Abney, Peter S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Åfarli, Tor A. 1985. Norwegian Verb-Particle Constructions as Causative Constructions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Åfarli, Tor A., and Eide, Kristin M.. 2003. Norsk generativ syntaks. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Linguistics Today 18. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, Robin, Holmes, Philip and Lundskær-Nielsen, Tom. 1995. Danish: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Allen, Cynthia L. 1996. A Change in Structural Case Marking in Early Middle English. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax 2, pp. 3–20. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1986. The Typology of Anaphoric Dependencies: Icelandic (and Other) Reflexives. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 65–88. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R.1990. The Grammar of Icelandic Verbs in -st. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 235–73. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R.2002. Syntax and Morphology are Different: Commentary on Jonas. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 271–5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Avery D. 1971. Case Agreement of Predicate Modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 127–51.Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery D. 1976. The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. NELS 6: 1–21. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 165–85. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery D.1982a. The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic. In Bresnan, Joan (ed.): The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 427–503. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery D.1982b. Long Distance Agreement in Modern Icelandic. In Jacobson, Pauline and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.): The Nature of Syntactic Representation, pp. 1–33. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Avery D.1990. Case Structures and Control. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 187–234. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Angantýsson, Ásgrímur, see Ásgrímur Angantýsson

Anward, Jan. 1974. Swedish Reflexivization. In Papers from the First Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 17–35. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.

Árnason, Kristján, see Kristján Árnason.

Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna, see Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir.

Angantýsson, Ásgrímur. 2001. Skandinavísk orðaröð í íslenskum aukasetningum. Íslenskt mál 23: 95–122.Google Scholar

Svavarsdóttir, Ásta. 1982. Þágufallssýki. Breytingar á fallnotkun í frumlagssæti ópersónulegra setninga. Íslenskt mál 4: 19–62.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 73–137. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna, see Jóhanna Barðdal.

Barnes, Michael P. 1986a. Subject, Nominative and Oblique Case in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 37: 13–46. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P. 1986b. Reflexivisation in Faroese: A Preliminary Survey. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 101: 95–126. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P. 1986–1987. The Faroese Auxiliary Verb munna. Fróðskaparrit 34–35: 42–49. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P. 1987. Some Remarks on Subordinate Clause Word Order in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 38: 3–85. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P.1992. Faroese Syntax – Achievements, Goals and Problems. In Louis-Jensen, Jonna and Poulsen, Jóhan Hendrik W. (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 7, pp. 17–37. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn. [Also in Scripta Islandica 43: 28–43 and in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P. 2001. Faroese Language Studies. Studia Nordica 5. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P.2002. Head + Modifier or Modifier + Head? In Johansen, Anfinnur, Hansen, Zakaris Svabo, Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon and Marnersdóttir, Malan (eds.): Eivindarmál: Heiðursrit til Eivind Weyhe á seksti ára degi hansara 25. April 2002, pp. 59–66. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn.Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P., and Eivind Weyhe. 1994. Faroese. In König, Ekkehard and Auwera, Johan (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 190–89. Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Barss, Andrew, and Lasnik, Howard. 1986. A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 219–51.Google Scholar

Bennis, Hans, Pica, Pierre and Rooryck, Johan (eds.). 1997. Atomism and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Bentzen, Kristine. 2003. V-to-I Movement in the Absence of Morphological Cues: Evidence from Northern Norwegian. In Papers from the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 573–88. Nordlyd 31. University of Tromsø, Tromsø.Google Scholar

Bergsveinsson, Sveinn, see Sveinn Bergsveinsson.

Bernódusson, Helgi, see Helgi Bernódusson.

Bernstein, Judy B. 2001. The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal Domain. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 536–61. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bessason, Haraldur, see Haraldur Bessason.

den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In Abraham, Werner (ed.): On the Formal Syntax of Westgermania, pp. 47–131. John Benjamins, Amsterdam [First distributed in manuscript form in 1977.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir. 1990. North American Icelandic: The Linguistic and Social Context of Vowel Mergers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. [Available from University of Michigan Dissertation Services since 1995.]

Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna. 1997. The Life Cycle of a Language. Canadian Ethnic Studies 29: 31–42.Google Scholar

Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarPubMed

Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1994. What Does Adjacency Do? In Phillips, Colin and Harley, Heidi (eds.): The Morphology-Syntax Connection, pp. 1–32. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan David.1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Bobaljik, Jonathan David.2000. Adjacency and Autonomy: Holmberg's Generalization Revisited. In Thórhallsdóttir, Guðrún (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 10, pp. 51–59. Institute of Linguistics, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. Realizing Germanic Inflection: Why Morphology Does not Drive Syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Jonas, Dianne. 1996. Subject Positions and the Role of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 195–236.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1998. Two Heads aren't always Better than One. Syntax 1: 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2000. Quirky Agreement. Studia Linguistica 54: 354–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2001. PF Merger in Scandinavian: Stylistic Fronting and Object Shift. WPSS 68: 75–115.Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the Locality of the Left Branch Extraction and the Structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braunmüller, Kurt. 1991. Die skandinavischen Sprachen im Überblick. Francke Verlag, Tübingen. [2nd revised edition 1999.]Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. A Note on Icelandic Coordination. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 355–65. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Burton, Strang, and Grimshaw, Jane. 1992. Coordination and VP-Internal Subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 305–13.Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Revised edition published as Italian Syntax by Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.]

Burzio, Luigi. 1991. The Morphological Basis of Anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Barriers. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Knowledge of Language. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam.1991. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. In Freidin, Robert (ed.): Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, pp. 417–54. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam.1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J. (eds.): The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by Phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar

Christensen, Ken Ramshøj. 2003. On the Synchronic and Diachronic Status of the Negative Adverbial ikke/not. WPSS 72: 1–53.Google Scholar

Christensen, Ken Ramshøj.2005. Interfaces: Negation – Syntax – Brain. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus.

Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1983. The Categorial Status of Norwegian Infinitival Relatives. In Papers from the 7th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 9–20. Department of Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar

Christensen, Kirsti Koch.1986. Norwegian ingen: A Case of Post-syntactic Lexicalization. In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax: Papers from a Workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 21–35. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1991a. AGR, Adjunction, and the Structure of Scandinavian Existential Sentences. Lingua 84: 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1991b. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i GB-teoretisk perspektiv. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 9: 21–49.Google Scholar

Christensen, Kirsti Koch, and Knut Tarald Taraldsen. 1989. Expletive Chain Formation and Past Participle Agreement in Scandinavian Dialects. In Benincà, Paola (ed.): Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, pp. 53–83. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1995. Adverbs and the Universal Hierarchy of Functional Projections. GLOW Newsletter 34: 14–15.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Clausing, Stephen. 1986. English Influence on American German and American Icelandic. Peter Lang, Bern.Google Scholar

Clements, George N. 1975. The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–77.Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar

Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella and Huang, C.-T. James (eds.). 2001. Long Distance Reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Collins, Chris, and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1996. VP-Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391–444.Google Scholar

Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 1990. Tense and Mood in English: A Comparison with Danish. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dehé, Nicole. 2004. On the Order of Objects in Icelandic Double Object Constructions. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 85–108.Google Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993a. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.

Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993b. On Attributive Adjectives in Scandinavian and Other Languages. Studia Linguistica 47: 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1995. Prepositionsstrandning och kasus i äldre svenska. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 110: 141–78.Google Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof.1998. Possession in Germanic. In Alexiadou, Artemis and Wilder, Chris (eds.): Possessor, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, pp. 87–108. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof. 2001. Stylistic Fronting: Evidence from Old Scandinavian. WPSS 68: 147–68.Google Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003a. Syntaktisk variation i nordiska nominalfraser. In Vangsnes, Øystein, Holmberg, Anders and Delsing, Lars-Olof (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 11–64. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003b. Preposition Stranding and Case. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 75–84. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar

Déprez, Viviane. 1989. On the Typology of Syntactic Positions and the Nature of Chains. Move α to the Specifier of Functional Projections. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Diderichsen, Paul. 1946. Elementær dansk grammatik. Gyldendal, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Diderichsen, Paul. 1964. Essentials of Danish Grammar. Akademisk forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Diesing, Molly. 1990. Verb Movement and the Subject Position in Yiddish. NLLT 8: 41–79.Google Scholar

Diesing, Molly.1996. Semantic Variables and Object Shift. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 66–84. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diesing, Molly. 1997. Yiddish VP Order and the Typology of Object Movement in Germanic. NLLT 15: 369–427.Google Scholar

Diesing, Molly, and Jelinek, Eloise. 1993. The Syntax and Semantics of Object Shift. WPSS 51.Google Scholar

Diesing, Molly, and Jelinek, Eloise. 1995. Distributing Arguments. Natural Language Semantics 3: 123–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egerland, Verner. 2003. Impersonal Pronouns in Scandinavian and Romance. WPSS 71: 75–102.Google Scholar

Einarsson, Stefán, see Stefán Einarsson.

Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson. 1982a: Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1982b. We Need (Some Kind of) a Rule of Conjunction Reduction. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 557–61. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 349–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1983. Sagnliðurinn í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 5: 7–28.Google Scholar

Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1984a. Rightward displacements of NPs in Icelandic. In Ringgaard, Kristian and Sørensen, Viggo (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 5, pp. 362–8. University of Aarhus, Aarhus.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1984b. Icelandic Word Order and það-Insertion. WPSS 8.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1984c. Af lýsingarorðsviðurlögum. Íslenskt mál 6: 57–80.Google Scholar

Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1986. Some Comments on Reflexivization in Icelandic. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 89–102. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1987a. Enda. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 10: 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1987b. OV Order in Icelandic. In Allen, R. D. S. and Barnes, Michael (eds.): Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of Teachers of Scandinavian Languages in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, pp. 33–49. Department of Scandinavian, University College, London.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1990a. Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. [The author's 1982 MA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.]Google Scholar

Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1990b. Null objects in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 367–79. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1991. Quirky Subjects in Old Icelandic. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 369–378. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1992. Nema. Íslenskt mál 14: 35–61.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1995. Old Icelandic: A Non-Configurational Language? NOWELE 26: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1996a. Word Order Variation in the VP in Old Icelandic. WPSS 58: 55–86.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur 1996b. Mikið er það sorglegt að refir skuli ekki geta klifrað í trjám. Höskollu gefið, pp. 14–16. A festschrift for Höskuldur Thráinsson. University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1997. Frumlag og fall að fornu. Íslenskt mál 18: 37–69.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 2000. Setningarstaða boðháttarsagna í fornu máli. Íslenskt mál 22: 63–90.Google Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 2002. Það í fornu máli og síðar. Íslenskt mál 24: 7–30.Google Scholar

Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.2005. Setningafræðilegar breytingar í íslensku. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur: Setningar, pp. 602–35. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. On Icelandic Word Order Once More. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 3–40. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Kiss, É. Katalin. 2002a. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

É. Kiss, Katalin.2002b. The EPP in a Topic-Prominent Language. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 107–24. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Engdahl, Elisabet. 1999. The Choice between bli-Passive and -s-Passive in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Ms., University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.

Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Erteschik, Nomi. 1973. On the Nature of Island Constraints. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Everaert, Martin. 1986. The Syntax of Reflexivization. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Everaert, Martin.1991. Nominative Anaphors in Icelandic: Morphology or Syntax? In Abraham, Werner, Kosmeijer, Wim and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 277–305. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar

Everaert, Martin.2001. Paradigmatic Restrictions on Anaphors. In Megerdoomian, Karine and Bar-el, L. A. (eds.): West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 20: 178–91. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, Mass.Google Scholar

Eythórsson, Thórhallur, see Thórhallur Eythórsson.

Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1977. Transformational Syntax in Dialectology: Scandinavian Word Order Varieties. In Fretheim, Torstein and Hellan, Lars (eds.): Papers from the Trondheim Syntax Symposium, pp. 65–83. University of Trondheim, Trondheim.Google Scholar

Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Mouton, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2004. The Syntax of Old Norse: With a Survey of the Inflectional Morphology and a Complete Bibliography. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein and Vannebo, Kjell Ivar. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar

Falk, Cecilia. 1990. On Double Object Constructions. WPSS 46: 53–100.Google Scholar

Falk, Cecilia.1993. Non-Referential Subjects in the History of Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund.

Ferguson, K. Scott. 1996. Shortest Move and Object Case Checking. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 97–111. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The Case for Case. In Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert T. (eds.): Universals in Linguistic Theory, pp. 1–88. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1971. Some Problems for Case Grammar. Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 245–65. Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar

Fischer, Susann, and Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. On Stylistic Fronting: Germanic vs. Romance. WPSS 68: 117–45.Google Scholar

Fiva, Toril. 1987. Possessor Chains in Norwegian. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Friðjónsson, Jón G., see Jón G. Friðjónsson.

Magnússon, Friðrik. 1984. Um innri gerð nafnliða í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 6: 81–111.Google Scholar

Friðrik Magnússon.1990. Kjarnafærsla og það-innskot í aukasetningum í íslensku. Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík. [The author's 1989 Master's thesis.]

Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2003. How Icelandic Can you be if you Speak Icelandic B? In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 115–22. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra. 1984. Towards a Theory of Long Distance Anaphors: A GB Approach. The Linguistic Review 3: 307–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra.1991. Prepositions, Binding and θ-Marking. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 185–208. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Guðmundsson, Helgi, see Helgi Guðmundsson.

Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2001. An Optimality Theory Analysis of Agreement in Icelandic DAT-NOM Constructions. WPSS 68: 15–47.Google Scholar

Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2003. On Stylistic Fronting Once More. WPSS 72: 153–205.Google Scholar

Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2004a. Stylistic Fronting. Studia Linguistica 58: 88–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.2004b. Oblique Subjects and Stylistic Fronting in the History of Scandinavian and English: The Role of IP-Spec. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus, Aarhus.

Gylfi Hafsteinsson. 1998. Um hömlur á röð íslenskra lýsingarorða – og samanburður við önnur tungumál. BA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.

Hafsteinsson, Gylfi, see Gylfi Hafsteinsson.

