Book contents
- Stylistic Virtue and Victorian Fiction
- Cambridge Studies In Nineteenth-Century Literature And Culture
- Stylistic Virtue and Victorian Fiction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction What Is Stylistic Virtue?
- Chapter 1 Stylistic Virtue and the Rise of Literary Formalism
- Chapter 2 Stylistic Virtue between Moralism and Aestheticism
- Chapter 3 Virtue Theory and the Nature of the Aesthetic
- Chapter 4 Thackeray’s Grace
- Chapter 5 Trollope’s Ease and Lucidity
- Chapter 6 Meredith’s Fervidness
- Afterword Stylistic Virtue and Literary Value
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies In Nineteenth-Century Literature And Culture
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2021
Book contents
- Stylistic Virtue and Victorian Fiction
- Cambridge Studies In Nineteenth-Century Literature And Culture
- Stylistic Virtue and Victorian Fiction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction What Is Stylistic Virtue?
- Chapter 1 Stylistic Virtue and the Rise of Literary Formalism
- Chapter 2 Stylistic Virtue between Moralism and Aestheticism
- Chapter 3 Virtue Theory and the Nature of the Aesthetic
- Chapter 4 Thackeray’s Grace
- Chapter 5 Trollope’s Ease and Lucidity
- Chapter 6 Meredith’s Fervidness
- Afterword Stylistic Virtue and Literary Value
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies In Nineteenth-Century Literature And Culture
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Stylistic Virtue and Victorian FictionForm, Ethics, and the Novel, pp. 226 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Able, August Henry, III. George Meredith and Thomas Love Peacock: A Study in Literary Influence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1933.Google Scholar
Adams, James Eli. Dandies and Desert Saints. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolph, Robert. “On the Possibility of a History of Prose Style.” Style 15.4 (Fall 1981): 435–50.Google Scholar
Adolph, Robert “aesthetic, n. and adj.” OED Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, July 2018. www.oed.com/view/Entry/3237.Google Scholar
Agnew, Lois Peters. Thomas De Quincey: British Rhetoric’s Romantic Turn. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Aitken, David. “‘A Kind of Felicity’: Some Notes about Trollope’s Style.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 20.4 (Mar. 1966): 337–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alison, Archibald. Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste. 2nd ed. Hartford: George Goodwin, 1821.Google Scholar
Allen, Brooke. “Sadness Balancing Wit: Thackeray’s Life and Works.” The New Criterion (Jan. 2001): 19–28.Google Scholar
Allison, Sarah. Reductive Reading: A Syntax of Victorian Moralizing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altinel, A. Savkar. Thackeray and the Problem of Realism. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1986.Google Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. Bleak Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Amanda . The Powers of Distance: Cosmopolitanism and the Cultivation of Detachment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Amanda . The Way We Argue Now: A Study in the Cultures of Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Anderson, James C. and Dean, Jeffrey T.. “Moderate Autonomism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38.2 (Apr. 1998): 150–66.Google Scholar
Anderson, Warren D. Matthew Arnold and the Classical Tradition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Anisman, Martin J. Introduction to The Luck of Barry Lyndon: A Critical Edition, ed. Anisman, Martin J.. New York: NYU Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Archer, William. “Robert Louis Stevenson: His Style and His Thought.” Time 13.11 (Nov. 1885): 581–91.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Art of Rhetoric. Trans. J.H. Freese. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Aristotle . Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. H. Rackman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Aristotle . Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. David Ross. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Aristotle . Poetics. Trans. Stephen Halliwell. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy. Ed. Garnett, Jane. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew . “The Function of Criticism at the Present Time.” In The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, ed. Super, R.H., vol. 3, 258–90. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew . “Marcus Aurelius.” In The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, ed. Super, R.H., vol. 3, 133–57. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew . “Preface to First Edition of Poems (1853).” In The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, ed. Super, R.H., vol. 1, 1–15. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew . “The Study of Poetry.” In The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, ed. Super, R.H., vol. 11, 161–88. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M.M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Bain, Alexander. English Composition and Rhetoric. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1871. Reprint, Delmar, NY: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints, 1996.Google Scholar
Bainton, George, ed. The Art of Authorship: Literary Reminiscences, Methods of Work, and Advice to Young Beginners. New York: Appleton, 1891.Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris. The Social Mission of English Criticism: 1848–1932. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence. “The Formation of Character: Mill’s ‘Ethology’ Reconsidered.” Polity 33.1 (Fall 2000): 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bator, Paul G. “The Formation of the Regius Chair of Rhetoric and Belles Lettres at the University of Edinburgh.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 75.1 (1989): 40–64.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Meredith: A Change of Masks: A Study of the Novels. London: Athlone Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Bender, John and Wellbery, David E.. “Rhetoricality: On the Modernist Return of Rhetoric.” In The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice, ed. Bender, John and Wellbery, David E., 3–39. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Berlin, James A. Writing Instruction in Nineteenth-Century American Colleges. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Best, Stephen and Sharon, Marcus. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations 108.1 (Fall 2009): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevilacqua, Vincent M. “Adam Smith’s Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres.” Studies in Scottish Literature 3.1 (1965): 41–60.Google Scholar
