Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:22:24.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamos with Ambipolar Diffusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

M. R. E. Proctor
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
P. C. Matthews
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
A. M. Rucklidge
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Ambipolar diffusion, or ion-neutral drift, has important effects on the transport of magnetic fields in weakly ionized media such as the galactic interstellar medium. Ambipolar diffusion can inhibit the development of small scale magnetic structure because the field ceases to be kinematic with respect to the ions at strengths well below equipartition with the neutrals. On the other hand, magnetic nulls are characterized by steep profiles in which the current density diverges. The addition of ambipolar diffusion to mean field α-ω dynamos makes the equations nonlinear and can lead to steady states or traveling waves.

INTRODUCTION

The theory of linear, kinematic, mean field dynamos has been studied extensively since the pioneering paper by Parker (1955). In such dynamos, the mean magnetic field grows despite the action of resistivity through the combined action of small-scale, helical motions (α effect) and large-scale shear flows (ω effect). If the background state is time independent, the mean field evolves exponentially in time, and saturation of the field amplitude must occur through effects not included in the model.

Astrophysical systems typically have very low resistivities and correspondingly high magnetic Reynolds numbers Rm (of order 108–1010 in the Solar convection zone and 1018–1020 in the galactic disk). This raises a problem for dynamo theory: if the resistivity is assumed to be molecular, the fastest growing wavelengths are extremely short and it is difficult to see how large scale fields could be generated. Moreover, the resistivity plays a central role in the calculation of the a effect (e.g., Moffatt 1978). Most workers therefore assume that turbulent resistivity is present.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×