Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section I Context
- Section II Applications in assessing population health
- Section III Applied life and population history
- Section IV Forefront of technique
- 15 Methods of ingestion and incisal designs
- 16 Dental reduction in Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene hominids: alternative approaches to assessing tooth size
- 17 Dental microwear analysis: historical perspectives and new approaches
- 18 Virtual dentitions: touching the hidden evidence
- Index
- References
16 - Dental reduction in Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene hominids: alternative approaches to assessing tooth size
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section I Context
- Section II Applications in assessing population health
- Section III Applied life and population history
- Section IV Forefront of technique
- 15 Methods of ingestion and incisal designs
- 16 Dental reduction in Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene hominids: alternative approaches to assessing tooth size
- 17 Dental microwear analysis: historical perspectives and new approaches
- 18 Virtual dentitions: touching the hidden evidence
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Contemporary humans have, on average, the smallest teeth of any hominid throughout the evolutionary history of the family. Within the genus Homo, the trend over the past two million years has been one of dental reduction; however, many anthropologists believe that this has been especially marked over the last 100 000 years or so (the Late Pleistocene and Holocene periods), both in Neandertals and so-called anatomically modern Homo sapiens (Brace, 1964, 1967, 2000; Brace et al., 1987; Calcagno, 1989; Calcagno and Gibson, 1991; Carlson and van Gerven, 1977; Frayer, 1978, 1984; y'Edynak, 1989, 1992). The way in which this reduction of tooth size came about is one of the key issues in the evolution of modern humans; yet, in order to understand this process, it is necessary to confront the issue of how tooth size should be assessed. It is clear that with rapidly advancing technology (some examples of which can be found in this volume), it may someday be possible to employ precise volumetric and morphometric methods of tooth assessment that can be easily applied in an “in vivo” field/collection situation. At present, however, it is more practical to use simple caliper measurements.
In this chapter we assess the traditional methods of determining tooth dimensions and discuss an alternative approach adopted for a study of dental reduction in hominids of the Late Pleistocene and Holocene. We then evaluate the effectiveness of the conventional methods vs. our proposed alternative.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Technique and Application in Dental Anthropology , pp. 364 - 388Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
and (1893). Variation in the form of the teeth. Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 4, 266Google Scholar
(1969). The basal area of posterior tooth crown components: the assessment of within tooth variations of premolars and molars. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 31, 163–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1975). Cusp size, sexual dimorphism, and heritability of cusp size in twins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 42, 127–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1967). Environment, tooth form, and size in the Pleistocene. Journal of Dental Research, 46, 809–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2000). Tooth size differences and the antiquity of cooking (abstract). American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, 30, 110–11Google Scholar
, , and (1987). Gradual change in human tooth size in the Late Pleistocene and Post-Pleistocene. Evolution, 41, 705–20Google ScholarPubMed
(1989). Mechanisms of Human Dental Reduction: A Case Study from Post-Pleistocene Nubia. Lawrence: University of KansasGoogle Scholar
Calcagno, J. M. and Gibson, K. R. (1991). Selective compromise: evolutionary trends and mechanisms in hominid tooth size. In Advances in Dental Anthropology, ed. and . New York: Wiley-Liss, pp. 59–76Google Scholar
and (1977). Masticatory function and post-Pleistocene evolution in Nubia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 46, 495–506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1996). Analysis of dental sexual dimorphism in two western Gulf of Mexico precontact populations utilizing cervical measurements (abstract). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Supplement 22, p. 87Google Scholar
(1977a). Cartesian coordinate analysis of the hominoid second lower deciduous molar. Journal of Dental Research, 56, 699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977b). Crown component variation in the hominoid lower second premolar. Journal of Dental Research, 56, 1093–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978). Crown component variation in hominoid upper first premolars. Archives of Oral Biology, 23, 491–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1981). Developmental correlates of crown component asymmetry and occlusal discrepancy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 55, 21–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1982). Efficacy of cranial versus dental measurements for separating human populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 57, 123–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). Dental reduction in Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene hominids (abstract). American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, 34, 70Google Scholar
and (2004). Testing hypotheses for dental reduction in Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene hominids (abstract). American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, 38, 95Google Scholar
and (2005). Dental reduction in Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene hominids: alternative approaches to assessing tooth size (abstract). American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, 40, 102Google Scholar
(1978). Evolution of the Dentition in Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe. Lawrence: University of KansasGoogle Scholar
Frayer, D. W. (1984). Biological and cultural change in the European Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene. In The Origin of Modern Humans: A World Survey of the Fossil Evidence, ed. and . New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 211–50Google Scholar
Goose, D. H. (1963). Dental measurement: an assessment of its value in anthropological studies. In Dental Anthropology, ed. . London: Pergamon Press, pp. 125–48Google Scholar
Hillson, S. W. (1998). Crown diameters, tooth crown development, and environmental factors in growth. In Human Dental Development, Morphology and Pathology: A Tribute to Albert A. Dahlberg, ed. . Eugene: University of Oregon, pp. 17–28Google Scholar
and (2003). Tooth size variation and dental reduction in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa between 12 0000 and 5000 BP (abstract). American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, 36, 114Google Scholar
, , and (2005). Alternative dental measurements: proposals and relationships with other measurements. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 126, 413–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayhall, J. T. (2000). Dental morphology: techniques and strategies. In Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton, ed. and . New York: Wiley-Liss, pp. 103–34Google Scholar
and (1954). Correlations among crown diameters of human teeth. Archives of Oral Biology, 9, 685–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986). Maxillary molar occlusal polygons in five human samples. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 70, 333–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1984). Patterns of molar wear in hunter-gatherers and agriculturalists. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 63, 39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(in press). Comment on “Alternative Dental Measurements” by Hillson et al. American Journal of Physical AnthropologyGoogle Scholar
(1967). Olduvai Gorge II: The Cranium and Maxillary Dentition of Australopithecus (Zinjanthropus) boisei. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969). The effect of mutations under conditions of reduced selection. Social Biology, 16, 11–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1989). Disease and dimensional compensation during Yugoslav dental reduction (abstract). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78, 327Google Scholar
y'Edynak, G. (1992). Dental pathology: a factor in post-Pleistocene Yugoslav dental reduction. In Culture, Ecology and Dental Anthropology, ed. . Delhi: Kamla-Raj Enterprises, pp. 133–44Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by