Abs, Hermann, Entscheidungen: 1949–1953; die Entstehung des Londoner Schuldenabkommens (Mainz: Hase & Koehler, 1991)Google Scholar

Adamson, Michael R.,‘The failure of the Foreign Bondholders Protective Council experiment, 1934–1940’, Business History Review, 76 (2002), 479–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ago, Roberto, ‘Addendum to the Eighth Report on State Responsibility’, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2(1) (1980)Google Scholar

Aldrich, George, The Jurisprudence of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal (Oxford University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alphand, Hervé, Le Partage de la dette ottomane et son règlement (Paris: Les Editions Internationales, 1928)Google Scholar

Andréadès, André, ‘Les Obligations financières, envers la dette publique ottomane, des provinces détachées de l'Empire turc depuis le Traité de Berlin’, Revue générale de droit international public, 15 (1908), 585–601Google Scholar

Andreeva, Yulia, ‘Salvaging or sinking the investment? MHS v Malaysia revisited’, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 7 (2008), 161–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babled, Henry, ‘Le Procès de la caisse de la dette égyptienne devant la cour mixte d'Alexandrie: le jugement et les Actes d'appel’, Revue Générale de Droit International Public, 3 (1896), 537–57Google Scholar

Babled, Henry. ‘Le Procès de la caisse de la dette égyptienne et l'arrêt de la cour d'Alexandrie’, Revue Générale de Droit International Public, 4 (1897), 124–36Google Scholar

,Baltic Business Daily, ‘Estonia facing foreign banks’ euro 27.5 million claim', 4 January 2006

,Bank for International Settlements, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and World Bank, External Debt Statistics: Guide for Compilers and Users (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2003)Google Scholar

Barnett, Barry, Galvis, Sergio and Gouraige, Ghislain, ‘On third world debt’, Harvard International Law Journal, 25 (1984), 83–151Google Scholar

Bartole, Sergio, ‘State immunity and the protection of private investors: the Argentine Bonds Case before Italian courts’, Italian Yearbook of International Law, 16 (2006), 165–85Google Scholar

Basdevant, Jules,‘L'Action coercitive anglo-germano-italienne’, Revue générale de droit international public, 12 (1904), 362–458Google Scholar

Bederman, David J., ‘Creditors’ claims in international law', International Lawyer, 34 (2000), 235–54Google Scholar

Benedek, Wolfgang, ‘Canevaro Claim Arbitration’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981)Google Scholar

Benedek, Wolfgang, ‘Cerruti Arbitrations’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981)Google Scholar

Benedek, Wolfgang, ‘Drago–Porter Convention’, Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 8 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 141–43Google Scholar

Bethell, Leslie, The Cambridge History of Latin America (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Blaisdell, Donald C., European Financial Control in the Ottoman Empire: A Study of the Establishment, Activities, and Significance of the Administration of the Ottoman Public Debt (New York: Columbia University Press, 1929)Google Scholar

Blustein, Paul, And the Money Kept Rolling In (and Out): Wall Street, the IMF, and the Bankrupting of Argentina (New York: Public Affairs, 2005)Google Scholar

Bonney, Richard, The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe, c. 1200–1815 (Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borchard, Edwin, ‘Contractual claims in international law’, Columbia Law Review, 13 (1913), 457–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borchard, Edwin, The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (New York: The Banks Law Publishing Co., 1915)Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin, ‘International loans and international law’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 26 (1932), 135Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin and Wynne, William, State Insolvency and Foreign Bondholders: vol. 1, General Principles (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951)Google Scholar

Bowett, Derek William, ‘Estoppel before international tribunals and its relation to acquiescence’, British Yearbook of International Law, 33 (1957), 21–51Google Scholar

Bradley, Michael, Fox, James D. and Gulati, G. Mitu, ‘The market reaction to legal shocks and their antidotes: lessons from the sovereign debt market’, Journal of Legal Studies, 39 (2010), 289–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broches, Aaron, ‘The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes: some observations on jurisdiction’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 5 (1966), 261–80Google Scholar

Broches, Aaron, ‘The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’, Recueil des cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 132 (1972), 330–410Google Scholar

Broches, Aaron, Selected Essays: World Bank, ICSID, and Other Subjects of Public and Private International Law (Dordrecht, Boston: M. Nijhoff, 1995)Google Scholar

Brooks, E. A. S., ‘Registration of international claims under the Foreign Compensation Act, 1950’, Transactions of the Grotius Society, 44 (1958), 187–98Google Scholar

Brown, Philip Marshall, ‘Ottoman Public Debt Arbitration’, American Journal of International Law, 20 (1926), 135–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, William O. and Burdekin, Richard C. K.,‘German debt traded in London during the Second World War: a British perspective on Hitler’, Economica, 69 (2002), 655–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchheit, Lee C., ‘Exchanging places’, International Financial Law Review, 10 (1991), 13–14Google Scholar

Buchheit, Lee C. ‘Legal aspects of assignments of interests in commercial bank loans’, in Lederman, J. (ed.), The Commercial Loan Resale Market (New York: Probus Professional, 1991), 443–54Google Scholar

Buchheit, Lee C. ‘How to negotiate the sharing clause’, International Financial Law Review, 12 (1993), 36Google Scholar

Buchheit, Lee C. ‘Changing bond documentation: the sharing clause’, International Financial Law Review, 17 (1998), 17Google Scholar

Buchheit, Lee C. ‘The role of the official sector in sovereign debt workouts’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 6 (2005), 333–43Google Scholar

Buchheit, Lee C. and Gulati, Mitu, ‘Exit consents in sovereign bond exchanges’, UCLA Law Review, 48 (2000), 59–84Google Scholar

Buchheit, Lee C. and Pam, Jeremiah S., ‘The pari passu clause in sovereign debt instruments’, Emory Law Journal, 53 (2003), 869–922Google Scholar

Bülck, Hartwig, ‘Société Commerciale de Belgique Case’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 4 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1982), 446Google Scholar

Bulow, Jeremy and Rogoff, Kenneth, ‘A constant recontracting model of sovereign debt’, Journal of Political Economy, 97 (1989), 155–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burchard, A., ‘The mixed claims commission and German property in the United States of America’, American Journal of International Law, 21 (1927), 472–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgstaller, Markus, ‘Nationality of corporate investors and international claims against the investor's own state’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 7 (2006), 857–82Google Scholar

Capitant, Henri, ‘Les Emprunts internationaux et le cours forcé’, Journal du droit international, 55 (1928), 561–65Google Scholar

,Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, The Hague Convention (II) of 1907 Respecting the Limitation of the Employment of Force for the Recovery of Contract Debts (Washington, DC: 1915)Google Scholar

Carreau, Dominique, Flory, Thiébaut and Juillard, Patrick, Droit international économique (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1990)Google Scholar

Carreau, Dominique and Shaw, Malcolm, La dette extérieure/The External Debt (Dordrecht, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Law (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Cheng, Tai-Heng, State Succession and Commercial Obligations (Ardsley: Transnational Publishers, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choi, Stephen J. and Gulati, G. Mitu, ‘Innovation in boilerplate contracts’, Emory Law Journal, 53 (2004), 929–96Google Scholar

Clark, Reuben, ‘Collecting on defaulted foreign dollar bonds’, American Journal of International Law, 34 (1940), 119–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coing, Helmut, ‘London Agreement on German external debt’, in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 364–76Google Scholar

,Corporation of Foreign Bondholders, Correspondence for Reference with Regard to the Imperial Ottoman Loans of 1858, 1862, 1869 (London: 1872)Google Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘Public international law in twentieth-century England’, in Beatson, J. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Jurists Uprooted: German-Speaking Émigré Lawyers in Twentieth-Century Britain (Oxford University Press, 2004), 681–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘Treaty and contract in investment arbitration’, Arbitration International, 24 (2008), 351–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremades, Bernardo and Cairns, David, ‘The brave new world of global arbitration’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 3 (2002), 173–209Google Scholar

Cummings, Homer, ‘Opinion upon the Act to Prohibit Financial Transactions with Any Foreign Government in Default on its Obligations to the United States’, American Journal of International Law, 29 (1935), 160–67Google Scholar

Curtis, Benjamin R. ‘Debts of the states’, North American Review, 58 (1844), 109–57Google Scholar

Dammers, Clifford, ‘A brief history of sovereign defaults and rescheduling’, in Suratgar, D. (ed.), Default and Rescheduling, Corporate and Sovereign Borrowers in Difficulties (London: Euromoney Publications, 1984), 77–84Google Scholar

Dawson, Frank G., The First Latin American Debt Crisis: The City of London and the 1822–25 Loan Bubble (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Bustamante y, Sirven, Antonio, S., La Seconde Conférence de la Paix, Chapter III: Le Recouvrement coercitif des dettes nationales (1909)

Lapradelle, Albert and Politis, Nicolas (eds.), Recueil des arbitrages internationaux, 3 vols. (Paris: Pedone, 1905–1954)Google Scholar

Rosa, Antonio, ‘Les finances de Saint-Dominique et le contrôle américain’, Revenue général de droit international public, 17 (1911), 401–49, 19 (1912), 499–583, 19 (1912), 72–121Google Scholar

Delaume, Georges R., ‘Gold and currency clauses in contemporary international loans’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 9 (1960), 199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaume, Georges R., Legal Aspects of International Lending and Economic Development Financing (New York: Dobbs Ferry, 1967)Google Scholar

Delaume, Georges R., ‘ICSID and the transnational financial community’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 1 (1986), 237–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaume, Georges R., ‘The proper law of loans concluded by international persons: a restatement and forecast’, American Journal of International Law, 56 (1962), 63–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derains, Yves, ‘Cour internationale d'arbitrage de la CCI: chronique des sentences arbitrales’, Journal du Droit International, 117 (1990), 1047–56Google Scholar

Descamps, Edouard and Renault, Louis, Recueil international des traités du XXe siècle, contenant l'ensemble du droit conventionnel entre les États et les sentences arbitrales, 7 vols. (Paris: Arthur Rousseau, 1904–1921)Google Scholar

Diena, Giulio, Il fallimento degli stati e il diritto internazionale (Turin: Unione Tipografico, 1898)Google Scholar

Di Tella, Rafael and Vogel, Ingrid, ‘The 2001 crisis in Argentina: an IMF-sponsored default?’, Harvard Business School Case No. 90–704–004 (2005)Google Scholar

Jacob, Dolinger, ‘Solution of Latin-American external debt by international arbitration’ (1990), in Cursos de Derecho Internacional, Serie Tematica Vol. II, Parte 1: El Sistema Interamericano (1974–2001)

Dolzer, Rudolf, Eigentum, Enteignung und Entschädigung im geltenden Völkerrecht (Heidelberg: Springer, 1985)Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Indirect expropriations: new developments?’, New York University Environmental Law Journal, 64 (2002), 64–93Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Fair and equitable treatment: a key standard in investment treaties’, International Lawyer, 39 (2005), 87–106Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Mixed Claims Commissions’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 3rd edn (2006)

Dolzer, Rudolf and Stevens, Margrete, Bilateral Investment Treaties (The Hague, Boston: M. Nijhoff, 1995)Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domke, Martin, La Clause ‘dollar-or’; la non-application de la législation américaine aux emprunts internationaux (Paris: Les Éditions Internationales, 1935)Google Scholar

Domke, Martin, ‘Des Emprunts d’états libellés en dollars-or', Journal de droit international, 63 (1937), 547–59Google Scholar

Domke, Martin, ‘Arbitration clauses and international loans’, Arbitration Journal, 3 (1939), 161Google Scholar

Douglas, Zachary, ‘The hybrid foundations of investment treaty arbitration’, British Yearbook of International Law, 74 (2003), 152–284Google Scholar

Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drago, Luis María, Cobro Coercitivo de Deudas Públicas (Buenos Aires: Coni Hermanos, 1906)Google Scholar

Drago, Luis María, ‘Les Emprunts d’État et leurs rapports avec la politique internationale', Revue générale de droit international public, (1907), 251

Drago, Luis María, ‘Note of Señor Minister of Foreign Relations of the Argentine Republic to the Minister of the Argentine Republic to the United States, Buenos Aires, December 29, 1902’, American Journal of International Law, 1 (1907), 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drago, Luis María, ‘State loans in their relation to international policy’, American Journal of International Law, 1 (1907), 692–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drucker, Alfred, ‘Compensation for nationalized property: the British practice’, American Journal of International Law, 49 (1955), 477–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulles, John Foster, ‘Our foreign loan policy’, Foreign Affairs, 5 (1926), 33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, Frederick S., The Protection of Nationals: A Study in the Application of International Law (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1932)Google Scholar

Dunn, Robert and Richt, , Adrian, American Foreign Investments (New York: Viking, 1926)Google Scholar

Eaton, Jonathan and Fernandez, Racquel, ‘Sovereign debt’, in Grossmann, G. M. and Rogoff, K. S. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995), vol. 3, 2032–77Google Scholar