Bevilacqua, Vincent M. . “Adam Smith and Some Philosophical Origins of Eighteenth-Century Rhetorical Theory.” Modern Language Review 63.3 (July 1968): 559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevis, Matthew. The Art of Eloquence: Byron, Dickens, Tennyson, Joyce. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Blair, Hugh. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. 2 vols. London: Strachan, Cadell, and Creech, 1783.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. Introduction to Walter Pater: Modern Critical Views, ed. Bloom, Harold, 1–21. New York: Chelsea, 1985.Google Scholar
Blythe, Helen Lucy. “Forms of Storytelling, Repetition, and Voice in Anthony Trollope’s Kept in the Dark.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Anthony Trollope, ed. Deborah, Denenholz Morse, Margaret, Markwick, and Turner, Mark W., 177–89. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Bogel, Frederic V. New Formalist Criticism: Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Bradford A. “Trollope on the Novel.” In Essays Critical and Historical, 219–31. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. . The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard . “Science and Philosophy” and Other Essays. London: Allen and Unwin, 1927.Google Scholar
Brace, Gerald Warner. “The World of Anthony Trollope.” In The Trollope Critics, ed. John Hall, N., 99–109. London: Macmillan, 1981.Google Scholar
Bradley, James. “Hegel in Britain: A Brief History of British Commentary and Attitudes (1).” Heythrop Journal 20.1 (1979): 1–24.Google Scholar
Brink, David O. Editor’s Introduction to Prolegomena to Ethics, by T.H. Green, ed. Brink, David O., xiii-cx. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brinton, Alan. “Quintilian, Plato, and the Vir Bonus.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 16.3 (1983): 167–84.Google Scholar
Brown, Julia Prewitt. Cosmopolitan Criticism: Oscar Wilde’s Philosophy of Art. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1997.Google Scholar
Buffon, Georges-Louis Leclerc. “Discourse on Style.” In Theories of Style in Literature, ed. Cooper, Lane, 162–79. New York: Macmillan, 1923.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia “Buffon: His Life and Writings.” The British Quarterly Review 13.25 (Feb. 1851): 125–59.Google Scholar
Burke, Michael. “Stylistics: From Classical Rhetoric to Cognitive Neuroscience.” In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. Burke, Michael, 1–7. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Busse, Beatrix. “(New) Historical Stylistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. Burke, Michael, 101–17. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Cabot, Frederick C. “The Two Voices in Thackeray’s Catherine.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 28.4. (1974): 404–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camlot, Jason. Style and the Nineteenth-Century British Critic: Sincere Mannerisms. Burlington: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Campbell, George. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New edition, with the author’s last additions and corrections. 1808. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1841. Reprint, Delmar, NY: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints, 1992.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. Sartor Resartus. Ed. Kerry, McSweeney and Peter, Sabor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. “Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research.” Ethics 110.2 (Jan. 2000): 350–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël . “Moderate Moralism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 36.3 (July 1996): 223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël . “Moderate Moralism versus Moderate Autonomism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38.4 (Oct. 1998): 419–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“catachresis.” In The Oxford Companion to English Literature, ed. Birch, Dinah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780192806871.001.0001/acref-9780192806871-e-1387.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng and Robbins, Bruce, eds. Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Colby, Robert A. “Thackeray’s Credo.” The Review of English Studies, New Series 15.60 (Nov. 1964): 381–96.Google Scholar
Cecil, Lord David. Early Victorian Novelists: Essays in Revaluation. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1935.Google Scholar
Cecil, H.M. “George Meredith.” The Free Review: A Monthly Magazine (1 Aug. 1894): 398–418.Google Scholar
“Christmas Games: Snapdragon.” In The Book of Days: A Miscellany of Popular Antiquities, ed. Chambers, Robert, 738–39. London and Edinburgh: W. and R. Chambers, 1864.Google Scholar
Clark, John W. The Language and Style of Anthony Trollope. London: Andre Deutsch, 1975.Google Scholar
Cluett, Robert. Prose Style and Critical Reading. New York: Teachers College Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Connolly, Joy. “Virile Tongues: Rhetoric and Masculinity.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, ed. Dominik, William and Hall, John, 83–97. London: Blackwell, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, Oliver. “Ethicism and Moderate Moralism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 40.3 (July 2000): 302–16.Google Scholar
Connors, Robert. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cope, Edward Meredith. An Introduction to Aristotle’s Rhetoric, with Analysis Notes and Appendices. London and Cambridge: Macmillan and Co., 1867. Reprint, Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar
Costelloe, Timothy M. The British Aesthetic Tradition: From Shaftesbury to Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Court, Franklin E. Institutionalizing English Literature. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Craig, David. John Ruskin and the Ethics of Consumption. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2006.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. The Cosmos of Duty: Henry Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croll, Morris. Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm. Ed. Max Patrick, J. and Evans, Robert O.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Mark. “Henry Gowan, William Makepeace Thackeray, and ‘The Dignity of Literature’ Controversy.” Dickens Quarterly 16.2 (June 1999): 104–15.Google Scholar
Crowley, Sharon. The Methodical Memory: Invention in Current Traditional Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Dale, Leigh. “T.H. Green and the Modern Novel: English at Oxford.” Modern Language Quarterly 75.2 (June 2014): 239–57.Google Scholar
Daley, Kenneth. “From the Theoretic to the Practical: Ruskin, British Aestheticism, and the Relation of Art to Use.” Prose Studies 20.2 (1997): 90–107.Google Scholar
Dames, Nicholas. The Physiology of the Novel: Reading, Neural Science, and the Form of Victorian Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Hugh Sykes. “Trollope and His Style.” A Review of English Literature 1.4 (Oct. 1960): 73–85.Google Scholar
Davies, Stephen. “Authors’ Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value.” British Journal of Aesthetics 46.3 (July 2006): 223–47.Google Scholar
Davies, Stephen . Musical Meaning and Expression. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Day, Henry Noble. Elements of the Art of Rhetoric: Adapted for Use in Colleges and Academies, and for Private Study. 3rd ed. New York: A.S. Barnes and Co., 1853.Google Scholar
Day, Henry Noble . The Science of Aesthetics; or, The Nature, Kinds, Laws, and Uses of Beauty. New Haven: C.C. Chatfield and Co., 1872.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul. “The Epistemology of Metaphor.” Critical Inquiry 5.1 (Autumn 1978): 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetrius. Demetrius on Style. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1902.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. Essays on Style, Rhetoric, and Language. Ed. Scott, Fred. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1893.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas . “On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts.” Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine 21.122 (Feb. 1827): 199–213.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. “Review of A History of Aesthetic.” The Philosophical Review 2.1 (Jan. 1893): 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, Linda. Hellenism and Homosexuality in Victorian Oxford. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Downs, Jack M. “David Masson, Belles Lettres, and a Victorian Theory of the Novel.” Victorian Literature and Culture 43.1 (Mar. 2015): 1–21.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry . “The Ideology of the Aesthetic.” Poetics Today 9.2 (1988): 327–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, John. English Prose: Its Elements, History, and Usage. London: Smith, Elder, and Co., 1890.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, Rodney Stenning. “Eighteenth-Century Allusions in Henry Esmond.” Style 51.1 (2017): 17–24.Google Scholar
Ehninger, Douglas. “Dominant Trends in English Rhetorical Thought, 1750–1800.” Southern Journal of Communication 18.1 (1952–53): 3–12.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. The Mill on the Floss. Ed. Byatt, A.S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Eliot, George . The Writings of George Eliot. Vol. 22. Boston: Houghton and Mifflin, 1908.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. “Arnold and Pater.” The Bookman: A Review of Books and Life 72.1 (1930): 1–7.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. . “Religion and Literature.” In Selected Prose, ed. Hayward, John, 31–42. London: Penguin, 1953.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. . “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” In The Selected Prose of T.S. Eliot, ed. Kermode, Frank, 37–44. London: Faber and Faber, 1975.Google Scholar
Encyclopedia Metropolitana. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. London: John Joseph Griffin and Co., 1849.Google Scholar
Engell, James. The Creative Imagination. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engell, James Episodes of Fiction, or Choice Stories from the Great Novelists. Edinburgh: William P. Nimmo, 1870.Google Scholar
Epperly, Elizabeth. Patterns of Repetition in Trollope. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Stefano. British Aestheticism and Ancient Greece: Hellenism, Reception, Gods in Exile. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanger, Donald. “Meredith as Novelist.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 16.4 (Mar. 1962): 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farina, Jonathan. Everyday Words and the Character of Prose in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenner, David E.W. Art in Context: Understanding Aesthetic Value. Athens: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Ferreira-Buckley, Linda. “Nineteenth-Century Rhetoric.” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age, ed. Enos, Theresa, 468–73. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Ferreira-Buckley, Linda . “Writing Instruction in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Great Britain: Continuity and Change, Transitions and Shifts.” In A Short History of Writing Instruction: From Ancient Greece to Contemporary America, ed. Murphy, James J., 3rd ed., 172–208. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Ferreira-Buckley, Linda and Michael Halloran, S.. Editor’s Introduction to Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, by Blair, Hugh, xv–liv. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. The Life of Jonathan Wild the Great. Ed. Rawson, Claude. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley , ed. Seventeenth-Century Prose: Modern Essays in Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Fisher, Judith Law. “Historical Introduction.” The Adventures of Philip on His Way Through the World, Shewing Who Robbed Him, Who Helped Him, and Who Passed Him By, by Thackeray, William Makepeace, 535–70. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Fisher, Judith Law. Thackeray’s Skeptical Narrative and the “Perilous Trade” of Authorship. Burlington: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Ian. “Walter Pater.” In Walter Pater: Modern Critical Views, ed. Bloom, Harold, 41–73. New York: Chelsea, 1985.Google Scholar
Gagnier, Regenia. Individualism, Decadence, and Globalization: On the Relationship of Part to Whole, 1859–1920. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2010.Google Scholar
Gallie, Roger D. Thomas Reid: Ethics, Aesthetics, and the Anatomy of the Self. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
Garcha, Amanpal. From Sketch to Novel: The Development of Victorian Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Katherine. “Ruskin’s Relation to Aristotle.” Philosophical Review 49.1 (1940): 52–62.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael B. “Lord Shaftesbury [Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury].” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, July 2011, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/shaftesbury/.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael B. . “Lord Shaftesbury [Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury].” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Sept. 2019, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/shaftesbury/.Google Scholar
Gillies, John. A New Translation of Aristotle’s Rhetoric with an Introduction and Appendix, Explaining Its Relation to His Exact Philosophy, and Vindicating that Philosophy, by Proofs that All Departures from It Have Been Deviations into Error. London and Edinburgh: Cadell and Blackwood, 1823.Google Scholar
Gilmour, Robin. The Idea of the Gentleman in the Victorian Novel. New York: Routledge, 1981.Google Scholar
Golden, James L., Berquest, Goodwin F., Coleman, William E., and Michael Sproule, J.. The Rhetoric of Western Thought. 8th ed. USA: Kendall/Hunt, 2004.Google Scholar
