Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Introduction
- THE REGION
- Southeast Asia and ASEAN: Running in Place
- Southeast Asian Economies: Moderating Growth Momentum
- Latent Danger: Boundary Disputes and Border Issues in Southeast Asia
- The Five Power Defence Arrangements at Forty (1971–2011)
- How Will Southeast Asia Position Itself in Asia's Future in an Age of Scarcities?
- BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
- CAMBODIA
- INDONESIA
- LAOS
- MALAYSIA
- MYANMAR
- PHILIPPINES
- SINGAPORE
- THAILAND
- TIMOR-LESTE
- VIETNAM
Southeast Asia and ASEAN: Running in Place
from THE REGION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Introduction
- THE REGION
- Southeast Asia and ASEAN: Running in Place
- Southeast Asian Economies: Moderating Growth Momentum
- Latent Danger: Boundary Disputes and Border Issues in Southeast Asia
- The Five Power Defence Arrangements at Forty (1971–2011)
- How Will Southeast Asia Position Itself in Asia's Future in an Age of Scarcities?
- BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
- CAMBODIA
- INDONESIA
- LAOS
- MALAYSIA
- MYANMAR
- PHILIPPINES
- SINGAPORE
- THAILAND
- TIMOR-LESTE
- VIETNAM
Summary
When Indonesia took the reins of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as the grouping's 2011 chair, expectations ran high that Jakarta would inject a new sense of urgency into the organization. Jakarta's activist agenda was designed to push the organization faster and further towards the goal of achieving a prosperous, peaceful, just, and democratic ASEAN Community by 2015. Indonesia was going to lead ASEAN (if it could be led) out of the doldrums of Thailand's 2009 chairmanship, crippled as it was by domestic political turmoil, followed in 2010 by status quo–oriented Vietnam. In the politesse of ASEAN discourse, Indonesia's stewardship has been praised for leading ASEAN to meet the challenges presented by community building. Indonesia handed off ASEAN's Chair for 2012 to Hun Sen's Cambodia, which received essentially the same package of unresolved issues and problems that Indonesia had wrestled with. Indonesia's major accomplishment was to keep the vision of community intact, although real community seems no closer today than it did when Indonesia assumed the chairmanship. The possible exception is political change in Myanmar.
Indonesia's hope to save ASEAN from itself was undone by the realities of ASEAN's workings. Outside of its creeping, hesitant economic integration, a faltering ASEAN has not delivered the political and strategic coherence required for the unity of will and purpose necessary for it to be an effective actor in the regional international order. The “ASEAN way” has been a dead end in terms of ASEAN common policymaking. The grouping has not demonstrated the “organizational coherence and clarity of leadership” necessary, as Alice Ba wrote, to maintain its influence and claim to centrality in Asian regionalism.
Indonesia gave it a new best try with the “Bali Concord III”, which calls for coordinated, cohesive, and coherent common positions so that ASEAN can have a single international voice on matters of common interest. As long as ASEAN's decision-making reflects controversy avoidance and lowest common denominator consensus on crucial issues of politics and security, the ASEAN voice will continue to be expressed through declaratory and platitudinous formulations rather than coordinated policy actions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Southeast Asian Affairs 2012 , pp. 3 - 22Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2012