Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:14:53.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The evolutionary nature of diversification in sexuals and asexuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Timothy G. Barraclough
Affiliation:
Division of Biology, Imperial College London
Diego Fontaneto
Affiliation:
Division of Biology, Imperial College London
Elisabeth A. Herniou
Affiliation:
Division of Biology, Imperial College London
Claudia Ricci
Affiliation:
Università di Milano, Dipartimento di Biologia
Roger Butlin
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Jon Bridle
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Dolph Schluter
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

Species are fundamental units of biology, but there remains uncertainty on both the pattern and processes of species existence. Are species real evolutionary entities or not? If they exist, what are the main processes causing independent evolution and character divergence to occur? This chapter describes how systematic analyses of combined DNA and morphological data can be used to shed light on the evolutionary nature and origin of species. One widely debated test-case has been the question of whether asexual organisms diversify into species; but empirical studies are rare and discussions have often been hampered by allegiance to restrictive species concepts. We present an alternative approach, testing a set of hypotheses for what evolutionary entities might be present in a classic asexual clade, the bdelloid rotifers. Combined analyses of genetic and morphological data reveal the existence of distinct entities conforming to the predicted effects of independent evolution and isolation between sub-lineages. Interestingly, different components of what is meant by ‘species’ do not strictly coincide. We discuss the applicability of related methods to sexual lineages and to the question of whether higher taxa are real.

Introduction

Diversity is a fundamental property of the living world. However, despite long interest in the causes of diversification, we still have an incomplete understanding of patterns and processes behind the evolution of biodiversity. Most evolutionary theory has focused around the concept of species – diversity appears to be packaged in distinct units and a wealth of theory recognizes independent evolution as the cause for this phenomenon (Coyne & Orr 2004; Gavrilets 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agapow, P. M., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Crandall, K. A., et al. (2004) The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Quarterly Review of Biology 79, 161–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arkhipova, I. R. and Meselson, M. (2005) Diverse DNA transposons in rotifers of the class Bdelloidea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 11781–11786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avise, J. C. and Walker, D. E. (1999) Species realities and numbers in sexual vertebrates: perspectives from an asexually transmitted genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 992–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barraclough, T. G., Birky, C. W. and Burt, A. (2003) Diversification in sexual and asexual organisms. Evolution 57, 2166–2172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barraclough, T. G. and Herniou, E. (2003) Why do species exist? Insights from sexuals and asexuals. Zoology 106, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, S. J. and Sneath, P. H. A. (1994) A numerical phenotypic taxonomic study of the genus Neisseria. Microbiology-UK 140, 2867–2891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, G., Lechowicz, M. J. and Waterway, M. J. (2006) The comparative evidence relating to functional and neutral interpretations of biological communities. Ecology 87, 1378–1386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birky, C. W. (2004) Bdelloid rotifers revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 2651–2652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birky, C. W., Wolf, C., Maughan, H.Herbertson, L. and Henry, E. (2005) Speciation and selection without sex. Hydrobiologia 546, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. (2000) Perspective: sex, recombination, and the efficacy of selection – was Weismann right? Evolution 54, 337–351.Google ScholarPubMed
Butlin, R. (2002) The costs and benefits of sex: new insights from old asexual lineages. Nature Reviews Genetics 3, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohan, F. M. (2001) Bacterial species and speciation. Systematic Biology 50, 513–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohan, F. M. (2006) Towards a conceptual and operational union of bacterial systematics, ecology, and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 361, 1985–1996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. and Orr, H. A. (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Queiroz, K. (2005) Different species problems and their resolution. Bioessays 27, 1263–1269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, J. (1981) Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35, 124–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaneto, D., Herniou, E. A., Boschetti, C., et al. (2007a) Independently evolving species in asexual bdelloid rotifers. PLoS Biology 5, 914–921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fontaneto, D., Herniou, E. A., Barraclough, T. G., Ricci, C. and Melone, G. (2007b) On the reality and recognisability of asexual organisms: morphological analysis of the masticatory apparatus of bdelloid rotifers. Zoologica Scripta 36, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilets, S. (2004) Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hanage, W. P., Fraser, C. and Spratt, B. G. (2005) Fuzzy species among recombinogenic bacteria. BMC Biology 3, 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanage, W. P., Fraser, C. and Spratt, B. G. (2006) The impact of homologous recombination on the generation of diversity in bacteria. Journal of Theoretical Biology 239, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. and DeWaard, J. R. (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heethoff, M., Domes, K., Laumann, M., et al. (2007) High genetic divergences indicate ancient separation of parthenogenetic lineages of the oribatid mite Platynothrus peltifer (Acari, Oribatida). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, J. (2001) The mind of the species problem. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, 326–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hey, J., Waples, R. S., Arnold, M. L., Butlin, R. K. and Harrison, R. G. (2003) Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, P. G. and Derrida, B. (1992) Genetic distance and species formation in evolving populations. Journal of Molecular Evolution 35, 454–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hijri, M. and Sanders, I. R. (2005) Low gene copy number shows that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inherit genetically different nuclei. Nature 433, 160–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, E. W. (1987) Recognizability of sexual and asexual species of rotifers. Systematic Zoology 36, 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. (2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. T. J. and Stinchcombe, J. R. (2007) An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 22, 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark Welch, D. and Meselson, M. (2000) Evidence for the evolution of bdelloid rotifers without sexual reproduction or genetic exchange. Science 288, 1211–1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mark Welch, D. B., Cummings, M. P., Hillis, D. M. and Meselson, M. (2004a) Divergent gene copies in the asexual class Bdelloidea (Rotifera) separated before the bdelloid radiation of within bdelloid families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 1622–1625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mark Welch, J. L., Mark Welch, D. B. and Meselson, M. (2004b) Cytogenetic evidence for asexual evolution of bdelloid rotifers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 1618–1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard Smith, J. (1986) Contemplating life without sex. Nature 324, 300–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. and Szathmary, E. (1995) The Major Transitions in Evolution. W. H. Freeman, Oxford.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. H. and Kreitman, M. (1991) Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351, 652–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochman, H., Lerat, E. and Daubin, V. (2005) Examining bacterial species under the specter of gene transfer and exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 6595–6599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlowska, T. E. (2005) Genetic processes in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiology Letters 251, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pons, J., Barraclough, T. G., Gomez-Zurita, J., et al. (2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Systematic Biology 55, 595–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricci, C. N. (1987) Ecology of bdelloids – how to be successful. Hydrobiologia 147, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieseberg, L. H., Wood, T. E. and Baack, E. J. (2006) The nature of plant species. Nature 440, 524–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, M. S. and Cohan, F. M. (1995) Recombination and migration rates in natural populations of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus mojavensis. Evolution 49, 1081–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, N. A. (2003) The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model. Evolution 57, 1465–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segers, H. (2007) Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution. Zootaxa 1564, 1–104.Google Scholar
Schluter, D. (2001) Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepp, S. and Paal, J. (1998) Taxonomic continuum of Alchemilla (Rosaceae) in Estonia. Nordic Journal of Botany 18, 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1953) The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sites, J. W. and Marshall, J. C. (2003) Delimiting species: a Renaissance issue in systematic biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. (1979) Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Templeton, A. (1989) The meaning of species and speciation: a population genetics approach. In: Speciation and Its Consequences (ed. Otte, D. and Endler, J.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Turelli, M., Barton, N. H. and Coyne, J. A. (2001) Theory and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, 330–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakeley, J. and Aliacar, N. (2001) Gene genealogies in a metapopulation. Genetics 159, 893–905.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×