Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:10:12.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Performing the sacred: a Durkheimian perspective on the performative turn in the social sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2009

Bernhard Giesen
Affiliation:
Chair for macro-sociology in the Department of History and Sociology, University of Konstanz (Germany); Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology, Yale University
Jeffrey C. Alexander
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Bernhard Giesen
Affiliation:
Universität Konstanz, Germany
Jason L. Mast
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Although generating a logic and scholarly sophistication of its own, social theory has always gained additional power and plausibility when grounded in pre-scientific paradigms and commonsense images of social reality. In this way the classical social theory of the eighteenth century started with the idea of society as a normative constitution based on contract; later on it imagined society as a coercive organization, as an organized division of labor or as a market. During the so-called cultural turn of the 1980s, social reality was conceived as a text that is interpreted by other texts. Meanwhile the focus has shifted from the structure of the text to the process of narrating it, from the normative constitution to the rituals of contracting, from the coercive organization and the revolutionary movement to the rituals of staging authority and the rituals of rebellion: social theory is going to take a performative turn.

Of course, this turn to performance is not entirely new. It has been preluded by the debate about the primacy of ritual over myth in classical anthropology (Smith 1927; Frazer 1922), it borrows from the theory of drama (Burke 1965; Schechner 1976), from the theory of speech acts (Searle 1970; Austin 1975), from the ethnomethodological thrust to dissolve institutional structures into modes of practices (Garfinkel 1989), and, most important of all, it has been programmatically introduced, some decades ago, by Victor Turner (Turner 1969, 1974, 1982) and Erving Goffman into sociology (Goffman 1959, 1986).

