Arrhenius, O. (1920a) Distribution of the species over the area. Meddelanden från Kungliga Vetenskapsakademiens Nobelinstitut, 4, 1–6.Google Scholar

Arrhenius, O. (1920b) Yta och arter. I. Svensk Botanisk Tidsskrift, 14, 327–329.Google Scholar

Arrhenius, O. (1921) Species and area. Journal of Ecology, 9, 95–99.Google Scholar

Arrhenius, O. (1923) On the relation between species and area – A reply. Ecology, 4, 90–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, K., Wait, D. A. & Anderson, W. B. (2003) Small island biogeography in the Gulf of California: Lizards, the subsidized island biogeography hypothesis, and the small island effect. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 1575–1581.Google Scholar

Braun-Blanquet, J. & Jenny, H. (1926) Vegetations-entwicklung und bodenbildung in der alpine stufe der Zentralalpen (Klimaxgebiet des Caricion curvulae). Denkschriften Schweizerische Naturforsch Gesellschaft, 63, 183–344.Google Scholar

Brenner, W. (1921) Växtgeografiska studier i Barõsunds skärgård. Acta Sociatatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, 49, 1–151.Google Scholar

Brown, J. H. (1971) Mammals on mountaintops: Nonequilibrium insular biogeography. The American Naturalist, 105, 467–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, S. A. (1934) Studies of virgin hardwood forest: II, A comparison of quadrat sizes in a quantitative phytosociological study of Nash's Woods, Posey County, Indiana. The American Midland Naturalist, 15, 529–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, S. A. (1938) The species–area curve. The American Midland Naturalist, 19, 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clench, H. K. (1979) How to make regional lists of butterflies: Some thoughts. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, 33, 216–231.Google Scholar

Cody, M. L., Moran, R., Rebman, J. & Thompson, H. (2002) Plants. A new island biogeography of the Sea of Cortés (ed. by Case, T. J., Cody, M. L. and Ezcurra, E.), pp. 63–111. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Colwell, R. K. & Coddington, J. A. (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 345, 101–118.Google Scholar

Colwell, R. K., Chang, X. M. & Chang, J. (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology, 85, 2717–2727.Google Scholar

Condit, R., Hubbell, S. P., LaFrankie, J. V., Sukumar, R., Monokaran, N., Foster, R. B. & Ashton, P. S. (1996) Species–area and species–individual relationships for tropical trees: A comparison of three 50-ha plots. Journal of Ecology, 84, 549–562.Google Scholar

Connor, E. F. & McCoy, E. D. (1979) The statistics and biology of the species–area relationship. The American Naturalist, 113, 791–833.Google Scholar

Crawley, M. J. & Harral, J. E. (2001) Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. Science, 291, 864–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Darlington, P. J. (1957) Zoogeography: The geographical distribution of animals. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Delsol, R., Loreau, M. & Haegeman, B. (2018) The relationship between spatial scaling of biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 27, 439–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dengler, J. (2008) Pitfalls in small-scale species–area sampling and analysis. Folia Geobotanica, 43, 269–287.Google Scholar

Dengler, J. (2009) Which function describes the species–area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 728–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deshaye, J. & Morisset, P. (1988) Floristic richness, area and habitat diversity in a hemiarctic archipelago. Journal of Biogeography, 15, 747–757.Google Scholar

Diamond, J.M. (1975) Assembly of species communities. Ecology and evolution of communities (ed. by Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M.), pp. 342–444. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Dony, J. G. (1977) Species–area relationships in an area of intermediate size. Journal of Ecology, 65, 475–484.Google Scholar

Drakare, S., Lennon, J. J. & Hillebrand, H. (2006) The imprint of geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species–area relationships. Ecology Letters, 9, 215–227.Google Scholar

Engen, S. (1978) Stochastic abundance models. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Fattorini, S. (2006) Detecting biodiversity hotspots by species–area relationships: A case study of Mediterranean beetles. Conservation Biology, 20, 1169–1180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fattorini, S. (2007a) Levels of endemism are not necessarily biased by the co-presence of species with different range sizes: A case study of Vilekin and Chikatunov's models. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 994–1007.Google Scholar

Fattorini, S. (2007b) To fit or not to fit? A poorly fitting procedure produces inconsistent results when the species–area relationship is used to locate hotspots. Biological Conservation, 16, 2531–2538.Google Scholar

Fattorini, S. & Fowles, A. P. (2005) A biogeographical analysis of the tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) of the island of Thasos in the context of the Aegean Islands (Greece). Journal of Natural History, 39, 3919–3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S. & Williams, C. B. (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. Journal of Animal Ecology, 12, 42–58.Google Scholar

Flather, C. H. (1996) Fitting species-accumulation functions and assessing regional land use impacts on avian diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fridley, J. D., Peet, R. K., Wentworth, T. R. & White, P. S. (2005) Connection fine- and broad-scale species–area relationships of southeastern U.S. flora. Ecology, 86, 1172–1177.Google Scholar

Gentile, G. & Argano, R. (2005) Island biogeography of the Mediterranean Sea: The species–area relationship for terrestrial isopods. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 1715–1726.Google Scholar

Gitay, H., Roxburgh, S. H. & Wilson, J. B. (1991) Species–area relations in a New-Zealand tussock grassland, with implications for nature-reserve design and for community structure. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2, 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleason, H. A. (1922) On the relation between species and area. Ecology, 3, 158–162.Google Scholar

Gleason, H. A. (1925) Species and area. Ecology, 6, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodall, D. W. (1952) Quantitative aspects of plant distribution. Biological Reviews, 27, 194–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gotelli, N. & Colwell, R. K. (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4, 379–391.Google Scholar

Green, J. L. & Ostling, A. (2003) Endemics–area relationships: The influence of species dominance and spatial aggregation. Ecology, 84, 3090–3097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, J. L. & Plotkin, J. B. (2007) A statistical theory for sampling species abundances. Ecology Letters, 10, 1037–1045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilhaumon, F., Gimenez, O., Gaston, K. J. & Mouillot, D. (2008) Taxonomic and regional uncertainty in species–area relationships and the identification of richness hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 15458–15463.Google Scholar

Hanski, I., Zurita, G. A., Bellocq, M. I. & Rybicki, J. (2013) Species–fragmented area relationship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110, 12715–12720.Google Scholar

Harte, J., Blackburn, T. & Ostling, A. (2001) Self-similarity and the relationship between abundance and range size. The American Naturalist, 157, 374–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harte, J., Kinzig, A. & Green, J. (1999) Self-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species. Science, 284, 334–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

He, F. & Hubbell, S. P. (2011) Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss. Nature, 473, 368–371.Google Scholar

He, F. & Hubbell, S. P. (2013) Estimating extinction from species–area relationships: Why the numbers do not add up. Ecology, 94, 1905–1912.Google Scholar

He, F. & Legendre, P. (1996) On species–area relations. The American Naturalist, 148, 719–737.Google Scholar

He, F. & Legendre, P. (2002) Species diversity patterns derived from species–area models. Ecology, 83, 1185–1198.Google Scholar

Hopkins, B. (1955) The species–area relations of plant communities. Journal of Ecology, 43, 409–426.Google Scholar

