Book contents
- States of Language Policy
- States of Language Policy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Routes of Change
- Part II Dependent Relationships
- Part III Levels of Governance
- 11 Indigenous Reconciliation and the Limits of Canada’s Language Regime
- 12 State Tradition and Language Revitalization in Wales
- 13 Language Regime Change and Europeanization
- 14 Language Regimes, Global English, and National Public Education
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
13 - Language Regime Change and Europeanization
The Council of Europe, Slovakia, and the Treatment of Romani
from Part III - Levels of Governance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2024
By
Book contents
- States of Language Policy
- States of Language Policy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Routes of Change
- Part II Dependent Relationships
- Part III Levels of Governance
- 11 Indigenous Reconciliation and the Limits of Canada’s Language Regime
- 12 State Tradition and Language Revitalization in Wales
- 13 Language Regime Change and Europeanization
- 14 Language Regimes, Global English, and National Public Education
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
In an increasingly integrated Europe, state language regimes are not the only ones that matter. It is also essential to understand how they interact with supranational language regimes. As Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries worked towards and then gained European Union membership after 2000, to what extent did their state language regimes become “Europeanized”? This question is examined through the case of Romani in Slovakia. The chapter has two aims: first, to demonstrate that the concept of a language regime can be fruitfully applied to supranational entities, and second, to examine the impact of such regimes at the state level. The Council of Europe’s language regime led it to advocate for increased support of Romani, as well as increased minority language rights in member states more generally. This work became bound up in the wider dynamics of Europeanization and European pressure on CEE states. At the level of the Slovak state, official policies towards Romani were changed in response to such pressure. Implementation of such commitments was limited, however. An analysis of state treatment of Romani language in Slovakia from approximately 1998 to 2018 thus illustrates a process through which a state language regime was altered but not transformed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- States of Language PolicyTheorizing Continuity and Change, pp. 246 - 266Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Ad Hoc Committee of Experts on Roma Issues (CAHROM). (2014). Conclusions of the Thematic Report on the Protection and Promotion of Languages Spoken by Roma. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. (2014). Fourth Opinion on the Slovak Republic. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Andrassy, G. and Vogl, M.. (2012). Article 1c. Non-Territorial Languages. In Nogueira López, A., Ruiz Vieytez, E. J. and Urrutia Libarona, I., eds., Shaping Language Rights: Commentary on the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages in Light of the Committee for Experts’ Evaluation. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, pp. 79–120.Google Scholar
Bond, M. (2012). The Council of Europe: Structure, History and Issues in European Politics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“CAHROM: Main Tasks of the Committee.” n.d. Council of Europe. www.coe.int/en/web/roma–and–travellers/main–tasks–of–the–committee.Google Scholar
Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. (2000). Recommendation No R(2000)4 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Education of Roma/Gypsy Children in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Constitution of the Slovak Republic. (1992). Slovak Republic.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2003). Report of the Conference on the Harmonisation of Teaching Materials in Romani Language. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2007). From Linguistic Diversity to Plurilingual Education: Guide for the Development of Language Education Policies in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2014). European Charter for Regional and Minority Languages. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Csergő, Z. (2007). Talk of the Nation: Language and Conflict in Romania and Slovakia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daftary, F. and Gál, K.. (2000). The New Slovak Language Law: Internal or External Politics? European Centre for Minority Issues – Working Paper. Flensburg: European Center for Minority Issues.Google Scholar
