Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×

Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.

Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T19:27:41.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Teaching for Creativity with Disciplined Improvisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Ronald A. Beghetto  and
James C. Kaufman
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
Ronald A. Beghetto
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University at San Bernardino
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

One of the biggest fears of teachers, particularly those who are just starting their career, is a classroom in chaos. Many teachers worry that inviting creativity into the classroom will result in curricular chaos (Aljughaiman & Mowrer-Reynolds, 2005; Beghetto, 2007; Westby & Dawson, 1995). At the same time, most teachers generally value student creativity (Runco, 2003) and worry that too great a focus on covering content can turn the act of teaching into little more than series of scripted monologues, delivered to a room full of passive students. These seemingly conflicting concerns and commitments result in a paradox in which teachers find themselves balancing two inverse tensions: (1) teaching requisite academic subject matter while still wanting to foster student creativity; and (2) wanting to allow for creativity yet fearing curricular chaos.

In this chapter, we address these tensions and discuss how teachers can, through disciplined improvisation, address the teaching paradox. We show how teachers can have enough structure for academic work to be productive, and at the same time allow for the improvisation necessary to encourage student creativity. We open the chapter by arguing that the teaching paradox results from the gap between the curriculum-as-planned and curriculum-as-lived. We then introduce our elaboration on the concept of disciplined improvisation and discuss how this concept can help address the teaching paradox.

Type
Chapter
Information
Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching , pp. 94 - 110
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Aoki, T. T. (2004). Spinning inspirited images. In Pinar, W. F. & Irwin, R. L. (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 413–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beghetto, R. A. (2005). Does assessment kill student creativity?The Educational Forum, 69, 254–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Ideational code-switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, P. F. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. PhiDelta Kappan, 80, 139–148.Google Scholar
Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1977). Research on teacher thinking. Curriculum Inquiry, 7, 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human creativity (pp. 297–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Selbst, M. (1994). Does reward increase or decrease creativity?Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 66, 1116–1127.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Martinage, M. (1989). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. & Zbikowski, S. M. (1993). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward: A further examination of intrinsic motivation training techniques. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamii, C. (2000). Double-column addition: A teacher uses Piaget’s theory [VHS Tape]. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2003). Creativity, cognition, and their educational implications. In Houtz, J. C. (Ed.), The educational psychology of creativity (pp. 25–56). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Series Eds.) & Kuhn, D. & Siegler, R. S. (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 464–510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined improvisation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 516–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organizational Science, 9, 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westby, E. L. & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom?Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×