Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:16:41.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Hierarchy under anarchy: informal empire and the East German state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Alexander Wendt
Affiliation:
Yale University
Daniel Friedheim
Affiliation:
Dartmouth Collage
Thomas J. Biersteker
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Cynthia Weber
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

States have sovereignty to the extent that they have exclusive authority over their territories. In the modern states system this authority is usually differentiated into internal and external sovereignty. This means that states have the ultimate authority within domestic society to make decisions even if the decisions are significantly constrained in practice by other domestic actors, and that states have the authority within international society to do as they please even if their actions are significantly constrained in practice by other states. To say that states are sovereign, in other words, is to say that they have certain rights, even if the exercise of those rights is constrained. Rights are not intrinsic, naturally given attributes, like the height or weight of an individual; they are conferred upon actors through a process of social recognition that constitutes particular kinds of identities. Rights are socially constructed. In the absence of recognition, a state might be able to achieve exclusive control by sheer force, but this is a very different and typically a more difficult matter than exercising rights. The recognition that constitutes states as sovereign comes from domestic and international society, both of which give permission to states to rule a particular space. In this chapter, we are interested primarily in the role of international society in this process.

We focus on external recognition because we are interested in situations in which state sovereignty coexists in relation to super-ordination, subordination, or hierarchy among states.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×