de Beco, G. and Lantschner, E.. (2012). The Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (the ACFC). In de Beco, G., ed., Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms of the Council of Europe. New York: Routledge, pp. 100–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donert, C. (2008). “The Struggle for the Soul of the Gypsy”: Marginality and Mass Mobilization in Stalinist Czechoslovakia. Social History, 33(2), 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donert, C. (2017). The Rights of the Roma: The Struggle for Citizenship in Postwar Czechoslovakia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. (2012). The Committee of Experts of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. In de Beco, G., ed., Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms of the Council of Europe. New York: Routledge, pp. 150–170.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2000). 2000 Regular Report from the Commission on Slovakia’s Progress towards Accession. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2001). 2001 Regular Report on Slovakia’s Progress towards Accession. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2002). 2002 Regular Report on Slovakia’s Progress towards Accession. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Secretariat. (2009). ECRI Report on Slovakia (Fourth Monitoring Cycle). Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Facuna, J. (2016). Through Intercultural Education in Primary Schools towards Social Inclusion of Pupils from Roma Communities. In Facuna, J. and Lužica, R., eds., Together with Roma, We Will Achieve More [Spolu S Romami Dosiahneme Viac: Zborník Príspevkov z Medzinárodnej Vedeckej Konferencie]. Bratislava: Government of Slovakia, pp. 174–192.Google Scholar
Friedman, E. (2005). The Slovak Government Plenipotentiary for Romani Communities: From Form to Substance? Eumap.Org, August 2005.Google Scholar
Government of the Slovak Republic. (2011). Strategy of the Slovak Republic for the Integration of Roma up to 2020. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Gramstad, S. (2010). The Charter’s Monitoring Mechanism: A Practical Perspective. In Minority Language Protection in Europe: Into a New Decade. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
Grin, F. (2003). Language Policy Evaluation and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, D. (2008). Nationalism Across Borders: Transnational Nationalist Advocacy in the European Union. Comparative European Politics, 6, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, W. (1998). Ways of Looking at Roma: The Case of Czechoslovakia. In Tong, D., ed., Gypsies: A Book of Interdisciplinary Readings. New York: Garland Publishing, pp. 13–68.Google Scholar
Halwachs, D. (2013). Remarks on the Romani Movement and Inclusion Policies. European Yearbook of Minority Issues, 10, 203–208.Google Scholar
Hogan–Brun, G. and Wolff, S., eds. (2003). Minority Languages in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensdottir, R. (2004). The Council of Europe Language Charter – Perspectives, Impact and Effectiveness. In II Mercator International Symposium: Europe 2004: A New Framework for All Languages? Tarragona, Catalunya.Google Scholar
Jordan, P. A. (2003). Does Membership Have Its Privileges?: Entrance into the Council of Europe and Compliance with Human Rights Norms. Human Rights Quarterly, 25(3), 660–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, J. (2004). Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D.. (1999). How Europe Matters: Different Mechanisms of Europeanization. European Integration Online Papers, 3(7).Google Scholar
Lajcakova, J. (2007). The Uneasy Road towards Remedying the Economic and Cultural Disadvantage of the Roma in Slovakia. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 14(1), 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D. (2007). Curriculum Framework for Romani: Seminar for Practitioners and Decision Makers. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Little, D. (2008). Teaching Romani: The Curriculum Framework for Romani and the European Language Portfolio. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Little, D. and Lazenby Simpson, B.. (2008). A Curriculum Framework for Romani. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Pandy, M. (2022). A “Truly European Language”: Europeanization and Supranational Language Regimes in the Case of Romani Language, 1998–2018. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Rácová, A. (2018). The Impact of Language Ideologies on the Language Practices of Roma in Slovakia. Asian and African Studies, 27(2), 192–215.Google Scholar
Rácová, A. and Samko, M.. (2017). On the Vitality and Endangerment of the Romani Language in Slovakia. Asian and African Studies, 26(2), 185–208.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The Europeanization of Public Policy. In Featherstone, K. and Radaelli, C. M., eds., The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ram, M. H. (2012). Legacies of EU Conditionality: Explaining Post-Accession Adherence to Pre-Accession Rules on Roma. Europe – Asia Studies, 64(7), 1191–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Romani.” (n.d.). Language Policy, Council of Europe. www.coe.int/en/web/language–policy/romani.Google Scholar
Sasse, G. (2008). The Politics of EU Conditionality: The Norm of Minority Protection during and beyond EU Accession. Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 842–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S. and Knobel, H.. (2005). The Impact of EU Political Conditionality. In Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U., eds., The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 29–50.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H.. (1993). Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoraka, K. (2010). Human Rights and Minority Rights in the European Union. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woehrling, J.-M. (2012). Introduction. In Nogueira López, A., Ruiz Vieytez, E. J. and Urrutia Libarona, I., eds., Shaping Language Rights: Commentary on the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages in Light of the Committee for Experts’ Evaluation. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, pp. 11–31.Google Scholar