Golden, James L., and Corbett, Edward P.J.. Introduction to The Rhetoric of Blair, Campbell, and Whately, 1–22. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
Goldie, Peter . “Towards a Virtue Theory of Art.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 47.4 (2007): 372–87.Google Scholar
Goldie, Peter . “Virtues of Art and Human Well-Being.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (2008): 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren. “Trollopian Form: An Introduction.” Literature Compass 7.9 (2010): 851–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren . Victorian Liberalism and the Victorian State: Character and Governance in Liberal Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren and Wright, Julia M.. “Introduction and Keywords.” In “Victorian Internationalisms,” ed. Lauren Goodlad and Julia M. Wright. Special issue, Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net 48 (Nov. 2007), doi 10.7202/017435ar.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. “catachresis.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, ed. Herman, David, Jahn, Manfred, and Ryan, Marie-Laure, 47. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Gordon, Ian A. The Movement of English Prose. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Twentieth Anniversary Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grech, Leanne. Oscar Wilde’s Aesthetic Education: The Oxford Classical Curriculum. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T.H. An Estimate of the Value and Influence of Works of Fiction in Modern Times. 1862. Ed. Scott, Fred Newton. Ann Arbor: The Ann Arbor Press, 1911.Google Scholar
Green, T.H. . Prolegomena to Ethics. Ed. Brink, David O.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Gronbeck, Bruce E. “Ehninger, Douglas W. (1913–1979).” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age, ed. Enos, Theresa, 204. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Grote, John. An Examination of the Utilitarian Philosophy. Cambridge: Deighton Bell, 1870.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. “Mercury’s Words: The End of Rhetoric and the Beginning of Prose.” Representations 138.1 (Spring 2017): 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliver, Harold. Thackeray’s Literary Apprenticeship: A Study of the Early Newspaper and Magazine Work of William Makepeace Thackeray. Valdosta: Southern Stationary and Printing Company, 1934.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. “Why Deliberative Democracy Is Different.” In Liberalism: Critical Concepts in Political Theory, ed. Smith, G.W., vol. 4: The Limits of Liberalism, 274–93. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Hadley, Elaine. Living Liberalism: Practical Citizenship in Mid-Victorian Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Donald E. Muscular Christianity: Embodying the Victorian Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Halloran, S. Michael. “Aristotle’s Concept of Ethos, or if Not His Somebody Else’s.” Rhetoric Review 1.1 (Sept. 1982): 58–63.Google Scholar
Hanley, Keith and Maidment, Brian. Introduction to Persistent Ruskin: Studies in Influence, Assimilation and Effect, ed. Hanley, Keith and Maidment, Brian, 1–14. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Harden, Edgar F. Thackeray the Writer: From Journalism to Vanity Fair. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Frederic. Studies in Early Victorian Literature. London: Edward Arnold, 1895.Google Scholar
Harwood, John T., ed. The Rhetorics of Thomas Hobbes and Bernard Lamy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hayward, Abraham. “Thackeray’s Writings.” The Edinburgh Review 87.175 (Jan. 1848): 46–67.Google Scholar
Hermogenes. Hermogenes’ On Types of Style. Trans. Cecil W. Wooten. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hills, Alison. “Moral and Aesthetic Virtue.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118.3 (Oct. 2018): 255–74.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Clare. “Digital Thackeray: Preserving the Legacy?” In Thackeray in Time: History, Memory, and Modernity, ed. Salmon, Richard and Crossley, Alice, 152–68. Burlington: Ashgate, 2016.Google Scholar
Howell, Wilbur Samuel. “Aristotle and Horace on Rhetoric and Poetics.” In Poetics, Rhetoric, and Logic: Studies in the Basic Disciplines of Criticism, 45–72. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Howell, Wilbur Samuel . Eighteenth-Century British Rhetoric and Logic. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Howell, Wilbur Samuel . Logic and Rhetoric in England, 1500–1700. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Howsam, Leslie, Stray, Christopher, Jenkins, Alice, Secord, James A., and Vaninskaya, Anna. “What the Victorians Learned: Perspectives on Nineteenth-Century Schoolbooks.” Journal of Victorian Culture 12.2 (2007): 262–85.Google Scholar
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. “The Three Faces of Flourishing.” Social Philosophy and Policy 16.1 (Winter 1999): 44–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Michael D. and Waithe, Marcus. Thinking through Style: Non-Fiction Prose of the Long Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, Isobel. “Victorian Literature and the Reception of Greece and Rome.” Literature Compass 7.6 (June 2010): 484–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, T.H. “Eminent Victorians and Greek Ethics.” In Essays on Henry Sidgwick, ed. Schultz, Bart, 279–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang . “The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach.” New Literary History 3.2 (Winter 1972): 279–99.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang . Walter Pater: The Aesthetic Moment. Trans. David Henry Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Ives, Maura C. “Introduction: Meredith’s New Quarterly Magazine Writing: Comedy, the Male Writer, and the Female Reader.” In Meredith’s Essay on Comedy and Other New Quarterly Magazine Publications, ed. Ives, Maura C., 13–43. London: Associated Universities Press, 1998.Google Scholar
James, Henry. “Anthony Trollope.” In Literary Criticism: Essays on Literature, American Writers, English Writers, 1330–54. New York: Library of America, 1984.Google Scholar
James, Henry . “The Art of Fiction.” In Literary Criticism: Essays on Literature, American Writers, English Writers, 44–65. New York: Library of America, 1984.Google Scholar
James, Henry . “Guy de Maupassant.” In Literary Criticism: French Writers, Other European Writers, The Prefaces to the New York Edition, 521–49. New York: Library of America, 1984.Google Scholar
James, Henry . “The Lesson of Balzac.” In Literary Criticism: French Writers, Other European Writers, The Prefaces to the New York Edition, 115–39. New York: Library of America, 1984.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Alexander. A Grammar of Rhetoric and Polite Literature. London: G. and W.B. Whittaker, 1818.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Claire. Exquisite Masochism: Marriage, Sex, and the Novel Form. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, Richard. The Victorians and Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara. A World of Difference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. “Belles Lettres, n.s.” A Dictionary of the English Language. Vol. 1. London: W. Strahan, 1755.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel . Lives of the Poets. Ed. Lonsdale, Roger. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard Foster. “Science and English Prose Style in the Third Quarter of the Seventeenth Century.” In Seventeenth-Century Prose: Modern Essays in Criticism, ed. Fish, Stanley E., 53–89. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Kames, Lord Home, Henry. Elements of Criticism. Ed. Jones, Peter. 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Walter. The Novel-Machine: The Theory and Fiction of Anthony Trollope. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. “The Contributions of Rhetoric to Literary Criticism.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Nisbet, H.B. and Rawson, Claude, vol. 4, 349–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Knelman, Judith. “Trollope’s Experiments with Anonymity.” Victorian Periodicals Review 14.1 (Spring 1981): 21–24.Google Scholar
Korg, Jacob. “Expressive Styles in The Ordeal of Richard Feverel.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 27.3 (Dec. 1972): 253–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornbluh, Anna. The Order of Forms: Realism, Formalism, and Social Space. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, Integrity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurnick, David. Empty Houses: Theatrical Failure and the Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landow, George P. The Aesthetic and Critical Theories of John Ruskin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Lee, Adam. “The Ethics of Contemplation: Pater’s Reading of Aristotle.” In Pater the Classicist: Classical Scholarship, Reception, and Aestheticism, ed. Martindale, Charles, Evangelista, Stefano, and Prettlejohn, Elizabeth, 309–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Lee-Lenfield, Spencer. “Translating Style: Flaubert’s Influence on English Narrative Prose.” Modern Language Quarterly 81.2 (June 2020): 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesjak, Carolyn. “Reading Dialectically.” Criticism 55.2 (Spring 2013): 233–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letwin, Shirley Robin. The Gentleman in Trollope: Individuality and Moral Conduct. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline . The Serious Pleasures of Suspense: Victorian Realism and Narrative Doubt. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Levine, George. Dying to Know: Scientific Epistemology and Narrative in Victorian England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Levine, George and Madden, William, eds. The Art of Victorian Prose. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Litvak, Joseph. Caught in the Act: Theatricality in the Nineteenth-Century English Novel. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, David. Language of Fiction: Essays in Criticism and Verbal Analysis of the English Novel. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.Google Scholar
Loesberg, Jonathan. A Return to Aesthetics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Loofbourow, John. Thackeray and the Form of Fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Lopes, Dominic McIver. “Virtues of Art: Good Taste.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (2008): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitzen, Rohan. “‘The Soul of Art’: Understanding Victorian Ethical Criticism.” English Studies in Canada 31.2–3 (2005): 151–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, David . “Notes and Documents: Masson’s Inaugural Lecture.” Ed. Irvin, James R.M. and Gravlee, G. Jack. Studies in Scottish Literature 14.1 (1979): 239–49.Google Scholar
Masson, David . “Pendennis and Copperfield: Thackeray and Dickens.” The North British Review 15.29 (May 1851): 57–89.Google Scholar
Maurice, F.D. Modern Philosophy, or A Treatise of Moral and Metaphysical Philosophy from the Fourteenth Century to the French Revolution, with a Glimpse into the Nineteenth Century. London: Griffin, Bohn, and Co., 1862.Google Scholar
McKendy, Thomas. “Sources of Parody in Thackeray’s Catherine.” Dickens Studies Annual 23 (1994): 287–302.Google Scholar
McMaster, Juliet. “Novels by Eminent Hands: Sincerest Flattery from the Author of Vanity Fair.” Dickens Studies Annual 18 (1989): 309–36.Google Scholar
McMaster, Juliet . Thackeray: The Major Novels. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971.Google Scholar
McMaster, Juliet . Trollope’s Palliser Novels: Theme and Pattern. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Meador, Prentice A., Jr. “Quintilian’s ‘Vir Bonus.’” Western Speech 34.3 (1970): 162–69.Google Scholar
Meredith, George . Beauchamp’s Career. Ed. Harris, Margaret. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Meredith, George . Diana of the Crossways: A Novel. London: Constable and Company, 1910.Google Scholar
Meredith, George . An Essay on Comedy and the Uses of the Comic Spirit. In Meredith’s Essay on Comedy and Other New Quarterly Magazine Publications, ed. Ives, Maura C., 114–45. London: Associated Universities Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Meredith, George . The Letters of George Meredith. Ed. Cline, Clarence Lee. Vol 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Merritt, Travis R. “Taste, Opinion, and Theory in the Rise of Victorian Prose Stylism.” In The Art of Victorian Prose, ed. Levine, George and Madden, William, 3–38. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Milic, Louis T. “Rhetorical Choice and Stylistic Option: The Conscious and Unconscious Poles.” In Literary Style: A Symposium, ed. Chatman, Seymour, 77–94. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Milic, Louis T. . “Stylistics.” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age, ed. Enos, Theresa, 703–08. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. . System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. 8th ed. Vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1872.Google Scholar
Miller, Andrew H. The Burdens of Perfection: On Ethics and Reading in Nineteenth- Century British Literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. Ariadne’s Thread: Story Lines. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis . Fiction and Repetition: Seven English Novels. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Miller, Thomas P. The Formation of College English: Rhetoric and Belles Lettres in the British Cultural Provinces. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Thomas P. . “The Formation of College English: A Survey of the Archives of Eighteenth-Century Rhetorical Theory and Practice.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 20.3 (Summer 1990): 261–86.Google Scholar