Hopkins, B. & Skellam, J. G. (1954) A new method for determining the type of distribution of plant individuals. Annals of Botany, 18, 213–217.Google Scholar

Hubbell, S. P. (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Irie, H. & Tokita, K. (2012) Species–area relationship for power-law species abundance distribution. International Journal of Biomathematics, 5, 1260014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kangas, P. (1987) On the use of species area curves to predict extinctions. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 158–162.Google Scholar

Keeley, J. E. & Fotheringham, C. J. (2005) Plot shape effects on plant species diversity measurements. Journal of Vegetation Science, 16, 249–256.Google Scholar

Keil, P., Pereira, H. M., Cabral, J. S., Chase, J. M., May, F., Martins, I. S. & Winter, M. (2018) Spatial scaling of extinction rates: Theory and data reveal nonlinearity and a major upscaling and downscaling challenge. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 27, 2–13.Google Scholar

Keil, P., Storch, D. & Jetz, W. (2015) On the decline of biodiversity due to area loss. Nature Communications, 6, 8837.Google Scholar

Kilburn, P. D. (1966) Analysis of the species–area relation. Ecology, 47, 831–843.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, S. (1974) The species–area relation I. A model for discrete sampling. Researches on Population Ecology, 15, 223–237.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, S. (1975) The species–area relation II. A second model for continuous sampling. Researches on Population Ecology, 16, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krishnamari, R., Kumar, A. & Harte, J. (2004) Estimating species richness at large spatial scales using data from small discrete plots. Ecography, 27, 637–642.Google Scholar

Kunin, W. E., Harte, J., He, F., Hui, C., Jobe, R. T., Ostling, A., Polce, C., Šizling, A., Smith, A. B., Smith, K., Smart, S. M., Storch, D., Tjørve, E., Ugland, K.-I., Ulrich, W. & Varma, V. (2018) Upscaling biodiversity: Estimating the species–area relationship from small samples. Ecological Monographs, 88, 170–187.Google Scholar

Kylin, H. (1923) Växtsociologiska randanmärkningar. Botaniska Notiser, 1923, 161–234.Google Scholar

Lennon, J. J., Kunin, W. E. & Hartley, S. (2002) Fractal species distributions do not produce power-law species–area relationships. Oikos, 97, 378–386.Google Scholar

Lennon, J. J., Kunin, W. E., Hartley, S. & Gaston, K. J. (2007) Species distribution patterns, diversity scaling and testing for fractals in Southern African birds. Scaling biodiversity (ed. by Storch, D., Marquet, P. and Brown, J.), pp. 51–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lomolino, M. V. (2000) Ecology’s most general, yet protean pattern: The species–area relationship. Journal of Biogeography, 27, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lomolino, M. V. (2001) The species–area relationship: New challenges for an old pattern. Progress in Physical Geography, 25, 1–21.Google Scholar

Lomolino, M. V. (2002) ‘… there are areas too small, and areas too large to show clear diversity patterns…’ R. H. MacArthur (1972: 191). Journal of Biogeography, 29, 555–557.Google Scholar

Lomolino, M. V. & Weiser, M. D. (2001) Towards a more general species–area relationship: Diversity of all islands, great and small. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 431–445.Google Scholar

MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1963) An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution, 17, 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Maddux, R. D. (2004) Self-similarity and the species–area relationship. The American Naturalist, 163, 616–626.Google Scholar

Malyshev, L. I. (1991) Some quantitative approaches to problems of comparative floristics. Quantitative approaches in phytogeography (ed. by Nimis, P. L. and Crovello, T. J.), pp. 15–33. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martín, H. G. & Goldenfeld, N. (2006) On the origin and robustness of power-law species–area relationships in ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 10310–10315.Google Scholar

Matthews, T. J., Borregaard, M. K., Guilhaumon, F., Triantis, K. A. & Whittaker, R. J. (2016a) On the form of species–area relationships in habitat islands and true islands. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 25, 847–858.Google Scholar

Matthews, T. J., Steinbauer, M., Tzirkalli, E., Triantis, K. A. & Whittaker, R. J. (2014) Thresholds and the species–area relationship: A synthetic analysis of habitat island datasets. Journal of Biogeography, 41, 1018–1028.Google Scholar

Matthews, T. J., Triantis, K. A., Rigal, F., Borregaard, M. K., Guilhaumon, F. & Whittaker, R. J. (2016b) Island species–area relationships and species accumulation curves are not equivalent: An analysis of habitat island datasets. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 25, 607–618.Google Scholar

Miller, R. I. & Wiegert, R. G. (1989) Documenting completeness, species–area relations, and the species-abundance distribution of a regional flora. Ecology, 70, 16–22.Google Scholar

Olszewski, T. D. (2004) A unified mathematical framework for the measurement of richness and evenness within and among multiple communities. Oikos, 104, 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, M. W. (1990) The estimation of species richness by extrapolation. Ecology, 71, 1195–1198.Google Scholar

Pereira, M. & Daily, G. C. (2006) Biodiversity dynamics in countryside landscapes. Ecology, 87, 1877–1885.Google Scholar

Picard, N., Karambé, M. & Birnbaum, P. (2004) Species–area curve and spatial pattern. Écoscience, 11, 45–54.Google Scholar

Pimm, S. L. & Askins, R. A. (1995) Forest loss predict bird extinctions in eastern North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92, 9343–9347.Google Scholar

Pimm, S. L. & Raven, P. (2000) Extinction by numbers. Nature, 403, 843–845.Google Scholar

Plotkin, J. B., Potts, M. D., Leslie, N., Manokaran, N., LaFrankie, J. & Ashton, P. S. (2000) Species–area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 207, 81–99.Google Scholar

Preston, F. W. (1960) Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology, 41, 611–627.Google Scholar

Preston, F. W. (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I & II. Ecology, 43 , 185–215, 410–432.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scheiner, S. M. (2003) Six types of species–area curves. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 12, 441–447.Google Scholar

Scheiner, S. M. (2004) A mélange of curves – further dialogue about species–area curves. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 13, 479–484.Google Scholar

Simberloff, D. (1992) Do species–area curves predict extinction in fragmented forests? Tropical deforestation and species extinction (ed. by Whitmore, T. C. and Sayer, J. A.), pp. 75–89. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Šizling, A. L. & Storch, D. (2004) Power-law species–area relationships and self-similar species distributions within finite areas. Ecology Letters, 7, 60–68.Google Scholar

Šizling, A. L. & Storch, D. (2007) Geometry of species distributions: Random clustering and scale invariance. Scaling biodiversity (ed. by Storch, D., Marquet, P. A. and Brown, J. H.), pp. 77–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Šizling, A. L., Šizlingová, E., Tjørve, E., Tjørve, K. M. C. & Kunin, W. E. (2017) How to allow SAR collapse across local and continental scales: A resolution of the controversy between Storch et al. (2012) and Lazarina et al. (2013). Ecography, 40, 971–981.Google Scholar

Storch, D. (2016) The theory of the nested species–area relationship: Geometric foundations of biodiversity scaling. Journal of Vegetation Science, 27, 880–891.Google Scholar

Storch, D., Šizling, A. L. & Gaston, K. J. (2003) Geometry of the species–area relationship in central European birds: Testing the mechanism. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, L. R., Woiwood, I. P. & Perry, J. N. (1978) The density-dependence of spatial behaviour and the rarity of randomness. Journal of Animal Ecology, 47, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tjørve, E. (2002) Habitat size and number in multi-habitat landscapes: A model approach based on species–area curves. Ecography, 25, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tjørve, E. (2003) Shapes and functions of species–area curves: A review of possible models. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 827–835.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. (2009) Shapes and functions of species–area curves (II): A review of new models and parameterizations. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 1435–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tjørve, E. (2010) How to resolve the SLOSS debate: Lessons from species-diversity models. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 264, 604–612.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. (2012) Arrhenius and Gleason revisited: New hybrid models resolve an old controversy. Journal of Biogeography, 39, 629–639.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. & Tjørve, K. M. C. (2008) The species–area relationship, self-similarity, and the true meaning of the z-value. Ecology, 89, 3528–3533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tjørve, E. & Tjørve, K. M. C. (2011) Subjecting the theory of the small-island effect to Ockham's razor. Journal of Biogeography, 38, 1834–1839.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. & Tjørve, K. M. C. (2017) Species–area relationship. eLS (Encyclopedia of Life Sciences Online), pp. 1–9. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. & Turner, W. R. (2009) The importance of samples and isolates for species–area relationships. Ecography, 32, 391–400.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E., Kunin, W. E., Polce, C. & Tjørve, K. M. C. (2008) The species–area relationship: Separating the effects of species-abundance and spatial distribution. Journal of Ecology, 96, 1141–1151.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E., Tjørve, K. C. M., Šizlingová, E. & Šizling, A. L. (2018) Great theories of species diversity in space and why they were forgotten: The beginnings of a spatial ecology and the Nordic early 20th-century botanists. Journal of Biogeography, 45, 530–540.Google Scholar

Triantis, K. A., Guilhaumon, F. & Whittaker, R. J. (2012) The island species–area relationship: Biology and statistics. Journal of Biogeography, 39, 215–231.Google Scholar

Triantis, K. A., Mylonas, M., Lika, K. & Vardinoyannis, K. (2003) A model for the species–area–habitat relationship. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 19–27.Google Scholar

Turner, W. R. & Tjørve, E. (2005) Scale-dependence in species–area relationships. Ecography, 28, 721–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ulrich, W. & Buszko, J. (2003) Self-similarity and the species–area relation of Polish butterflies. Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ulrich, W. & Buszko, J. (2005) Detecting biodiversity hotspots using species–area and endemics–area relationships. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 1977–1988.Google Scholar

Veech, J. A. (2000) Choice of species–area function affects identification of hotspots. Conservation Biology, 14, 140–147.Google Scholar

Veech, J. A., Crist, T. O. & Summerville, K. S. (2003) Intraspecific aggregation decreases local species diversity of arthropods. Ecology, 84, 3376–3383.Google Scholar

Williams, C. B. (1950) The application of the logarithmic series to the frequency of occurrence of plant species in quadrats. Journal of Ecology, 38, 107–138.Google Scholar

Williams, C. B. (1964) Patterns in the balance of nature and related problems in quantitative ecology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Williams, M. R. (1995) An extreme-value function model of the species incidence and species–area relations. Ecology, 76, 2607–2616.Google Scholar

Williams, M. R., Lamont, B. B. & Hestridge, J. D. (2009) Species–area functions revisited. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 1994–2004.Google Scholar

Williamson, M., Gaston, K. J. & Lonsdale, W. M. (2001) The species–area relationship does not have an asymptote! Journal of Biogeography, 28, 827–830.Google Scholar

Williamson, M., Gaston, K. J. & Lonsdale, W. M. (2002) An asymptote is an asymptote and not found in species–area relationships. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 1713.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (1961) The nature of the taxon cycle in the Melanesian ant fauna. The American Naturalist, 95, 169–193.Google Scholar

Adler, P. B. & Lauenroth, W. K. (2003) The power of time: Spatiotemporal scaling of species diversity. Ecology Letters, 6, 749–756.Google Scholar

Adler, P. B., White, E. P., Lauenroth, W. K., Kaufman, D. M., Rassweiler, A. & Rusak, J. A. (2005) Evidence for a general species–time–area relationship. Ecology, 86, 2032–2039.Google Scholar

Allen, A. P. & White, E. P. (2003) Effects of range size on species–area relationships. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5, 493–499.Google Scholar

Arita, H. T. & Rodríguez, P. (2002) Geographic range, turnover rate and the scaling of species diversity. Ecography, 25, 541–550.Google Scholar

Arrhenius, O. (1921) Species and area. Journal of Ecology, 9, 95–99.Google Scholar

Azaele, S., Muneepeerakul, R., Maritan, A., Rinaldo, A. & Rodriguez-Iturbea, I. (2008) Predicting spatial similarity of freshwater fish biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 7058–7062.Google Scholar

Azovsky, A. I. (2002) Size-dependent species–area relationship in benthos: Is the world more diverse for microbes? Ecography, 25, 273–282.Google Scholar

Bartha, S. & Ittzés, P. (2001) Local richness-species pool ratio: A consequence of the species–area relationship. Folia Geobotanica, 36, 9–23.Google Scholar

Bonn, A., Storch, D. & Gaston, K. J. (2004) Structure of the species–energy relationship. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271, 1685–1691.Google Scholar

Caley, M. J. & Schluter, D. (1997) The relationship between local and regional diversity. Ecology, 78, 70–80.Google Scholar

Carey, S., Harte, J. & delMoral, R. (2006) Effect of community assembly and primary succession on the species–area relationship in disturbed ecosystems. Ecography, 29, 866–872.Google Scholar

Chiarucci, A., Viciani, D., Winter, C. & Diekmann, M. (2006) Effects of productivity on species–area curves in herbaceous vegetation: Evidence from experimental and observational data. Oikos, 115, 475–483.Google Scholar

Coleman, D. B. (1981) On random placement and species–area relations. Mathematical Biosciences, 54, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condit, R., Hubbell, S. P., Lafrankie, J. V., Sukumar, R., Manokaran, N., Foster, R. B. & Ashton, P. S. (1996) Species–area and species–individual relationships for tropical trees: A comparison of three 50-ha plots. Journal of Ecology, 84, 549–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, E. F. & McCoy, E. D. (1979) The statistics and biology of the species–area relationship. The American Naturalist, 113, 791–833.Google Scholar

Dengler, J. (2009) Which function describes the species–area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 728–744.Google Scholar

Drakare, S., Lennon, J. L. & Hillebrand, H. (2006) The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species–area relationships. Ecology Letters, 9, 215–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Finlay, B. J. (2002) Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science, 296, 1061–1063.Google Scholar

Fridley, J. D., Peet, R. K., Wentworth, T. R. & White, P. S. (2005) Connecting fine- and broad-scale species–area relationships of southeastern U.S. flora. Ecology, 86, 1172–1177.Google Scholar

Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M. & Lawton, J. H. (1997) Interspecific abundance–range size relationships: An appraisal of mechanisms. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 579–601.Google Scholar

Gaston, K. J., Evans, K. L. & Lennon, J. J. (2007) The scaling of spatial turnover: Pruning the thicket. Scaling Biodiversity. (ed. by Storch, D., Marquet, P. A. & Brown, J. H.), pp. 181–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gleason, H. A. (1922) On the relation between species and area. Ecology, 3, 158–162.Google Scholar

Gray, J. S., Ugland, K. I. & Lambshead, J. (2004) On species accumulation and species–area curves. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 13, 567–568.Google Scholar

Green, J. L. & Plotkin, J. B. (2007) A statistical theory for sampling species abundances. Ecology Letters, 10, 1037–1045.Google Scholar

Haegeman, B. & Etienne, R. S. (2010) Entropy maximization and the spatial distribution of species. The American Naturalist, 175, E74–E90.Google Scholar

Hanski, I. & Gyllenberg, M. (1997) Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science, 275, 397–400.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. A., Allan, D. G., Underhill, L. G., Herremans, M., Tree, A. J., Parker, V. & Brown, C. J. (1997) The atlas of southern African birds. Vol I & II. Johannesburg: Bird Life South Africa.Google Scholar

Harte, J. & Kinzig, A. P. (1997) On the implications of species–area relationships for endemism, spatial turnover, and food web patterns. Oikos, 80, 417–427.Google Scholar

Harte, J., Conlisk, E., Ostling, A., Green, J. L. & Smith, A. B. (2005) A theory of spatial structure in ecological communities at multiple spatial scales. Ecological Monographs, 75, 179–197.Google Scholar

Harte, J., Kinzig, A. & Green, J. (1999) Self-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species. Science, 284, 334–336.Google Scholar

Harte, J., Smith, A. B. & Storch, D. (2009) Biodiversity scales from plots to biomes with a universal species–area curve. Ecology Letters, 12, 789–797.Google Scholar

He, F. & Condit, R. (2007) The distribution of species: Occupancy, scale, and rarity. Scaling biodiversity (ed. by Storch, D., Marquet, P. A. and Brown, J. H.), pp. 32–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

He, F. & Gaston, K. J. (2000) Estimating species abundance from occurrence. The American Naturalist, 156, 553–559.Google Scholar

He, F. & Legendre, P. (1996) On species–area relations. The American Naturalist, 148, 719–737.Google Scholar

He, F. & Legendre, P. (2002) Species diversity patterns derived from species–area models. Ecology, 85, 1185–1198.Google Scholar

Hubbell, S. P. (2001) The unified theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review, 106, 620–630.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1982) On the rationale of maximum entropy methods. Proceedings of the IEEE, 70, 939–952.Google Scholar

Koleff, P., Gaston, K. J. & Lennon, J. J. (2003) Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 367–382.Google Scholar

Kunin, W. E. (1997) Sample shape, spatial scale and species counts: Implications for reserve design. Biological Conservation, 82, 369–377.Google Scholar

Kunin, W. E. (1998) Extrapolating species abundances across spatial scales. Science, 281, 1513–1515.Google Scholar

Kunin, W. E., Harte, J., He, F., Hui, C., Jobe, R. T., Ostling, A., Polce, C., Šizling, A. L., Smith, A. B., Smith, K., Smart, S. M., Storch, D., Tjørve, E., Ugland, K.-I., Ulrich, W. & Varma, V. (2018) Up-scaling biodiversity: Estimating the species–area relationship from small samples. Ecological Monographs, 88, 170–187.Google Scholar

Kůrka, P., Šizling, A. L. & Rosindell, J. (2010) Analytical evidence for scale-invariance in the shape of species abundance distributions. Mathematical Biosciences, 223, 151–159.Google Scholar

Lazarina, M., Kallimanis, A. S. & Sgardelis, S. (2013) Does the universality of the species–area relationship apply to smaller scales and across taxonomic groups? Ecography, 36, 965–970.Google Scholar

Leitner, W. A. & Rosenzweig, M. L. (1997) Nested species–area curves and stochastic sampling: A new theory. Oikos, 79, 503–512.Google Scholar

Lennon, J. J., Kunin, W. E. & Hartley, S. (2002) Fractal species distributions do not produce power-law species area distribution. Oikos, 97, 378–386.Google Scholar

Lepš, J. & Štursa, J. (1989) Species–area curve, life history strategies, and succession: A field test of relationships. Vegetatio, 83, 249–257.Google Scholar

MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Martín, H. G. & Goldenfeld, N. (2006) On the origin and robustness of power-law species–area relationships in ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 10310–10315.Google Scholar

May, R. (1975) Patterns of species abundance and diversity. Ecology and evolution of communities (ed. by Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M.), pp. 81–120. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

McGill, B. J. (2010) Towards a unification of unified theories of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 13, 627–642.Google Scholar

McGill, B. J. & Collins, C. (2003) A unified theory for macroecology based on spatial patterns of abundance. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5, 469–492.Google Scholar

Nachman, G. (1981) A mathematical model of the functional relationship between density and spatial distribution of a population. Journal of Animal Ecology, 50, 453–460.Google Scholar

Nee, S. & Cotgreave, P. (2002) Does the species–area relationship account for the density–area relationship? Oikos, 99, 545–551.Google Scholar

Nekola, J. C. & White, P. S. (1999) Distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography, 26, 867–878.Google Scholar

O’Dwyer, J. P. & Green, J. L. (2010) Field theory for biogeography: A spatially explicit model for predicting patterns of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 13, 87–95.Google Scholar

Ovaskainen, O. & Hanski, I. (2003) The species–area relationship derived from species-specific incidence functions. Ecology Letters, 6, 903–909.Google Scholar

Pautasso, M. & Weisberg, P. J. (2008) Negative density–area relationship: The importance of zeros. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 17, 203–210.Google Scholar

Preston, F. V. (1960) Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology, 41, 611–627.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, M. L. & Ziv, Y. (1999) The echo pattern of species diversity: Pattern and processes. Ecography, 22, 614–628.Google Scholar

Rosindell, J. & Cornell, S. J. (2007) Species–area relationships from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape. Ecology Letters, 10, 586–595.Google Scholar

Rosindell, J. & Cornell, S. J. (2009) Species–area curves, neutral models, and long-distance dispersal. Ecology, 90, 1743–1750.Google Scholar

Scheiner, S. M. (2003) Six types of species–area curves. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 12, 441–447.Google Scholar

Scheiner, S. M. (2004) A mélange of curves – Further dialogue about species–area relationships. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 13, 479–484.Google Scholar

Shmida, A. & Wilson, M. V. (1985) Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 12, 1–20.Google Scholar

Šizling, A. L. & Storch, D. (2004) Power-law species–area relationships and self-similar species distributions within finite areas. Ecology Letters, 7, 60–68.Google Scholar

Šizling, A. L. & Storch, D. (2007) Geometry of species distributions: Random clustering and scale invariance. Scaling Biodiversity (ed. by Storch, D., Marquet, P. A. & Brown, J. H.), pp. 77–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Šizling, A. L., Kunin, W. E., Šizlingová, E., Reif, J. & Storch, D. (2011) Between geometry and biology: The problem of universality of the species–area relationship. The American Naturalist, 178, 602–611.Google Scholar

Šizling, A. L., Šizlingová, E., Tjørve, E., Tjørve, K. M. C. & Kunin, W. E. (2017) How to allow SAR collapse across local and continental scales: A resolution of the controversy between Storch et al. (2012) and Lazarina et al. (2013). Ecography, 40, 971–981.Google Scholar

Šizling, A. L., Storch, D., Reif, J. & Gaston, K. J. (2009b) Invariance in species-abundance distributions. Theoretical Ecology, 2, 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Šizling, A. L., Storch, D., Šizlingová, E., Reif, J. & Gaston, K. J. (2009a) Species abundance distribution results from a spatial analogy of central limit theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 6691–6695.Google Scholar

Storch, D. (2016) The theory of the nested species–area relationship: Geometric foundations of biodiversity scaling. Journal of Vegetation Science, 27, 880–891.Google Scholar

Storch, D. & Šizling, A. L. (2008) The concept of taxon invariance in ecology: Do diversity patterns vary with changes in taxonomic resolution? Folia Geobotanica, 43, 329–344.Google Scholar

Storch, D., Evans, K. L. & Gaston, K. J. (2005) The species–area–energy relationship. Ecology Letters, 8, 487–492.Google Scholar

Storch, D., Keil, P. & Jetz, W. (2012) Universal species–area and endemics–area relationships at continental scales. Nature, 488, 78–81.Google Scholar

Storch, D., Marquet, P. A. & Brown, J. H. (eds.) (2007) Scaling biodiversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Storch, D., Šizling, A. L., Reif, J., Polechová, J., Šizlingová, E. & Gaston, K. J. (2008) The quest for a null model for macroecological patterns: Geometry of species distributions at multiple spatial scales. Ecology Letters, 11, 771–784.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. (2003) Shapes and functions of species–area curves: A review of possible models. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 827–835.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. (2009) Shapes and functions of species–area curves (II): A review of new models and parameterizations. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 1435–1445.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. & Tjørve, K. M. C. (2008) The species–area relationship, self-similarity, and the true meaning of the z-value. Ecology, 89, 3528–3533.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. & Turner, W. R. (2009) The importance of samples and isolates for species–area relationships. Ecography, 32, 391–400.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E., Kunin, W. E., Polce, C. & Tjørve, K. M. C. (2008) Species–area relationship: Separating the effects of species abundance and spatial distribution. Journal of Ecology, 96, 1141–1151.Google Scholar

Ugland, K. I., Gray, J. S. & Ellingsen, K. E. (2003) The species-accumulation curve and estimation of species richness. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 888–897.Google Scholar

Ugland, K. I., Gray, J. S. & Lambshead, J. D. (2005) Species accumulation curves analysed by a class of null models discovered by Arrhenius. Oikos, 108, 263–274.Google Scholar

Ulrich, W. & Buszko, J. (2003) Self-similarity and the species–area relation of Polish butterflies. Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 263–270.Google Scholar

Virkkala, R. (1993) Ranges of northern forest passerines: A fractal analysis. Oikos, 67, 218–226.Google Scholar

White, E. P. (2007) Spatiotemporal scaling of species richness: Patterns, processes, and implications. Scaling Biodiversity (ed. by Storch, D., Marquet, P. A. and Brown, J. H.), pp. 325–346. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittaker, R. H. (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs, 30, 279–338.Google Scholar

Williams, M. R. (1995) An extreme-value function model of the species incidence and species–area relationship. Ecology, 76, 2607–2616.Google Scholar

Williamson, M. H. (1988) Relationship of species number to area, distance and other variables. Analytical biogeography (ed. by Myers, A. A. & Giller, P. S.), pp. 91–115. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Wright, D. H. (1991) Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. Journal of Biogeography, 18, 463–466.Google Scholar

Arrhenius, O. (1921) Species and area. Journal of Ecology, 9, 95–99.Google Scholar

Borda-de-Água, L., Hubbell, S. P. & He, F. (2007) Scaling biodiversity under neutrality. Scaling Biodiversity (ed. by Storch, D., Marquet, P. A. and Brown, J. H.), pp. 347–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Borda-de-Água, L., Hubbell, S. P. & McAllister, M. (2002) Species–area curves, diversity indices, and species abundance distributions: A multifractal analysis. The American Naturalist, 159, 138–155.Google Scholar

Castillo, E. (1988) Extreme value theory in engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Castillo, E., Hadi, A. S., Balakrishnan, N. & Sarabia, J. M. (2005) Extreme value and related models with applications in engineering and science. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Coles, S. (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Condit, R. (1998) Tropical forest census plots: Methods and results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama and a comparison with other plots. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Condit, R., Hubbell, S. P., Lafrankie, J. V., Sukumar, R., Manokaran, N., Foster, R. B. & Ashton, P. S. (1996) Species–area and species–individual relationships for tropical trees: A comparison of three 50-ha plots. Journal of Ecology, 84, 549–562.Google Scholar

de Haan, L. (1970) On regular variation and its applications to the weak convergence of sample extremes. Matematisch Centrum Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Falk, M., Hüsler, J. & Reiss, R. D. (2011) Laws of small numbers: Extremes and rare events, 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. & Tippett, L. H. C. (1928) Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 24, 180–190.Google Scholar

Fréchet, M. (1927) Sur la loi de probabilité de l'écart maximum. Annales de la Société Polonaise de Mathématique, 6, 93–116.Google Scholar

García, C. & Borda‐de‐Água, L. (2017) Extended dispersal kernels in a changing world: Insights from statistics of extremes. Journal of Ecology, 105, 63–74.Google Scholar

Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A. & Rubin, D. B. (2014) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar

Gilleland, E. & Katz, R. W. (2016) extRemes 2.0: An extreme value analysis package in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 72, 1248–1287.Google Scholar

Gleason, H. A. (1922) On the relation between species and area. Ecology, 3, 158–162.Google Scholar

Gnedenko, B. V. (1943) Sur la distribution limite d'une série aléatoire, Annals of Mathematics, 44, 423–453.Google Scholar

Guilhaumon, F., Gimenez, O., Gaston, K. J. & Mouillot, D. (2008) Taxonomic and regional uncertainty in species–area relationships and the identification of richness hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 15458–15463.Google Scholar

Gumbel, E. J. (1935) Les valeurs extrêmes des distributions statistiques. Annales de l’ Institute Henri Poincaré, 5, 115–158.Google Scholar

He, F. & Hubbell, S. P. (2011) Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss. Nature, 473, 368–371.Google Scholar

Hubbell, S. P. (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kellner, J. R. & Hubbell, S. P. (2017) Adult mortality in a low‐density tree population using high‐resolution remote sensing. Ecology, 98, 1700–1709.Google Scholar

Kellner, J. R., Armston, J., Birrer, M., Cushman, K. C., Duncanson, L., Eck, C., Falleger, C., Imbach, B., Král, K., Krůček, M., Trochta, J., Vrška, T. & Zgraggen, C. (2019) New opportunities for forest remote sensing through ultra-high-density drone lidar. Surveys in Geophysics, 40, 959–977.Google Scholar

Levy, O., Ball, B. A., Bond-Lamberty, B., Cheruvelil, K. S., Finley, A. O., Lottig, N. R., Punyasena, S. W., Xiao, J., Zhou, J., Buckley, L. B., Filstrup, C. T., Keitt, T. H., Kellner, J. R., Knapp, A. K., Richardson, A. D., Tcheng, D., Toomey, M., Vargas, R., Voordeckers, J. W., Wagner, T. & Williams, J. W. (2014) Approaches to advance scientific understanding of macrosystems ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 15–23.Google Scholar

Martín, H. G. & Goldenfeld, N. (2006) On the origin and robustness of power-law species–area relationships in ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 10310–10315.Google Scholar

Matthews, T. J., Triantis, K. A., Rigal, F., Borregaard, M. K., Guilhaumon, F. & Whittaker, R. J. (2016) Island species–area relationships and species accumulation curves are not equivalent: An analysis of habitat island datasets. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 25, 607–618.Google Scholar

May, R.M. (1975) Patterns of species abundance and diversity. Ecology and evolution of communities (ed. by Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M.), pp. 81–120. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar

von Mises, R. (1936) La distribution de la plus grande de n valeurs. Reproduced, Selected papers of von Mises, R. (1964) American Mathematical Society, 2, 271–294.Google Scholar

Preston, F. W. (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I. Ecology, 43, 185–215.Google Scholar

R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scheiner, S. M. (2003) Six types of species–area curves. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 12, 441–447.Google Scholar

Tjørve, E. (2003) Shapes and functions of species–area curves: A review of possible models. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 827–835.Google Scholar

Triantis, K. A., Guilhaumon, F. & Whittaker, R. J. (2012) The island species–area relationship: Biology and statistics. Journal of Biogeography, 39, 215–231.Google Scholar

Williams, M. R. (1995) An extreme‐value function model of the species incidence and species‐area relations. Ecology, 76, 2607–2616.Google Scholar

Williams, M. R., Lamont, B. B. & Henstridge, J. D. (2009) Species–area functions revisited. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 1994–2004.Google Scholar

Arfken, G. B. & Weber, H. J. (2005) Mathematical methods for physicists, 6th ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Brown, J., Gillooly, J., Allen, A., Savage, V. & West, G. (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 85, 1771–1789.Google Scholar

Cavender-Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. & Kembel, S. W. (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecology Letters, 12, 693–715.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Dewar, R. C. & Porté, A. (2008) Statistical mechanics unifies different ecological patterns. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 251, 389–403.Google Scholar

Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E. & Yates, C. J. (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 17, 43–57.Google Scholar

Frieden, B. R. (1972) Restoring with maximum likelihood and maximum entropy. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 62, 511–518.Google Scholar

Golan, A. (2018) Foundations of info-metrics: Modeling, inference, and imperfect information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Golan, A., Judge, G. & Miller, D. (1996) Maximum entropy econometrics: Robust estimation with limited data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Graham, C. H., Parra, J. L., Rahbek, C. & McGuire, J. A. (2009) Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 19673–19678.Google Scholar

Green, J. L., Holmes, A. J., Westoby, M., Oliver, I., Briscoe, D., Dangerfield, M., Gillings, M. & Beattie, A. (2004) Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature, 430, 135–138.Google Scholar

Gull, S. F. & Newton, T. J. (1986) Maximum entropy tomography. Applied Optics, 25, 156–160.Google Scholar

Haegeman, B. & Loreau, M. (2009) Trivial and nontrivial applications of entropy maximization in ecology: A reply to Shipley. Oikos, 118, 1270–1278.Google Scholar

Harte, J. (2011) Maximum entropy and ecology: A theory of abundance, distribution, and energetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harte, J. & Kitzes, J. (2014) Inferring regional-scale species diversity from small-plot censuses. PLoS One, 10, e0117527.Google Scholar

Harte, J. & Newman, E. A. (2014) Maximum information entropy: A foundation for ecological theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 384–389.Google Scholar

Harte, J., Kitzes, J., Newman, E. & Rominger, A. (2013) Taxon categories and the universal species–area relationship. The American Naturalist, 181, 282–287.Google Scholar

Harte, J., Rominger, A. & Zhang, Y. (2015) Extending the maximum entropy theory of ecology to higher taxonomic levels. Ecology Letters, 18, 1068–1077.Google Scholar

Harte, J., Smith, A. & Storch, D. (2009) Biodiversity scales from plots to biomes with a universal species area curve. Ecology Letters, 12, 789–797.Google Scholar

Harte, J., Zillio, T., Conlisk, E. & Smith, A. (2008) Maximum entropy and the state variable approach to macroecology. Ecology, 89, 2700–2711.Google Scholar

Harvey, B. J. & Holzman, B. A. (2014) Divergent successional pathways of stand development following fire in a California closed‐cone pine forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 25, 88–99.Google Scholar

Horner-Devine, M., Lage, M., Hughes, J. & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2004) A taxa–area relationship for bacteria. Nature, 432, 750–753.Google Scholar

Hubbell, S. P. (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1957a) Information theory and statistical mechanics: I. Physical Review, 106, 620–630.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1957b) Information theory and statistical mechanics: II. Physical Review, 108, 171–191.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1963) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Brandeis Summer Institute 1962, statistical physics (ed. by Ford, K.), pp. 181–218. New York: Benjamin.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1968) Prior probabilities. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4, 227–240.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1979) Where do we stand on maximum entropy. The maximum entropy principle (ed. by Levine, R. and Tribus, M.), pp. 15–118. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1982) On the rationale of maximum entropy methods. Proceedings of the IEEE, 70, 939–952.Google Scholar

Kempton, R. A. & Taylor, L. R. (1974) Log-series and log-normal parameters as diversity discriminants for the Lepidoptera. Journal of Animal Ecology, 43, 381–399.Google Scholar

Kitzes, J. & Wilber, M. (2016) macroeco: Reproducible ecological pattern analysis in Python. Ecography, 39, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraft, N. J., Cornwell, W. K., Webb, C. O. & Ackerly, D. D. (2007) Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. The American Naturalist, 170, 271–283.Google Scholar

Krishnamani, R., Kumar, A. & Harte, J. (2004) Estimating species richness at large spatial scales using data from small discrete plots. Ecography, 27, 637–642.Google Scholar

Kunin, W., Harte, J., He, F., Hui, C., Jobe, J., Ostling, A., Polce, C., Šizling, A., Smith, A., Smith, K., Smart, S., Storch, D., Tjørve, E., Ugland, K., Ulrich, W. & Varma, V. (2018) Upscaling biodiversity: Estimating the species–area relationship from small samples. Ecological Monographs, 88, 170–187.Google Scholar

Lozano, F. & Schwartz, M. (2005) Patterns of rarity and taxonomic group size in plants. Biological Conservation, 126, 146–154.Google Scholar

Marquet, P. A., Allen, A. P., Brown, J. H., Dunne, J. A., Enquist, B. J., Gillooly, J. F., Gowaty, P. A., Green, J. L., Harte, J., Hubbell, S. P., O’Dwyer, J., Okie, J. G., Ostling, A., Ritchie, M., Storch, D. & West, G. B. (2014) On theory in ecology. BioScience, 64, 701–710.Google Scholar

Meshulam, L., Gauthier, J., Brody, C., Tank, D. & Bialek, W. (2017) Collective behavior of place and non-place neurons in the hippocampal network. Neuron, 96, 1178–1191.Google Scholar

Mora, T., Walczak, A., Bialek, W. & Callan, C. (2010) Maximum entropy models for antibody diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 5405–5410.Google Scholar

Newman, E. A., Wilber, M. Q., Kopper, K. E., Moritz, M. A., Falk, D. A., McKenzie, D. & Harte, J. (2020) A comparative study of community structure metrics in a high-severity disturbance regime. Ecosphere, 11(1):e3022.10.1002/ecs2.3022.Google Scholar

Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190, 231–259.Google Scholar

Rominger, A. J. & Merow, C. (2016) meteR: An R package for testing the maximum entropy theory of ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 241–247.Google Scholar

Rominger, A. J., Goodman, K. R., Lim, J. Y., Armstrong, E. E., Becking, L. E., Bennett, G. M., Brewer, M. S., Cotoras, D. D., Ewing, C. P., Harte, J., Martinez, N. D., O’Grady, P. M., Percy, D. M., Price, D. K., Roderick, G. K., Shaw, K. L., Valdovinos, F. S., Gruner, D. S. & Gillespie, R. G. (2016) Community assembly on isolated islands. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 25 , 769–780.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roussev, V. (2010) Data fingerprinting with similarity digests. Advances in digital forensics VI (ed. by Chow, K.-P. and Shenoi, S.), pp. 207–226. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1912) On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13, 1–26.Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. & Simberloff, D. (2001) Taxon size predicts rates of rarity in vascular plants. Ecology Letters, 4, 464–469.Google Scholar

Shipley, B., Ville, D. & Garnier, E. (2006) From plant traits to plant communities: A statistical mechanics approach to biodiversity. Science, 314, 812–814.Google Scholar

Skilling, J. (1984) Theory of maximum entropy image reconstruction. Maximum entropy and Bayesian methods in applied statistics (ed. by Justice, J. H.), pp. 156–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, F. A., Brown, J. H., Haskell, J. P., Lyons, S. K., Alroy, J., Charnov, E. L., Dayan, T., Enquist, B. J., Morgan Ernest, S. K., Hadly, E. A. & Jones, K. E. (2004) Similarity of mammalian body size across the taxonomic hierarchy and across space and time. The American Naturalist, 163, 672–691.Google Scholar

Steinbach, P. J., Ionescu, R. & Matthews, C. R. (2002) Analysis of kinetics using a hybrid maximum-entropy/nonlinear-least-squares method: Application to protein folding. Biophysical Journal, 82, 2244–2255.Google Scholar

Supp, S. R., Xiao, X., Ernest, S. & White, E. (2012) An experimental test of the response of macroecological patterns to altered species interactions. Ecology, 93, 2505–2511.Google Scholar

Swenson, N. G., Enquist, B. J., Pither, J., Thompson, J. & Zimmerman, J. K. (2006) The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. Ecology, 87, 2418–2424.Google Scholar

ter Steege, H., Pitman, N. C. A., Sabatier, D., Baraloto, C., Salomão, R. P., Guevara, J. E., Phillips, O. L., Castilho, C. V., Magnusson, W. E., Molino, J.-F., Monteagudo, A., Núñez Vargas, P., Montero, J. C., Feldpausch, T. R., Coronado, E. N. H., Killeen, T. J., Mostacedo, B., Vasquez, R., Assis, R. L., Terborgh, J., Wittmann, F., Andrade, A., Laurance, W. F., Laurance, S. G. W., Marimon, B. S., Marimon, B.-H., Guimarães Vieira, I. C., Amaral, I. L., Brienen, R., Castellanos, H., Cárdenas López, D., Duivenvoorden, J. F., Mogollón, H. F., Matos, F. D. d. A., Dávila, N., García-Villacorta, R., Stevenson Diaz, P. R., Costa, F., Emilio, T., Levis, C., Schietti, J., Souza, P., Alonso, A., Dallmeier, F., Montoya, A. J. D., Fernandez Piedade, M. T., Araujo-Murakami, A., Arroyo, L., Gribel, R., Fine, P. V. A., Peres, C. A., Toledo, M., Aymard, C. G. A., Baker, T. R., Cerón, C., Engel, J., Henkel, T. W., Maas, P., Petronelli, P., Stropp, J., Zartman, C. E., Daly, D., Neill, D., Silveira, M., Paredes, M. R., Chave, J., Lima Filho, D. d. A., Jørgensen, P. M., Fuentes, A., Schöngart, J., Cornejo Valverde, F., Di Fiore, A., Jimenez, E. M., Peñuela Mora, M. C., Phillips, J. F., Rivas, G., van Andel, T. R., von Hildebrand, P., Hoffman, B., Zent, E. L., Malhi, Y., Prieto, A., Rudas, A., Ruschell, A. R., Silva, N., Vos, V., Zent, S., Oliveira, A. A., Schutz, A. C., Gonzales, T., Trindade Nascimento, M., Ramirez-Angulo, H., Sierra, R., Tirado, M., Umaña Medina, M. N., van der Heijden, G., Vela, C. I. A., Vilanova Torre, E., Vriesendorp, C., Wang, O., Young, K. R., Baider, C., Balslev, H., Ferreira, C., Mesones, I., Torres-Lezama, A., Urrego Giraldo, L. E., Zagt, R., Alexiades, M. N., Hernandez, L., Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, I., Milliken, W., Palacios Cuenca, W., Pauletto, D., Valderrama Sandoval, E., Valenzuela Gamarra, L., Dexter, K. G., Feeley, K., Lopez-Gonzalez, G. & Silman, M. R. (2013) Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora. Science, 342, 1243092.Google Scholar

Tolstoy, L. (1952) Anna Karenina (trans by Garnett, C.), p. 1. New York: Heritage Press.Google Scholar

Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 475–505.Google Scholar

White, E. P., Thibault, K. & Xiao, X. (2012) Characterizing species abundance distributions across taxa and ecosystems using a simple maximum entropy model. Ecology, 93, 1772–1778.Google Scholar

Williams, R. J. (2010) Simple MaxEnt models explain food web degree distributions. Theoretical Ecology, 3, 45–52.Google Scholar

Xiao, X., McGlinn, D. & White, E. (2015) A strong test of the maximum entropy theory of ecology. The American Naturalist, 185, E70–E80.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. (eds.) (1972) Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, 10th Printing. National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series 55. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Allouche, O. & Kadmon, R. (2009) Demographic analysis of Hubbell’s neutral theory of biodiversity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 258, 274–280.Google Scholar

Alzate, A., Janzen, T., Bonte, D., Rosindell, J. & Etienne, R. S. (2019) A simple spatially explicit neutral model explains the range size distribution of reef fishes. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 28, 875–890.Google Scholar

