We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2022
Introduction
The King's Fund audit of coalition health policy (Ham et al, 2015: 1) claims that the first half of the 2010–15 parliament was taken up with debate on the Health and Social Care Bill (HSCB), while the second half was devoted to limiting the damage caused by the Bill and subsequent Act and dealing with the effects of growing financial and service pressures in the NHS (see also, Seldon and Snowdon, 2015: 540). While previous Social Policy Reviews have focused on the first half (Ruane, 2010; 2012; Mays, 2011; Heins, 2013), there has been little coverage of the second half. However, was it a case of a game of two halves or did the coalition reforms bring about the final whistle, signalling the end of the NHS?
This chapter examines both halves of the coalition government's health policy (see, for example, Burchardt, 2015 and Glasby, 2016, on social care). After a brief ‘extra time’ exploring the early period of the Conservative government elected in May 2015, it provides a ‘match report’ of temporal, intrinsic and comparative evaluation templates. ‘The final whistle?’ explores the debate on the ‘end of the NHS’ in terms of the issues of privatisation and financial crisis/sustainability.
First half: the Health and Social Care Act
Many commentators regard the reorganisation of the White Paper, Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS (Department of Health, 2010a) and the subsequent Health and Social Care Act (HSCA) of 2012 as the biggest change in the history of the NHS (for example, Ruane, 2010; 2012; Mays, 2011; Heins, 2013). For example, according to Hunter (2013b), the changes ushered in by the HSCA are different in both scope and intent from anything to which the NHS has previously been subjected. According to Seldon and Snowdon (2015: 181), this ‘NHS debacle’ was ‘the biggest cock-up of Cameron's premiership’. Widely regarded as a ‘car crash’ of both politics and policy making, it was, in the words of Sir David Nicholson, then NHS chief executive, ‘the only change management system you can actually see from space’ (quoted in Timmins, 2012).
Timmins (2012) relates the story that before the 2010 election, David Cameron promised ‘no top-down reorganisations’ of the NHS (see also, Seldon and Snowdon, 2015).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
