Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- Note on transliteration, translations, and dates
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Public order and its malcontents
- Part II Disease of the century
- Part III Political theology and moral epidemics
- Epilogue
- Selected bibliography
- Index
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- Note on transliteration, translations, and dates
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Public order and its malcontents
- Part II Disease of the century
- Part III Political theology and moral epidemics
- Epilogue
- Selected bibliography
- Index
Summary
[T]he general is not thought about with passion but with a comfortable superficiality. The exception, on the other hand, thinks the general with intense passion.
Søren Kierkegaard, Repetition, 1843Sovereign is he who decides on the exception.
Carl Schmitt, Political Theology, 1922[T]he “state of exception” in which we live is not the exception but the rule.
Walter Benjamin, Theses on the Philosophy of History, 1940Suicide is an exception. Only a small minority of people actively seek death. This fact renders suicide unusual and particular. Yet its particularity rests not on the numbers of such deaths. Throughout European history, self-killing has also been regarded as a special – and usually a terrible – way to die. It has formed not just a deviation from normalcy but also an assault upon it. Modern Western societies now tend to see suicide as the consequence of a mental illness or depression that has undermined the “natural instinct” to preserve life. While many suicides may indeed be related to illness, this approach renders the decision to die intrinsically pathological, even trivial, because it disputes the potential of ethical choice and reflexivity. Another feature of recent times, in contrast, is the contentious debate about the “right to die,” a right that is typically circumscribed to those instances when disease or incapacity has already destroyed the “quality” of life. This exception (to the exception) confirms the tautological norm prevalent today: healthy people would not choose to take their own lives, unless they were not healthy.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Suicide and the Body Politic in Imperial Russia , pp. 1 - 16Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007