Eichengreen, Barry and Portes, Richard, ‘Debt and defaults in the 1930s: causes and consequences’ in Corbridge, S. E. (ed.), International Debt (London; New York: I. B. Tauris Publishers, 1999)Google Scholar

Eichengreen, B. and Temin, P., ‘The gold standard and the Great Depression’, Contemporary European History, 9 (2000), 183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eizenstadt, Stuart, Imperfect Justice: Looted Assets, Slave Labor, and the Unfinished Business of World War II (New York: Public Affairs, 2003)Google Scholar

Esteves, Rui Pedro, ‘Quis custodiet quem? Sovereign debt and bondholders' protection before 1914’, Department of Economics, Oxford University, Discussion Paper Series, No. 323, April 2007

Fachiri, Alexander, ‘Judgment No. 14, delivered July 12, 1929: the Serbian Loans Case’, British Yearbook of International Law, 11 (1930), 203–08Google Scholar

Fauchille, Paul, ‘Les Tribunaux mixtes d'Égypte’, Revue générale de droit international public, 1 (1894), 126–35Google Scholar

Fawcett, James, Declining Jurisdiction in Private International Law (Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Feder, Gershon and Just, Richard E., ‘Debt crisis in an increasingly pessimistic international market: the case of Egyptian credit, 1862–1876’, The Economic Journal, 94 (1984), 340–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feilchenfeld, Ernst H., Public Debt and State Succession (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1931)Google Scholar

Feilchenfeld, Ernst H., ‘Rights and remedies of holders of foreign bonds’, in Quindry, S. E. (ed.), Bonds and Bondholders: Rights and Remedies (Chicago: Burdette Smith, 1934)Google Scholar

Feis, Herbert, ‘The export of American capital’, Foreign Affairs, 3 (1925), 668–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feis, Herbert, Europe, the World's Banker, 1870–1914 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1931)Google Scholar

Feis, Herbert, 1933: Characters in Crisis (Boston, Toronto: Little, 1966)Google Scholar

Feller, A. H., The Mexican Claims Commissions, 1923–1934: A Study in the Law and Procedure of International Tribunals (New York: Macmillan, 1935)Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall, The Cash Nexus: Money and Power in the Modern World, 1700–2000 (New York: Basic Books, 2001)Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Fleck, Dieter, ‘Dawes Plan (1924) and Young Plan (1930)’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 3rd edn (2007)

Folz, Hans Ernst, ‘State Debts’, in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 8 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 484–88Google Scholar

Forbes, Neil,‘London banks, the German Standstill agreements, and “economic appeasement” in the 1930s’, Economic History Review, 40 (1987), 571–87Google Scholar

Freeman, Alwyn V., The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice (London, New York: Longmans, 1938)Google Scholar

Freeman, Alwyn V., ‘Recent aspects of the Calvo Doctrine and the challenge of international law’, American Journal of International Law, 40 (1946), 121–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frieden, Jeffrey A., ‘Capital politics: creditors and the international political economy’, Journal of Public Policy, 8 (1988), 265–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaillard, Emmanuel, ‘Establishing jurisdiction through a most-favored-nation clause’, New York Law Journal, 233 (2005), 3–6Google Scholar

Gaillard, Emmanuel, ‘Investment treaty arbitration and jurisdiction over contract claims: the SGS Cases considered’, in Weiler, T. (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May, 2005), 325–46

Gelpern, Anna and Sester, Brad, ‘Domestic and external debt: the doomed quest for equal treatment’, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 35 (2004), 795–814Google Scholar

Genet, Raoul, ‘L'Affaire des empruntes serbes et brésiliens devant la Cour Permanente de Justice Internationale et les principes du droit international’, Revue général du droit international privé, 36 (1928), 669–94Google Scholar

Gianviti, François, ‘Garantie de change et réevaluation monétaire: l'affaire de l'emprunt Young (Sentence du 16 mai 1980 du Tribunal d'arbitrage des dettes extérieures allemandes)’, Annuaire français du droit international, 26 (1980), 250–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gianviti, Francoiset al., A European Mechanism for Sovereign Debt Crisis Resolution: A Proposal (Brussels: Bruegel, 2010)Google Scholar

Gold, Joseph, Evensen, Jane and Oh, Jai Keun, Legal and Institutional Aspects of the International Monetary System: Selected Essays (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1979)Google Scholar

Golsong, Heribert, ‘Souveranitätsprivileg und Schuldendienst privater Anleihenehmer’, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft, 31 (1985), 1815–16Google Scholar

Götz, Volkmar, ‘Ottoman Debt Arbitration’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 220–21Google Scholar

Götz, Volkmar, ‘Serbian Loan Case’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 256–58Google Scholar

Griffin, Peter and Farren, Ania, ‘How ICSID can protect sovereign bondholders?’International Financial Law Review, 24 (9) (2005), 21–24Google Scholar

,Group of Ten, The Resolution of Sovereign Liquidity Crises: A Report to the Ministers and Governors Prepared Under the Auspices of the Deputies (G10: 1996)

,Group of Ten, Report of the G10 Working Group on Contractual Clauses (G10: 2002)

Gulati, Mitu, Buchheit, Lee and Thompson, Robert B., ‘The dilemma of odious debt’, Duke Law Journal, 56 (2007), 1201–62Google Scholar

Hagan, Sean, ‘Designing a legal framework to restructure sovereign debt’, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 36 (2005), 299–402Google Scholar

Hahn, Hugo J. and Behrens, Peter, Die Wertsicherung der Young-Anleihe: Das Urteil des Schiedsgerichtshofs für das Abkommen über Deutsche Auslandsschulden vom 16. Mai 1980: Text und Kommentare (Tübingen: Mohr, 1984)Google Scholar

Haldane, Andrew G., Fixing Financial Crises in the Twenty-First Century (London, New York: Routledge, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, William E., International Law, 5th edn (Oxford University Press, 1904)Google Scholar

Halverson Cross, Karen, ‘Arbitration as a means of resolving sovereign debt disputes’, American Review of International Arbitration, 17 (2008), 335–81Google Scholar

Harris, Charles R. S., Germany's Foreign Indebtedness (Oxford University Press, 1935)Google Scholar

Head, John W., ‘Evolution of the governing law for loan agreements of the World Bank and other multilateral development banks’, American Journal of International Law, 90 (1996), 214–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbst, Jochen, ‘Norwegian Loans Case’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 3rd edn (2009)

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The taking of property by the state: recent developments in international law’, Recueil des cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 176 (1982), 259–392Google Scholar