Haider, Hubert. 1997. Extraposition. In Beerman, Dorothee, Leblanc, David and Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.): Rightward Movement, pp. 115–51. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haider, Hubert. 2001. How to Stay Accusative in Insular Germanic. WPSS 68: 1–14.Google Scholar

Haider, Hubert, Susan Olsen and Sten Vikner. 1995. Introduction. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, I, pp. 1–45. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haider, Hubert, and Prinzhorn, Martin (eds.). 1986. Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, Mark. 2006. Historical Linguistics: Theory and Method. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Halldórsson, Halldór. 1982. Um méranir. Drög að samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun. Íslenskt mál 4: 159–89.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1981. Fleiryrtar aukatengingar? Íslenskt mál 3: 59–76.Google Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1983. Um frásagnarumröðun og grundvallarorðaröð í forníslensku. Master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1985. Subordinate V1 in Icelandic: How to Explain a Root Phenomenon. WPSS 18.Google Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1986. Verb Post-Second in a V2 Language. In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 138–49. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1988. From OV to VO: Evidence from Old Icelandic. WPSS 34.Google Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund. [Reprinted by the Linguistic Institute at the University of Iceland 1992.]

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990a. V1 Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 41–69. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990b. Long Distance Reflexives and Moods in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 309–46. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1990c. Icelandic Case Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical A-positions. WPSS 45: 35–82.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1990–1991. Beygingarsamræmi. Íslenskt mál 12–13: 31–77.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1991. Icelandic Case-Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments. NLLT 9: 327–63.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1992a. Um beygingarsamræmi og málkunnáttu. Íslenskt mál 14: 63–87.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1992b. The Case of Quirky Subjects. WPSS 49: 1–26.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993a. The Structure of the Icelandic NP. Studia Linguistica 47: 177–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993b. Agreement as Head Visible Feature Government. Studia Linguistica 47: 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993c. Argument-drop in Old Icelandic. Lingua 89: 247–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1994. Morphological Case, Abstract Case and Licensing. In Hedlund, Cecilia and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Proceedings of the 14th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics – Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 145–59. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1996. Icelandic Finite Verb Agreement. WPSS 57: 1–46.Google Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1997. Öðruvísi frumlög. In Agnarsdóttir, Anna, Pétursson, Pétur and Tulinius, Torfi (eds.): Milli himins og jarðar, pp. 299–306. Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2000. The Locus of Case and Agreement. WPSS 65: 65–108.Google Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2001. Inflectional Features and Clausal Structure. In Niemi, Jussi and Heikkinen, Janni (eds.): Nordic and Baltic Morphology, pp. 99–111. Studies in Languages 36, University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2002a. Agree and Agreement. WPSS 70: 101–56.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2002b. To be an Oblique Subject: Russian vs. Icelandic. NLLT 20: 691–724.Google Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2003. Case: Abstract vs. Morphological. In Brandner, Ellen and Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 223–68. CSLI Publications, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004a. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In Abraham, Werner (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 59–99. Akademieverlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2004b. Agree in Syntax, Agreement in Signs. WPSS 74: 1–42.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2004c. The Syntax of Person, Tense and Speech Features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16: 219–51.Google Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004d. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In Abraham, Werner (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 61–103. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson2004e. Icelandic Non-Nominative Subjects: Facts and Implications. In Bhaskararao, Peri and Subbarao, K. V. (eds.): Non-Nominative Subjects 2, pp. 137–59. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2005a. Accusative and the Nom/Acc Alternation in Germanic. WPSS 76: 93–133.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2005b. Meaningful Silence, Meaningless Sounds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 235–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006a. The Nominative Puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 2: 389–408.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006b. The Icelandic Noun Phrase: Central Traits. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 121: 193–236.Google Scholar

Halldórsson, Halldór, see Halldór Halldórsson.

Hankamer, Jorge, and Mikkelsen, Line Hove. 2002. A Morphological Analysis of Definite Nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 137–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankamer, Jorge, and Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.Google Scholar

Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft. 1999. Grammatik over det danske sprog. Ms., Roskilde and Copenhagen.

Bessason, Haraldur. 1967. A Few Specimens of North American Icelandic. Scandinavian Studies 39: 115–46.Google Scholar

Bessason, Haraldur. 1971. Isländskan i Nordamerika. Språk i Norden 1971, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar. 1976. The Scandinavian Languages: An Introduction to their History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar. 1982. Scandinavian Language Structures: A Comparative Historical Survey. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Heinat, Fredrik. 2005. A Note on Long Object Shift. WPSS 76: 135–42.Google Scholar

Helgi Bernódusson. 1982. Ópersónulegar setningar. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.

Kjartansson, Helgi Skúli. 1991. Nýstárleg þolmynd í barnamáli. Skíma 14: 18–22.Google Scholar

Hellan, Lars. 1983. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Binding. WPSS 5.Google Scholar

Hellan, Lars.1986a. The Headedness of NPs in Norwegian. In Muysken, Pieter and Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.): Features and Projections, pp. 89–122. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellan, Lars.1986b. On Anaphora and Predication in Norwegian. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 103–24. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellan, Lars. 1988. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Hellan, Lars.1991a. The Phrasal Nature of Double Object Clusters. In Abraham, Werner, Kosmeijer, Wim and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 67–92. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar

Hellan, Lars.1991b. Containment and Connectedness Anaphors. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 27–48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellan, Lars, and Platzack, Christer. 1995. Pronouns in Scandinavian: An Overview. WPSS 56: 47–69.Google Scholar

Henriksen, Jeffrei. 1991. Navnháttur ella lýsingarháttur í føroyskum. Málting 3: 25–29.Google Scholar

Henriksen, Jeffrei. 2000. Orðalagslæra. Sprotin, Tórshavn.Google Scholar

Herslund, Michael. 1984. Particles, Prefixes and Preposition Stranding. In Sørensen, Finn and Heltoft, Lars (eds.): Topics in Danish Syntax, pp. 34–71. Nydanske studier og almen kommunikationsteori 14. Akademisk forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Hestvik, Arild. 1992. LF Movement of Pronouns and Antisubject Orientation. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 557–94.Google Scholar

Hjartardóttir, Thóra Björk, see Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir.

Holmberg, Anders. 1984. On Certain Clitic-Like Elements in Swedish. WPSS 13: 1–31.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders.1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.

Holmberg, Anders.1991a. The Distribution of Scandinavian Weak Pronouns. In Riemsdijk, Henk and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.): Clitics and their Hosts, pp. 155–74. Eurotyp Working Papers, Theme Group 8: Clitics. Tilburg University, Tilburg.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 1991b. On the Scandinavian Double Object Construction. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 141–55. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 1993. Two Subject Positions in IP in Mainland Scandinavian. WPSS 52: 29–41.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders.1994. The Pros and Cons of Agreement in Scandinavian Impersonals. In Cinque, Guglielmo, Koster, Jan, Pollock, Jean-Yves, Rizzi, Luigi and Zanuttini, Raffaella (eds.): Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, pp. 217–36. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 1997. The True Nature of Holmberg's Generalization. NELS 27: 203–17.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization. Studia Linguistica 53:1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 2000. Scandinavian Stylistic Fronting: How Any Category can Become an Expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 2001. Expletives and Agreement in Scandinavian Passives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 85–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmberg, Anders (ed.). 1992. The Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Institute of Linguistics, University of Umeå, Umeå.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders, and Platzack, Christer. 1988. On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. WPSS 42: 25–42.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack.1991. On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. In Abraham, Werner, Kosmeijer, Wim and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 93–118. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders, and Platzack, Christer. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders, and Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2003. Agreement and Movement in Icelandic Raising Constructions. Lingua 113: 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Philip, and Hinchliffe, Ian. 1994. Swedish. A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Hoop, Helen. 1992. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen. [Published 1996 by Garland, New York.]

Hornstein, Norbert. 1989. Verb Raising in Icelandic Infinitives. NELS 20: 215–29.Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert. 1991. Expletives: A Comparative Study of English and Icelandic. WPSS 47: 1–88.Google Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1976. Reflexives and Subjunctives in Icelandic. NELS 6: 225–39.Google Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1979. On Complementation in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York.

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1980. Tilvísunarfornöfn?Íslenskt mál 2: 53–96.Google Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1984. Different Types of Infinitival Complements in Icelandic. In Geest, Wim and Putseys, Yvan (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 247–55. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986a. V1, V2, V3 in Icelandic. In Haider, Hubert and Prinzhorn, Martin (eds.): Verb-Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, pp. 169–94. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986b. On Auxiliaries, AUX and VP in Icelandic. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 235–65. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1990. A Semantic Reflexive in Icelandic. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 289–307. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego. [A slightly revised version of Höskuldur Thráinsson 1976.]Google Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1991. Long Distance Reflexives and the Typology of NPs. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 49–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1992. A Note on Underspecification and Binding. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 73–90. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1993. On the Structure of Infinitival Complements. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3, pp. 181–213. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994a. Icelandic. In König, Ekkehard and Auwera, Johan (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 142–89. Routledge, London.

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994b. Comments on the Paper by Vikner. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 149–62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRef

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1996. On the Non-Universality of Functional Categories. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 253–81. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRef

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1997. The Chapters by Kiparsky, Roberts and Weerman: An Epilogue. In Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 495–508. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Höskuldur Thráinsson.1998. Infinitival Complements in Some Old and Modern Germanic Languages. In Askedal, John Ole (ed.): Historische germanische und deutsche Syntax: Akten des internationalen Symposiums anläßlich des 100. Geburtstages von Ingerid Dal, pp. 335–63. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1999. Review of Anders Holmberg and Christer Platzack: The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 35: 418–30.Google Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001a. Object Shift and Scrambling. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 148–202. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001b. Syntactic Theory for Faroese and Faroese for Syntactic Theory. In Braunmüller, Kurt and Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon (eds.): Moderne lingvistiske teorier og færøsk, pp. 89–124. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.2003. Syntactic Variation, Historical Development, and Minimalism. In Hendrick, Randall (ed.): Minimalist Syntax, pp. 152–91. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Höskuldur Thráinsson.2005. Setningar: Handbók um setningafræði. [Editor and main author Höskuldur Thráinsson, co-authors Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson, Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson, Sigríður Magnúsdóttir, Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir and Thórunn Blöndal.] Íslensk tunga 3. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.

Höskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein and Steve Peter. 1996. Introduction. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. vii–xxxix. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRef

Höskuldur Thráinsson, Hjalmar P. Petersen, Jógvan í Lon Jacobsen and Zakaris S. Hansen. 2004. Faroese: A Handbook and Reference Grammar. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn, and Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.

Höskuldur Thráinsson and Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir. 1986. Pro-Drop, Topic Drop …: Where do Old and Modern Icelandic Fit in? In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 150–61. Papers from a workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Vikner, Sten. 1995. Modals and Double Modals in the Scandinavian Languages. WPSS 55: 51–88.Google Scholar

Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, see Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.

Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg, see Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir.

Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–74.Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James, and C.-C. Jane Tang. 1991. The Local Nature of the Long-Distance Reflexive in Chinese. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 263–82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora. A Cross-Linguistic Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard. 1992. So-called ‘Double Objects’ and Grammatical Relations. Language 68: 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyams, Nina, and Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður. 1990. The Development of ‘Long-Distance Anaphora’: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison with Special Reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition 1: 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iatridou, Sabine, and Kroch, Anthony. 1992. The Licensing of CP-recursion and its Relevance to the Germanic Verb-Second Phenomenon. WPSS 50: 1–24.Google Scholar

Iversen, Ragnvald. 1918. Syntaksen i Tromsø Bymaal. Bymaals-Lagets Forlag, Oslo [Kristiania].Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Jakob Jóh. Smári. 1920. Íslenzk setningafræði. Bókaverzlun Ársæls Árnasonar, Reykjavík. [Reprinted by Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík, 1987.]

Jóhanna Barðdal. 1993. Accusative and Dative Case of Objects of Some Transitive Verbs in Icelandic and the Semantic Distinction between them. In Flyktförsök: Kalasbok till Christer Platzack på femtioårsdagen 18 november 1993, från doktorander och dylika, pp. 1–13. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 1999a. Case in Icelandic – A Construction Grammar Approach. Tijdschrift voor Skandinavistiek 20: 65–100.Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 1999b. The Dual Nature of Icelandic Psych-Verbs. WPSS 64: 79–101.Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000a. The Subject is Nominative! On Obsolete Axioms and their Deeprootedness. Papers from the 17th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 93–117. Institute of Language and Communication, University of Odense, Odense.Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000b. Oblique Subjects in Old Scandinavian. NOWELE 37: 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000c. Case Assignment of Nonce Verbs in Icelandic. SKY Journal of Linguistics 13: 7–28.Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2001a. The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jóhanna Barðdal.2001b. Case in Icelandic – A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund.

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2002. ‘Oblique subjects’ in Icelandic and German. WPSS 70: 61–99.Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2006. Construction-Specific Properties of Syntactic Subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 39–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jóhanna, Barðdal and Molnár, Valéria. 2000. Passive in Icelandic – Compared to Mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65: 109–46.Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003a. The Change that Never Happened: The Story of Oblique Subject. Journal of Linguistics 39: 439–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003b. Icelandic vs. German: Oblique Subjects, Agreement and Expletives. Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Case and Control Constructions in German, Faroese and Icelandic: Or How to Evaluate Marginally Acceptable Data?WPSS 75: 1–36.Google Scholar

Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson. 1990. The Pronoun maður in Icelandic. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1991. Stylistic Fronting in Icelandic. WPSS 48: 1–43.Google Scholar

Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1992. The Two Perfects of Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 14: 129–45.Google Scholar

Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.1996. Clausal Achitecture and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1997–1998. Sagnir með aukafallsfrumlagi. Íslenskt mál 19–20: 11–43.Google Scholar

Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000a. Definites in Icelandic existentials. In Thórhallsdóttir, Guðrún (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 125–34. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000b. Case and Double Objects in Icelandic. In Nelson, Diane and Foulkes, Paul (eds.): Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, pp. 71–94. University of Leeds, LeedsGoogle Scholar

Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2002. S-Adverbs in Icelandic and the Feature Theory of Adverbs. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9: 73–89.Google Scholar

Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2003. Not so Quirky: On Subject Case in Icelandic. In Brandner, Ellen and Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.): New Perspectives in Case Theory, pp. 127–63. CSLI Publications, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar

Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005a. Merkingarhlutverk, rökliðir og fallmörkun. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur: Setningar, pp. 350–409. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005b. Merkingarflokkar nafnliða og setningagerð. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur: Setningar, pp. 435–58. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003. Breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 25: 7–40.Google Scholar

Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Variation in Subject Case Marking in Insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 223–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M., see Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir.

Johnson, Kyle. 1985. Some Notes on Subjunctive Clauses and Binding in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 102–37.Google Scholar

Kyle, Johnson. 1991. Object positions. NLLT 9: 577–636.Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle, and Vikner, Sten. 1994. Verb Movement in Scandinavian Infinitives. WPSS 53: 61–84.Google Scholar

Jonas, Dianne. 1994. The TP Parameter in Scandinavian Syntax. In Hedlund, Cecilia and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Proceedings of the XIVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics and the VIIIth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 33–59. Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Jonas, Dianne.1996a. Clause Structures, Expletives and Verb Movement. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 167–88. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonas, Dianne.1996b. Clause Structure and Verb Syntax in Scandinavian and English. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

Jonas, Dianne.2002. Residual V-to-I. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 251–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonas, Dianne, and Bobaljik, Jonathan D.. 1993. Specs for Subjects: The Role of TP in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 59–98.Google Scholar

Jón G. Friðjónsson. 1986. Um notkun forsetninga í íslensku. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.

Friðjónsson, Jón G.. 1989. Samsettar myndir sagna. Málvisindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Friðjónsson, Jón G.. 1990–1991. Beygingarsamræmi með samsettu frumlagi. Íslenskt mál 12–13: 79–103.Google Scholar

Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli, see Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.

Josefsson, Gunlög. 1992. Object Shift and Weak Pronominals in Swedish. WPSS 49: 59–94.Google Scholar

Josefsson, Gunlög.1994. Scandinavian Pronouns and Object Shift. In Riemsdijk, Henk and Hellan, Lars (eds.): Clitics: Their Origin, Status and Position, pp. 91–122. Eurotyp Working Papers 6. Tilburg University, TilburgGoogle Scholar

Josefsson, Gunlög.2003. Four Myths about Object Shift in Swedish. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 199–207. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.

Julien, Marit. 2002a. Optional ha in Swedish and Norwegian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Julien, Marit. 2002b. Determiners and Word Order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica 56: 264–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Point of View. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. The Rise of Positional Licensing. In Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 460–94. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Bierwisch, Manfred and Heidolph, Karl (eds.): Progress in Linguistics, pp. 143–73. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiss, Katalin É., see É. Kiss, Katalin.

Kissock, Madelyn. 1995. Reflexive-Middle Constructions and Verb Raising in Telugu. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1986. Mörk orðmyndunar og beygingar: Miðmynd í nútímaíslensku. Íslenskt mál 8: 63–119.Google Scholar

Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1988. A Feature Based Approach to Thematic Roles. Papers from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 2: 135–50.Google Scholar

Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1989. VP-Specifier Subjects and the CP/IP Distinction in Icelandic and Mainland Scandinavian. WPSS 44: 89–100.Google Scholar

Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1991a. Icelandic Double Objects as Small Clauses. WPSS 48: 77–97.Google Scholar

Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1991b. Psych-Verbs and Binding in Icelandic. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 335–44. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Kjartan G. Ottósson1992. The Icelandic Middle Voice: The Morphological and Phonological Development. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.

Ottósson, Kjartan G.. 1993. Double-Object Small Clauses and Reanalysis in Icelandic Passives. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics XI, pp. 371–87. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.Google Scholar

Kjartan G. Ottósson.1994. Comments on the Paper by Santorini. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 107–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kjartan Ottosson. 2003. Subject Positions, Adverbials and Functional Projections in Modern Icelandic. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 249–56. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar

Kjartansson, Helgi Skúli, see Helgi Skúli Kjartansson.

Kosmeijer, Wim. 1991. The Distribution of það: An Argument against a Generalized Comp Analysis. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 182–93. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Kossuth, Karen C. 1981. Unmarked Definite NPs and Referential Cohesion in Old Icelandic Narrative. Íslenskt mál 3: 85–100.Google Scholar

Koster, Jan, and Reuland, Eric (eds.). 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kress, Bruno. 1975. Zum Verhältnis syntaktischer Strukturen zu Strukturen der objektiven Realität, dargestellt am Beispiel des Isländischen. In Dahlstedt, Karl-Hampus (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, II, pp. 539–45. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Kress, Bruno. 1982. Isländische Grammatik. VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir. 1996. Á sögnum verður sjaldnast skortur: Afleiðslusagnir og innlimunarsagnir í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.

Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M.. 2005. Temporal Adverbs in Icelandic: Adverbs of Quantification vs. Frequency Adverbs. WPSS 76: 31–72.Google Scholar

Árnason, Kristján. 1981. Um merkingu viðtengingarháttar í íslensku. In Afmæliskveðja til Halldórs Halldórssonar, pp. 154–72. Íslenska málfræðifélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Kristoffersen, Kristian Emil. 1994. Passiv i norrønt og nyislandsk – ei samanliking. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 12: 43–67.Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1975. Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax. In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, pp. 276–336. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Ladusaw, William, and David Dowty. 1987. Towards a Non-Grammatical Account of Thematic Roles. In Wilkins, Wendy (ed.): On the Nature of Thematic Roles. Syntax and Semantics 21. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 1988. On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91.Google Scholar

Levander, Lars. 1909. Älvdalsmålet i Dalarna: Ordböjning och syntax. Stockholm.Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Levin, Lori S., and Simpson, Jane. 1981. Quirky Case and Lexical Representation of Icelandic Verbs. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 185–96. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, David. 2006. How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightfoot, David, and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.). 1994. Verb Movement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lødrup, Helge. 2006. Anaphors without Visible Binders: Evidence from Norwegian. Ms., University of Oslo.

Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. The Structure of DPs: Some Principles, Parameters and Problems. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 562–603. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

López, Luis. 2003. Complex Dependencies: The Person-Number Restriction in Icelandic. WPSS 72: 55–90.Google Scholar

Magnússon, Friðrik, see Friðrik Magnússon.

Maling, Joan. 1976. Notes on Quantifier-Postposing. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 708–18.Google Scholar

Maling, Joan. 1980. Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 2: 175–93. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 71–91. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar

Maling, Joan. 1984. Non-Clause Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 211–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maling, Joan.1986. Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 53–63. Reidel, Dordrecht. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 277–87. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maling, Joan. 1987. Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic: Reference to Thematic Roles. WPSS 28.Google Scholar

Maling, Joan. 1988. Variations on a Theme: Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Germanic Syntax, pp. 168–91. Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar

Maling, Joan. 2001. Dative: The Heterogeneity of Mapping among Morphological Case, Grammatical Functions and Thematic Roles. Lingua 111: 419–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maling, Joan. 2002a. Icelandic Verbs with Dative Objects. WPSS 70: 1–60.Google Scholar

Maling, Joan. 2002b. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi: Verbs with Dative Objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 24: 31–105. [A revised version of Maling 2002a.]Google Scholar

Maling, Joan, and Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1995. On Nominative Objects in Icelandic and the Feature [+ human]. WPSS 56: 71–9.Google Scholar

Maling, Joan, and Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður. 2002. The ‘New Impersonal’ Construction in Icelandic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 97–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maling, Joan, and Rex A. Sprouse. 1995. Structural Case, Specifier-Head Relations, and the Case of Predicate NPs. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 167–86. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maling, Joan, and Zaenen, Annie. 1978. The Nonuniversality of a Surface Filter. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 475–497. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 383–407. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar

Maling, Joan, and Zaenen, Annie. 1985. Preposition-Stranding and Passive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 197–209. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 153–64. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manzini, Maria Rita, and Wexler, Kenneth. 1987. Parameters, Binding Theory and Learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 3: 413–44.Google Scholar

Martin, Roger. 1992. On the Distribution and Case Features of PRO. Ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs.

