Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:48:24.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The biological component of the simulation model for boreal forest dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Herman H. Shugart
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Gordon B. Bonan
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The extent of the circumpolar boreal forest strongly corresponds to macroclimate. Within its climatic limits, the system functions as a complex interrelation between solar radiation, soil moisture, the forest floor organic layer, nutrient availability, forest fires, insect outbreaks and vegetation patterns (Bonan & Shugart 1989). Bonan (1989a and Chapter 15 of this volume) has specified a model for the environmental regimes, which sets the limits driving boreal forest dynamics. He has linked this model with a forest succession model, a gap model, which simulates the demographic processes of tree populations through time within the environmental constraints, and a model of moss dynamics. The combined model mimics the large-scale dynamics of boreal forest (Bonan 1989a; Bonan & Korzukhin 1989).

Bonan's model simulated different stands well with respect to species composition, biomass and density. The ability to simulate such trends in quantitative characteristics of tree species is a robust feature of gap models in general (Shugart 1984; Leemans & Prentice 1987). This robustness is largely a result of the coupling of growth responses of individual trees to environmental factors. If the annual growth of a tree declines as a result of environmental conditions, its chances of dying increase. Thus, the individual tree is removed from the plot, leaving room for better-adapted individuals. This aspect of the traditional gap models appears to provide a robust ability to reproduce composition, biomass and density. If more precisely defined forest structures are used to test such models, the models are often less successful.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×