Hollander, Jacob H., ‘The Convention of 1907 between the United States and the Dominican Republic’, American Journal of International Law, 1 (1907), 287–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holm-Hadulla, Moritz, ‘Ottoman Debt Arbitration’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 3rd edn (2007)

Hornbeck, Jeff, ‘Argentina's sovereign debt restructuring’, Congressional Research Service, 19 October 2004Google Scholar

,House of Commons, Report from the Select Committee on Loans to Foreign States; together with the Proceedings of the Committee, Minutes of Evidence, Appendix, and Index (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1875)Google Scholar

Howe, Daniel, What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848 (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Howland, Charles P.,‘Our repudiated state debts’, Foreign Affairs, 6 (1928), 395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, Manley O., ‘The Bank for International Settlements’, American Journal of International Law, 24 (1930), 561CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David, Essays Moral, Political, and Literary (1758), ed. E. F. Miller (1987, revised edition)

Hyde, Charles Cheney,‘The negotiation of external loans with foreign governments’, American Journal of International Law, 16 (1922), 523–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imbert, Henri-Marc, Les Emprunts d'Etats étrangers: recours individuels et action collective des créanciers (Paris: A. Leclerc, 1905)Google Scholar

,Independent Evaluation Group, Debt Relief for the Poorest: An Evaluation Update of the HIPC Initiative (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006)Google Scholar

,International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, ICSID: History of the Convention (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1968)Google Scholar

Irmscher, Tobias, ‘Pledge of state territory and property’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 3rd edn (2007)

Jenks, C. Wilfred, The Prospects of International Adjudication (London: Stevens & Sons, 1964)Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., A Modern Law of Nations: An Introduction (New York: Macmillan, 1956)Google Scholar

Jèze, Gaston, ‘La Garantie des emprunts publics d'Etat’, Recueil des cours de l'Académie de Droit International, (1925), 155–236Google Scholar

Jones, Leonard and Bowers, Renzo, The Law of Bonds and Bond Securities (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1935)Google Scholar

Kämmerer, Jörn Axel, ‘Der Staatsbankrott aus völkerrechtlicher Sicht’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 65 (2005), 651–76Google Scholar

Kämmerer, Jörn Axel, ‘State bankruptcy’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 3rd edn (2009)

Kaufmann, Wilhelm, Das Internationale Recht der Egyptischen Staatsschuld (Berlin: Puttkammer & Mühlbrecht, 1891)Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Wilhelm, ‘Le Droit international et la dette publique égyptienne’, Revue de droit international et de législation comparée, 22 (1891), 556–86; 23 (1892), 48–75, 144–75, 266–316Google Scholar

Kebedgy, Michel, ‘De la protection des créanciers d'un Etat étranger’, Journal du droit international, 21 (1894), 59–72 and 504–19Google Scholar

Kennedy, Crammond, ‘The Drago Doctrine’, North American Review, 185 (1907), 614–22Google Scholar

Kewening, Wilhelm A., ‘Young Plans Loans Arbitration’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 296–98Google Scholar

King, Jeff, ‘Odious debt: the terms of the debate’, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commerce, 32 (2007), 606–68Google Scholar

Kläger, Roland, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klug, A., The German Buybacks, 1932–1939: A Cure for Overhang? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Studies in International Finance, No. 75, 1993)Google Scholar

Kobrak, Christoph, Banking on Global Markets: Deutsche Bank and the United States, 1870 to the Present (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Koessler, Maximilian, ‘Government espousal of private claims before international tribunals’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 13 (1946), 180–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohler, J., ‘Die Lehren des Canevarofalles’, Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht, 7 (1913), 1Google Scholar

Kolker, Carlyn, ‘When nations go bust’, American Lawyer, November 2003

Krasner, Stephen, Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kremer, Michael and Jayachandran, Seema, ‘Odious debt’, American Economic Review, 96 (2006), 82–92Google Scholar

Kriebaum, Ursula, Eigentumsschutz im Völkerrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2008)Google Scholar

Krishan, Devashish, ‘A notion of investment’, in Weiler, T. (ed.), Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law, vol. 1 (Huntington, NY: Juris, 2008)Google Scholar

Krueger, Anne, A New Approach to Sovereign Debt Restructuring (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Arthur K., ‘The gold clause in international loans’, American Journal of International Law, 28 (1934), 312–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lafontaine, Henri, Pasicrisie internationale 1794–1900: histoire documentaire des arbitrages internationaux (Berne: Staempfli, 1902)Google Scholar

Landes, David S., Bankers and Pashas: International Finance and Economic Imperialism in Egypt (New York: Harper Row, 1969)Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold D., ‘Political policies and the international investment market’, The Journal of Political Economy, 31 (1923), 380–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latané, John, ‘Forcible collection of international debts’, The Atlantic Monthly (1906), 542–50

Lauterpacht, Hersch, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (with Special Reference to International Arbitration) (London, New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1927)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933)Google Scholar

,League of Nations, Report of the Committee for the Study of International Loan Contracts (Geneva: League of Nations, 1939)Google Scholar

Legrand, Janet and Canning, Tom, ‘Vulture funds rocked by decision of English High Court’, Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 5 (2007), 289–90Google Scholar

Legum, Barton and Mouawad, Caline, ‘The meaning of “Investment” in the ICSID Convention’, in Bekker, P., Dolzer, R. and Waibel, M. (eds.), Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy: Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts (Cambridge University Press, 2010), 326–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leigh, Monroe, ‘Libra Bank Limited et al. v. Banco Nacional de Costa Rica, S.A. 676 F.2d 47’, American Journal of International Law, 76 (1982), 851–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Cleona and Schlotterbeck, Karl, America's Stake in International Investments (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1938)Google Scholar

Leyendecker, Ludwig, Auslandsverschuldung und Völkerrecht (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1988)Google Scholar

Lillich, Richard B., The Protection of Foreign Investment: Six Procedural Studies (Syracuse University Press, 1965)Google Scholar

Lillich, Richard B., International Claims: Postwar British Practice (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1967)Google Scholar

Lillich, Richard B., ‘International claims: their settlement by lump sum agreements’, in Sanders, P. (ed.), International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1967)Google Scholar

Lillich, Richard and Christenson, Gordon, International Claims: Their Preparation and Presentation (Syracuse University Press, 1962)Google Scholar

Lillich, Richard and Weston, Burns, International Claims: Their Settlement by Lump Sum Agreements (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1975)Google Scholar

Lipson, Charles, Standing Guard: Protecting Foreign Capital in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Lipstein, Kurt, ‘The place of the Calvo Clause in international law’, The British Yearbook of International Law, 22 (1945), 133–45Google Scholar