Morgan, Benjamin. “Aesthetic Freedom: Walter Pater and the Politics of Autonomy.” ELH 77.3 (Fall 2010): 731–56.Google Scholar
Morgan, Benjamin . The Outward Mind: Materialist Aesthetics in Victorian Science and Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Morgan, Thaïs. “Reimagining Masculinity in Victorian Criticism: Swinburne and Pater.” Victorian Studies 36.3 (Spring 1993): 315–32.Google Scholar
Morgan, Thaïs . “Victorian Effeminacies.” In Victorian Sexual Dissidence, ed. Dellamora, Richard, 109–26. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Morley, John. Aphorisms. Delivered before the Edinburgh Philosophical Institution Nov. 11, 1887. London: Macmillan, 1887.Google Scholar
Morse, Deborah Denenholz, Markwick, Margaret, and Turner, Mark W., eds. The Routledge Research Companion to Anthony Trollope. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul and Emerson, Caryl. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Jane. Trollope and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Newman, John Henry. The Idea of a University, Defined and Illustrated. 3rd ed. London: Basil, Montagu, Pickering, 1873.Google Scholar
North, Joseph. Literary Criticism: A Concise Political History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Ohmann, Richard M. “Prolegomena to the Analysis of Prose Style.” In Style in Prose Fiction, ed. Martin, Harold C., 1–24. New York: Columbia University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Pantůčková, Lidmila. “The Relationship of W.M. Thackeray to Henry Fielding.” Sborník Prací Filosofické Fakulty Brněnské U D.9 (1962): 99–114.Google Scholar
Parker, David. “Thackeray’s Barry Lyndon.” Ariel: A Review of International English Literature 6.4 (1975): 68–80.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter. Appreciations, with an Essay on Style. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter . The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry. Ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Patey, Douglas Lane. “The Eighteenth Century Invents the Canon.” Modern Language Studies 18.1 (Winter 1988): 17–37.Google Scholar
Patey, Douglas Lane . “The Institution of Criticism in the Eighteenth Century.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Nisbet, H.B. and Rawson, Claude, vol. 4, 3–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel M. Hermogenes and the Renaissance: Seven Ideas of Style. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Pawelski, James O. and Moores, D.J., eds. The Eudaimonic Turn: Well-Being in Literary Studies. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Pearson, Richard. W.M. Thackeray and the Mediated Text: Writing for Periodicals in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Peltason, Timothy. “Seeing Things as They Are: Literary Judgment and Disinterestedness.” Literary Imagination 9.2 (2007): 177–94.Google Scholar
Pernot, Laurent. Rhetoric in Antiquity. Trans. W.E. Higgins. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. The Poetry and Prose of Alexander Pope. Ed. Williams, Aubrey. London: Houghton Mifflin, 1969.Google Scholar
Poster, Carol. “Pedagogy and Bibliography: Aristotle’s Rhetoric in Nineteenth-Century England.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31.2 (Spring 2001): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poster, Carol . “Whose Aristotle? Which Aristotelianism?: A Historical Prolegomenon to Thomas Farrell’s Norms of Rhetorical Culture.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 41.4 (2008): 375–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prickett, Stephen. “England: Romantic Legacies.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Habib, M.A.R, vol. 6, 154–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Purcell, William M. “A Reassessment of Adam Smith’s Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres.” Communication Studies 37:1 (1986): 45–54.Google Scholar
Purcell, William M. . “Style.” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age, ed. Enos, Theresa, 698–702. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Quintilian. Institutio Oratoria. Trans. David A. Russell. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Rahv, Philip. “Fiction and the Criticism of Fiction.” The Kenyon Review 18.2 (Spring 1956): 276–99.Google Scholar
Raleigh, Walter. The English Novel: Being a Short Sketch of Its History from the Earliest Times to the Appearance of Waverley. 5th ed. London: John Murray, 1911.Google Scholar
Raleigh, Walter . “Style.” London: Edward Arnold, 1897. Reprint, New York: Garland Publishing, 1986.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics. Trans. Gabriel Rockhill. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Ransom, John Crowe. “Criticism, Inc.” The Virginia Quarterly Review 13.4 (Autumn 1937): 586–602.Google Scholar
Ransom, John Crowe . “The Understanding of Fiction.” The Kenyon Review 12.2 (Spring 1950): 189–218.Google Scholar
Rawlins, Jack P. Thackeray’s Novels: A Fiction that Is True. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Foreword to The Methods of Ethic, by Sidgwick, Henry. 7th ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981.Google Scholar
Rawson, Claude. Satire and Sentiment, 1660–1830: Stress Points in the English Augustan Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Gordon . Thackeray: The Uses of Adversity 1811–1846. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1955.Google Scholar
Richards, I.A. . Principles of Literary Criticism. 1924. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976.Google Scholar
Riggle, Nick. “Personal Style and Artistic Style.” The Philosophical Quarterly 65.261 (Oct. 2015): 711–31.Google Scholar
Roberts, Tom. “Aesthetic Virtues: Traits and Faculties.” Philosophical Studies 175.2 (Feb. 2018): 429–47.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jenefer M. “Style and Personality in the Literary Work.” The Philosophical Review 94.2 (Apr. 1985): 227–47.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jenefer M. . “Style and Significance in Art History and Art Criticism.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40.1 (Fall 1981): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Jesse. Good Form: The Ethical Experience of the Victorian Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ross, Iain. Oscar Wilde and Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ross, Trevor. The Making of the English Literary Canon: From the Middle Ages to the Late Eighteenth Century. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rousseau, George S. Nervous Acts: Essays on Literature, Culture, and Sensibility.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. Lectures on Art Delivered before the University of Oxford in Hilary Term, 1870. New York: Maynard, 1893.Google Scholar
Russell, David. Tact: Aesthetic Liberalism and the Essay Form in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ryan, Vanessa L. Thinking without Thinking in the Victorian Novel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Saintsbury, George. Corrected Impressions: Essays on Victorian Writers. New York: Dodd, Mead, and Co., 1895.Google Scholar
