How “Scripted” Materials Might Support Improvisational Teaching

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511997105.011

10 - How “Scripted” Materials Might Support Improvisational Teaching

Insights from the Implementation of a Reading Comprehension Curriculum

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Annette Sassi

Edited by

R. Keith Sawyer

Show author details

Annette Sassi: Affiliation:
TERC, Cambridge, USA
R. Keith Sawyer: Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Scripted teaching and improvisational teaching seem to be diametrically opposed. Improvisational teaching emphasizes that teaching and learning emerge in the moment and that teachers need to engage with their students and the ideas that they have. It draws attention to how the enacted curriculum grows out of what students’ learning needs are at a given time. In what is commonly referred to as scripted teaching, teachers are provided with materials that consist of explicit step-by-step directions and word-for-word scripts. There would seem to be an unbridgeable gap between improvisational teaching and scripted teaching. Yet, as Sawyer (2004a) aptly points out, teaching – even teaching that is explicitly designed to capture improvisational elements – cannot happen without some type of structure and framework. Constructing that just-right degree of structure is a delicate balancing act, which can be especially challenging for the teacher trying to establish a collaborative classroom.

In this chapter, I focus on two of the paradoxes that Sawyer identified in his introduction: the teaching paradox, or the tension between crafting the “well-managed” classroom and sliding toward the “chaotic” classroom; and the curriculum paradox, or the tension between meeting curriculum goals and responding to students’ ideas and curiosities.

Type: Chapter
Information: Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching , pp. 209 - 235

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997105.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ball, D. L. (1993). With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 94(4): 373–397.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ball, D. and Cohen, D. (1996). Reform by the Book: What Is – or Might Be – the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform?Educational Researcher, 25(9): 6–8, 14.Google Scholar

Brown, M. and Edelson, D. (2003). Teaching as Design. The Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools: LeTUs Report Series.

Calkins, L. (2001). The Art of Teaching Reading. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar

Developmental Studies Center (2004). Making Meaning: Strategies That Build Comprehension and Community. Oakland, CA: Developmental Studies Center.Google Scholar

Education Development Center (forthcoming). Foundations Science: A Comprehensive High School Curriculum. Newton, MA: Education Development Center.

Grimes, Nikki (2002). My Man Blue. London: Puffin Books.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, M. W. and Talbert, J. E. (1993). Introduction: New Visions of Teaching. In Cohen, D. K., McLaughlin, M. W., and Talbert, J. E. (Eds.), Teaching for Understanding: Challenges for Policy and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Neufeld, B. and Donaldson, M. (in press). Coaching for Instructional Improvement: Conditions and Strategies That Matter. To appear in Kelly, B. and Perkins, D. F. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Implementation Science for Educational Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Neufeld, B. and Roper, D. (2002). Off to a Good Start: Collaborative Coaching and Leaning in the Effective Practice Schools. Cambridge, MA: Education Matters.Google Scholar

Neufeld, B. and Roper, D. (2003). Year II of Collaborative Coaching and Learning in the Effective Practice Schools: Expanding the Work. Cambridge, MA: Education Matters.Google Scholar

Neufeld, B. and Sassi, A. (2004). Getting Our Feet Wet: Using Making Meaning for the First Time. Cambridge, MA: Education Matters.Google Scholar

Pearson, P. D, Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., and Roehler, L. R. (1992). Developing Expertise in Reading Comprehension: What Should Be Taught and How Should It Be Taught? In Farstup, J. and Samuels, S. J. (Eds.), What Research Has to Say to the Teacher of Reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Pearson Education/Scott ForesmanInvestigations in Number, Data, and Space.

Pendlebury, S. (1995). Reason and Story in Wise Practice. In McEwan, H. and Egan, K. (Eds.), Narrative in Teaching, Learning, and Research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Pinnell, G. S. and Fountas, I. C. (2002). Leveled Books for Readers, Grade 3–6. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Pressley, M. (2002). Beginning Reading Instruction: The Rest of the Story from Research. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar

Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can Curriculum Materials Support Teachers’ Learning? Two Fourth-Grade Teachers’ Use of a New Mathematics Text. The Elementary School Journal, 100 (4), 331–350.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sassi, A. (2002). Cultivating Perception: Helping Teachers to Attend the Salient Features of Their Mathematics Classroom. Center for the Development of Teaching Paper Series, Education Development Center, Newton, MA.

Sawyer, R. K. (2004a). Creative Teaching: Collaborative Discussion as Disciplined Improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2): 12–20.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K. (2004b). Improvised Lessons: Collaborative Discussions in the Classroom. Teacher Education, 15(2): 189–201.Google Scholar

Slavin, R. E. and Madden, N. A. (2001). Success for All: Research and Reform in Elementary Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., and Datnow, A. (2007) Research In, Research Out: The Role of Research in the Development and Scale-Up of Success for All. In Furhman, S. H., Cohen, D. K., and Mosher, F. (Eds.), The State of Education Policy Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar