Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:26:37.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - When sinks rescue sources in dynamic environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

By
Matthew R. Falcy  and
Brent J. Danielson
Edited by
Jianguo Liu ,
Vanessa Hull ,
Anita T. Morzillo  and
John A. Wiens
Matthew R. Falcy
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Brent J. Danielson
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Jianguo Liu
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Vanessa Hull
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Anita T. Morzillo
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
John A. Wiens
Affiliation:
PRBO Conservation Science
Get access

Summary

Many species of conservation concern occur in spatially heterogeneous landscapes composed of different patches that function as population sources and population sinks. Temporal variation in habitat quality, due to a cycle of habitat disturbance and subsequent recovery, can create relatively underappreciated source–sink dynamics. A cycle of disturbance and recovery can cause a given patch to alternate between functioning as a population source and a population sink. During “good” years, this patch can conceivably sustain another nearby patch that is always sink habitat. However, after a disturbance, the putative source patch may then depend upon individuals from that sink for recolonization. Thus, the metapopulation can depend upon the presence of sink populations for long-term persistence, provided that the sink is relatively unaffected by disturbance. We developed a simple, two-patch model of source–sink dynamics in order to explore the sensitivity of long-term metapopulation persistence to the temporal scale of habitat disturbance, recovery in a putative source patch, and the rate of population decline in the sink. We found that management directed at decelerating the rate of population decline in the sink can have a much greater affect on metapopulation persistence than management targeted at increasing the rate of habitat recovery in the source. This result is magnified as disturbance frequency increases. It is hoped that sinks crucial to metapopulation survival are given appropriate conservation status.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sources, Sinks and Sustainability , pp. 139 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Emanuel, K. (2005). Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 436(7051): 686–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foppen, R. P. B., Chardon, J. P. and Liefveld, W. (2001). Understanding the role of sink patches in source–sink metapopulations: reed warbler in an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 14(6): 1881–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, A. and Holt, R. D. (2002). The inflationary effects of environmental fluctuations in source–sink systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99(23): 14872–14877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gyllenberg, M., Osipov, A. V. and Södervacka, G. (1996). Bifurcation analysis of a metapopulation model with sources and sinks. Nonlinear Science 6: 329–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, J. (2006). On the failure of modern species concepts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21(8): 447–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, R. D. (1985). Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theoretical Population Biology 28: 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R. D. (1997). On the evolutionary stability of sink populations. Evolutionary Ecology 11: 723–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R. D., Barfield, M. and Gonzalez, A. (2003). Impacts of environmental variability in open populations and communities: “inflation” in sink environments. Theoretical Population Biology 64: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, A. H. (1909). Notes on the distribution of certain mammals of the southeastern United States. Proceedings of the Biology Society of Washington 22: 55–68.Google Scholar
Howell, A. H. (1921). A biological survey of Alabama. North American Fauna 45: 1–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivey, R. D. (1949). Life history notes on three mice from the Florida east coast. Journal of Mammalogy 30: 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, V. A. A. and Yoshimura, J. (1998). Populations can persist in an environment consisting of sink habitats only. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 95: 3696–3698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. (2004). Source–sink dynamics in a temporally heterogeneous environment. Ecology 85(7): 2037–2045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsland, S. E. (1995). Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Landsea, C. (2005). Hurricanes and global warming. Nature 438: E11–E13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malanson, G. P. (1993). Riparian Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D. W. (2003). Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, W. F. and Doak, D. F. (2002). Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Pulliam, H. R. (1988). Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132(5): 652–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulliam, H. R. (1996). Sources and sinks: empirical evidence and population consequences. In Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time (Rhodes, O. E. Jr., Chesser, R. K. and Smith, M. H., eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL: 45–70.Google Scholar
Roy, M., Holt, R. D. and Barfield, M. (2005). Temporal autocorrelation can enhance the persistence and abundance of metapopulations comprised of coupled sinks. American Naturalist 166(2): 246–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sneckenberger, S. I. (2001). Factors influencing habitat use by the Alabama beach mouse (Peromyscus polionotus ammobates). MS thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
Swilling, W. R. Jr., Wooten, M. C., Holler, N. R. and Lynn, W. J. (1998). Population dynamics of Alabama beach mouse (Peromyscus polionotus ammobates) following Hurricane Opal. American Midland Naturalist 140: 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L. and Nowak, M. A. (1994). Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenberth, K. (2005). Uncertainty in hurricanes and global warming. Science 308(5729): 1753–1754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service) (2005). Draft Revised Habitat Recovery Plan for the Alabama Beach Mouse (Peromyscus polionotus ammobates). US Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Webster, P. J., Holland, G. J., Curry, J. A. and Chang, H. R. (2005). Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309(5742): 1844–1846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×