Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- Note on transliteration, translations, and dates
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Public order and its malcontents
- 1 Victims of their own will
- 2 Virtue and vice in an age of Enlightenment
- 3 The regulation of suicide
- 4 Punishing the body, cleansing the conscience
- 5 Policing and paternalism
- 6 Arbiters of the self: the suicide note
- Part II Disease of the century
- Part III Political theology and moral epidemics
- Epilogue
- Selected bibliography
- Index
5 - Policing and paternalism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- Note on transliteration, translations, and dates
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Public order and its malcontents
- 1 Victims of their own will
- 2 Virtue and vice in an age of Enlightenment
- 3 The regulation of suicide
- 4 Punishing the body, cleansing the conscience
- 5 Policing and paternalism
- 6 Arbiters of the self: the suicide note
- Part II Disease of the century
- Part III Political theology and moral epidemics
- Epilogue
- Selected bibliography
- Index
Summary
In the records of occurrences in Tambov Province, it was incidentally stated that the landowner of Kirsanov district Zaitsov – while drunk – cruelly punished his serf Savel'ev […] due to which the named peasant hanged himself. Next to this report, located in the extracts of May 9, 1831, His Highness deigned to write: “Find out what is happening with the landowner.”
From the file of the Third Section of His Majesty's Own Chancellery entitled “On the landowner Zaitsov, who cruelly punished his peasant”The principle of personal governance had long stood at the heart of Russia's political system, and it was especially important during the reign of Nicholas I. Jealously preserving his role as autocrat, he regarded law as an instrument of rule, preferred administrative solutions, and often bypassed established institutions of state, particularly in his use of informal committees. Recognizing the rampant corruption in the bureaucracy, he sought to combat abuses through acts of intervention, police surveillance, and the appointment of upstanding servitors. He consequently strengthened the supervisory powers of governors, who formed an extension of his personal authority in the provinces, and established His Majesty's Own Chancellery, which soon became a powerful new administrative apparatus. At the heart of Nicholas's system was the Third Section of his chancellery, the secret police or gendarmerie. Though chiefly concerned with sedition, the Third Section possessed a wide sphere of competence, including matters relating to sectarianism, foreigners, counterfeiting, statistical information pertinent to policing, and “reports about all occurrences without exception.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Suicide and the Body Politic in Imperial Russia , pp. 128 - 148Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007