Lissakers, Karin, Banks, Borrowers, and the Establishment: A Revisionist Account of the International Debt Crisis (New York: Basic Books, 1991)Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Overlapping jurisdiction in international tribunals’, Australian Yearbook of International Law, 20 (1999), 191–204Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., International Economic Law (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Madden, John, Nadler, Marcus and Sauvain, Harry, America's Experience as a Creditor Nation (New York: Prentice-Hall, 1937)Google Scholar

Magnus, S. W., ‘The Foreign Compensation Commission’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 37 (1988), 975–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mallarmé, André, ‘L'arbitrage vénézuélien devant la Cour de la Haye’, Revue général du droit international public, 13 (1906), 423–500Google Scholar

Mander, Benedict, ‘New tack on Argentina debt’, Financial Times, London (28 September 2006)Google Scholar

Mann, Francis A., ‘The proper law of contracts concluded by international persons’, British Yearbook of International Law, 35 (1959), 34–57Google Scholar

Marboe, Irmgard, ‘Compensation and damages in international law’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 7 (2007), 723–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marichal, Carlos, A Century of Debt Crises in Latin America: From Independence to the Great Depression, 1820–1930 (Princeton University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Martens, Ernst, ‘Norwegian Loans Case’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1982), 210Google Scholar

Maurer, Noel and Musacchio, Aldro, ‘The Barber of Buenos Aires: Argentina's debt renegotiation’ (2006), Harvard Business School Case 9–706–034Google Scholar

Mauro, Paolo, Sussman, Nathan and Yafeh, Yishay, Emerging Markets and Financial Globalization: Sovereign Bond Spreads in 1870–1913 and Today (Oxford University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mauro, Paolo and Yafeh, Yishay, ‘The Corporation of Foreign Bondholders’, International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 03/107 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2003)Google Scholar

McGrane, Reginald Charles, Foreign Bondholders and American State Debts (New York: Macmillan, 1935)Google Scholar

McLachlan, Campbell, Shore, Laurence and Weiniger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michaels, Ralf, ‘Public and private international law: German views on global issues’, Journal of Private International Law, 4 (2008), 121–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchener, Kris J. and Weidenmier, Marc D., ‘Supersanctions and sovereign debt repayment’, Journal of International Money and Finance, 29 (2009), 19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, John B. (ed.), History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States Has Been a Party (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1898)Google Scholar

Moore, Lyndon and Kaluzny, Jakub, ‘Regime change and debt default: the case of Russia, Austro-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire following World War I’, Explorations in Economic History, 42 (2005), 237–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morales, Rafael A., ‘The German Debt Settlement of 1953: Some Guidelines for the Current Debt Crisis’, in D. Carreau and H. Shaw (eds.), La dette extérieure – The External Debt (Dordrecht, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995), 79–107Google Scholar

Moulin, H. A., ‘La Doctrine de Drago’, Revue générale de droit international public, 14 (1907), 417–72Google Scholar

Münch, Fritz, ‘French-Peruvian Claims Arbitration’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 106–07Google Scholar

Munro, Dana G.,Intervention and Dollar Diplomacy in the Caribbean, 1900–1921 (Princeton University Press, 1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munro, Dana G. [n. a.] ‘The American and British pecuniary claims arbitration’, American Journal of International Law, 7 (1913), 575–80Google Scholar

Munro, Dana G.‘Nueva York: En la reunión entre Kirchner y Prodi surgió el tema de los bonistas’, Clarín, Buenos Aires, 19 September 2006Google Scholar

Munro, Dana G.‘Paris Club agrees to substantial debt relief for Iraq’, American Journal of International Law, 99 (2005), 260Google Scholar

Munro, Dana G.‘The proposed Loan Convention between the United States and Honduras and the United States and Nicaragua’, American Journal of International Law, 5 (1911), 1044–51Google Scholar

Munro, Dana G.‘The San Dominican “Enabling Act”’, American Journal of International Law, 1 (1907), 978Google Scholar

Neymarck, Alfred, Finances contemporaines, Vol. III: questions économiques et financières 1872–1904 (Paris: Guillaumin et Cie, 1905)Google Scholar

Nguyen Quoc, Dinh, Daillier, Patrick and Pellet, Alain, Droit International Public (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1987)Google Scholar

Oberhammer, Paul and Reinisch, August, ‘Restitution of Jewish property in Austria’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (2000), 737–61Google Scholar

O'Connell, D. P., State Succession in Municipal Law and International Law, vol. 1: Internal Relations (Cambridge University Press, 1967)Google Scholar

O'Connell, D. P., International Law (London: Stevens, 1970)Google Scholar

O'Keefe, Roger, ‘The doctrine of incorporation revisited’, British Yearbook of International Law, 79 (2008), 7–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olivares-Caminal, Rodrigo, Legal Aspects of Sovereign Debt Restructuring (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010)Google Scholar

Olivares Marcos, Gustavo, ‘The legal practice of the recovery of state external debt’, PhD Thesis (University of Geneva, 2005)Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa and Lauterpacht, Hersch, International Law: A Treatise, 5th edn (London, New York: Longmans, 1935)Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa and Lauterpacht, Hersch, International Law: A Treatise, 8th edn (London, New York: Longmans, 1955)Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa and McNair, Arnold Duncan, International Law: A Treatise (London, New York: Longmans, 1928)Google Scholar

Orcasitas Llorente, Luis, ‘Sentencia del Tribunal Internacional de Justicia de la Haya de 6 de julio de 1957 sobre ciertos empréstitos noruegos en el mercado francés’, Revista española de derecho internacional, 10 (1957), 467–79Google Scholar

,Padao-Bey, ‘De la compétence de la juridiction mixte dans les contestations entre les indigènes et les administrations de l'Etat en Egypte’, Journal du droit international, 15 (1888), 300–16Google Scholar

Panizza, Ugo, Sturzenegger, Federico and Zettelmeyer, Jeromin, ‘The economics and law of sovereign debt and default’, Journal of Economic Literature, 47 (2009), 651–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, William W., Arbitration of International Business Disputes: Studies in Law and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Parra, Antonio, ‘The institutions of ICSID arbitration proceedings’, News from ICSID, 20 (2003), 13Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, ‘Arbitration without privity’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 10 (1995), 232–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penfield, William Lawrence, The Venezuelan Arbitration before the Hague Tribunal, 1903 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office: 1905)Google Scholar

Phillimore, Robert, Commentaries upon International Law, vol. 2 (London: Butterworth, 1882)Google Scholar

Platt, D. C. M., Finance, Trade, and Politics in British Foreign Policy 1815–1914 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968)Google Scholar