Bell, G. (2001) Neutral macroecology. Science, 293, 2413–2418.Google Scholar

Bewick, S., Chisholm, R. A., Akçay, E. & Godsoe, W. (2015) A stochastic biodiversity model with overlapping niche structure. Theoretical Ecology, 8, 81–109.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. A. & Lichstein, J. W. (2009) Linking dispersal, immigration and scale in the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 12, 1385–1393.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. A. & Pacala, S. W. (2010) Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 15821–15825.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. A., Fung, T., Chimalakonda, D. & O’Dwyer, J. P. (2016) Maintenance of biodiversity on islands. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20160102.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. A., Lim, F., Yeoh, Y. S., Seah, W. W., Condit, R. & Rosindell, J. (2018) Species–area relationships and biodiversity loss in fragmented landscapes. Ecology Letters, 21, 804–813.Google Scholar

Clark, J. S. (2009) Beyond neutral science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 8–15.Google Scholar

Clark, J. S. (2012) The coherence problem with the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 198–202.Google Scholar

Clark, J. S., Silman, M., Kern, R., Macklin, E. & HilleRisLambers, J. (1999) Seed dispersal near and far: Patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology, 80, 1475–1494.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. M. (1975) The island dilemma: Lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biological Conservation, 7, 129–146.Google Scholar

Durrett, R. & Levin, S. (1996) Spatial models for species–area curves. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 179, 119–127.Google Scholar

Etienne, R. S. & Alonso, D. (2005) A dispersal-limited sampling theory for species and alleles. Ecology Letters, 8, 1147–1156.Google Scholar

Haegeman, B. & Etienne, R. S. (2017) A general sampling formula for community structure data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 1506–1519.Google Scholar

Halley, J. M. & Iwasa, Y. (2011) Neutral theory as a predictor of avifaunal extinctions after habitat loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 2316–2321.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O. & Townshend, J. R. G. (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342, 850–853.Google Scholar

Hanski, I., Zurita, G. A., Bellocq, M. I. & Rybicki, J. (2013) Species–fragmented area relationship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110, 12715–12720.Google Scholar

He, F. (2005) Deriving a neutral model of species abundance from fundamental mechanisms of population dynamics. Functional Ecology, 19, 187–193.Google Scholar

He, F. & Legendre, P. (2002) Species diversity patterns derived from species–area models. Ecology, 83, 1185–1198.Google Scholar

Heaney, L. R. (2000) Dynamic disequilibrium: A long‐term, large‐scale perspective on the equilibrium model of island biogeography. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 9, 59–74.Google Scholar

Holley, R. A. & Liggett, T. M. (1975) Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting systems and the voter model. The Annals of Probability, 3, 643–663.Google Scholar

Hubbell, S. P. (1997) A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Coral Reefs, 16, S9–S21.Google Scholar

Hubbell, S. P. (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kingman, J. F. C. (1982) The coalescent. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 13, 235–248.Google Scholar

Lewis, O. T. (2006) Climate change, species–area curves and the extinction crisis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361, 163–171.Google Scholar

Lomolino, M. V. & Weiser, M. D. (2001) Towards a more general species–area relationship: Diversity on all islands, great and small. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 431–445.Google Scholar

MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1963) An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution, 17, 373–387.Google Scholar

MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human bell-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

McGarigal, K. & Marks, B. J. (1995) FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. Portland, OR: Northwest Research Station, USDA-Forest Service.Google Scholar

McGill, B. J. (2003) A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature, 422, 881–885.Google Scholar

Niering, W. A. (1963) Terrestrial ecology of Kapingamarangi Atoll, Caroline Islands. Ecological Monographs, 33, 131–160.Google Scholar

O’Dwyer, J. P. & Cornell, S. J. (2018) Cross-scale neutral ecology and the maintenance of biodiversity. Scientific Reports, 8, 10200.Google Scholar

O’Dwyer, J. P. & Green, J. L. (2010) Field theory for biogeography: A spatially explicit model for predicting patterns of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 13, 87–95.Google Scholar

Pigolotti, S. & Cencini, M. (2009) Speciation-rate dependence in species–area relationships. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 260, 83–89.Google Scholar

Plotkin, J. B., Potts, M. D., Yu, D. W., Bunyavejchewin, S., Condit, R., Foster, R., Hubbell, S., LaFrankie, J., Manokaran, N., Seng, L. H., Sukumar, R., Nowak, M. A. & Ashton, P. S. (2000) Predicting species diversity in tropical forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97, 10850–10854.Google Scholar

Preston, F. W. (1960) Time and space variation of species. Ecology, 41, 611–627.Google Scholar

Ricklefs, R. E. (2006) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: Do the numbers add up? Ecology, 87, 1424–1431.Google Scholar

Rosindell, J. & Cornell, S. J. (2007) Species–area relationships from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape. Ecology Letters, 10, 586–595.Google Scholar

Rosindell, J. & Cornell, S. J. (2009) Species–area curves, neutral models, and long-distance dispersal. Ecology, 90, 1743–1750.Google Scholar

Rosindell, J. & Phillimore, A. B. (2011) A unified model of island biogeography sheds light on the zone of radiation. Ecology Letters, 14, 552–560.Google Scholar

Rosindell, J., Cornell, S. J., Hubbell, S. P. & Etienne, R. S. (2010) Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 13, 716–727.Google Scholar

Rosindell, J., Hubbell, S. P. & Etienne, R. S. (2011) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26, 340–348.Google Scholar

Rosindell, J., Hubbell, S. P., He, F., Harmon, L. J. & Etienne, R. S. (2012a) The case for ecological neutral theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosindell, J., Jansen, P. A. & Etienne, R. S. (2012b) Age structure in neutral theory resolves inconsistencies related to reproductive-size threshold. Journal of Plant Ecology, 5, 64–71.Google Scholar

Rosindell, J., Wong, Y. & Etienne, R. S. (2008) A coalescence approach to spatial neutral ecology. Ecological Informatics, 3, 259–271.Google Scholar

Scheiner, S. M. (2003) Six types of species–area curves. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 12, 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storch, D., Keil, P. & Jetz, W. (2012) Universal species–area and endemics–area relationships at continental scales. Nature, 488, 78–81.Google Scholar

Thomas, C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L. J., Collingham, Y. C., Erasmus, B. F. N., Siqueira, M. F. D., Grainger, A., Hannah, L., Hughes, L., Huntley, B., Jaarsveld, A. S. V., Midgley, G. F., Miles, L., Ortega-Huerta, M. A., Peterson, A. T., Phillips, O. L. & Williams, S. E. (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427, 145–148.Google Scholar

Thompson, S. E., Chisholm, R. A. & Rosindell, J. (2019) Characterising extinction debt following habitat fragmentation using neutral theory. Ecology Letters, 22, 2087–2096.Google Scholar

Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L. & Nowak, M. A. (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, 65–66.Google Scholar

Vallade, M. & Houchmandzadeh, B. (2003) Analytical solution of a neutral model of biodiversity. Physical Review E, 68, 0619021–0619025.Google Scholar

Volkov, I., Banavar, J. R., Hubbell, S. P. & Maritan, A. (2003) Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature, 424, 1035–1037.Google Scholar

Volkov, I., Banavar, J. R., Hubbell, S. P. & Maritan, A. (2007) Patterns of relative species abundance in rainforests and coral reefs. Nature, 450, 45–49.Google Scholar