013.Google Scholar

[236] Suen, C-Y., Completely bounded maps on C*-algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 93 (1985), 81–87.Google Scholar

[237] Szwarc, R., An analytic series of irreducible representations of the free group, Ann. Inst. Fourier 38 (1988), 87–110.Google Scholar

[238] Takesaki, M., A note on the cross-norm of the direct product of C^∗-algebras, Kodai Math. Sem. Rep. 10 (1958), 137–140.Google Scholar

[239] Takesaki, M., Duality for crossed products and the structure of von Neumann algebras of type III, Acta Math. 131 (1973), 249–310.Google Scholar

[240] Takesaki, M., Theory of Operator algebras, vol. I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979.Google Scholar

[241] Takesaki, M., Theory of Operator algebras, vol. II, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2003.Google Scholar

[242] Takesaki, M., Theory of Operator algebras, vol. III, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2003.Google Scholar

[243] Tao, T., Expansion in finite simple groups of Lie type, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015.Google Scholar

[244] Thom, A., Examples of hyperlinear groups without factorization property, Groups Geom. Dyn. 4 (2010), 195–208.Google Scholar

[245] Tomiyama, J., Tensor products and projections of norm one in von Neumann algebras, Lecture Notes, University of Copenhagen, 1970.Google Scholar

[246] Tomiyama, J., Tensor products and approximation problems of C^∗-algebras, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 11 (1975/76), 163–183.Google Scholar

[247] Tomiyama, J., On the product projection of norm one in the direct product of operator algebras. Tôhoku Math. J. 11, no. (1959) 305–313.Google Scholar

[248] Tomiyama, J., On the projection of norm one in W^∗-algebras. III, Tôhoku Math. J. (2) 11 (1959) 125–129.Google Scholar

[249] Tonge, A., The complex Grothendieck inequality for 2 × 2 matrices, Bull. Soc. Math. Grèce (N.S.) 27 (1986), 133–136.Google Scholar

[250] Trott, S., A pair of generators for the unimodular group, Canad. Math. Bull. 5 (1962), 245–252.Google Scholar

[251] Tsirelson, B.S., Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequality, Lett. Math. Phys. 4 (1980), 93–100.Google Scholar

[252] Valette, A., Minimal projections, integrable representations and property (T), Arch. Math. (Basel) 43 (1984), 397–406.Google Scholar

[253] Voiculescu, D., Property T and approximation of operators, Bull. London Math. Soc. 22 (1990), 25–30.Google Scholar

[254] Voiculescu, D., Dykema, K., and Nica, A., Free Random Variables, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1992.Google Scholar

[255] Wassermann, S., On tensor products of certain group C^∗-algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 23 (1976), 239–254.Google Scholar

[256] Wassermann, S., Injective W^∗-algebras, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 82 (1977), 39–47.Google Scholar

[257] Wassermann, S., A pathology in the ideal space of L(H) ⊗ L(H), Indiana Univ. Math. J. 27 (1978), 1011–1020.Google Scholar

[258] Wassermann, S., Exact C^∗-algebras and related topics, Lecture Notes Series, 19. Seoul National University, Seoul, 1994.Google Scholar

[259] Wassermann, S., C^∗-algebras associated with groups with Kazhdan’s property T, Ann. Math. 134 (1991), 423–431.Google Scholar

[260] Werner, D., Some lifting theorems for bounded linear operators, Functional analysis (Essen, 1991), 279–291, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 150, Dekker, New York, 1994.Google Scholar

[261] Willig, P., On hyperfinite W∗-algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (1973), 120–122.Google Scholar

[262] Wilson, J. S., On characteristically simple groups, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 80 (1976), 19–35.Google Scholar

[263] Woronowicz, S., Selfpolar forms and their applications to the C^∗-algebra theory, Rep. Mathematical Phys. 6 (1974), 487–495.Google Scholar

[264] Zhang, C., Representation and geometry of operator spaces, Ph.D. thesis, University of Houston, 1995.Google Scholar

[265] Zippin, M., The separable extension problem, Israel J. Math. 26 (1977), 372–387.Google Scholar

[266] Zippin, M., Extension of bounded linear operators, Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces, Vol. 2, 1703–1741, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive