Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T02:27:19.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: symbolic action in theory and practice: the cultural pragmatics of symbolic action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2009

By
Jeffrey C. Alexander  and
Jason L. Mast
Edited by
Jeffrey C. Alexander ,
Bernhard Giesen  and
Jason L. Mast
Jeffrey C. Alexander
Affiliation:
Lillian Chavenson Saden Professor of Sociology and also Chair of the Sociology Department, Yale University
Jason L. Mast
Affiliation:
Doctoral Candidate in Sociology and a Visiting Fellow, University of California, Los Angeles and Yale University
Jeffrey C. Alexander
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Bernhard Giesen
Affiliation:
Universität Konstanz, Germany
Jason L. Mast
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

The question of theory and practice permeates not only politics but culture, where the analogue for theory is the social-symbolic text, the bundle of everyday codes, narratives, and rhetorical configurings that are the objects of hermeneutic reconstruction. Emphasizing action over its theory, praxis theorists have blinded themselves to the deeply embedded textuality of every social action (Bourdieu 1984; Swidler 1986; Turner 2002). But a no less distorting myopia has affected the vision from the other side. The pure hermeneut (e.g., Dilthey 1976; Ricoeur 1976) tends to ignore the material problem of instantiating ideals in the real world. The truth, as Marx (1972: 145) wrote in his tenth thesis on Feuerbach, is that, while theory and practice are different, they are always necessarily intertwined.

Theory and practice are interwoven in everyday life, not only in social theory and social science. In the following chapters, we will see that powerful social actors understand the conceptual issues presented in this introduction in an intuitive, ethnographic, and practical way. In the intense and fateful efforts to impeach and to defend President Clinton (Mast, ch. 3), for instance, individuals, organizations, and parties moved “instinctively” to hook their actions into the background culture in a lively and compelling manner, working to create an impression of sincerity and authenticity rather than one of calculation and artificiality, to achieve verisimilitude. Social movements' public demonstrations (Eyerman, ch. 6) display a similar performative logic.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Performance
Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual
 , pp. 1 - 28
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, Roger D. 1995. “Foreword to the Aldine Paperback Edition,” in Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Aldine de Grayter.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1987. Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory Since World War II. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988. Action and Its Environments: Toward a New Synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1996. “Cultural Sociology of Sociology of Culture?” Culture 10, 3–4: 1–5.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2003a. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2003b [1988]. “Watergate as Democratic Ritual,” reprinted in The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Smith, Phillip. 1993. “The Discourse of American Civil Society: A New Proposal for Cultural Studies.” Theory and Society 22, 2: 151–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Smith, Phillip 1998. “Cultural Sociology or Sociology of Culture? Towards a Strong Program for Sociology's Second Wind.” Sociologie et Société 30, 1: 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Steve Sherwood. 2002. “‘Mythic gestures’: Robert N. Bellah and Cultural Sociology,” in Meaning and Modernity: Religion, Polity, and Self, ed. Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., and Tipton, S. M.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Auslander, Philip. 1997. From Acting to Performance: Essays in Modernism and Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auslander, Philip 1999. Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1975 [1962]. How To Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities, or, The End of the Social, and Other Essays. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard. 1986. Story, Performance and Event: Contextual Studies in Oral Narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1968 [1936]. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,” pp. 217–52, in Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, N. 1955. “Monarchies and Sociologists: A Reply to Professor Shils and Mr. Young.” Sociological Review 3: 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel. 1962 [1961]. Image: or, What happened to the American Dream. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. 1969. The Empty Space. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1987 [1790]. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1957 [1941]. The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth 1959. “On Catharsis, or Resolution, with a Postscript.” The Kenyon Review 21: 337–75.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth 1965. “Dramatism.” Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 7: 445–51.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith 1993. “Critically Queer.” GLQ 1: 17–32.Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin. 2001. The Haunted Stage: The Theatre as Memory Machine. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James. 1986. “On Ethnographic Allegory,” pp. 98–121 in Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, James 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Conquergood, Dwight. 1995. “On Caravans and Carnivals: Performance Studies in Motion.” The Drama Review 39, 4: 137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conquergood, Dwight 2002. “Performance Studies: Interventions and Radical Research.” The Drama Review 46, 2: 145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayan, Daniel and Katz, Elihu. 1992. Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1982a [1972]. “Signature Event Context,” in Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1982b. “Différance,” in Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Elin ed. 1996. Performance and Cultural Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1976. “The Construction of the Historical World in the Human Studies,” pp. 168–245 in Dilthey: Selected Writings, ed. Rickman, H. P., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1995 [1915]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Edles, Laura. 1998. Symbol and Ritual in the New Spain: The Transition to Democracy After Franco. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa and Goodwin, Jeff. 1996. “Symbols, Positions, Objects: Toward a New Theory of Revolutions and Collective Action.” History and Theory 35, 3: 358–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa and Mische, Ann. 1998. “What is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103, 4: 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyerman, Ron and Jamison, Andrew. 1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Alessandro. 2001. “The Evil That Men Do,” in Rethinking Evil, ed. Lara, Maria Pia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frischmann, Donald H. 1994. “New Mayan Theatre in Chiapas: Anthropology, Literacy and Social Drama,” in Negotiating Performance: Gender, Sexuality and Theatricality in Latin/o America, ed. Taylor, Diana and Villegas, Juan. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973a. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture,” in The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford 1973b. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight,” in The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford 1980. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1980. Renaissance Self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hays, Sharon. 1994. “Structure and Agency and the Sticky Problem of Culture.” Sociological Theory 12, 1: 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W.. 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum Publishing.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1964. Language in Culture and Society. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Ronald. 1996. “Civil Society and Crisis: Culture, Discourse, and the Rodney King Beating.” American Journal of Sociology 101: 1238–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Ronald 2000. Race, Media, and the Crisis of Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. 1991. The Postmodern Condition, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kane, Anne E. 1991. “Cultural Analysis in Historical Sociology: The Analytic and Concrete Forms of the Autonomy of Culture.” Sociological Theory 9, 1: 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Anne E. 1997. “Theorizing Meaning Construction in Social Movements: Symbolic Structures and Interpretation during the Irish Land War, 1879–1882.” Sociological Theory 15: 249–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1975. “Political Ritual and Social Integration.” Sociology 2: 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacAloon, John. 1984. “Introduction: Cultural Performances, Culture Theory,” pp. 1–18, in Rite, Drama, Festival, Spectacle: Rehearsals Toward a Theory of Cultural Performance, ed. MacAloon, John. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Jon. 1998. “Gender Trouble: (the) Butler Did It,” pp. 217–35 in The Ends of Performance, ed. Phelan, Peggy and Lane, Jill. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Jon. 2001. Perform or Else: From Discipline to Performance. New York: Routledge.
Magnuson, Eric. 1997. “Ideological Conflict in American Political Culture.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 17, 6: 84–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. 1971 [1927]. “Conservative Thought,” in From Karl Mannheim, ed. Wolff, Kurt H.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marvin, Carolyn and Ingle, David W.. 1999. Blood Sacrifice and the Nation: Totem Rituals and the American Flag. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1972. “Theses on Feuerbach,” pp. 143–45, in The Marx–Engels Reader, 2nd edn., ed. Tucker, R.. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Morris, Charles Williams. 1938. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2000 [1927]. The Birth of Tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1981 [1962]. “Rationalism in Politics,” pp. 1–36 in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York: Methuen.
Peters, Julie Stone. 2000. Theatre of the Book, 1480–1880 – Print, Text, and Performance in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambo, Eric and Chan, Elaine. 1990. “Text, Structure, and Action in Cultural Sociology.” Theory and Society 19: 635–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1971. “The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text.” Social Research 38: 529–62.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul 1976. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.Google Scholar
Roach, Joseph. 1996. Cities of the Dead: Circum-Atlantic Performance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Roach, Joseph 2000. “Cutting Loose: Burying the ‘First Man of Jazz,’” pp. 3–14 in Joyous Wakes, Dignified Dying: Issues in Death and Dying, ed. Harvey, Robert and Kaplan, E. Ann. Stony Brook: Humanities Institute of the State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1976. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall 1981. Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities: Structure in the Early History of the Sandwich Islands Kingdom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1985. “The Linguistic Sign,” pp. 28–46 in Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology, ed. Innis, Robert E.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 1977. Essays on Performance Theory 1970–1976. New York: Drama Book Specialists.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard 1985. Between Theatre and Anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard 1988. Performance Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard 1998. “What is Performance Studies Anyway,” pp. 357–62 in The Ends of Performance, ed. Phelan, Peggy and Lane, Jill. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard 2002. Performance Studies: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. “Between Macro and Micro: Contexts and Other Connections,” pp. 207–34, in The Micro-Macro Link, ed. Alexander, J., Giesen, B., Munch, R., and Smelser, N.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1961. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1951. “Institutional Vulnerability in Mass Society.” The American Journal of Sociology 56: 320–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selznick, Philip 1952. The Organizational Weapon.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sewell, William Jr. 1985. “Ideologies and Social Revolutions: Reflections on the French Case.” Journal of Modern History 57: 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation,” pp. 188–201, reprinted in The New American Cultural Sociology, ed. Smith, Phillip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Steven Jay. 1994. “Narrating the Social: Postmodernism and the Drama of Democracy.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 4: 69–88.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward and Young, Michael. 1953. “The Meaning of the Coronation.” Sociological Review 1: 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Milton. 1959. Traditional India: Structure and Change. Philadelphia: American Folklore Society.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip. 1991. “Codes and Conflict: Toward a Theory of War as Ritual.” Theory and Society 20, 1: 103–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Philip 1996. “Executing Executions: Aesthetics, Identity and the Problematic Narratives of Capital Punishment Ritual.” Theory and Society 25, 2: 235–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Philip, ed. 1998. “The New American Cultural Sociology,” pp. 1–14 in The New American Cultural Sociology, ed. Smith, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. 1995. “Narrating and Naturalizing Civil Society and Citizenship Theory: The Place of Political Culture and the Public Sphere.” Sociological Theory 13: 229–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51: 273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Diana. 1995. “Performing Gender: Las Madres de la Plaza de Mayo,” pp. 275–305 in Negotiating Performance: Gender, Sexuality, and Theatricality in Latin/o American, ed. Taylor, Diana and Villegas, Juan. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Kenneth. 1990. “Secularization and Sacralization,” pp. 161–81 in Rethinking Progress: Movements, Forces, and Ideas at the end of the 20th Century, ed. Alexander, J. C. and Sztompka, P.. Boston: Unwin Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Jonathan. 2002. Face to Face: Toward a Sociological Theory of Interpersonal Behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor 1974a. Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor 1974b. “Religious Paradigms and Political Action: Thomas Becket at the Council of Northampton,” pp. 60–97 in Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor 1982. From Ritual to Theater: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
Wagner-Pacifici, Robin E. 1986. The Moro Morality Play: Terrorism as Social Drama. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Warner, W. Lloyd. 1959. The Living and the Dead: A Study of the Symbolic Life of Americans. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×