Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:48:47.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Theoretical Background

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2020

Claudia R. Binder
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Romano Wyss
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Emanuele Massaro
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Audouin, M., & de Wet, B. (2012). Sustainability thinking in environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(4), 264274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.742695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audouin, M., Burns, M., Weaver, A., et al. (2015). An introduction to sustainability science and its links to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 321348.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Binder, C. R., Feola, G., & Steinberger, J. K. (2010). Considering the normative systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2), 7181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.002.Google Scholar
Binder, C.R, Hutter, M., Pang, M., & Webb, R. (2020). System science and sustainability assessment. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 3064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, A., Morrison-Saunders, A., & Pope, J. (2012). Sustainability assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 5362.Google Scholar
Bond, A., Pope, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2015). Introducing the roots, evolution and effectiveness of sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 319.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In Jarrett, H (ed.), Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 314.Google Scholar
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future: Brundtland Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Christen, M., & Schmidt, S. (2012). A formal framework for conceptions of sustainability: A theoretical contribution to the discourse in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 20(6), 400410. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.518.Google Scholar
Cilliers, P. (2008). Complexity theory as a general framework for sustainability science. In Burns, M & Weaver, A (eds.), Exploring Sustainability Science: A Southern African Perspective. Stellenbosch, South Africa: African Sun Media, pp. 926.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1965). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). The politics of participatory sustainability assessment: an analysis of power. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87122.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). For the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739755.Google Scholar
Gasparatos, A., & Scolobig, A. (2012). Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecological Economics, 80, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.005.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. B. (2016a). Foundations: Sustainability and the requirements for getting there. In Gibson, R. B. (ed.), Sustainability Assessment: Applications and Opportunities. New York: Routledge, pp. 115.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. B. (2016b). Applications: From generic criteria to assessments in particular places and cases. In Gibson, R. B. (ed.), Sustainability Assessment: Applications and Opportunities. New York: Routledge, pp. 1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. B., Hassan, S., Holtz, S., Tansey, J., & Whitelaw, G. (2005). Sustainability Assessment: Criteria and Processes. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (2013). Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grace, W., & Pope, J. (2015). A systems approach to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 285320.Google Scholar
Grober, U. (2007). Deep roots: A conceptual history of ‘sustainable development’ (Nachhaltigkeit) (Discussion Papers / Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 2007-002). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH.Google Scholar
Hashemian, B., Massaro, E., Bojic, I., Arias, J. M., Sobolevsky, S., & Ratti, C. (2017). Socioeconomic characterization of regions through the lens of individual financial transactions. PloS one, 12(11), e0187031.Google Scholar
Hugé, J., Waas, T., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Koedam, N., & Block, T. (2013). A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment: Interpreting sustainable development in practice. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 187198.Google Scholar
International Association for Impact Assessment (2012). Impact Assessment. www.iaia.org/news-details.php?ID=30 (accessed 2.5.18).Google Scholar
Jabbour, J., Keita-Ouane, F., Hunsberger, C., et al. (2012). Internationally agreed environmental goals: A critical evaluation of progress. Environmental Development, 3, 524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2012.05.002.Google Scholar
James, P. (2014). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 233253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kates, R. W. (2011). What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 1944919450. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116097108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lélé, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), 607621. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. London: Earth Island.Google Scholar
Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 6586.Google Scholar
Meirelles, J., Pagani, , A., Athanassiadis, A., & Binder, C.R. (2020). Sustainability issues in urban systems from a metabolic perspective. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 261289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. K. (2012). Environmental impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 514. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.Google Scholar
Mori, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), 94106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001.Google Scholar
Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Gunn, J. A. E., Bond, A., & Retief, F. (2014). Strengthening impact assessment: A call for integration and focus. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872841.Google Scholar
Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60, 498508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023.Google Scholar
Norgaard, R. B. (1994). Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Osorio, L. A. R., Lobato, M. O., & Del Castillo, X. Á. (2009). An epistemology for sustainability science: A proposal for the study of the health/disease phenomenon. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16(1), 4860. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500902760571.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M., McDonald, G., & Hardy, D. (2017). Is there more in common than we think? Convergence of ecological footprinting, energy analysis, life cycle assessment and other methods of environmental accounting. Ecological Modelling, 362, 1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.022.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Phillis, Y. A., Kouikoglou, V. S., & Verdugo, C. (2017). Urban sustainability assessment and ranking of cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 254265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintér, L., Hardi, P., Martinuzzi, A., & Hall, J. (2012). Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecological Indicators, 17, 2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.001.Google Scholar
Pope, J., Bond, A., Hugé, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2017). Reconceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 205215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.002.Google Scholar
Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam Policy and Practice: Climate Change and Resilience, 8(1), 126.Google Scholar
Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987–2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13(4), 212227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., et al. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 19331949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, , et al. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232.Google Scholar
Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.Google Scholar
Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010). Accounting for sustainability: Combining qualitative and quantitative research in developing “indicators” of sustainability. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 4153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570902864145.Google Scholar
Schilling, T., Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2020). A Concept for Sustainability Transition Assessment (STA): A Dynamic Systems Perspective Informed by Resilience Thinking. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123138.Google Scholar
Science for Environment Policy. (2018). Indicators for Sustainable Cities. In-depth Report 12. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol.Google Scholar
Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2016). Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031.Google Scholar
Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 7387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, L. Y., Jorge Ochoa, J., Shah, M. N., & Zhang, X. (2011). The application of urban sustainability indicators: A comparison between various practices. Habitat International, 35(1), 1729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006.Google Scholar
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281299.Google Scholar
Slaper, T., & Hall, T. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86, 48.Google Scholar
Stagl, S. (2012). Value articulating institutions and changing social preferences. In Brousseau, E, Dedeurwaerdere, T, & Siebenhüner, B, eds., Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 225240. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262017244.003.0237.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.Google Scholar
Thabrew, L., Wiek, A., & Ries, R. (2009). Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: Applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(1), 6776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.03.008.Google Scholar
Turcu, C. (2013). Re-thinking sustainability indicators: Local perspectives of urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), 695719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.698984.Google Scholar
UN. (2017). Sustainable Development Goal 11. Make Cities and Human Settlements Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11 (accessed 2.5.18).Google Scholar
Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(9), 55125534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095512.Google Scholar
Waas, T., Hugé, J., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2011). Sustainable development: A bird’s eye view. Sustainability, 3(12), 16371661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101637.Google Scholar
Webb, R., Rissik, D., Petheram, L., Beh, J. L., & Stafford Smith, M. (2018). Co-designing adaptation decision support: Meeting common and differentiated needs. Climatic Change, 2018, 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2165-7.Google Scholar
White, M. A. (2013). Sustainability: I know it when I see it. Ecological Economics, 86, 213217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.020.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.009.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., Ness, B., Schweizer-Ries, P., Brand, F. S., & Farioli, F. (2012). From complex systems analysis to transformational change: A comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustainability Science, 7 (S1), 524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0148-y.Google Scholar

References

Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., et al. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 3039.Google Scholar
Adams, K., Hester, P., Bradley, J., T. J., Meyers, & Keating, C. (2014). Systems theory as the foundation for understanding systems. Systems Engineering, 17(1). DOI:http://10.1002/sys.21255.Google Scholar
Adetunji, I. O., Price, A. D. F., Fleming, P. R., & Kemp, P. (2003). The application of systems thinking to the concept of sustainability. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/19873.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (2002). Metaphysics, Book H: Form and being at work, J. Sachs, Trans., 2nd edition. Santa Fe: Green Lion Press.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. R. (1947). Principles of the self-organizing dynamic system. The Journal of General Psychology, 37(2), 125128. DOI:http://10.1080/00221309.1947.9918144.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Audouin, M., & de Wet, B. (2012). Sustainability thinking in environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(4), 264274. DOI:http://10.1080/14615517.2012.742695.Google Scholar
Aulin‐Ahmavaara, A. (1979). The law of requisite hierarchy. Kybernetes, 8(4), 259266.Google Scholar
Baccini, P., & Bader, H.-P. (1996). Regionaler Stoffhaushalt. Heidelberg7 Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. www.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/tocs/48751952.pdf.Google Scholar
Basile, P. S., Agnew, M., Hölzl, A., et al. (1980). The IIASA set of energy models: Its design and application. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/12459/.Google Scholar
Batty, M. (2009). Cities as complex systems: Scaling, interaction, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies. In Meyers, R. A. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Complexity and Systems Science. New York: Springer, pp. 10411071. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_69.Google Scholar
Beer, S. (1979). The Heart of Enterprise. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1949). General systems theory. Biologia Generalis, 19(1), 114129.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1950). An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134165.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1962). Modern Theories of Development: An Introduction to Theoretical Biology, J. H. Woodger, Trans. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, revised ed. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, L. (2013). The kind of problem a city is (Working Paper 2013–03-008). Santa Fe, USA: Santa Fe Institute. www.santafe.edu/research/results/working-papers/the-kind-of-problem-a-city-is.Google Scholar
Binder, C. R., Baldi, M. G., Gex, B., & Massaro, E. (2020b). The sustainability solution space. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 181208.Google Scholar
Binder, C. R., Mühlemeier, S., & Wyss, R. (2017). An indicator-based approach for analyzing the resilience of transitions for energy regions. Part I: Theoretical and conceptual considerations. Energies, 10(1), 36. DOI:http://10.3390/en10010036.Google Scholar
Blackmore, C., Reynolds, M., Ison, R., & Lane, A. (2015). Embedding sustainability through systems thinking in practice: some experiences from the Open University. In Wyness, L (ed.), Education for Sustainable Development Pedagogy: Criticality, Creativity, and Collaboration. Pedrio Occasional Paper 8, pp. 3235.Google Scholar
Boesch, A., & de Montmollin, A. (2020). Indicators for assessing the sustainability of cities. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 311331.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1928). The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature, 121(3050), 580590.Google Scholar
Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications. A report to the Balaton Group, International Institute for Sustainable Development. www.ulb.ac.be/ceese/STAFF/Tom/bossel.pdf.Google Scholar
Bossel, H. (2003). Assessing viability and sustainability: A systems-based approach for deriving comprehensive indicator sets. Conservation Ecology, 5(2). DOI:http://10.5751/ES-00332-050212.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2(3) 197208. DOI:http://10.1287/mnsc.2.3.197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1966). The Impact of the Social Sciences. Bombay: Vakils, Feffer and Simons Private.Google Scholar
Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Oxford, UK: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bunge, M. (1997). Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27(4), 410465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, M. (2004). How does it work?: The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 182210. DOI:http://10.1177/004839319702700402.Google Scholar
Cannon, W. B. (1929). Organisation for physiological homeostasis. Physiological Reviews, 9(3), 399431. DOI:http://10.1152/physrev.1929.9.3.399.Google Scholar
Checkland, P. B. (1993). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cherns, A. (1976). The principles of sociotechnical design. Human Relations, 29(8), 783792. DOI:http://10.1177/001872677602900806.Google Scholar
Cherns, A. (1987). Principles of sociotechnical design revisited. Human Relations, 40(3), 153161. DOI:http://10.1177/001872678704000303.Google Scholar
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cilliers, P. (2005). Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 255267. DOI:http://10.1177/0263276405058052.Google Scholar
Cilliers, P. (2008). Complexity theory as a general framework for sustainability science. Exploring Sustainable Science: A South African Perspective, 39–57.Google Scholar
Clark, W. C., Jones, D. D., & Holling, C. (1979). Lessons for ecological policy design: a case study of ecosystem management. Ecological Modelling, 7(1), 153.Google Scholar
Costanza, R. (2014). A theory of socio-ecological system change. Journal of Bioeconomics, 16(1), 3944.Google Scholar
Cruz, I., Stahel, A., & Max-Neef, M. (2009). Towards a systemic development approach: Building on the Human-Scale Development paradigm. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 20212030.Google Scholar
d’Alembert, J. le R. (1743). Traité de l’équilibre et du mouvement des fluids. Librarie David, l’aîné: Paris.Google Scholar
Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2(2), 1421.Google Scholar
Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). The politics of participatory sustainability assessments: an analysis of power. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87122.Google Scholar
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Forrester, J. W. (1969). Urban Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Forrester, J. W. (1971). World Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Future Earth. (2014). Future Earth Strategic Research Agenda 2014: Priorities for a global sustainability research agenda. Science Committee and Interim Engagement Committee. www.futureearth.org/sites/default/files/strategic_research_agenda_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Gallopín, G. (2003). A Systems Approach to Sustainability and Sustainable Development. United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2009). The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism. Accounting Forum, 33(3), 245256.Google Scholar
Gorddard, R., Colloff, M. J., Wise, R. M., Ware, D., & Dunlop, M. (2016). Values, rules and knowledge: Adaptation as change in the decision context. Environmental Science & Policy, 57, 6069.Google Scholar
Grace, W., & Pope, J. (2015). A systems approach to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A. (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 285320. DOI:http://10.4337/9781783471379.Google Scholar
Graf, R. (2014). Öl und Souveränität: Petroknowledge und Energiepolitik in den USA und Westeuropa in den 1970er Jahren. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grimm, N. B., Cook, E. M., Hale, R. L., & Iwaniec, D. M. (2015). A Broader Framing of Ecosystem Services in Cities. Routledge Handbooks Online. DOI:10.4324/9781315849256.ch14.Google Scholar
Häfele, W. (1974). Future Energy Resources. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/74/1/RR-74-020.pdf.Google Scholar
Häfele, W. (1976). Second Status Report of the IIASA Project on Energy Systems. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/542/.Google Scholar
Halla, P., & Binder, C.R. (2020). Sustainability Assessment: Introduction and Framework. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 729.Google Scholar
Hammond, D. (2002). Exploring the genealogy of systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(5), 429439. DOI:http://10.1002/sres.499.Google Scholar
Hammond, D. (2003). The Science of Synthesis: Exploring the Social Implications of General Systems Theory. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Helmer, O. (1967). Memorandum M-2027 15 March 1967. Sent to Tom Brown, Herbert Coldhamer, Oleg Hoeffding, Arnold Horelick, Roger Levien, Richard Nelson, Ed Quade, Harry Rowen, Sid Winter, Albert Wholstetter, and Charles Wolf, “Addendum to my previous Memo M-1929, On the East-West Center.” Ford Foundation Archive.Google Scholar
Hester, P. T., & Adams, K. M. (2017). Systemic Decision Making:Fundamentals for Understanding Problems and Messes, 2nd ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, A. (2013). Understanding Systems Science: A Visual and Integrative Approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(5), 580595.Google Scholar
Hitch, C. (1953). Sub-optimization in operations problems. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 1(3), 8799. DOI:http://10.1287/opre.1.3.87.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In Schulze, P., ed., Engineering within Ecological Constraints. Washington DC: National Academies Press, pp. 3143.Google Scholar
Hunt, P. (1975). Funds position: Keystone in financial planning. Harvard Business Review, 53(3), 106115.Google Scholar
IAEA Archives. (1975). Letter from Jan M. Døderlein, Director Safety Dept., Institut for Atomeneri, Kjeller, Norway to Otway. 16.12.1975, IAEA/IIASA Joint Cooperation.Google Scholar
IIASA. (1973). IIASA Annual Report 1973. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
IIASA. (1974). IIASA Annual Report 1974. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
IIASA. (1975). IIASA Annual Report 1975. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
IIASA. (1976). IIASA Annual Report 1976. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
IIASA. (1977). IIASA Annual Report 1977. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
IIASA. (1978). IIASA Annual Report 1978. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
IIASA. (1979). IIASA Annual Report 1979. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
Ison, R. (1999). Applying systems thinking to higher education. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 16(2), 107112. DOI:http://10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199903/04)16:2<07::aid-sres278>3.0.CO;2-E.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119.Google Scholar
Kaplan, M. M. (1976). 26th Pugwash Conference Mühlhausen, Report of the Director-General. In Leo Szilard Papers, California Digital Library. https://library.ucsd.edu/dc/object/bb7578448 h.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. A. (1990). The Sciences of Complexity and “Origins of Order.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Chicago: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 299322.Google Scholar
Kay, J. J., Regier, H. A., Boyle, M., & Francis, G. (1999). An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures, 31(7), 721742.Google Scholar
Keppie, D. M. (2006). Context, emergence, and research design. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34(1), 242246.Google Scholar
Klir, G. J. (1968). An Approach to General Systems Theory. Princeton, NJ: Nostrand.Google Scholar
Korzybski, A. (1994). Science and Sanity: an Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics, 5th edition. Englewood, NJ: Institute of General Semantics.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. H. (1782). Logische und philosophische Abhandlungen, vol. 1. Berlin/Dessau/Leipzig.Google Scholar
Laszlo, E. (1972). Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Towards a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought. New York: Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Laszlo, E. (1975). The Systems View of the World: The Natural Philosophy of the New Developments in the Sciences. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Levai, A. (1977). 27th Pugwash Conference Munich, FRG- – Where lies the real danger of nuclear power? In Leo Szilard Papers, California Digital Library. https://library.ucsd.edu/dc/object/bb0138107 n.Google Scholar
Levien, R. E. (2000). RAND, IIASA, and the conduct of systems analysis. In Hughes, A. C. & Hughes, T. P. (eds.), Systems, Experts, and Computers: The Systems Approach in Management and Engineering, World War II and After. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 10751082.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems (Bednarz, J. trans., Baecker, D. ed.). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Maiteny, P., & Ison, R. (1997).“Learner-Centred Evaluation of Systems, Systems Courses, and Future Needs in Systems Learning. In Stowell, Frank A., Ison, Ray L., Armson, Rosalind, Holloway, Jacky, Jackson, Sue, & McRobb, Steve (eds.), Systems for Sustainability. Boston: Springer, pp. 257262.Google Scholar
Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. 6586).Google Scholar
Max-Neef, M. A., Elizalde, A., & Hopenhayn, M. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. New York: Apex Press.Google Scholar
McCulloch, W. S., Arbib, M. A., Lettvin, J. Y., & Papert, S. A. (1959). Embodiments of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McPhearson, T., Pickett, S. T. A., Grimm, N. B., et al. (2016). Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience, 66(3), 198212.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W.W. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H. (1998). Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development: A Report to the Balaton Group. Hartland Four Corners, VT: The Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Mesarovic, M. D. (1967). General systems theory and its mathematical foundation. In Record of the IEEE Systems Science and Cybernetics Conference, vol. 3. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, pp.122.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 8197. DOI:http://10.1037/h0043158.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
M’Pherson, P. K. (1974). A perspective on systems science and systems philosophy. Futures, 6(3), 219239.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323351. DOI:http://10.1080/00107510500052444.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1977). The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science, 195(4284), 12891293.Google Scholar
Ossimitz, G., & Lapp, C. (2006). Das Metanoia-Prinzip: eine Einführung in systemisches Denken und Handeln. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.Google Scholar
Otway, H. J. (1975). Risk Assessment and Societal Choices (IIASA Research Memorandum). Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/514/.Google Scholar
Otway, H. J., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Public Attitudes and Decision Making. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/761/.Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.-H. (2011). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 3rd edition. Darmstadt: Springer.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1896). Cours d’économie politique. Lausanne: Rouge.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1970). On building social system theory: A personal history. Daedalus, 99(4), 826881. DOI:http://10.2307/20023975.Google Scholar
Pattee, H. H. (1973). Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., McDonnell, M. J., & Zhou, W. (2016). Evolution and future of urban ecological science: Ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2(7), e01229.Google Scholar
Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110122.Google Scholar
Portugali, J., Meyer, H., Stolk, E., & Tan, E. (Eds.). (2012). Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age: An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning and Design. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. www.springer.com/gp/book/9783642245435.Google Scholar
Rindzevičiūtė, E. (2016). The Power of Systems: How Policy Sciences Opened up the Cold War World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ropohl, G. (1999). Philosophy of Socio-Technical Systems. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 4(3), 186194. DOI:http://10.5840/techne19994311.Google Scholar
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 1824.Google Scholar
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314325.Google Scholar
Schilling, T., Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C.R. (2020). A Concept for Sustainability Transition Assessment (STA): A Dynamic Systems Perspective Informed by Resilience Thinking. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123138.Google Scholar
Scholz, R., & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded Case Study Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. DOI:http://10.4135/9781412984027.Google Scholar
Seefried, E. (2015). Zukünfte: Aufstieg und Krise der Zukunftsforschung 1945–1980, vol. 106. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1948a). A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Part 1. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379423.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1948b). A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Part 2. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 623656.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99118. DOI:http://10.2307/1884852.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129138. DOI:http://10.1037/h0042769.Google Scholar
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189212.Google Scholar
Smuts, J. C. (1926). Holism and Evolution. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707719.Google Scholar
Straussfogel, D., & Von Schilling, C. (2009). Systems theory. In Kitchin, R & Thrift., N (eds.), International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography. Oxford: Elsevier, pp.151158.Google Scholar
The Ecological Sequestration Trust. (2013). Review of Current Advanced Integrated Models for City-Regions, Presented at the Technology Strategy Board’s Future Cities Catapult, London, UK. https://ecosequestrust.org/latest/publications/review-of-current-advanced-integrated-models-for-city-regions/.Google Scholar
Ukidwe, N. U., & Bakshi, B. R. (2008). Resource intensities of chemical industry sectors in the United States via input–output network models. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32(9), 20502064.Google Scholar
United Cities and Local Governments. (2015). The Sustainable Development Goals: What Local Governments Need to Know. Barcelona: United Cities and Local Governments.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, USA. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.Google Scholar
Vester, F. (1988). The bio cybernetic approach as a basis for planning our environment. Systems Practice, 1(4), 399413.Google Scholar
Waltner-Toews, D., & Kay, J. (2005). The evolution of an ecosystem approach: The diamond schematic and an adaptive methodology for ecosystem sustainability and health. Ecology and Society, 10(1). DOI:http://10.5751/ES-01214-100138.Google Scholar
Webb, R., Bai, X., Smith, M. S., & Thomson, G. (2018a). Sustainable urban systems: Co-design and framing for transformation. Ambio, 47(1), 5777.Google Scholar
Webb, R., Rissik, D., Petheram, L., Beh, J.-L., & Smith, M. S. (2018b). Co-designing adaptation decision support: meeting common and differentiated needs. Climatic Change, 1–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2165-7.Google Scholar
Wedding, G. C., & Crawford-Brown, D. (2007). Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: A focus on sustainability and green building. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(2), 483495.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589608.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics. Scientific American, 179(5), 1419.Google Scholar
Wilber, K. (2011). The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion. New York: Random House Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2013). Carbon Dioxide, Climate and Society: Proceedings of a IIASA Workshop cosponsored by WMO, UNEP, and SCOPE, February 21–24, 1978. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wise, R. M., Fazey, I., Stafford Smith, M., & Campbell, B. (2014). Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Global Environmental Change, 28, 325336.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wymore, W. (1967). A Mathematical Theory of Systems Engineering: The Elements. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wymore, W. (1993). Model-Based Systems Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (1984). The institutional context of science, models, and policy: The IIASA Energy Study. Policy Sciences, 17(3), 277320.Google Scholar

References

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2005). Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Berlin: Fischer.Google Scholar
Blythe, J., Silver, J., Evans, L., et al. (2018). The dark side of transformation: Latent risks in contemporary sustainability discourse. Antipode, 50(5), 12061223.Google Scholar
Bradbury, H. (2015). The Sage Handbook of Action Research. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Brown, C. S. (1995). Anthropocentrism and ecocentrism: The quest for a new worldview. The Midwest Quarterly, 36(2), 191.Google Scholar
Bryant, R. L. (2015). The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.Google Scholar
Büscher, B. (2012). Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa. Conservation and Society, 10(1), 2941.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (1997). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Churchman, C. W. (1979). The Systems Approach and Its Enemies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation biology, 6(1), 3746.Google Scholar
Daily, G. C., Söderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., et al. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289(5478), 395396.Google Scholar
Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., et al. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 2128.Google Scholar
Davydova, I., & Sharrock, W. (2003). The rise and fall of the fact/value distinction. The Sociological Review, 51(3), 357375.Google Scholar
Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., et al. (2018). Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science, 359 (6373), 270272. DOI:10.1126/science.aap8826.http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6373/270.Google Scholar
EEA. (2015). The European Environment: State and Outlook 2015: Synthesis Report. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
Farrell, K. N. (2011). Snow White and the wicked problems of the west: A look at the lines between empirical description and normative prescription. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 36(3), 334361.Google Scholar
Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998). Society’s metabolism. Journal of industrial ecology, 2(1), 6178.Google Scholar
Fleck, L. (2012). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., & Büscher, B. (2015). NatureT M Inc.: Nature as a neoliberal capitalist imaginary. In Bryant, R. L. (ed.), The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, pp. 359372.Google Scholar
Foster, J. B. (2009). The Ecological Revolution: Making Peace with the Planet. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Frame, B., & Brown, J. (2008). Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 225241.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1990). Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, vol. 15. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25 (7), 739755.Google Scholar
Grunwald, A. (2004). Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: the need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1–2), 150167.Google Scholar
Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Martinez-Alier, J., & Winiwarter, V. (2011). A socio-metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another great transformation. Sustainable Development, 19(1), 114.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns., Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hayward, T. (2007). Human rights versus emissions rights: Climate justice and the equitable distribution of ecological space. Ethics & International Affairs, 21(4), 431450.Google Scholar
Healy, H., Martinez-Alier, J., & Kallis, G. (2015). From ecological modernization to socially sustainable economic degrowth: Lessons from ecological economics. In Bryant, R. L. (ed.), The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, pp. 577590.Google Scholar
Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological economics, 60(1), 119128.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (2003). A Treatise of Human Nature. North Chelmsforth:Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
Imran, S., Alam, K., & Beaumont, N. (2014). Reinterpreting the definition of sustainable development for a more ecocentric reorientation. Sustainable Development, 22 (2), 134144.Google Scholar
IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5 C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Incheon: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In Jasanoff, S (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. (2015). Ethics of science and a new social contract for knowledge. In Meisch, S, Lundershausen, J, Bossert, L, & Rockoff, M (eds.), Ethics of Science in the Research for Sustainable Development. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 153178.Google Scholar
Kallis, G. (2011). In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 873880.Google Scholar
Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Environment, 47(3), 8.Google Scholar
Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2007). Sustainable development: How to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 3(2).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1997). Politiques de la nature: Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Leff, E. (2002). Die Geopolitik nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Ökonomisierung des Klimas, Rationalisierung der Umwelt und die gesellschaftliche Wiederaneignung der Natur. In Görg, C and Brand, U (eds.), Mythen globalen Umweltmanagements: Rio + 10. Munster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot, pp. 92117.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (2013). One Dimensional Man: Studies in Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: Science or fiction? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2(1).Google Scholar
Martinez-Alier, J., & Muradian, R. (2015). Handbook of Ecological Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1968). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Band 1: Der Produktionsprozess des Kapitals. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1983). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Band 3: Der Gesamtprozess der kapitalistischen Produktion. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human scale development: Conception, application and further reflections. New York and London: The Apex Press.Google Scholar
McCool, S. F., & Stankey, G. H. (2004). Environmental management, 33(3), 294305.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (1990). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (2006). The scientific revolution and The Death of Nature. Isis, 97(3), 513533.Google Scholar
Mumby, D. K., & Clair, R. P. (1997). Organizational discourse. In Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction, vol. 2. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 181205.Google Scholar
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M., and Scott, P. B. (2001). Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
OECD. (2012). OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Okereke, C. (2010). Climate justice and the international regime. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 462474.Google Scholar
O’Neill, J. (2008). Happiness and the good life. Environmental Values, 17(2), 125144.Google Scholar
O’Neill, J., and Uebel, T. (2015). Analytical philosophy and ecological economics. In Handbook of Ecological Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 4878.Google Scholar
Pielke, J., and Roger, A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Potthast, T. (2015). Ethics in the sciences beyond Hume, Moore and Weber: Taking epistemic-moral hybrids seriously. In Meisch, S, Lundershausen, J, Bossert, L, and Rockoff, M (eds.), Ethics of Science in the Research for Sustainable Development. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 129152.Google Scholar
Putnam, H., et al. (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rametsteiner, E., Pülzl, H., Alkan-Olsson, J., and Frederiksen, P. (2011). Sustainability indicator development: Science or political negotiation? Ecological Indicators, 11(1), 6170.Google Scholar
Rao, N. D., and Min, J. (2017). Decent living standards: Material prerequisites for human wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 138(1), 225244.Google Scholar
Ravetz, J., and Funtowicz, S. (2015). Post-normal science. In Meisch, S, Lundershausen, J, Bossert, L, and Rockoff, M (eds.), Ethics of Science in the Research for Sustainable Development. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 101112.Google Scholar
Reynaud, J.-D., and Richebé, N. (2009). Rules, conventions and values: A plea in favor of ordinary normativity. Revue Française de Sociologie, 50(5), 335.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369384.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2).Google Scholar
Rutgers, M. R. (2012). A pantheon of public values: A historical and conceptual approach to the normativity of facts and values. A paper presented at The Public Values Consortium Biennial Workshop, Chicago, IL. www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai: uva. nl, volume 376695.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2016). Natur gegen Kapital: Marx’ Ökologie in seiner unvollendeten Kritik des Kapitalismus. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Salleh, A. (2015). Neoliberalism, scientism and earth system governance. In Bryant, R. L. (ed.), The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, pp. 432446.Google Scholar
Schneidewind, U. (2013). Transformative literacy: Gesellschaftliche ver¨anderungsprozesse verstehen und gestalten. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 22(2), 8286.Google Scholar
Schneidewind, U. (2015). Transformative Wissenschaft-Motor fu¨r gute Wissenschaft und lebendige Demokratie. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(2), 8891.Google Scholar
Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 12731285.Google Scholar
Spaargaren, G. (2011). Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 813822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanuro, D. (2012). L’impossible capitalisme vert. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
van der Hel, S. (2018). Science for change: A survey on the normative and political dimensions of global sustainability research. Global Environmental Change, 52: 248258.Google Scholar
Videira, N., Antunes, P., Santos, R., and Lopes, R. (2010). A participatory modelling approach to support integrated sustainability assessment processes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(4), 446460.Google Scholar
Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., et al. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(9), 55125534.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. (1968). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Heidelberg: Mohr.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
WWF. (2016). Living Planet Report 2016. Risk and Resilience in a New Era. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International.Google Scholar
Ziegler, R., and Ott, K. (2011). The quality of sustainability science: A philosophical perspective. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 7(1), 3144.Google Scholar

References

Adelle, C., & Weiland, S. (2015). Sustainability assessment at the policy level. In Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham & Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 103–124.Google Scholar
Allen, A. (1998). Rethinking power. Hypatia, 13(1), 2140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01350.x.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt Brace jovanovich.Google Scholar
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216224.Google Scholar
Avelino, F. (2017). Power in sustainability transitions: Analysing power and (dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(6), 505–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1777.Google Scholar
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947–995.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 2441.Google Scholar
Beierle, T. C. (1999). Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Review of Policy Research, 16(3–4), 75103.Google Scholar
Bell, S., Morse, S., & Shah, R. A. (2012). Understanding stakeholder participation in research as part of sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management, 101, 1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.004.Google Scholar
Berg, M., & Lidskog, R. (2018). Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: A deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1371919.Google Scholar
Binder, C. R., Baldi, M. G., Gex, B., & Massaro, E. (2020b). The sustainability solution space. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. 181208).Google Scholar
Binder, C. R., Feola, G., & Steinberger, J. K. (2010). Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2), 7181.Google Scholar
Blok, A. (2007). Experts on public trial: On democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 163182.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, D., Collins, K., Fry, C., & Munton, R. (1998). Deliberative and inclusionary processes: Their contributions to environmental governance. ESRC DIPs in Environmental Decision-Making, 17.Google Scholar
Brand, U. (2016). “Transformation” as a new critical orthodoxy: The strategic use of the term “transformation” does not prevent multiple crises. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(1), 2327.Google Scholar
Burton, B., & Rowell, A. (2002). British American tobacco’s socially responsible smoke screen. PR Watch, 9(4), 612.Google Scholar
Button, M., & Mattson, K. (1999). Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation. Polity, 31(4), 609637.Google Scholar
Cashmore, M., & Richardson, T. (2013). Power and environmental assessment: Introduction to the special issue. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 39, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.08.002.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP).Google Scholar
Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (2015). Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. Abington and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Claudel, M., Massaro, E., Santi, P., Murray, F., & Ratti, C. (2017). An exploration of collaborative scientific production at MIT through spatial organization and institutional affiliation. PloS one, 12(6), e0179334.Google Scholar
Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003.Google Scholar
Cook, B. R., Kesby, M., Fazey, I., & Spray, C. (2013). The persistence of “normal” catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference. Social Studies of Science, 43(5), 754779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713478670.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A. (2004). Spaces for transformation? Reflections on issues of power and difference in participation in development. In Hickey, S & Mohan, G (eds.), Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation. London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 7591.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A., & Coelho, V. S. (2007). Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas, vol. 4. Zed Books.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201215.Google Scholar
Digeser, P. (1992). The fourth face of power. The Journal of Politics, 54(4), 9771007.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. (1993). Policy analysis and planning: From science to argument. In Fischer, F & Forester, J (eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J., & Pickering, J. (2017). Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance. Ecological Economics, 131, 353360.Google Scholar
Eyben, R., Harris, C., & Pettit, J. (2006). Introduction: exploring power for change. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 110.Google Scholar
Farrell, K. N. (2011). Snow White and the wicked problems of the west: A look at the lines between empirical description and normative prescription. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 36(3), 334361.Google Scholar
Felt, U. (2009). Knowing and living in academic research: Convergences and heterogeneity in research cultures in the European context. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Fiorino, D. J. (1989). Environmental risk and democratic process: A critical review. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 14, 501.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Frame, B., & Brown, J. (2008). Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 225241.Google Scholar
Fritz, L. (2018). (De-)constructing participation in transdisciplinary sustainability research: A critical review of key concepts. In Engelschalt, J, Maibaum, A, Engels, F, & Odenwald, J (eds.), Schafft Wissen–Gemeinsames und geteiltes Wissen in Wissenschaft und Technik (SSOAR). München: SSOAR, pp. 106–124.Google Scholar
Fritz, L., & Binder, C. R. (2018). Participation as relational space: A critical approach to analysing participation in sustainability research. Sustainability, 10(8), 2853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082853.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). The emergence of post-normal science. In Von Schomberg, R (ed.), Science, Politics and Morality. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 85123.Google Scholar
Garmendia, E., & Stagl, S. (2010). Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 17121722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.027.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 2333.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and knowledge. In Reason, P & Bradbury, H (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, Concise Paperback Edition. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, pp. 7281.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2008). Power and knowledge. In Reason, P & Bradbury, H (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, 2nd edition. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, pp. 172189.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Gibson, B., Hassan, S., & Tansey, J. (2013 ). Sustainability Assessment: Criteria and Processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Glass, J. H., Scott, A. J., & Price, M. F. (2013). The power of the process: Co-producing a sustainability assessment toolkit for upland estate management in Scotland. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 254265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.03.024.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. H. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hage, M., Leroy, P., & Petersen, A. C. (2010). Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production. Futures, 42(3), 254264.Google Scholar
Halla, P. & Binder, C. R. (2020). Sustainability Assessment: Introduction and Framework. In Binder, C.R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. 729).Google Scholar
Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2006). Some dare call it power. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C, Lawrence, T. B. & Nord, W. R. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications, pp. 754–775.Google Scholar
Hartz-Karp, J., Pope, J., & Petrova, S. (2015). A deliberative collaborative governance approach to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment, Cheltenham and Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 375402.Google Scholar
Haugaard, M. (2002). Power: A Reader. Manchester Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Haugaard, M. (2003). Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(1), 87113.Google Scholar
Haugaard, M. (2012). Rethinking the four dimensions of power: Domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 3354.Google Scholar
Hayward, C. R. (2000). De-facing Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegger, D., & Dieperink, C. (2015). Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: What is in it for science? Ecology and Society, 20(4). www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss4/art1/.Google Scholar
Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 119128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002.Google Scholar
Holmes, T. (2001). A participatory approach in practice: Understanding fieldworkers’ use of participatory rural appraisal in ActionAid The Gambia. IDS Working Papers, 123.Google Scholar
Holmes, T., & Scoones, I. (2000). Participatory environmental policy processes: Experiences from North and South. IDS Working Paper, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. Brighton.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. (1999). Policy analysis, science and politics: From “speaking truth to power” to “making sense together.” Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 201210. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782482.Google Scholar
Igelsböck, J. (2016). Designing “integration machines.” In Krings, B-J, Rodríguez, H, & Schleisiek, A (eds.), Scientific Knowledge and the Transgression of Boundaries. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp.133160.Google Scholar
Jacobs, M. (1997). Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making institutions. Valuing Nature, 211231.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), 223244.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kallis, G., Hatzilacou, D., Mexa, A., Coccossis, H., & Svoronou, E. (2009). Beyond the manual: Practicing deliberative visioning in a Greek island. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 979989.Google Scholar
Kallis, G., Videira, N., Antunes, P., et al. (2006). Participatory methods for water resources planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(2), 215234.Google Scholar
Kasemir, B. (2003). Public Participation in Sustainability Science: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641642.Google Scholar
Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2007). Sustainable development: How to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 3(2), 514.Google Scholar
Klenk, N., & Meehan, K. (2015). Climate change and transdisciplinary science: Problematizing the integration imperative. Environmental Science & Policy, 54(Supplement C), 160167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.017.Google Scholar
Klenk, N., Reed, M. G., Lidestav, G., & Carlsson, J. (2013). Models of representation and participation in model forests: Dilemmas and implications for networked forms of environmental governance involving indigenous people. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(3), 161176.Google Scholar
Kothari, U., & Cooke, B. (Eds.) (2001). Participatory development: Power, knowledge and social control. In Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books, pp. 139152.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, M., & Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2013). Participatory knowledge production and power. In Phillips, L, Kristiansen, M, Vehviläinen, M, & Gunnarsson, E (eds.), Knowledge and Power in Collaborative Research: A Reflexive Approach. Taylor & Francis, pp. 193212.Google Scholar
Kropp, C. (2013). Demokratische Planung der Klimaanpassung? Über die Fallstricke partizipativer Verfahren im expertokratischen Staat. In Knierim, A, Baasch, S, & Gottschick, M (eds.), Partizipation und Klimawandel–Ansprüche, Konzepte und Umsetzung München: Oekonom, pp. 5574.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. P. (2013). Impact Assessment: Practical Solutions to Recurrent Problems and Contemporary Challenges. Wiley Online Library. DOI 10.1002/9781118678381.Google Scholar
Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change, 31(5), 931959.Google Scholar
Lövbrand, E., & Stripple, J. (2013). Bringing governmentality to the study of global climate governance. In Stripple, J & Bulkeley, H (eds.), Governing the Climate: New Approaches to Rationality, Power and Politics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 2741.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26(3), 277286.Google Scholar
McCool, S. F., & Stankey, G. H. (2004). Indicators of sustainability: Challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental Management, 33(3), 294305.Google Scholar
McCullum, C., Pelletier, D., Barr, D., Wilkins, J., & Habicht, J.-P. (2004). Mechanisms of power within a community-based food security planning process. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 206222.Google Scholar
Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. 6586).Google Scholar
Merino-Saum, A. (2020). Assessing sustainability through participatory multi-criteria approaches (PMCAs): An updated comparative analysis. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. XX).Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mielke, J., Vermassen, H., Ellenbeck, S., Milan, B. F., & Jaeger, C. (2016). Stakeholder involvement in sustainability science: A critical view. Energy Research & Social Science, 17, 7181.Google Scholar
Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Bond, A., & Retief, F. (2014). Towards sustainability assessment follow-up. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45, 3845.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Munda, G. (2006). Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy, 23(1), 8694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.012.Google Scholar
Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008). A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(3), 325344.Google Scholar
O’Brien, F., & Meadows, M. (2001). How to develop visions: A literature review, and a revised CHOICES approach for an uncertain world. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14(4), 495515.Google Scholar
Partzsch, L. (2015). Kein Wandel ohne Macht: Nachhaltigkeitsforschung braucht ein mehrdimensionales Machtverständnis. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(1), 4856.Google Scholar
Pellizzoni, L. (2003). Uncertainty and participatory democracy. Environmental Values, 12(2), 195224. https://doi.org/0.3197/096327103129341298.Google Scholar
Pellow, D. N. (1999). Negotiation and confrontation: Environmental policymaking through consensus. Society & Natural Resources, 12(3), 189203.Google Scholar
Polatidis, H., Haralambopoulos, D. A., Munda, G., & Vreeker, R. (2006). Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources, Part B, 1(2), 181193.Google Scholar
Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 4556.Google Scholar
Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raik, D. B., Wilson, A. L., & Decker, D. J. (2008). Power in natural resources management: An application of theory. Society and Natural Resources, 21(8), 729739.Google Scholar
Rametsteiner, E., Pülzl, H., Alkan-Olsson, J., & Frederiksen, P. (2011). Sustainability indicator development: Science or political negotiation? Ecological Indicators, 11(1), 6170.Google Scholar
Rauschmayer, F., van den Hove, S., & Koetz, T. (2009). Participation in EU biodiversity governance: How far beyond rhetoric? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(1), 4258.Google Scholar
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., et al. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 19331949.Google Scholar
Renn, O., & Schweizer, P.-J. (2009). Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 174185. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.507.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369384.Google Scholar
Rosendahl, J., Zanella, M. A., Rist, S., & Weigelt, J. (2015). Scientists’ situated knowledge: Strong objectivity in transdisciplinarity. Futures, 65, 1727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.011.Google Scholar
Rubio, F. D., & Baert, P. (2012). The politics of knowledge: An introduction. In Rubio, F.D. & Baert, P (eds.), The Politics of Knowledge. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 110.Google Scholar
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.Google Scholar
Sanderson, I. (1999). Participation and democratic renewal: from ‘instrumental’ to ‘communicative rationality’? Policy & Politics, 27(3), 325341.Google Scholar
Santos, R., Antunes, P., Baptista, G., Mateus, P., & Madruga, L. (2006). Stakeholder participation in the design of environmental policy mixes. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 100110.Google Scholar
Schikowitz, A. (2016). Choreographies of togetherness: Re-ordering collectivity and individuality in transdisciplinary sustainability research in Austria (Doctoral thesis). Wien.Google Scholar
Schilling, T., Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C.R. (2020). A Concept for Sustainability Transition Assessment (STA): A Dynamic Systems Perspective Informed by Resilience Thinking. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123138.Google Scholar
Schneider, F. (2020). A mixed-method, dialogue based approach to sustainability assessments: Fostering learning towards sustainable development. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 141160.Google Scholar
Schneider, F., Bonriposi, M., Graefe, O., et al. (2015). Assessing the sustainability of water governance systems: The sustainability wheel. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(9), 15771600.Google Scholar
Schneider, F., & Buser, T. (2018). Promising degrees of stakeholder interaction in research for sustainable development. Sustainability Science, 13(1), 129142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0507-4.Google Scholar
Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 7387.Google Scholar
Siew, T. F., Aenis, T., Spangenberg, J. H., et al. (2016). Transdisciplinary research in support of land and water management in China and Southeast Asia: Evaluation of four research projects. Sustainability Science, 813829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0378-0.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. J., Diduck, A. P., Vespa, M., Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., & Bond, A. (2015). Public participation in sustainability assessment: Essential elements, practical challenges and emerging directions. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Camberley: Edward Elgar, pp. 349375.Google Scholar
Spash, C. L. (2007). Deliberative Monetary Valuation (DMV) in Theory. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Spash, C. L., & Vatn, A. (2006). Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics, 60(2), 379388.Google Scholar
Stauffacher, M., Flüeler, T., Krütli, P., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: A transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss prealpine region. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21(6), 409422.Google Scholar
Stave, K. A. (2002). Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. System Dynamics Review, 18(2), 139167.Google Scholar
Stirling, A. (2008). “Opening up” and “closing down” power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(2), 262294.Google Scholar
Stirling, A., & Mayer, S. (1999). Rethinking Risk: A Pilot Multicriteria Mapping of a Genetically Modified Crop in Agricultural Systems in the UK. Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Thomas, H. (1998). Collaborative action in local plan-making: Planners’ perceptions of “planning through debate.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(1), 127144.Google Scholar
Turnhout, E. (2009). The effectiveness of boundary objects: The case of ecological indicators. Science and Public Policy, 36(5), 403412.Google Scholar
van Asselt Marjolein, B. A., & Rijkens-Klomp, N. (2002). A look in the mirror: Reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change, 12(3), 167184.Google Scholar
van den Hove, S. (2006). Between consensus and compromise: Acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches. Land Use Policy, 23(1), 1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.001.Google Scholar
Vatn, A. (2005). Rationality, institutions and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 55(2), 203217.Google Scholar
Vennix, J. A. (1996). Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. Chichester and New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Videira, N., Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Lobo, G. (2006). Public and stakeholder participation in European water policy: A critical review of project evaluation processes. Environmental Policy and Governance, 16(1), 1931.Google Scholar
Videira, N., Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Lopes, R. (2010). A participatory modelling approach to support integrated sustainability assessment processes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(4), 446460.Google Scholar
Videira, N., Lopes, R., Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Casanova, J. L. (2012). Mapping maritime sustainability issues with stakeholder groups. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(6), 596619.Google Scholar
Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(9), 55125534.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. 5. rev. edition. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, L., Swartling, A. G., & Jäger, J. (2009). Participation of experts and non-experts in a sustainability assessment of mobility. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(4), 232250.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589608.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (2007). Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political–conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 99110.Google Scholar
