Introduction

In a classic paper comparing the political systems of Melanesia and Polynesia, Sahlins (1963) identified Big Men – financial transactors and entrepreneurs – as the quintessentially Melanesian type of traditional leader. But more recently a number of authors have suggested that Melanesian patterns of leadership are rather more diverse than Sahlins' argument implies (Allen 1984; Chowning 1979; Douglas 1979; Godelier 1986). In particular, it has become evident that the control of knowledge is an important basis of leadership in some Melanesian societies, and that leaders in these societies differ from the Big Men described by Sahlins. Lindstrom, for instance, has suggested an ideal-typical distinction between ‘wealth-based’ and ‘knowledge-based’ Melanesian polities, arguing that in the latter

Avatip approximates very closely to Lindstrom's ‘knowledge-based’ type of Melanesian polity, and in this chapter I discuss the significance of ritual knowledge as the key resource of leaders in Avatip society, and the ways in which processes of political competition revolve around the transmission and control of this knowledge. The first part of the chapter deals with the transmission of hereditary mythology and magic within the subclan, and the implicit – and sometimes explicit – competition between subclan-agnates for the control of this lore.