Saintsbury, George . Introduction to The Oxford Thackeray. Vol. 6: The Memoirs of Barry Lyndon, Esq., and the Miscellaneous Papers Written between 1843 and 1847, ix-xxii. London: Oxford University Press, 1908.Google Scholar
Saintsbury, George . “Modern English Prose.” Fortnightly Review 19.110 (Feb. 1876): 243–59.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J.B. Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J.B. . Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Schweizer, Harold. “Literary Autonomy: The Growth of a Modern Concept.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Habib, Rafey, vol. 6, 231–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Seneca the Younger. “Styles and Morals.” In Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations, ed. Russell, D.A. and Winterbottom, M., 362–67. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper (Third Earl of). Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. Ed. Klein, Lawrence E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Lesley. Schiller’s Aesthetic Essays: Two Centuries of Criticism. Columbia: Camden House, 1995.Google Scholar
Shillingsburg, Peter L. Review of The Luck of Barry Lyndon: A Critical Edition, by William Makepeace Thackeray, ed. Martin J. Anisman. The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 66.2 (1972): 219–23.Google Scholar
Shirilan, Stephanie. “The Forbidden Pleasures of Style: Seventeenth-Century Prose in Twentieth-Century Criticism.” Prose Studies 34.2 (Aug. 2012): 115–28.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor. “Art as Technique.” In Critical Theory Since Plato, ed. Adams, Hazard, rev. ed., 750–59. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace, 1992.Google Scholar
Shuger, Debora K. “Conceptions of Style.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Kennedy, George, vol. 3, 176–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Shuter, William. “History as Palingenesis in Pater and Hegel.” PMLA 86.3 (1971): 411–21.Google Scholar
Sibley, Frank. “Making Music Our Own.” In The Interpretation of Music: Philosophical Essays, ed. Krausz, Michael, 165–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sibley, Frank . “Particularity, Art and Evaluation.” In Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics, ed. Benson, John, Redfern, Betty, and Cox, Jeremy Roxbee, 88–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. Lectures on the Ethics of T.H. Green, Mr. Herbert Spencer, and J. Martineau. London: Macmillan, 1902.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry . The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. Foreword by John Rawls. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry . Outlines of the History of Ethics for English Readers. 1886. Boston: Beacon Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry . “The Prophet of Culture.” In Culture and Anarchy, by Matthew Arnold, ed. Garnett, Jane, 157–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jonah. “Victorian Aesthetics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Victorian Literary Culture, ed. John, Juliet, 561–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Simons, Gary. “Thackeray’s Articles in the Morning Chronicle.” Studies in Bibliography 59.1 (2015): 249–68.Google Scholar
Simons, Gary . “Thackeray’s Contributions to the Times.” Victorian Periodicals Review 40.4 (Winter 2007): 332–54.Google Scholar
Skilton, David J. Anthony Trollope and His Contemporaries: A Study in the Theory and Conventions of Mid-Victorian Fiction. London: Macmillan, 1972.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, ed. Bryce, J.C., vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Smith, Craig R. “Constructing a Neo-Romantic Rhetorical Theory.” Western Journal of Communication 80.2 (Mar.–Apr. 2016): 220–37.Google Scholar
Sorlin, Sandrine. “Three Major Handbooks in Three Years: Stylistics as a Mature Discipline.” Language and Literature 25.3 (Aug. 2016): 286–301.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. Philosophy of Style: An Essay. With notes by the editor. New York: D. Appleton, 1884.Google Scholar
Stang, Richard. The Theory of the Novel in England, 1850–1870. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1959.Google Scholar
Statman, Daniel. “Introduction to Virtue Ethics.” In Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader, ed. Statman, Daniel, 1–41. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Stebbins, Lucy and Stebbins, Richard. The Trollopes: The Chronicle of a Writing Family. London: Secker and Warburg, 1947.Google Scholar
Steiner, George. On Difficulty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Robert Louis. “On Style in Literature: Its Technical Elements.” The Contemporary Review 47 (Apr. 1885): 548–61.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter and Whiteley, Sara, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolnitz, Jerome. “On the Origins of ‘Aesthetic Disinterestedness.’” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20.2 (Winter 1961): 131–43.Google Scholar
Stopper, M.R. [Jonathan Barnes]. “Greek Philosophy and the Victorians.” Phronesis 26.3 (1981): 267–85.Google Scholar
Stray, Christopher. Classics Transformed: Schools, Universities, and Society in England, 1830–1960. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Stray, Christopher “style, n.” OED Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, June 2020. www.oed.com/view/Entry/192315.Google Scholar
Sundell, M.G. “Thackeray Criticism: Its Fortunes and Misfortunes.” Novel 4.3 (Fall 1972): 513–21.Google Scholar
Super, R.H. “Truth and Fiction in Trollope’s Autobiography.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 48.1 (June 1993): 74–88.Google Scholar
Sussman, Herbert. Victorian Masculinities: Manhood and Masculine Poetics in Early Victorian Literature and Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Sussman, Matthew. “Meredith’s Style.” In On Style in Victorian Fiction, ed. Tyler, Daniel, 244–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Sussman, Matthew . “Optative Form in Anthony Trollope’s The Small House at Allington.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 71.4 (Mar. 2017): 485–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, John. “‘Henry Esmond’ and the Virtues of Carelessness.” Modern Philology 68.4 (May 1971): 345–54.Google Scholar
Sweet, William. “British Idealist Philosophy of Religion.” In The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Mander, W.J., 560–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Algernon Charles. Swinburne Replies. Ed. Hyder, Clyde Kenneth. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Symonds, John Addington. Essays Speculative and Suggestive. Vol. 1. London: Chapman and Hall, 1890.Google Scholar
Symons, Arthur. “A Note on George Meredith.” The Fortnightly Review (Nov. 1897): 673–78.Google Scholar