McCloskey, James. 1997. Subjecthood and Subject Positions. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 197–235. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar

Nilsen, Øystein. 1997. Adverbs and A-Shift. WPSS 59: 1–31.Google Scholar

Nilsen, Øystein.1998. The Syntax of Circumstantial Adverbials. MA thesis, University of Tromsø, Tromsø.

Orešnik, Janez. 1972. Morphophonemic Notes on the Modern Icelandic Imperative Singular. In Firchow, Evelyn S., Grimstad, Karen, Hasselmo, Nils and O'Neil, Wayne A. (eds.): Studies for Einar Haugen, pp. 450–9. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orešnik, Janez.1980. On the Modern Icelandic Clipped Imperative. In Hovdhaugen, Even (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 305–14. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar

Ottosson, Kjartan, see Kjartan Ottosson.

Ottósson, Kjartan G., see Kjartan G. Ottósson.

Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perlmutter, David (ed.). 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar, I. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Petersen, Hjalmar P. 1999. Kloyvdir setningar. Málting 26: 15–24.Google Scholar

Petersen, Hjalmar P. 2000. IP or TP in Modern Faroese. WPSS 66: 75–83.Google Scholar

Petersen, Inge Lise. 1996. ‘Der kan jo være nogen der kan itte tåle det.’ Om hovedsætningsordstilling i bisætninger. In Nielsen, Bent Jul and Pedersen, Inge Lise (eds.): Studier i talesprogsvariation og sprogkontakt: Til Inger Eskjær på halvfjerdsårsdagen den 20. maj 1996, pp. 242–51. Reitzel, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Pica, Pierre. 1984. On the Distinction between Argumental and Non-Argumental Anaphors. In Geest, Wim and Putseys, Yvan (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 185–94. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Pica, Pierre. 1987. On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle. NELS 17: 483–99.Google Scholar

Pica, Pierre.1991. Antecedent Government and Binding: The Case of Long-Distance Reflexivization. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 119–35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1979. The Semantic Interpretation of Aspekt and Aktionsarten: A Study of Internal Time Reference in Swedish. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer.1983. Existential Sentences in English, German, Icelandic and Swedish. In Karlsson, Fred (ed.): Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Hanasaari, Finland, December 17–19, 1982, pp. 80–100. Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1985a. Narrative Inversion in Old Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 7: 127–44.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1985b. A Survey of Generative Analyses of the Verb Second Phenomenon in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platzack, Christer.1986a. Comp, Infl and Germanic Word Order. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 185–234. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platzack, Christer.1986b. The Structure of Infinitival Clauses in Danish and Swedish. In Dahl, Östen and Holmberg, Anders (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 123–37. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1987a. The Case of Narrative Inversion in Swedish and Icelandic. WPSS 31: 9–14.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1987b. The Scandinavian Languages and the Null Subject Parameter. NLLT 5: 377–401.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1988a. The Emergence of a Word Order Difference in Scandinavian Subordinate Clauses. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 215–38. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer.1988b. Den centralskandinaviska bisatsordföljdens framväxt. In Studier i svensk språkhistoria, pp. 241–55. Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A 41. Lund University Press, Lund.

Platzack, Christer.1989. The Swedish Supine: An Active Verb Form or the Non-Agreeing Form of the Past Participle? In Jaspers, Danny, Klooster, Wim, Putseys, Yvan and Seuren, Pieter (eds.): Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon: Studies in Honor of Wim de Geest, pp. 305–19. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer.1996. Small Pro, Weak Agr and Syntactic Differences in Scandinavian. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 180–96. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1998. Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet: En introduktion till modern generativ grammatik. Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1999. The Subject of Icelandic Psych-Verbs. WPSS 64: 103–15.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer.2005. Cross-Germanic Promotion to Subject in Ditransitive Passives – A Feature-Driven Account. In Vulchanova, Mila and Åfarli, Tor A. (eds.): Grammar and Beyond: Essays on Honour of Lars Hellan, pp. 135–61. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer, and Holmberg, Anders. 1989. The Role of AGR and Finiteness. WPSS 43: 51–76.Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer, and Rosengren, Inger. 1997. On the Subject of Imperatives. A Minimalist Account of the Imperative Clause. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar

Poole, Geoffrey. 1992. The Case Filter and Stylistic Fronting in Icelandic. In Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 19–31. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Poole, Geoffrey.1996. Optional Movement in the Minimalist Program. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur and Zwar, C. Jan-Wouter (eds.): Minimal Ideas, pp. 199–216. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poser, William J. 1992. Blocking of Phrasal Constructions by Lexical Items. In Sag, Ivan and Szabolcsi, Anna (eds.): Lexical Matters, pp. 111–30. CSLI, Stanford.Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M., and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1988. Expletive Noun Phrases in Subcategorized Positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 635–70.Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1988. Citation Etiquette beyond Thunderdome. Topic … Comment. NLLT 6: 579–88.Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian, and Svenonius, Peter. 2002. The Lexical Syntax and Lexical Semantics of the Verb-Particle Construction. In West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 21: 387–400. Cascadilla Press, Somerville.Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1991. Anaphors and Logophors: An Argument Structure Perspective. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 283–321. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya, and Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.Google Scholar

Reinholtz, Charlotte. 1989. V-2 in Mainland Scandinavian: Finite Verb Movement to Agr. WPSS 44: 101–17.Google Scholar

Reuland, Eric, and Jan Koster. 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora: An Overview. In Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 1–25. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reuland, Eric, and Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1997. Long Distance ‘Binding’ in Icelandic: Syntax or Discourse? In Bennis, Hans, Pica, Pierre and Rooryck, Johan (eds.): Atomism and Binding, pp. 323–40. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar, pp. 289–330. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2001. Head Movement. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 113–47. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur, see Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.

Rohrbacher, Bernhard. 1999. Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-Drop. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. [A revised version of the author's 1994 dissertation The Germanic VO Languages and the Full Paradigm: A Theory of V to I Raising. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Published as Infinite Syntax by Arlex Publications, Norwood, New Jersey, 1986.]

Safir, Kenneth J. 1985. Syntactic Chains. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sandøy, Helge. 1976. Laust samansette verb i vestnordisk. Ein samanliknande leddstillingsanalyse for islandsk, færøysk og romsdalsmål. MA thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.

