Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T15:38:10.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Variation and change in sign languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

By
Robert Bayley ,
Adam C. Schembri  and
Ceil Lucas
Edited by
Adam C. Schembri  and
Ceil Lucas
Robert Bayley
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Adam C. Schembri
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
Ceil Lucas
Affiliation:
Gallaudet University
Adam C. Schembri
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Ceil Lucas
Affiliation:
Gallaudet University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

All human languages vary in both time and space as well as according to the linguistic environment in which a particular form is used. For example, the ASL sign DEAF has three main forms. It can be produced with a movement from ear to chin (the citation or dictionary form), from chin to ear or by contacting the check once (both non-citation forms). Even though the form of DEAF varies from signer to signer, and even within the signing of the same signer, the variation we observe is not random. Rather, signers’ choices among the three forms of DEAF are systematically constrained by a range of linguistic and social influences, or factors. For example, compared to signers in other parts of the United States, signers in Boston, Massachusetts use the citation form of DEAF more often. In contrast, signers in Kansas, Missouri, and Virginia tend to prefer non-citation forms. Indeed, a study of variation in the sign DEAF showed that signers in these states used non-citation forms of DEAF 85 percent of the time, more than twice the rate of signers in Boston (Bayley, Lucas, and Rose 2000: 92).

The region of the country where a signer lives is not the only influence on the choice of a form of DEAF. For example, although ASL signers in Boston generally used more citation forms of DEAF than signers in other areas of the United States, Boston signers aged 55 and older are far less likely to choose a non-citation form of DEAF than are younger signers. Bayley et al. (2000) reported that Boston signers aged 55 and older used the citation form of DEAF 76 percent of the time. In contrast, signers between the ages of 26 and 55 used the citation form 54 percent of the time, and signers between the ages of 14 and 26 used the citation form only 46 percent of the time. In addition, variation can be affected by linguistic factors. To continue with the example of DEAF, Lucas (1995) and Bayley et al. (2000) found that signers were very likely to use a non-citation form of DEAF when it was part of a compound, as in DEAF^CULTURE or DEAF^WORLD. However, when DEAF was a predicate adjective, as in PRO.1 DEAF (‘I am deaf’), signers were more likely to choose the citation form.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sociolinguistics and Deaf Communities , pp. 61 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battison, Robbin M., Markowicz, Harry, and Woodward, James C. (1975) A good rule of thumb: Variable phonology in American Sign Language. In Fasold, Ralph W. and Shuy, Roger (eds.), Analyzing Variation in Language. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert (2013) The quantitative paradigm. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd edn (pp. 85–107). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert, Lucas, Ceil, and Rose, Mary (2000) Variation in American Sign Language: The case of DEAF. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward (eds.) (1993) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles (1986) Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2002) Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo, Geraci, Carlo, and Zucchi, Sandro (2009) Another way to mark syntactic dependencies: The case for right-peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language 85: 278–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta and Sankoff, David (1974) Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50: 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croneberg, Carl. G. (1965) Appendix D: Sign language dialects. In Stokoe, William C., Casterline, Dorothy C., and Croneberg, Carl G., A Dictionary of American Sign Language (pp. 313–319). Silver Spring, MD: Linstok.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2000) Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity at Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph (1990) The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Schembri, Adam, Rentelis, Ramas, and Cormier, Kearsy (2013) Variation in handshape and orientation in British Sign Language: The case of the “1” hand configuration. Language and Communication 33: 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, Susan and Gong, Qunhu (2010) Variation in East Asian sign language structures. In Brentari, Diane (ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 499–518). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia (2007) A bend in the road: Subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish after 30 years of sociolinguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 624–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frishberg, Nancy (1975) Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51: 696–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraci, Carlo, Battaglia, Katia, Cardinaletti, Anna, Cecchetto, Carlo, Donati, Caterina, Guiduce, Serena, and Mereghetti, Emiliano (2011) The LIS corpus project: A discussion of sociolinguistic variation in the lexicon. Sign Language Studies 11: 328–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraci, Carlo and Bayley, Robert (2011) Chi, cosa, dove, perché e quando: la distribuzione dei segni wh- in LIS. In Cardinaletti, Anna, Cecchetto, Carlo, and Donati, Caterina (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e deimensioni di variazione nella LIS (pp. 127–144). Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Geraci, Carlo, Bayley, Robert, Cardinaletti, Anna, Cecchetto, Carlo, and Donati, Caterina (2015) Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh-signs. Linguistics 53: 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, Elizabeth and Tagliamonte, Sali (1999) Another piece for the verbal -s story: Evidence from Devon in southwest England. Language Variation and Change 11: 87–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Kyle and Johnson, Daniel Ezra (2013) Quantitative analysis. In Bayley, Robert, Cameron, Richard, and Lucas, Ceil (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1980) Variation in the group and in the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space (pp. 1–36). New York: Academic. Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1993) Quantitative analysis. In Preston, Dennis R. (ed.), American Dialect Research (pp. 223–249). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. and Bayley, Robert (1995) On the choice of relative pronouns in English. American Speech 70: 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoopes, Rob (1998) A preliminary examination of pink extension: Suggestions regarding its constraints, occurrence and function. In Lucas, Ceil (ed.), Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze: Language Use in Deaf Communities (pp. 3–17). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Jia, Li and Bayley, Robert (2002) Null pronoun variation in Mandarin Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(3): 103–116.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra (2009) Getting off the Goldvarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effect variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1963) The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1969) Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45: 715–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1989) The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1994) Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William (2006) The Social Stratification of English in New York City, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott and Johnson, Robert (1989) American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64: 195–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil (1995) Sociolinguistic variation in ASL: The case of DEAF. In Lucas, Ceil (ed.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities (vol. I, pp. 3–25). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil (ed.) (1996) Multicultural Aspects of Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Lucas, Ceil (2007) Variation and modality. In Bayley, Robert and Lucas, Ceil (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Theories, Methods, and Applications (pp. 145–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil (2013) Methods for studying sign languages. In Bayley, Robert, Cameron, Richard, and Lucas, Ceil (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 280–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil and Bayley, Robert (2005) Variation in ASL: The role of grammatical function. Sign Language Studies 6: 38–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil and Bayley, Robert (2010) Variation in ASL. In Brentari, Diane (ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 451–475). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil and Bayley, Robert (2011) Variation in sign languages: Recent research on ASL and beyond. Language and Linguistics Compass 5: 677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, McCaskill, Carolyn, and Hill, Joseph (2013) The incorporation of African American English into Black ASL. International Journal of Bilingualism.
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, Reed, Ruth, and Wulf, Alyssa (2001) Lexical variation in African American and white American Sign Language. American Speech 76: 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, Rose, Mary, and Wulf, Alyssa (2002) Location variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 2: 407–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, and Valli, Clayton (2001) Sociolinguistic Variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, Valli, Clayton, Rose, Mary, and Wulf, Alyssa (2001) Sociolinguistic variation. In Lucas, Ceil (ed.), The Sociolinguistics of Sign Languages (pp. 61–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Goeke, Amber, Briesacher, Rebecca, and Bayley, Robert (2007) Variation in ASL: Two hands or one? Paper presented at the Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation 36, University of Pennsylvania.
Lucas, Ceil, Mirus, Gene, Palmer, Jeffrey L., Roessler, Nicholas, and Frost, Adam (2013) The effect of new technologies on sign language research. Sign Language Studies 13: 541–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil and Valli, Clayton (1992) Language Contact in the American Deaf Community. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McCaskill, Carolyn, Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, and Hill, Joseph (2011) The Hidden Treasure of Black ASL: Its History and Structure. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
McKee, Rachel, Schembri, Adam C., McKee, David, and Johnston, Trevor (2011) Variable subject expression in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. Language Variation and Change 23: 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley (1987) Language and Social Networks, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo and Zentella, Ana Celia (2012) Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialect Leveling, and Structural Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol (1988) Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Palmer, Jeffrey L., Reynolds, Wanette, and Minor, Rebecca (2012) “You want WHAT on your pizza?!”: Videophone and video relay service as potential forces on lexical standardization of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 12: 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnasis, Ila (ed.) (1998) Cultural and Language Diversity and the Deaf Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter and Metzger, Melanie (1996) Sociolinguistic factors in sign language research. In Arnold, Jennifer, Blake, Renée, Davidson, Brad, Schwenter, Scott, and Solomon, Julie (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory and Analysis (pp. 229–240). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana (1980) “Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish and termino en español”: Towards a typology of code-switching. Linguistics 18: 581–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, David (2009) Sign language contact and interference: ASL and LSM. Language in Society 37: 161–187.Google Scholar
Roy, Joseph (2014) Sociolinguistic statistics: The intersection between statistical models, empirical data, and sociolinguistic theory. In Barysevich, Alena, D'Arcy, Alexandra, and Heap, David (eds.), Proceedings of Methods XIV: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology (pp. 261–275). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Smith, Eric (2005) Goldvarb X: A Variable Rule Application for Macintosh and Windows [computer program]. Toronto and Ottawa: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam C., Cormier, Kearsy, Johnston, Trevor, McKee, David, and Woll, Bencie (2010) Sociolinguistic variation in British, Australian, and New Zealand sign languages. In Brentari, Diane (ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 476–498). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam C., Fenlon, Jordan, Rentelis, Ramas, Reynolds, Sally, and Cormier, Kearsy (2013) Building the British Sign Language Corpus. Language Documentation and Conservation 7: 136–154.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam and Johnston, Trevor (2013) Sociolinguistic variation and change in sign languages. In Bayley, Robert, Cameron, Richard, and Lucas, Ceil (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 503–522). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, McKee, David, McKee, Rachel, Pivac, Sara, Johnston, Trevor, and Goswell, Delia (2009) Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change 21: 193–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1994) Approaches to Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie (2004) Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuy, Roger, Wolfram, Walt, and Riley, William (1968) Field Techniques in an Urban Dialect Study. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Shroyer, Edgar H. and Shroyer, Susan P. (1984) Signs across America. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Stamp, Rosemary, Schembri, Adam, Fenlon, Jordan, Rentelis, Ramas, and Cormier, Kearsy (2011) Lexical variation and change in British Sign Language (BSL): Evidence for dialect levelling? Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE), Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, Germany.
Stokoe, William C. (1960) Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication System of the American Deaf. Occasional Paper Number 8. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2006) Analysing Sociological Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine (2007) Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change 19: 101–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1974) The Social Stratification of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt (1969) A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt (1989) Structural variability in language development: Final nasals in vernacular Black English. In Fasold, Ralph W. and Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), Language Change and Variation (pp. 301–332). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt (1991) Dialects and American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt (1993) Identifying and interpreting linguistic variables. In Preston, Dennis R. (ed.), American Dialect Research (pp. 193–221). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt (1997) Dialect in society. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 107–126). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (2006) American English: Dialects and Variation, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woodward, James C. (1976) Black southern signing. Language in Society 5: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulf, Alyssa, Dudis, Paul, Bayley, Robert, and Lucas, Ceil (2002) Variable subject presence in ASL narratives. Sign Language Studies 3: 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia (1997) Growing up Bilingual: Puerto Rican Children in New York. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×