Taylor, D.J. Introduction to The Newcomes, by William Makepeace Thackeray, ed. Taylor, D.J., xviii–xxix. London: Everyman, 1994.Google Scholar
Tener, Robert H. “R.H. Hutton: Some Attributions.” Victorian Periodicals Newsletter 6.2 (June 1973): 1–65.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace . Catherine: A Story. Ed. Goldfarb, Sheldon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace . “The Dignity of Literature.” Morning Chronicle 25033 (12 Jan. 1850): 4.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace . The History of Pendennis. Ed. Sutherland, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace . The Memoirs of Barry Lyndon, Esq. Ed. Sanders, Andrew. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace . “Men and Coats.” Fraser’s Magazine 24.140 (Aug. 1841): 208–217.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace . The Newcomes. Ed. Taylor, D.J.. London: Everyman, 1994.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace . Novels by Eminent Hands. In Burlesques. New York: John B. Alden, 1883.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace . “Parisian Caricatures.” London and Westminster Review 32.2 (Apr. 1839): 282–305.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace . The Yellowplush Correspondence, Jeames’s Diary, The Great Hogarty Diamond, Etc. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar
Thirlwell, Angela. Introduction to Nina Balatka, by Trollope, Anthony, v–xiii. London: Trollope Society, 1996.Google Scholar
Thomas, David Wayne. Cultivating Victorians: Liberal Culture and the Aesthetic. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Thorpe, James. The Sense of Style: Reading English Prose. Hamden, CT: Archon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Tillotson, Geoffrey and Tillotson, Kathleen. Mid-Victorian Studies. London: Athlone Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Tillotson, Geoffrey and Tillotson, Kathleen “Titmarsh’s Tour through Turkeydom.” Fraser’s Magazine 33 (Jan. –June1846): 85–96.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. “Structural Analysis of Narrative.” NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 3.1 (Autumn 1969): 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toolan, Michael. “Stylistics.” In A Companion to Literary Theory, ed. Richter, David H., 60–71. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toolan, Michael . “The Theory and Philosophy of Stylistics.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. Stockwell, Peter and Whiteley, Sara, 13–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Touster, Eva Beach. “The Literary Relationship of Thackeray and Fielding.” The Journal of English and German Philology 46.4 (Oct. 1947): 383–94.Google Scholar
Townsend, Dabney. “Introduction: Aesthetics in the Eighteenth Century.” In Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics, ed. Townsend, Dabney, 1–31. Amityville: Baywood, 1999.Google Scholar
Tracy, Robert. Trollope’s Later Novels. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Treitler, Leo. “Language and the Interpretation of Music.” In Music and Meaning, ed. Robinson, Jenefer, 23–56. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. An Autobiography. Ed. Sadleir, Michael and Page, Frederick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony . Barchester Towers. Ed. Sadleir, Michael and Page, Frederick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony . Nina Balatka: The Story of a Maiden of Prague. Ed. Angela Thirlwell. London: Trollope Society, 1996.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony . The Small House at Allington. Ed. Thompson, Julian. London: Penguin, 1991.Google Scholar
Turner, Frank M. The Greek Heritage in Victorian Britain. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Turner, Frank M. . “Why the Greeks and Not the Romans in Victorian Britain?” In Rediscovering Hellenism: The Hellenic Inheritance and the English Imagination, ed. Clarke, G.W., 61–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Turner, James. Philology: The Forgotten Origins of the Modern Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Van Dam, Frederik. Anthony Trollope’s Late Style: Victorian Liberalism and Literary Form. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dam, Frederik , ed. Edinburgh Companion to Anthony Trollope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Van Ghent, Dorothy “virtue, n.” OED Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, June 2020. www.oed.com/view/Entry/223835.Google Scholar
Walsh, W.H. “The Zenith of Greats.” In The History of the University of Oxford, ed. Brock, M.G. and Curthoys, M.C., vol. 7: Nineteenth-Century Oxford, Part 2, 311–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wellbery, David E. “The Transformation of Rhetoric.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Brown, Marshall, vol. 5, 185–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalley, George. “On Translating Aristotle’s Poetics.” University of Toronto Quarterly 39.2 (Jan. 1970): 77–106.Google Scholar
Whately, Richard. Elements of Rhetoric. 1828. Nashville: Southern Methodist Publishing House, 1861. Reprint, Delmar, NY: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints, 1996.Google Scholar
White, Edward M. “Thackeray’s Contributions to Fraser’s Magazine.” Studies in Bibliography 19 (1966): 67–84.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. “The Suppression of Rhetoric in the Nineteenth Century.” In The Rhetoric Canon, ed. Schildgen, Brenda Deen, 21–32. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Giles. Aestheticism and the Philosophy of Death: Walter Pater and Post- Hegelianism. New York: Legenda, 2010.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. De Profundis and Other Writings. Ed. Hesketh Pearson. London: Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar . The Picture of Dorian Gray. Ed. Mighall, Robert. London: Penguin, 2000.Google Scholar
Williams, Carolyn. Transfigured World: Walter Pater’s Aesthetic Historicism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Williamson, George. The Senecan Amble: A Study in Prose Form from Bacon to Collier. London: Faber and Faber, 1951.Google Scholar
Willis, Kirk. “The Introduction and Critical Reception of Hegelian Thought in Britain 1830–1900.” Victorian Studies 32.1 (Autumn 1988): 85–111.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W.K. and Beardsley, M.C. “The Intentional Fallacy.” The Sewanee Review 54.3 (July–Sep. 1946): 468–88.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. “The Novels of George Meredith.” In The Common Reader: Second Series, 226–36. London: Hogarth Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia . A Room of One’s Own and Three Guineas. Hammersmith: Harper Collins, 2014.Google Scholar
Wright, Daniel. Bad Logic: Reasoning about Desire in the Victorian Novel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Wyland, Russell M. “An Archival Study of Rhetoric Texts and Teaching at the University of Oxford, 1785–1821.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 21.3 (Summer 2003): 175–95.Google Scholar