Sandøy, Helge. 1986. ‘Han er åt og kjem seg.’ Om ein vestnordisk aspektkonstruksjon. Nordisk institutt, Bergen.Google Scholar

Sandøy, Helge. 1991. Attraksjon av supinum i færøsk og norsk. Danske folkemål 33: 251–62. [Papers from the 4th conference of Scandinavian dialectologists, Askov, Denmark, 12–16 August 1990.]Google Scholar

Santorini, Beatrice. 1988. Variable Rules vs. Variable Grammars in the History of Yiddish. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 29: 63–73.Google Scholar

Santorini, Beatrice.1989. The Generalization of the Verb-Second Constraint in the History of Yiddish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Santorini, Beatrice.1994. Some Similarities and Differences between Icelandic and Yiddish. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 87–106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schütze, Carson. 2003. Syncretism and Double Agreement with Icelandic Nominative Objects. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 295–303. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.

Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of Logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445–81.Google Scholar

Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1989. The Structure of Icelandic Infinitival Clauses and the Status of the Infinitival Marker að. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.

Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.1992. Binding in Icelandic: Evidence from Language Acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður and Hyams, Nina. 1992. Reflexivization and Logophoricity: Evidence from the Acquisition of Icelandic. Language Acquisition 2: 359–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður and Maling, Joan. 2001. Það var hrint mér á leiðinni í skólann: Þolmynd eða ekki þolmynd?Íslenskt mál 23: 123–80.Google Scholar

Sigríður Valfells. 1970. Middle Voice in Icelandic. In Benediktsson, Hreinn (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 551–71. Vísindafélag Íslendinga, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann, see Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.

Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður, see Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.

Smith, Henry. 1994. Dative Sickness in Germanic. NLLT 12: 675–736.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry. 1996. Restrictiveness in Case Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Revised version of the author's 1992 Stanford University dissertation.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–50.Google Scholar

Sprouse, Rex. 1989. On the Syntax of the Double Object Construction in Selected Germanic Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton.

Einarsson, Stefán. 1945. Icelandic: Grammar. Texts. Glossary. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar

Stowell, Tim. 1983. Subjects across Categories. The Linguistic Review 2: 285–312.Google Scholar

Strahan, Tania E. 2003. Long-Distance Reflexives in Norwegian: A Quantitative Study. Lincom Europa, Munich.Google Scholar

Sundquist, John D. 2002. Object Shift and Holmberg's Generalization in the History of Norwegian. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 326–47. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svavarsdóttir, Ásta, see Ásta Svavarsdóttir.

Bergsveinsson, Sveinn. 1969. Die Stellung des Adverbs im Isländischen. Folia linguistica 3: 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svenonius, Peter. 1996a. The Optionality of Particle Shift. WPSS 57: 47–75.Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter.1996b. The Verb-Particle Alternation in the Scandinavian Languages. Ms., University of Tromsø.

Svenonius, Peter.2000. Quantifier Movement in Icelandic. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): The Derivation of VO and OV, pp. 255–92. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svenonius, Peter.2002a. Subject Positions and the Placement of Adverbials. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 202–42. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter. 2002b. Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svenonius, Peter.2002c. Introduction. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 3–27. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter.2003. Swedish Particles and Directional Prepositions. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 343–51. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter (ed.). 2002. Subjects, Expletives and the EPP. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1980. On the Nominative Island Condition, Vacuous Application and the that-trace Filter. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Indiana.

Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1984. Some Phrase Structure Dependent Differences between Swedish and Norwegian. WPSS9.Google Scholar

Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1986. Som and the Binding Theory. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 149–84. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1994. Reflexives, Pronouns and Subject/Verb Agreement in Icelandic and Faroese. WPSS 54: 43–58.Google Scholar

Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1995. On Agreement and Nominative Objects in Icelandic. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 307–27. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan and Andersson, Erik. 1999a. Svenska Akademiens grammatik II. Ord. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan and Andersson, Erik. 1999b. Svenska Akademiens grammatik III. Fraser. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan and Andersson, Erik. 1999c. Svenska Akademiens grammatik IV. Satser och meningar. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir. 2004. Verlaufsformen. Isländisch, Rheinisches Deutsch, Englisch. MA thesis, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.

Hjartardóttir, Thóra Björk. 1993. Getið í eyðurnar: Um eyður fyrir frumlög og andlög í eldri íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland. [The author's 1987 master's thesis.]Google Scholar

Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2001. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2000. Fall á fallanda fæti? Um breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 22: 185–204.Google Scholar

Thórhallur Eythórsson.2002. Changes in Subject Case-Marking in Icelandic. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 196–212. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2003. Oblique Subjects: A Germanic Inheritance!WPSS 71:145–202.Google Scholar

Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2005. Oblique Subjects: A Common Germanic Inheritance. Language 81: 824–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2003. The Case of Subject in Faroese. WPSS 72: 207–31.Google Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur, see Höskuldur Thráinsson.

Torfadóttir, Theódóra Anna, see Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir.

Torp, Arne. 1992. Der sogenannte ‘Garpegenitiv’: Ursprung, Alter und Verbreitung im heutingen Norwegisch. In Elmevik, Lars and Schöndorf, Kurt Erich (eds.): Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien III. Papers from the 3rd Symposium ‘Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien’, Sigtuna August 17–20, 1989, pp. 151–66. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Torp, Arne. 1998. Nordiske språk i nordisk og germansk perspektiv. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Travis, Lisa deMena. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Travis, Lisa deMena. 1988. The Syntax of Adverbs. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 280–310. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar

Trosterud, Trond. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter and the New Mainland Scandinavian Word Order: A Possible Counterexample from a Norwegian Dialect. In Papers from the 11th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics I, pp. 87–100. University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar

Ura, Hiroyuki. 2000. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Vainikka, Anne. 1985. Icelandic Case without Primitive Grammatical Functions. WPSS24.Google Scholar

Valfells, Sigríður, see Sigríður Valfells.

Valin, Robert. 1991. Another Look at Icelandic Case Marking and Grammatical Relations. NLLT 9: 145–94.Google Scholar

Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 1995. Referentiality and Argument Positions in Icelandic. WPSS 55: 89–109.Google Scholar

Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.1999. The Identification of Functional Architecture. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen.

Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2000. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i minimalistisk perspektiv. In Andersen, Øivin, Fløttum, Kjersti and Kinn, Torodd (eds.), Menneske, språk og fellesskap: Festskrift til Kirsti Koch Christensen på 60–årsdagen 1. desember 2000. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 2001. On Noun Phrase Architecture, Referentiality and Article Systems. Studia Linguistica 55: 249–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002a. Icelandic Expletive Constructions and the Distribution of Subject Types. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 43–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002b. A Verb's Gotta Do What a Verb's Gotta Do! On Scandinavian Infinitivals and the AGR Parameter. In Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter and Abraham, Werner (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax: Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 203–17. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2003. ‘Identifikasjon’ og morfologiens rolle i den nordiske nominalfrasen. In Vangsnes, Øystein, Holmberg, Anders and Delsing, Lars-Olof (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 111–94. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar

Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2004. Rolling up the Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Ms., University of Tromsø, Tromsø. [A paper presented at GLOW, Thessaloniki, 2004.]

