Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:11:00.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix B - Attitude Determination Hardware

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Marcel J. Sidi
Affiliation:
Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Hardware items that are mandatory for realizing almost any spacecraft attitude and orbit control system can be divided into two classes: instrumentation for measuring the attitude of the satellite; and instrumentation for providing forces and torques. The latter category will be treated in Appendix C. Appendix B deals with attitude sensors, but is not an extensive treatment of the subject. There are excellent textbooks and technical papers providing complete treatment of the hardware from both analytical and practical points of view; Wertz (1978) is especially recommended. However, for completeness and for the reader's convenience, a short exposition of the basic principles of satellite attitude hardware will be presented here, together with examples of existing space-proven commercial instruments.

Attitude measurement hardware is used to determine the attitude of the satellite with respect to a defined reference frame. The final product may be, for instance, the Euler angles of the satellite in the orbit reference frame, or (in a different context) the sun vector components in the body axis frame. Attitude determination hardware includes:

  1. earth sensors (in particular, infrared earth sensors);

  2. sun sensors;

  3. star sensors;

  4. rate and rate integrating sensors, based on gyroscopic, laser, or other solid-state principles; and

  5. magnetometers.

The quality of the instruments is responsible for the accuracy that can be achieved in the attitude control system. For instance, there are sun sensors that can measure the direction of the sun with an accuracy of 0.015°, whereas others have an accuracy of only 0.5° however, analytical processing of the two sensors° output is basically the same. The commonly used attitude reference sources are the earth, the sun, and the stars.

The earth is used in two different aspects, optical and magnetic. The more important one is the optical aspect. Unlike the sun (which appears as a small illuminated disk) or the stars (which can be treated as illuminated points), the earth – as seen from nearby space – has a complex appearance that must be adequately modeled for accurate attitude determination.

Type
Chapter
Information
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
A Practical Engineering Approach
, pp. 328 - 378
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bednarek, T. (1992), “Dual Cone Scanning Earth Sensor Processing Algorithms,”Small Satellite Technologies and Applications II (SPIE vol. 1691). Bellingham, WA: International Society of Optical Engineering, pp. 181–91.Google Scholar
Desvignes, F., Doittau, F., Krebs, J., and Tissot, M. (1985), “Optical Sensors for Space-craft Attitude Measurement with Respect to the Earth,”Infrared Technology and Applications (SPIE vol. 590). Bellingham, WA: International Society of Optical Engineering, pp. 322–30.Google Scholar
Fallon, J., and Selby, V. (1990), “An Optical Locator for Horizon Sensing,” Paper no. 90-32, 13th Annual AAS Guidance and Control Conference (3–7 February, Keystone, CO).
Gates, F., and McAloon, K. (1976), “A Precision Star Tracker Utilizing Advanced Techniques,” Paper no. 76-113, AIAA 14th Aerospace Sciences Meeting (January, Washington, DC).
Gontin, R. A., and Ward, K. A. (1987), “Horizon Sensor Accuracy Improvement Using Earth Horizon Profile Phenomenology,” Paper no. 87-2598, Navigation and Control Conference. Washington, DC: AIAA, pp. 1495–1502.Google Scholar
Hablani, H. (1993), “Modeling of Roll/Pitch Determination with Horizon Sensors: Oblate Earth,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference (9–11 August, Monterey, CA). Washington, DC: AIAA, pp. 1133–47.
Hirshfeld, A., and Sinott, R. (1990), Sky Catalogue 2000.0. Belmont, MA: Sky Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoffleit, D. (1964), Catalog of Bright Stars. New Haven, CT: Yale University Observatory.Google Scholar
ITHACO, Inc. (1983), “Conical Earth Sensor (IPS-6) 12/83,”ITHACO Space Products, Ithaca, NY.
Kosik, J. (1991), “Star Pattern Identification Aboard an Inertially Stabilized Spacecraft,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 14(2): 230–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, G., Mosbacher, B., and Purll, D. (1986), “The ROSAT Star Tracker,”Instrumentation in Astronomy VI (SPIE vol. 627). Bellingham, WA: International Society of Optical Engineering, pp. 243–53.Google Scholar
Lyle, R., Leach, J., and Shubin, L. (1971), “Earth Albedo and Emitted Radiation,” Document no. SP-8067, NASA, Washington, DC.
Matthews, A., Baker, R., and Doyle, C. (1992), “The Hemispherical Resonator Gyro: New Technology Gyro for Space,” 12th FAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace: Aerospace Control 92 (7–11 September, Ottobrunn, Germany).
McCanless, F., Quasius, G., and Unruh, W. (1962), “Star Tracker Aerospace Reference Study – Stars,” Report no. ASD-TDR-62-1056, Honeywell Military Products Group, St. Petersburg, FL.
Maute, P., Blancke, J., and Alby, F. (1989), “Autonomous Geostationary Station Keeping System Optimization and Validation,”Acta Astronautica 20: 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuerry, J., Wagner, D., Sullivan, M., Deters, R., and Radovich, M. (1992), “A New Generation Stellar Attitude Sensor: The CT-601 Solid-State Star Tracker,” 12th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace: Aerospace Control 92 (7–11 September, Ottobrunn, Germany).
Muller, E., and Jappel, A. (1977), International Astronomical Union, Proceedings of the Sixteenth General Assembly (Grenoble 1976). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pochard, M. (1992), “A Fifteen Years Lifetime Mechanism for an Infrared Earth Sensor” (ESA SP-334), Proceedings of the Fifth European Space Mechanisms and Tribology Symposium (28-30 October, ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands). Paris: European Space Agency, pp. 353–8.Google Scholar
Sheela, B., Shekhar, C., Padmanabhan, P., and Chandrasekhar, M. (1991), “New Star Identification Technique for Attitude Control,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 14(2): 477–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidi, M. (1980), “On Maximization of Gain-Bandwidth in Sampled Systems,”International Journal of Control 32(6): 1099–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithsonian Institute, Staff (1971), Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Star Catalog, parts I-IV. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
SODERN (1977), “Static Infrared Horizon Sensor STA 03: Description, Operation, Functions and Characteristics,” Document no. C.04.1163A, SODERN, Limeil-Brevannes, France.
SODERN (1991a), “Scanning Infrared Earth Sensor STD 15: Description, Operation, Functions and Characteristics,” Document no. C.04.1346-05, SODERN, Limeil-Brevannes, France.
SODERN (1991b), “Infrared Horizon Scanning Sensor (500 to 1200 Km) STD 16: Description, Operation, Functions and Characteristics,” Document no. C.04.1970-05, SODERN, Limeil-Brevannes, France.
Stanton, R., and Hill, R. (1980), “CCD Star Sensor for Fine Pointing Control of Space-borne Telescopes,”Journal of Guidance and Control 3(2): 179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strikwerda, T., Fisher, H., Kilgus, C., and Frank, L. (1991), “Autonomous Star Identification and Spacecraft Attitude Determination with CCD Star Trackers,”Spacecraft Guidance Navigation and Control Systems (proceedings of the first international conference organized by ESA at ESTEC, 4-7 June, Noordwijk, Netherlands). Paris: European Space Agency, pp. 195–200.Google Scholar
Swanson, C. (1982), “DRIRU I/ SKIRU – The Application of the DTG to Spacecraft Attitude Control,” Paper no. 82-1624, AIAA Guidance and Control Conference (9-11 August, San Diego, CA).
Tai, F., and Barnes, R. (1989), “The Dual Cone Scanner: An Enhanced Performance, Low-Cost Earth Sensor,” Paper no. 89-013,12th Annual AAS Guidance and Control Conference (4-8 February, Keystone, CO). San Diego, CA: American Astronautical Society, pp. 147–69.
Vedder, J. (1993), “Star Trackers, Star Catalogs, and Attitude Determination: Probabilistic Aspects of System Design,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 16(3): 498–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertz, J. (1978), Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwartbol, T., Van Den Dam, R., Terpstra, A., and Van Woerkom, P. (1985), “Attitude Estimation and Control of Maneuvering Spacecraft,”Automatica 21(5): 513–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×