Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:06:59.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - On estimating demographic and dispersal parameters for niche and source–sink models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

By
H. Ronald Pulliam ,
John M. Drake  and
Juliet R. C. Pulliam
Edited by
Jianguo Liu ,
Vanessa Hull ,
Anita T. Morzillo  and
John A. Wiens
H. Ronald Pulliam
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
John M. Drake
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Juliet R. C. Pulliam
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Jianguo Liu
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Vanessa Hull
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Anita T. Morzillo
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
John A. Wiens
Affiliation:
PRBO Conservation Science
Get access

Summary

Demography plays a central role in ecology, and accurate estimation of demographic parameters is essential to testing basic theories of life-history evolution, population regulation, and species coexistence, as well as applying ecological theory to a broad range of practical issues including species conservation, predicting shifts in species distribution due to climate change, and understanding the emergence and spread of new diseases. Our goals in this chapter are twofold: first, to demonstrate a problem with estimating demographic parameters that stems from ignoring dispersal, and second, to propose a solution to this problem. We illustrate the problem with a simulation model that shows how ignoring dispersal may lead to the misclassification of sources and sinks; we attempt to solve the problem by using generalized linear models to differentiate population change due to fecundity from population change due to dispersal, thereby helping to improve source and sink classification. We believe that the particular example discussed is only one of a number of parameter-estimation problems limiting our ability to test and apply ecological theories in field systems and that an approach to parameter estimation similar to that used here may be broadly useful in narrowing the gap between ecological theory and field testing of that theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sources, Sinks and Sustainability , pp. 183 - 215
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Diez, J. M. (2006). Hierarchical patterns of symbiotic orchid germination linked to adult proximity and environmental gradients. Journal of Ecology 95: 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez, J. M. and Pulliam, H. R. (2007). Hierarchical analysis of species distributions and abundance across environmental gradients. Ecology 88: 3144–3152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elith, J. and Burgman, M. A. (2002). Predictions and their validation: rare plants in the Central Highlands, Victoria, Australia. In Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale (J. M. Scott, P. Heglund and Morrison, M. L., eds.). Island Press, Washington, DC: 303–314.Google Scholar
Guisan, A. and Thuiller, W. (2005). Predicting species distributions: offering more than simple habitat models. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, R. (1993). Population dynamic consequences of habitat heterogeneity: an experimental study. Ecology 74: 816–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, R. and Tielborger, K. (1999). Testing for source–sink dynamics: an experimental approach exemplified with desert annuals. Oikos 86: 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, M. (2006). Habitat, environment and niche: what are we modeling?Oikos 115: 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, M., Phillips, B. L., Tracy, C. R., Betts, G. and Porter, W. P. (2008). Modelling species distributions without using species distributions: the cane toad in Australia under current and future climates. Ecography 31: 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawesson, J. E. and Oksanen, J. (2002). Niche characteristics of Danish woody species as derived from coenoclines. Journal of Vegetation Science 13(2): 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. (1969). Species packing and what interspecific competition minimizes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 64: 1369–1371.Google Scholar
May, R. M. and MacArthur, R. H. (1972). Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 69: 1109–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulliam, H. R. (2000). On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 3: 168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulliam, H. R. and Waser, N. M. (2010). Ecological invariance and the search for generality in ecology. In The Ecology of Place: Contributions of Place-Based Research to Ecological Understanding (Billick, I. and Price, M. V., eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL: 69–92.Google Scholar
Urban, M. C., Phillips, B. L., Skelly, D. K. and Shine, R. (2007). The cane toad’s (Chaunus [Bufo] marinus) increasing ability to invade Australia is revealed by a dynamically updated range model. Proceedings of the Royal Society – Biological Sciences – Series B 274: 1413–1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, R. J. (2007). Linking understory evergreen herbaceous distributions and niche differentiation using habitat-specific demography and experimental common gardens. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×