VangsnesØystein, , Holmberg, Anders and Delsing, Lars-Olof (eds.). 2003. Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten. 1985. Parameters of Binder and Binding Category in Danish. WPSS23.Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten. 1989. Object Shift and Double Objects in Danish. WPSS 44: 141–55.Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten. 1991. Relative der and other Co-elements in Danish. Lingua 84: 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vikner, Sten.1994. Finite Verb Movement in Scandinavian Embedded Clauses. In Lightfoot, David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 117–47. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vikner, Sten. 1995a. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten. 1995b. Vo-to-Io Movement and Inflection for Person in All Tenses. WPSS 55: 1–27. [Also published in Liliane Haegeman (ed.) 1997: The New Comparative Syntax, pp. 189–213. Longman, London.]Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten. 1997. The Interpretation of Object Shift, Optimality Theory and Minimalism. WPSS 60: 1–24.Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten. 1997–1998. Vo-til-Io flytning og personfleksion i alle tempora. Íslenskt mál 19–20: 85–132.Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten.2003. Null Objects under Coordination in Yiddish and Scandinavian. In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 365–75. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten, and Bonnie Schwartz. 1995. The Verb Always Leaves IP in V2 Clauses. In Belletti, Adriana and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.): Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, pp. 11–62. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten, and Sprouse, Rex. 1988. Have/Be Selection as a Chain Membership Requirement. WPSS 38: 1–48.Google Scholar

Vikør, Lars S. 1995. The Nordic Languages: Their Status and Interrelations. 2nd edn. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Vinka, Mikael. 1998. Two Disinct Verb Particle Constructions in Swedish. In Cambier-Langeveld, T., Liptak, A. and Redford, M. (eds.): Proceedings of ConSole VI, pp. 269–281. HIL, Leiden.Google Scholar

Ward, Gregory, and Birner, Betty. 1995. Definiteness and the English Existential. Language 71: 722–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weerman, Fred. 1997. On the Relation between Morphological and Syntactic Case. In Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 427–59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wexler, Kenneth, and Maria Rita Manzini. 1987. Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory. In Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin (eds.): Parameter Setting, pp. 41–76. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whelpton, Matthew. 2006. Resultatives in Icelandic – A Preliminary Investigation. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.

Wide, Camilla. 2002. Perfect in Dialogue. Form and Functional Potential of the vera búinn að + inf. Construction in Contemporary Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.

Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–38.Google Scholar

Willson, Kendra. 2000. Grammaticalization, Borrowing and Verb Post-Second Sentences in Icelandic. In Thórhallsdóttir, Guðrún (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 253–64. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen. 1997. Four Way Case Systems: Ergative, Nominative, Objective and Accusative. NLLT 15: 181–227.Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen.2003. Burzio's Generalization, Markedness and Locality Constraints on Nominative Objects. In Brandner, Ellen and Zinsmeister, Heike (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 301–29. CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yip, Moira, Maling, Joan and Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. Case in Tiers. Language 63: 217–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaenen, Annie. 1980. Extraction Rules in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York, 1985.

Zaenen, Annie. 1983. On Syntactic Binding. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 469–504.Google Scholar

Zaenen, Annie, and Maling, Joan. 1984. Unaccusative, Passive and Quirky Case. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3: 317–29. Stanford University. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 137–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar

Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1985. Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive. NLLT 3: 441–83. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 95–136. Academic Press, San Diego, and in Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) 2006: Lexical Semantics in LFG, pp. 163–207. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.]Google Scholar

Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2001. Sentential Negation. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 511–35. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1989. A-type Binding and Narrative Point of View. Language 65: 695–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M., and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n't. Language 59: 502–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abney, Peter S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Åfarli, Tor A. 1985. Norwegian Verb-Particle Constructions as Causative Constructions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Åfarli, Tor A., and Eide, Kristin M.. 2003. Norsk generativ syntaks. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Linguistics Today 18. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, Robin, Holmes, Philip and Lundskær-Nielsen, Tom. 1995. Danish: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Allen, Cynthia L. 1996. A Change in Structural Case Marking in Early Middle English. In Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel David and Peter, Steve (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax 2, pp. 3–20. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1986. The Typology of Anaphoric Dependencies: Icelandic (and Other) Reflexives. In Hellan, Lars and Christensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 65–88. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R.1990. The Grammar of Icelandic Verbs in -st. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 235–73. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R.2002. Syntax and Morphology are Different: Commentary on Jonas. In Lightfoot, David W. (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 271–5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Avery D. 1971. Case Agreement of Predicate Modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 127–51.Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery D. 1976. The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. NELS 6: 1–21. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 165–85. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery D.1982a. The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic. In Bresnan, Joan (ed.): The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 427–503. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Andrews, Avery D.1982b. Long Distance Agreement in Modern Icelandic. In Jacobson, Pauline and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.): The Nature of Syntactic Representation, pp. 1–33. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Avery D.1990. Case Structures and Control. In Maling, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 187–234. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Angantýsson, Ásgrímur, see Ásgrímur Angantýsson

Anward, Jan. 1974. Swedish Reflexivization. In Papers from the First Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 17–35. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.

Árnason, Kristján, see Kristján Árnason.

Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna, see Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir.

Angantýsson, Ásgrímur. 2001. Skandinavísk orðaröð í íslenskum aukasetningum. Íslenskt mál 23: 95–122.Google Scholar

Svavarsdóttir, Ásta. 1982. Þágufallssýki. Breytingar á fallnotkun í frumlagssæti ópersónulegra setninga. Íslenskt mál 4: 19–62.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 73–137. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna, see Jóhanna Barðdal.

Barnes, Michael P. 1986a. Subject, Nominative and Oblique Case in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 37: 13–46. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P. 1986b. Reflexivisation in Faroese: A Preliminary Survey. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 101: 95–126. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P. 1986–1987. The Faroese Auxiliary Verb munna. Fróðskaparrit 34–35: 42–49. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P. 1987. Some Remarks on Subordinate Clause Word Order in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 38: 3–85. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P.1992. Faroese Syntax – Achievements, Goals and Problems. In Louis-Jensen, Jonna and Poulsen, Jóhan Hendrik W. (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 7, pp. 17–37. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn. [Also in Scripta Islandica 43: 28–43 and in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P. 2001. Faroese Language Studies. Studia Nordica 5. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P.2002. Head + Modifier or Modifier + Head? In Johansen, Anfinnur, Hansen, Zakaris Svabo, Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon and Marnersdóttir, Malan (eds.): Eivindarmál: Heiðursrit til Eivind Weyhe á seksti ára degi hansara 25. April 2002, pp. 59–66. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn.Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P., and Eivind Weyhe. 1994. Faroese. In König, Ekkehard and Auwera, Johan (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 190–89. Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Barss, Andrew, and Lasnik, Howard. 1986. A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 219–51.Google Scholar

Bennis, Hans, Pica, Pierre and Rooryck, Johan (eds.). 1997. Atomism and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Bentzen, Kristine. 2003. V-to-I Movement in the Absence of Morphological Cues: Evidence from Northern Norwegian. In Papers from the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 573–88. Nordlyd 31. University of Tromsø, Tromsø.Google Scholar