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Performance
Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual
, pp. 325 - 367
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 1995. Homo Sacer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Philip Smith. 2001. “The Strong Program in Cultural Theory: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics,” pp. 135–51 in Jonathan, H. Turner (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C., Eyerman, Ron, Giesen, Bernhard, Smelser, Neil J., and , Piotr Sztompka, eds. 2004. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Artaud, Antonini. 1958. The Theater and Its Double, trans. Mary Caroline Richards. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1979. Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1965. Rabelais and His World, trans. Helen Iswolsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. , Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Baumann, Richard. 1986. Story, Performance, and Event: Contextual Studies in Oral Narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1973. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Catherine M. 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Catherine M. 1997. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bohrer, Karl H. 2003. Ekstasen der Zeit. Vienna: Hanser.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, Percy. 1991. “The Operational Character of Scientific Concepts,” pp. 57–69 in Boyd, Richard (ed.), The Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1957. The Philosophy of Literary Form. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth 1962. A Grammar of Motives. Cleveland, Ohio: Meridian.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth 1965. “Dramatism,” pp. 445–51 in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. VII.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caillois, Roger. 1994. L'homme et le sacré. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Campbell, Joseph. 1981. The Mythic Image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Joseph 1988. The Power of Myth. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Campbell, Joseph 1993. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin. 1996. Performance: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chambers, Ross. 1980. “Le Masque et le miroir: Vers une théorie relationnelle du théâtre,” Études littéraires 13: 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1982. Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Elin. 1989. “Mimesis, Mimicry, and the ‘True-Real’,” Modern Drama 32: 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary 1973. Natural Symbols. London: Barrie and Jenkins.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1960. Les Formes Élémentaires de la Vie Réligieuse. Le Système Totémique en Australie. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. 1986. The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah 1992. Max Weber on Charisma and Institution Building: Selected Papers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 1959. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea 1985. Symbolism, the Sacred and the Arts. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, , Edward, E. 1937. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana. 1983. The Literary Speech Act: Don Juan with Austin, or Seduction in Two Languages, trans. Catherine Porter. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2002. Politik als Inszenierung: Vortragsabend mit der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen im Niedersächsischen Landtag am 12. November 2001. Hannover: Hahn.Google Scholar
Frazer, James G. 1922. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1963. Das Unheimliche. Aufsätze zur Literatur. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund 1969. Gesammelte Werke. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1989. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Garner, Stanton B. Jr. 1994. Bodied Spaces: Phenomenology and Performance in Contemporary Drama. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1972. “Deep Play. Notes on the Balinese Cockfight,” Daedalus 101: 1–37.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford 1980. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gennep, Arnold. 1977. The Rites of Passage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giesen, Bernhard. 1999. Kollektive Identität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Giesen, Bernhard 2004. Triumph and Trauma. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Giesen, Bernhard and Suber, Daniel. 2005. Cultural Perspectives on Politics and Religion. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Girard, René. 1977. Violence and the Sacred. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On Facework: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction,” Psychiatry, 18: 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1982. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, Mass.: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. 2 vols. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hassan, Ihab. 1971. The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Towards a Postmodern Literature. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1984. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. 1950. Homo Ludens. New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kurz, Gerhard. 1997. Metapher, Allegorie, Symbol. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Langer, Susanne K. 1967. Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite and Art. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1999. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas and Peter, L. Berger. 1987. The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas and Schütz, Alfred. 1974. Structures of the Life-World. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1999. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1960. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mersch, Dieter. 2002. Ereignis und Aura: Untersuchungen zu einer Ästhetik des Performativen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles W. 1938. “Foundations of the Theory of Signs,” The International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 1, 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1994. Geburt der Tragödie: Schriften zur Literatur und Philosophie der Griechen. Frankfurt am Main: Insel-Verlag.Google Scholar
Otto, Rudolf. 1917. Das Heilige: Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen. Breslau: Trewendt und Granier.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. 1977. Toward a Speech-Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel. 1996. In Search of Lost Time: The Guermantes Way. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Roy A. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1967. The Symbolism of Evil. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 1965. Rites and Symbols of Initiation. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard ed. 1976. Ritual, Play and Performance. Readings in the Social Sciences: Theatre. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard 1985. Between Theater and Anthropology. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechner, Richard 1993. The Future of Ritual: Writings on Culture and Performance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Christoph. 2003. “Symbolizität und Authentizität. Zur Kommunikation von Gefühlen in der Lebenswelt,” pp. 101–34 in Giesen, Bernhard, Osterhammel, Jürgen, and Rudolf Schlögl, (eds.), Die Wirklichkeit der Symbole. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. 1964. Collected Papers. Vol. II: Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1970. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward Albert. 1979. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, William Robertson. 1927. Lectures on the Religion of the Semites: The Fundamental Institutions. London: Black.Google Scholar
Stanislavsky, Konstantin S. 1980. An Actor Prepares, trans. Hapgood, Elizabeth Reynolds. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. 1989. Miracles. New York: Collier-McMillan.Google Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley J. 1981. A Performative Approach to Ritual. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley J. 2002. “Form and Meanings of Magical Acts,” pp. 340–57 in Lambek, Michael (ed.), A Reader in the Anthropology of Religion. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor M. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor M. 1974. Dramas, Fields and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor M. 1981. “Social Dramas and Stories about Them,” pp. 137–64 in Mitchell, W. J. T. (ed.), On Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor M. 1982. From Ritual to Theatre. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor M. 1990. “Are There Universals of Performance in Myth, Ritual and Drama?” pp. 8–18 in Schechner, Richard and Appel, Willa (eds.), By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuw, Gerardus. 1950. “Urzeit und Endzeit,” Eranos-Jahrbuch 18: 11–51.Google Scholar
Wagner, Peter. 1998. “Fest-Stellungen. Beobachtungen zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Diskussion über Identität,” pp. 44–72 in Assmann, Aleida and Heidrun, Friese (eds.), Identitäten. Erinnerung, Geschichte, Identität 3. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wagner-Pacifici, , Erica, Robin. 1986. The Moro Morality Play: Terrorism as Social Drama. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1988. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Weber, Max 1990. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriβder verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1999. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1976. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×