Platt, D. C. M., ‘British bondholders in nineteenth-century Latin America: injury and remedy’, Inter-American Economic Affairs, 14 (1960), 3–43Google Scholar

Platt, D. C. M., Foreign Finance in Continental Europe and the United States, 1815–1870: Quantities, Origins, Functions and Distribution (London: Allen & Unwin, 1984)Google Scholar

Plesch, Árpád, The Gold Clause: A Collection of International Cases and Opinions (London: Stevens & Sons, 1936)Google Scholar

Politis, Nicolas, Les Emprunts d'Etat en droit international (Paris: A. Durand et Pedone-Lauriel, 1894)Google Scholar

Politis, Nicolas, ‘La Caisse de la Dette Egyptienne: ses pouvoirs et sa responsabilité’, Revue général de droit international public, 3 (1896), 245–52Google Scholar

Pollock, Frederick and Maitland, Frederic William, The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I (Cambridge University Press, 1898)Google Scholar

Porzecanski, Arturo, ‘From rogue creditors to rogue debtors: implications of Argentina's default’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 6 (2005), 311–31Google Scholar

Power, Philip, ‘Sovereign debt: the rise of the secondary market and its implications for future restructurings’, Fordham Law Review, 64 (1996), 2701–72Google Scholar

Price, Daniel, ‘Contract-related claims in Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal jurisprudence’, in Drahozal, C. R. and Gibson, C. S. (eds.), The Iran–US Claims Tribunal at 25: The Cases Everyone Needs to Know for Investor–State and International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2007), 199Google Scholar

Prudhomme, André, ‘Les Emprunts des Etats brésilien et serbe devant la Cour Permanente de Justice Internationale de la Haye’, Journal du droit international, 56 (1929), 837–95Google Scholar

Raffer, Kunibert, ‘Applying Chapter 9 insolvency to international debts: an economically efficient solution with a human face’, World Development, 18 (1990), 301–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ralston, Jackson H., Venezuelan Arbitrations of 1903, 58th Cong., 2nd session, Senate Document No. 316 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1904)Google Scholar

Ralston, Jackson, The Law and Procedure of International Tribunals (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1926)Google Scholar

Randolph, Bessie C., ‘Foreign bondholders and the repudiated debts of the Southern States’, American Journal of International Law, 25 (1931), 63–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raymond, William, ‘Savings bank loans and repudiations of state debt’, 9 February 1931

Re, Edward, ‘The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission and the adjudication of international claims’, American Journal of International Law, 56 (1962), 728–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, Lucy, Paulsson, Jan and Blackaby, Nigel, Guide to ICSID Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 2004)Google Scholar

Reinisch, August, State Responsibility for Debt (Vienna: Böhlau, 1995)Google Scholar

Reinisch, August, International Organizations before National Courts (Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinisch, August, ‘Necessity in international investment law – an unnecessary split of opinions in recent ICSID cases? Comments on CMS v. Argentina and LG&E v. Argentina’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 8 (2007), 191–214Google Scholar

Reinisch, August, ‘Expropriation’, in Schreuer, C., Ortino, F. and Muchlinski, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Reisman, Michael and Sloane, Robert, ‘Indirect expropriation and its valuation in the BIT generation’, British Yearbook of International Law, 74 (2004), 115–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reisman, Michael and Sloane, Robert, Report on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, Doc ICSID/2 (1993) 1 ICSID Reports23Google Scholar

Rieffel, Lex, Restructuring Sovereign Debt: The Case for Ad Hoc Machinery (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Rippy, J. Fred, ‘A bond-selling extravaganza of the 1920's’, Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, 23 (1950), 238–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, ‘Power and persuasion in investment treaty interpretation: the dual role of states’, American Journal of International Law, 104 (2010), 179–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogoff, Kenneth and Reinhart, Carmen, ‘Serial default and the “paradox” of rich to poor capital flows’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings (2004), 53–58

Rogoff, Kenneth and Zettelmeyer, Jeromin, ‘Bankruptcy procedures for sovereigns: a history of ideas, 1976–2001’, International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 49 (2002), 470–507Google Scholar

Ronald, James H., ‘National organizations for the protection of holders of foreign bonds’, George Washington Law Review, 3 (1935), 411–53Google Scholar

Rose, Andrew and Spiegel, Mark Maury, ‘A gravity model of sovereign lending: trade, default, and credit’, Special IssueIMF Staff Papers/International Monetary Fund, 51 (2005), 50–63Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Emily S., Financial Missionaries to the World: The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy, 1900–1930 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Emily S. and Rosenberg, Norman L., ‘From colonialism to professionalism: the public-private dynamic in United States foreign financial advising, 1898–1929’, Journal of American History, 74 (1987), 59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, Mark F., ‘Chronicles of the Bulbank Case: the rest of the story', Journal of International Arbitration, 19 (2002), 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowland, Buford, ‘William Wordsworth and Mississippi Bonds’, Journal of Southern History, 1 (1935), 501–07CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruiz del Rio, Oscar A., ‘Arbitration clauses in international loans’, Journal of International Arbitration, 4 (1987), 45Google Scholar

Sacerdoti, Giorgio, ‘Bilateral treaties and multilateral instruments in investment protection’, Recueil des cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 269 (1997), 251–460Google Scholar

Sachs, Jeffrey, Theoretical Issues in International Borrowing, Princeton Studies in International Finance 54 (1984)Google Scholar

Sack, Alexander N., Les effets des transformations des états sur leurs dettes publiques et autres obligations financières: traité juridique et financier (Paris: Sirey, 1927)Google Scholar

Salmon, J. J. A., Le Rôle des organisations internationales en matière de prêts et d'emprunts: problèmes juridiques (London: Stevens & Sons, 1958)Google Scholar

Salter, Arthur, ‘War debts’, International Affairs, 12 (1933), 147–67Google Scholar

Sandrock, Otto, ‘Is international arbitration inept to solve disputes arising out of international loan agreements?’Journal of International Arbitration, 11 (1994), 33–60Google Scholar

Saxegaard, Magnus, ‘Creditor participation in the HIPC debt relief initiatives: the case of Guyana’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 32 (2002), 725–31Google Scholar

Say, Jean-Baptiste, A Treatise on Political Economy, 6th US edn, translated from the 4th edition in French by Prinsep, C. R. and Biddle, Clement C. (Philadelphia: Claxton, Remsen & Haffelfinger, 1834, reprinted 1880)Google Scholar

Scelle, Georges, ‘Bulgarian independence’, 6 (1912), American Journal of International Law, 659–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schill, Stephan, ‘International investment law and the host state's power to handle economic crises: Comment on the ICSID decision in LG&E v. Argentina’, Journal of International Arbitration, 24 (2007), 265–86Google Scholar

Schill, Stephan, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schill, Stephan W. and Kim, Yun-I, ‘Sovereign bonds in economic crisis: Is the necessity defence under international law applicable in investor–state relations? A critical analysis of the decision of the German Constitutional Court in the Argentine Bondholder Cases', Yearbook of International Investment Law and Policy 2010–2011 (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Schoch, Magdalena, Die Entscheidungen des Internationalen Schiedsgerichts zur Auslegung des Dawes-Plans (Berlin: W. Rothschild, 1927)Google Scholar

Schoo, Alberto, La clausula oro: las obligaciones a oro ante la ley, la doctrina y la jurisprudencia: el derecho comparado (Buenos Aires: Bernabe, 1937)Google Scholar

Schoo, Alberto, Régimen jurídico de las obligaciones monetarias internacionales (Buenos Aires: G. Kraft, 1940)Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Unjustified enrichment in international law’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 22 (1974), 281–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘International and domestic law in investment disputes’, Austrian Review of International and European Law, 1 (1989), 89–120Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Commentary on the ICSID Convention: Article 25’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 11 (1996), 316Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Travelling the BIT route: of waiting periods, umbrella clauses and forks in the road’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 5 (2004), 231–56Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Fair and equitable treatment in arbitral practice’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 6 (2005), 357–86Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Investment treaty arbitration and jurisdiction over contract claims: the Vivendi I Case considered’, in Weiler, T. (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May, 2005), 281–324Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘The concept of expropriation under the ECT and other investment protection treaties’, in Ribeiro, C. (ed.), Investment Arbitration and The Energy Charter Treaty (Huntington, NY: Juris Publishing, 2006), 108–58Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, Malintoppi, Loretta, Reinisch, August and Sinclair, Anthony, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuker, Stephen A., The End of French Predominance in Europe: The Financial Crisis of 1924 and the Adoption of the Dawes Plan (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1976)Google Scholar

Schwebel, Stephen, ‘On whether breach by a state of a contract with an alien is a breach of international law’, in Justice in International Law, Selected Writings of Stephen Schwebel (Cambridge: Grotius, 1994), 425CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, Hal S., Sovereign Debt Default: Cry for the United States, Not Argentina, Washington Legal Foundation, Working Paper Series No. 140 (2006)Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown, ‘The work of the Second Hague Peace Conference’, American Journal of International Law, 2 (1908), 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, William Amasa, The Repudiation of State Debts (New York, Boston: T. Y. Crowell, 1893)Google Scholar

Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, The Austrian–German Arbitral Tribunal (Syracuse University Press, 1972)Google Scholar

Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, ‘Russian Indemnity Arbitration (1912)’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 246Google Scholar

Sessions, Gene A., Prophesying upon the Bones: J. Reuben Clark and the Foreign Debt Crisis, 1933–39 (University of Illinois Press, 1992), 20Google Scholar

Sexton, Jay, Debtor Diplomacy: Finance and American Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era, 1837–1873 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shany, Yuval, ‘Contract claims v. treaty claims: mapping conflicts between ICSID decisions on multisourced investment claims’, American Journal of International Law, 99 (2005), 835–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shihata, Ibrahim and Parra, Antonio, ‘The experience of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 14 (1999), 299–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silagi, Michael, ‘Preferential Claims against Venezuela Arbitration’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 234–35Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth A., ‘Why innovate? Founding the Bank for International Settlements’, World Politics, 45 (1993) 361–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, Beth A., Who Adjusts?: Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy during the Interwar Years (Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Simpson, Gerry, Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simpson, J. L., ‘The agreement on German external debts’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 6 (1957), 472–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Anthony, ‘The origins of the umbrella clause in the international law of investment protection’, Arbitration International, 20 (2004), 411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam, An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776) (New York: Knopf, 1991)Google Scholar

Smith, Craigh, ‘Major creditors in accord to waive 80% of Iraq debt’, New York Times, 22 November 2004, p. 4Google Scholar

Soares Micali, Isabella, ‘Aspects juridiques de l'endettement international – l'expérience du Brésil’, Doctoral Thesis, University of Paris I, Panthéon Sorbonne, 1993

Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, The International Law on Foreign Investment (Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, 2004; 3rd edn, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiermann, Ole, ‘Individual rights, state interests and the power to waive ICSID jurisdiction under bilateral investment treaties’, Arbitration International, 20 (2004), 179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sraffa, Pierto (ed.), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo (11 vols., 1951–1973), vol. 4, Pamphlets and Papers, 1815–23 (1970)Google Scholar

Stasavage, David, Public Debt and the Birth of the Democratic State: France and Great Britain, 1688–1789 (Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sturzenegger, Federico and Zettelmeyer, Jeromin, ‘Haircuts: estimating investor losses in sovereign debt restructurings, 1998–2005’, IMF Working Paper No. 05/137 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2005)

Sturzenegger, Federico and Zettelmeyer, Jeromin, Debt Defaults and Lessons from a Decade of Crises (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Summers, Lionel, ‘La Clause Calvo: tendances nouvelles’, Revue de droit international, 7 (1915), 567Google Scholar

Summers, Lionel and Fraleigh, Arnold, ‘The United States–Japanese Property Commission’, American Journal of International Law, 56 (1962), 407–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sylla, Richard and Wallis, John Joseph, ‘The anatomy of sovereign debt crises: lessons from the American state defaults of the 1840s’, Japan and the World Economy, 10 (1998), 267–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szodruch, Alexander, ‘State insolvency – consequences and obligations under investment treaties’, in Hofmann, R. and Tams, C. J. (eds.), The International Convention for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Taking Stock after 40 Years (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007), 141–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szurek, S., ‘Epilogue d'un contentieux historique: l'accord du 27 mai 1997 entre le gouvernement de la République Française et le Gouvernement de la Fédération de Russie rélatif au règlement définitif des créances réciproques entre la France et la Russie antérieures au 9 mai 1945’, Annuaire français du droit international, 44 (1998), 144–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tams, Christian, J., ‘An appealing option? The debate about an ICSID appellate mechanism’, Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht (Martin-Luther-University, Halle), 57 (2006), 1–56Google Scholar

Teitelbaum, Ruth, ‘Who's afraid of Maffezini? Recent developments in the interpretation of most favored nation clauses’, Journal of International Arbitration, 22 (2005), 225–38Google Scholar

