Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Illustrations
- Preface
- Part I Networks, Relations, and Structure
- Part II Mathematical Representations of Social Networks
- Part III Structural and Locational Properties
- 5 Centrality and Prestige
- 6 Structural Balance and Transitivity
- 7 Cohesive Subgroups
- 8 Affiliations and Overlapping Subgroups
- Part IV Roles and Positions
- Part V Dyadic and Triadic Methods
- Part VI Statistical Dyadic Interaction Models
- Part VII Epilogue
- Appendix A Computer Programs
- Appendix B Data
- References
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- List of Notation
5 - Centrality and Prestige
from Part III - Structural and Locational Properties
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Illustrations
- Preface
- Part I Networks, Relations, and Structure
- Part II Mathematical Representations of Social Networks
- Part III Structural and Locational Properties
- 5 Centrality and Prestige
- 6 Structural Balance and Transitivity
- 7 Cohesive Subgroups
- 8 Affiliations and Overlapping Subgroups
- Part IV Roles and Positions
- Part V Dyadic and Triadic Methods
- Part VI Statistical Dyadic Interaction Models
- Part VII Epilogue
- Appendix A Computer Programs
- Appendix B Data
- References
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- List of Notation
Summary
One of the primary uses of graph theory in social network analysis is the identification of the “most important” actors in a social network. In this chapter, we present and discuss a variety of measures designed to highlight the differences between important and non-important actors. Definitions of importance, or synonymously, prominence, have been offered by many writers. All such measures attempt to describe and measure properties of “actor location” in a social network. Actors who are the most important or the most prominent are usually located in strategic locations within the network. As far back as Moreno (1934), researchers have attempted to quantify the notions of sociometric “stars” and “isolates.”
We will discuss the most noteworthy and substantively interesting definitions of importance or prominence along with the mathematical concepts that the various definitions have spawned. Among the definitions that we will discuss in this chapter are those based on degree, closeness, betweenness, information, and simply the differential status or rank of the actors.
These definitions yield actor indices which attempt to quantify the prominence of an individual actor embedded in a network. The actor indices can also be aggregated across actors to obtain a single, group-level index which summarizes how variable or differentiated the set of actors is as a whole with respect to a given measure. We will show how to calculate both actor and group indices in this chapter.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Network AnalysisMethods and Applications, pp. 169 - 219Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994
- 13
- Cited by