Wynne, B., & Felt, U. (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously: Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Zurek, M. B., & Henrichs, T. (2007). Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 12821295.Google Scholar

References

Aalbers, C. B. E. M., & Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling: How citizens’ initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 261275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005.Google Scholar
Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B., & Jhagroe, S. (2016). The politics of sustainability transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 557567. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782.Google Scholar
Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016). Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 628649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259.Google Scholar
Binder, C. R, Hutter, M., Pang, M., & Webb, R. (2020a). “System science and sustainability assessment. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 3064.Google Scholar
Binder, C. R., Mühlemeier, S., & Wyss, R. (2017). An indicator-based approach for analyzing the resilience of transitions for energy regions. Part I: Theoretical and conceptual considerations. Energies, 10(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010036.Google Scholar
CASS, P. (1997). Research on sustainability and global change: Visions in science policy by Swiss researchers. ProClim: Forum for Climate and Global Change and Swiss Academy of Sciences, Bern.Google Scholar
Cowell, M. M. (2013). Bounce back or move on: Regional resilience and economic development planning. Cities, 30, 212222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.001.Google Scholar
Cretney, R., & Bond, S. (2014). “Bouncing back” to capitalism? Grass-roots autonomous activism in shaping discourses of resilience and transformation following disaster. Resilience, 2(1), 1831. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.872449.Google Scholar
Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L. (2012). Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 991998.Google Scholar
Folke, C. (2016). Resilience (Republished). Ecology and Society, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09088-210444.Google Scholar
Foxon, T. J. (2002). Technological and institutional ‘lock-in’ as a barrier to sustainable innovation. Imperial College Centre for Policy and Technology Working Paper.Google Scholar
Foxon, T. J. (2011). A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 22582267.Google Scholar
Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). The politics of participatory sustainability assessments: An analysis of power. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87122.Google Scholar
Gallopín, G. (2003). A Systems Approach to Sustainability and Sustainable Development. United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., Tyfield, D., & Urry, J. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 2140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. (2016). Sustainability Assessment: Applications and Opportunities. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. B. (2006). Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3), 170182.Google Scholar
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936957.Google Scholar
Halla, P., & Binder, C.R. (2020). Sustainability Assessment: Introduction and Framework. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 729.Google Scholar
Hashemian, B., Massaro, E., Bojic, I., Arias, J. M., Sobolevsky, S., & Ratti, C. (2017). Socioeconomic characterization of regions through the lens of individual financial transactions. PloS one, 12(11), e0187031.Google Scholar
Hassink, R. (2005). How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies, 13(4), 521535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500107134.Google Scholar
Hester, P. T., & Adams, K. M. (2017). Systemic Decision Making: Fundamentals for Understanding Problems and Messes (2nd ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Hugé, J., Waas, T., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Koedam, N., & Block, T. (2013). A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment:interpreting sustainable development in practice. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 187198.Google Scholar
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., et al. (2001). Sustainability Science. Science, 292(5517), 641642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386.Google Scholar
Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(1), 7891. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469709.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D. (2014). To transition! Governance panarchy in the new transformation. https://drift.eur.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/To_Transition-Loorbach-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42(3), 237246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009.Google Scholar
Luederitz, C., Abson, D. J., Audet, R., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Many pathways toward sustainability: Not conflict but co-learning between transition narratives. Sustainability Science, 12(3), 393407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0414-0.Google Scholar
Luthe, T., & Wyss, R. (2015). Introducing adaptive waves as a concept to inform mental models of resilience. Sustainability Science, 10(4), 673685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0316-6.Google Scholar
Luthe, T., & Wyss, R. (2016). Resilience to climate change in a cross-scale tourism governance context: a combined quantitative-qualitative network analysis. Ecology and Society, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08234-210127.Google Scholar
Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change: Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003.Google Scholar
Massaro, E., Ganin, A., Perra, N., Linkov, I., & Vespignani, A. (2018). Resilience management during large-scale epidemic outbreaks. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1859.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 7075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003.Google Scholar
Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems.Cambridge University Press, pp. 6586.Google Scholar
Mühlemeier, S., Binder, C. R., & Wyss, R. (2017). ‘It’s an endurance race’: An indicator-based resilience analysis of the energy transition in the Allgäu Region, Bavaria. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(S1), 199206.Google Scholar
Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2018). Ein indikatorengestützter Ansatz zur Resilienzanalyse von Energiesystemen in Transition. In Karidi, M, Schneider, M, & Gutwald, R, Resilienz. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 293326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19222-8_15.Google Scholar
Nair, S., & Howlett, M. (2016). From robustness to resilience: Avoiding policy traps in the long term. Sustainability Science, 11(6), 909917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0387-z.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (2005, November 12). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton and New York: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203023846-11.Google Scholar
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.Google Scholar
Pintér, L., Hardi, P., Martinuzzi, A., & Hall, J. (2012). Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecological Indicators, 17, 2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.001.Google Scholar
Pope, J., Bond, A., Hugé, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2017). Reconceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62(Supplement C), 205215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.002.Google Scholar
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.Google Scholar
Schilling, T., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2018). The resilience of sustainability transitions. Sustainability, 10(12), 4593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124593.Google Scholar
Sinclair, K., Rawluk, A., Kumar, S., & Curtis, A. (2017). Ways forward for resilience thinking: Lessons from the field for those exploring social-ecological systems in agriculture and natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09705-220421.Google Scholar
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011.Google Scholar
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2). www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/inline.html.Google Scholar
Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., et al. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 40(7), 762780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.009.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., Binder, C., & Scholz, R. W. (2006). Functions of scenarios in transition processes. Futures, 38(7), 740766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.003.Google Scholar
Wiese, F. (2016). Resilience thinking as an interdisciplinary guiding principle for energy system transitions. Resources, 5(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources5040030.Google Scholar
Wyss, R., Mühlemeier, S., & Binder, C. R. (2018). An indicator-based approach for analysing the resilience of transitions for energy regions. Part II: Empirical application to the case of Weiz-Gleisdorf, Austria. Energies, 11(9), 2263. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092263.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×