Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T15:32:49.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Discourse analysis and sign languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

By
Elizabeth A. Winston  and
Cynthia Roy
Edited by
Adam C. Schembri  and
Ceil Lucas
Elizabeth A. Winston
Affiliation:
Teaching Interpreting Education and Mentors (TIEM) Center
Cynthia Roy
Affiliation:
Gallaudet University
Adam C. Schembri
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Ceil Lucas
Affiliation:
Gallaudet University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Introduction

People often wonder what discourse analysis is and what the field of study includes. As a newer field, discourse analysis is still determining its own boundaries. It is different from traditional linguistics in several ways – it uses natural data for analysis, and it deals with utterances, as opposed to sentences. If you spend time observing everyday talk, you will notice that these utterances rarely look like those grammatical sentences seen in the grammar books and often described in linguistic research about syntax and grammar. In everyday interaction, people do not always use complete “sentences,” they leave out information, they add meaning with their voice, or their faces, and they leave their comments unfinished. Yet, we still understand each other. An utterance, then, is the real-life expression of people's thoughts, ideas, and feelings.

Simply put, discourse analysis is the study of language in use. In discourse analysis, we study how people interact by expressing meaning using language within a context. This includes much more than just studying the words or signs that make up an utterance. It includes all the aspects of those utterances: pacing, facial expression, body shifting, gestures, and any other features that add meaning to an utterance. It also includes building understanding one utterance at a time, from beginning to end, in real time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sociolinguistics and Deaf Communities , pp. 95 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, C. (1977) Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. In Friedman, L. (ed.), On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 215–236). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Becker, A. (1995) Beyond Translation: Essays in Philology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D. and Crossley, L. (2002) Prosody on the hands and face. Sign Language and Linguistics 5(2): 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dachkovsky, S. and Sandler, W. (2009) Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech 52(2–3): 287–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudis, P. (2004) Body partitioning in real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2): 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudis, P. (2011). The body in scene depictions. In Roy, C. (ed.), Discourse in Signed Languages (pp. 3–45). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (2001) The transcription of discourse. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Hamilton, H. E. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 321–348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pederson, E. (1992) Point of view in Danish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15(2): 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenlon, J., Denmark, T., Campbell, R., and Woll, B. (2007) Seeing sentence boundaries. Sign Language and Linguistics 10(2): 177–200.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981) Replies and Responses: Forms of Talk (pp. 5–77). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics (vol. III, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, A. (2010) The interaction of eye blinks and other prosodic cues in German Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics 13(1): 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogue, R. (2010) OOs and AAs: Mouth gestures as ideophones in American Sign Language, unpublished dissertation, Gallaudet University.
Hoza, J. (2007) It's Not What You Sign: Politeness in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Hoza, J. (2011) The discourse and politeness functions of HEY and WELL in American Sign Language. In Roy, Cynthia (ed.), Discourse in Signed Languages (pp. 69–95). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Janzen, T. (2005) Introduction to the theory and practice of signed language interpreting. In Janzen, T. (ed.), Topics in Signed Language Interpreting: Theory and Practice 63: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. (2010) From archive to corpus: Transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(1): 106–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972) The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax: Language in the Inner City (pp. 354–96). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. K. (2003) Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaskill, C., Lucas, C., Bayley, R., and Hill, J. (2011) The Hidden Treasure of Black ASL: Its History and Structure. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. [book + DVD]Google Scholar
McCleary, L. and de Arantes Leite, T. (2013) Turn-taking in Brazilian Sign Language. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4(1).Google Scholar
Metzger, M. (1995) Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities 255–271.
Metzger, M. (2000) Interactive role-plays as a teaching strategy. In Roy, C. (ed.), Innovative Practices for Teaching Sign Language Interpreters (pp. 83–108). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Metzger, M. and Bahan, B. (2001) Discourse analysis. In Lucas, C. (ed.), The Sociolinguistics of Sign Languages (pp. 112–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, M. and Mather, S. (2004) Constructed dialogue and constructed action in Conversational narratives in ASL, poster presented at the Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 8). Barcelona, September 30–October 2.
Ormel, E. and Crasborn, O. (2012) Prosodic correlated of sentences in signed languages: A literature review and suggestions for new types of studies. Sign Language Studies 12(2): 279–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, R. and Quer, J. (2009) Nonmanuals: Their Grammatical and Prosodic Rules. Sign languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pichler, D. C., Hochgesang, J. A., Lillo-Martin, D., and de Quatros, R. M. (2010) Conventions for sign and speech transcription of child bimodal bilingual corpora in ELAN. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition 1(1): 11–40.Google Scholar
Roush, D. (1999) Indirect strategies in American Sign Language: Requests and refusals, unpublished master's thesis, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.
Roush, D. (2007) Indirectness strategies in American Sign Language requests and refusals: deconstructing the deaf-as-direct stereotype. In Metzger, M. and Fleetwood, E. (eds.), Translation, Sociolinguistic, and Consumer Issues in Interpreting (pp. 103–156). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, C. B. (1989) Features of discourse in an American Sign Language lecture. In Lucas, C. (ed.), The Sociolinguistics of the Deaf Community (pp. 231–251). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, C. (2000) Interpreting as a Discourse Process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanheim, L. M. (2003) Turn exchange in an interpreted medical encounter. In Metzger, M., Collins, S., Dively, V., and Shaw, R. (eds.), From Topic Boundaries to Omission. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse (vol. VIII). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swabey, L. (2011) Referring expressions in ASL discourse. In Roy, C. (ed.), Discourse in Signed Languages (pp. 96–118). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, R., Emmorey, K., and Kluender, R. (2006). The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: An eye-tracking study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(2): 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thumann, M. (2010) Identifying Depiction in American Sign Language Presentations, unpublished dissertation. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Thumann, M. (2011) Identifying depiction: Constructed action and constructed dialogue in ASL presentations. In Roy, C. (ed.), Discourse in Signed Languages (pp. 46–66). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Kooij, E., Crasborn, O., and Emmerik, W. (2006) Explaining prosodic body leans in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Pragmatics required. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1598–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. (1994) Eyeblinks and ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies 84(1): 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S. and Shaffer, B. (2005) Towards a cognitive model of interpreting. In Janzen, T. (ed.), Topics in Signed Language Interpreting (pp. 135–164). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. and Shaffer, B. (2006) Modality in American Sign Language. In Frawley, W. (ed.), Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies (pp. 107–131). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Winston, E. (1991) Spatial referencing and cohesion in an American Sign Language text. Sign Language Studies 73(1): 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, E. (1993) Spatial mapping in comparative discourse frames in an American Sign Language lecture, unpublished dissertation, Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Winston, E. (1995) Comparative discourse frames in an ASL text. In Emmorey, K. and Reilly, J. (eds.), Language, Gesture, and Space (pp. 85–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Winston, E. (1996) Spatial mapping in ASL discourse. In Proceedings of the 1996 Conference of Interpreter Trainers Convention (pp. 1–28). Little Rock, AK.Google Scholar
Winston, E. (1998) Spatial mapping and involvement in ASL story-telling. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze (pp. 183–210). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Winston, E. (2000) It just doesn't look like ASL! Defining, recognizing, and teaching prosody in ASL. In CIT at 21: Celebrating Excellence (pp. 103–115). Silver Spring, MD: RID Publications.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×