Thompson, Helen and Runciman, David, ‘Sovereign debt and private creditors: new legal sanction or the enduring power of states?’ New Political Economy, 11 (2006), 541–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tietje, Christian, ‘Staateninsolvenz und Kapitalaufnahme auf internationalen Anleihemärkten’, in Leible, S. and Ruffert, M. (eds.), Völkerrecht und IPR (Jenaer Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2006), 193–214Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles, Coercion, Capital, and European States AD 990–1990 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990)Google Scholar

Toniolo, Gianni, Central Bank Cooperation at the Bank for International Settlements, 1930–1973 (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Touzé, Sébastien, ‘L'affaire des emprunts russes devant la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme’, Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme, 57 (2004), 283–316Google Scholar

Treitel, Guenter, The Law of Contract, 6th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1983)Google Scholar

Tudor, Ioana, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Foreign Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turlington, Edward Willis, Mexico and Her Foreign Creditors (Columbia University Press, 1930)Google Scholar

Vagts, Detlev, ‘Sovereign bankruptcy: In re Germany (1953), In re Iraq (2004)’, American Journal of International Law, 98 (2004), 302–06CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vagts, Detlev, ‘International economic law and the American Journal of International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 100 (2006), 769–82Google Scholar

Vagts, Detlev, ‘Foreword’, in Waibel, M.et al. (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration (Amsterdam: Wolters, Kluwer, 2010)Google Scholar

Harten, Gus, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Houtte, Hans, Delmartino, Bart, Yi, Iasson and Das, Hans, Post-war Restoration of Property Rights under International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Veeser, Cyrus, A World Safe for Capitalism: Dollar Diplomacy and America's Rise to Global Power (Columbia University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Vermeule, Adrian, Law and the Limits of Reason (Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmerston, Viscount, The Speech of Viscount Palmerston in Reply to the Motion of Lord George Bentinck, M.P. for an Address to Her Majesty in Favour of the Spanish Bondholders Tried and Compared with the Fundamental Law of this Country as Laid Down by Blackstone and Locke; and with the Principles and Rules of Grotius and Vattel (London: Essingham Wilson, 1848)Google Scholar

Vohryzek-Griest, A., ‘Unjust enrichment unjustly ignored: opportunities and pitfalls in bringing unjust enrichment claims under ICSID’, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 31 (2010), 101Google Scholar

Katte, , Christoph, ‘Brazilian Loans Case’, in Bernhard, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 1981), 39–40Google Scholar

Waibel, Michael, ‘Opening Pandora's Box: sovereign bonds in international arbitration’, American Journal of International Law, 101 (2007), 711–59Google Scholar

Waibel, Michael, ‘Elusive certainty: Implications of Donegal v. Zambia’, International Financial Law Review, 31 (7) (2007), 31–34Google Scholar

Waibel, Michael, ‘Two worlds of necessity in ICSID arbitration: CMS v. LG&E’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 20 (2007), 637–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waibel, Michael, ‘The diplomatic channel’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A. and Olleson, S. (eds.), Handbook on State Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Waibel, Michael, ‘Bank insolvency and state insolvency’, in Lastra, Rosa (ed.), Cross-Border Bank Insolvency (Oxford University Press, 2011), 345–67Google Scholar

Waibel, Michael, Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Kwo-Hwa and Balchin, Claire (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration (Amsterdam: Wolters, Kluwer, 2010)

Wälde, Thomas, ‘The Serbian Loans Case: a precedent for investment treaty protection of foreign debt?’ in Weiler, T. (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration – Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May 2005), 383–424Google Scholar

Wälde, Thomas and Kolo, Abba, ‘Environmental regulation, investment protection and “regulatory takings” in international law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 50 (2001), 811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watrin, Germain, Essai de construction d'un contentieux international des dettes publiques (Paris: Sirey, 1929)Google Scholar

Webber, Jude,‘Argentina delighted over debt swap success’, Financial Times, 23 June 2010Google Scholar

Weber, David J.,‘The Spanish-Mexican rim’, in Milner, C.et al. (eds.), Oxford History of the American West (Oxford University Press, 1994), 45–78Google Scholar

Weidemaier, W.Mark, C., ‘Disputing boilerplate’, Temple Law Review, 82 (2009), 1–54Google Scholar

Weiss, Martin A., ‘Iraq: Paris Club debt relief, CRS Report for Congress’, Congressional Research Service (2005)

Wellens, Karel, Economic Conflicts and Disputes before the World Court (1922–1995): A Functional Analysis (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996)Google Scholar

Wells, Louis, ‘Property rights for foreign capital: sovereign debt and private direct investment in times of crisis’, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2009–2010 (Oxford University Press, 2010), 477–504

Weston, Burns, International Claims: Postwar French Practice (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1971)Google Scholar

White, Gillian, ‘Wealth deprivation: creditor and contract claims’, in Lillich, R. B. (ed.), International Law of State Responsibility to Aliens (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1983), 165–66Google Scholar

Williams, John Fischer, ‘Le droit international et les obligations financières internationales qui naissent d'un contrat’, Recueil des cours de l'Académie de Droit International (1923), 293–361

Williams, John Fischer, International Law and International Financial Obligations Arising from Contract (Leiden: Brill, 1924)Google Scholar

Williams, John Fischer, ‘The tribunal for the interpretation of the Dawes Plan’, American Journal of International Law, 22 (1928), 797–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, John Fischer, Chapters on Current International Law and the League of Nations (London, 1929)Google Scholar

Wood, Philip, International Loans, Bonds, and Securities Regulation (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1995)Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William, Poetical Works (Oxford University Press, 1947)Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy, ‘The legal nature of treaties’, American Journal of International Law, 10 (1916), 706–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wuarin, Albert, Essai sur les emprunts d'Etats et la protection des droits des porteurs de fonds d'États étrangers (Paris: J. B. Sirey, 1907)Google Scholar

Wynne, Albert, ‘Droit des porteurs de fonds d'Etats étrangers’, Journal du droit international, 37 (1912), 420Google Scholar

Wynne, William, State Insolvency and Foreign Bondholders, Vol. 2: Selected Case Histories of Governmental Foreign Bond Defaults and Debt Readjustments (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951)Google Scholar

Yannaca-Small, Catherine, ‘Fair and equitable treatment standard in international investment law’, in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (ed.), International Investment Law: A Changing Landscape – A Companion Volume to International Investment Perspectives (OECD, 2005)

Young, J. P., European Currency and Finance (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1925)Google Scholar

Zitelmann, Ernst, Der Canevaro-Streitfall: Schiedsspruch vom 3. Mai 1912 auf Grund des Schiedsvergleichs vom 25. April 1910 (Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1914)Google Scholar