Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of contributors
- 1 Social support and psychiatric disorder: overview of evidence
- PART I CONCEPTS AND ORIGINS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT
- PART II LESSONS FROM SELECTED OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES
- 6 Social support as a high-risk condition for depression in women
- 7 The importance of context: who needs and who does not need social support among college students?
- 8 Teenage peer networks in the community as sources of social problems: a sociological perspective
- PART III LESSONS FROM INTERVENTION STUDIES
- PART IV INTERVENTION PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Index
7 - The importance of context: who needs and who does not need social support among college students?
from PART II - LESSONS FROM SELECTED OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of contributors
- 1 Social support and psychiatric disorder: overview of evidence
- PART I CONCEPTS AND ORIGINS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT
- PART II LESSONS FROM SELECTED OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES
- 6 Social support as a high-risk condition for depression in women
- 7 The importance of context: who needs and who does not need social support among college students?
- 8 Teenage peer networks in the community as sources of social problems: a sociological perspective
- PART III LESSONS FROM INTERVENTION STUDIES
- PART IV INTERVENTION PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Index
Summary
The extent to which people need or indeed are able to use personal relationships is found in the literature in various different forms. In the field of applied psychology an early distinction was made between person-oriented and task-oriented group leaders and a theory of group behaviour in the work situation was built around this (Fiedler, 1967). The work of Eysenck and others on extraversion–introversion is extremely well known (e.g. Eysenck & Eysenck, 1985). The tradition started by Murray (1938) and continued by McClelland and others (Atkinson, 1958) of describing peoples' needs and motives has led to work on the need for power and the need for intimacy (McAdams et al., 1984). Finally, and perhaps most relevant, come the ideas of Beck and others on sociotropy and autonomy. Sociotropy or social dependency
‘refers to the person's investment in positive interchange with other people. It includes passive–receptive wishes (acceptance, intimacy, understanding, support, guidance): narcissistic wishes (admiration, prestige, status) … Individuality (autonomy) refers to the person's investment in preserving and increasing his independence, mobility and personal rights: freedom of choice, action and expression: protection of his domain … and attaining meaningful goals’.
(Beck, 1983)Given that there may be individual differences (however described) in the need for social interaction and that social support on the whole seems to prevent symptoms, various questions arise: Do all types of people have an equal need for social support in time of trouble? Are there circumstances in which social support is not helpful?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Support and Psychiatric DisorderResearch Findings and Guidelines for Clinical Practice, pp. 163 - 173Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995
- 1
- Cited by