Atkin, Albert. 2013. Peirce’s theory of signs. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics/Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David. 2011. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer, version 5.2.17. 1992–2011. www.praat.org.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary, and Hall, Kira. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5), 585–614.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1), 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2009. The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21(1), 135–56.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2011. Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech 86(1), 52–68.Google Scholar

Darley, John, and Gross, Paget. 1983. A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(1), 20–33.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, Annette. 2015. Perceiving personae: Effects of social information on perceptions of TRAP-backing. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2), Article 5.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, Annette. 2016. Social Meaning in Linguistic Perceptions. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, Annette. 2018. Controlled and automatic perceptions of a sociolinguistic marker. Language Variation and Change 30(2), 261–85.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, Annette, Eckert, Penelope, Podesva, Robert J., Pratt, Teresa, and Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2016. The low vowels in California. Publication of the American Dialect Society [Speech in the Western States, Vol. 1: The Coastal States] 101.Google Scholar

Drager, Katie. 2010. Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistic Compass 4(7), 473–80.Google Scholar

Drager, Katie, and Kirtley, M. Joelle. 2016. Awareness, salience, and stereotypes in exemplar-based models of speech production and perception. In Babel, A. (ed.), Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1–24.Google Scholar

Driscoll, Anna, and Lape, Emma. 2015. Reversal of the Northern Cities Shift in Syracuse, New York. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2), Article 6.Google Scholar

DuBois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 139–82.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4),453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2010. Affect, sound symbolism, and variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2), Article 9.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2016. Variation, meaning, and social change. In Coupland, N. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 68–85.Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul, and Docherty, Gerard. 2006. The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34, 409–38.Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 2016. Sociolinguistic differentiation. In Coupland, N. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 113–35.Google Scholar

Giles, Howard. 1970. Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review 22, 211–27.Google Scholar

Goldinger, Stephen. 1996. Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 22(5), 1166–83.Google Scholar

Goldinger, Stephen. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105(2), 251–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

The Half Moon Bay Style Collective (Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Eckert, Penelope, Mendoza-Denton, Norma, and Moore, Emma). 2006. The elements of style. Poster presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 35. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Warren, Paul, and Drager, Katie. 2005. Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34, 458–84.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith T., and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, P. V. (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 35–83.Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Johnson, K. and Mullennix, J. W. (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press, 145–65.Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith. 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34(4), 485–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert, Wallace, Hodgson, Richard, Gardner, Robert, and Fillenbaum, Samuel. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1), 44–51.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez. 2007. Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society 36(4), 533–54.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Chris, and Moore, Emma. 2017. Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, Emma, and Podesva, Robert J.. 2009. Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38(4), 447–85.Google Scholar

Nickerson, Raymond S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2(2), 175–220.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy A. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Social Psychology (Special Edition) 18(1), 62–85.Google Scholar

Nosofsky, Robert M. 1991. Stimulus bias, asymmetric similarity, and classification. Cognitive Psychology 23, 94–140.Google Scholar

Nygaard, Lynne C, Burt, S. Alexandra, and Queen, Jennifer S.. 2000. Surface form typicality and asymmetric transfer in episodic memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26(5), 1228–4.Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 335–58.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1895. Of reasoning in general. Rpt. in Houser, N., De Tienne, A., Eller, J. R., Lewis, A. C., Clark, C. L., and Bront Davis, D. (eds.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (1893–1913). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998, 11–26.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1903. Sundry Logical Conceptions. Rpt. in Houser, N., De Tienne, A., Eller, J. R., Lewis, A. C., Clark, C. L., and Bront Davis, D. (eds.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (1893–1913). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998, 267–88.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1909. Excerpts from letters to William James. Rpt. in Houser, N., De Tienne, A., Eller, J. R., Lewis, A. C., Clark, C. L., and Bront Davis, D. (eds.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (1893–1913). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998, 492–502.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins, 137–57.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert J. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4), 478–504.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert. J., Hall-Lew, Lauren, Brenier, Jason, Starr, Rebecca, and Lewis, Stacy. 2012. Condoleezza Rice and the sociophonetic construction of identity. In Hernandez-Campoy, J. M. and Cutillas-Espinosa, J. A. (eds.), Style-shifting in Public: New Perspectives on Stylistic Variation. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins, 65–80.Google Scholar

Prichard, Hilary, and Tamminga, Meredith. 2012. The impact of higher education on Philadelphia vowels. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2), Article 11.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1966. Course in General Linguistics. Bally, Ch. and Sechehaye, A. (eds.), Baskin, Wade, trans. New York: McGraw-Hill [original publication in 1916].Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, K. and Selby, H. A. (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11–56.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3), 193–229.Google Scholar

Strand, Elizabeth. 1999. Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1), 86–99.Google Scholar

Sumner, Meghan, and Samuel, Arthur G.. 2005. Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language 52(3), 322–38.Google Scholar

Sumner, Meghan, and Samuel, Arthur G.. 2009. The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language 60(4), 487–501.Google Scholar

Sumner, Meghan, Kim, Seung-Kyung, King, Ed, and McGowan, Kevin. 2014. The socially-weighted encoding of spoken words: A dual-route approach to speech perception. Frontiers in Language Sciences 4, Article 1015.Google Scholar

Wagner, Suzanne Evans, Mason, Alexander, Nesbitt, Monica, Pevan, Erin, and Savage, Matt. 2015. Reversal and re-organization of the Northern Cities Shift in Michigan. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 44. Toronto, ON.Google Scholar

Zhang, Qing. 2008. Rhotacization and the ‘Beijing Smooth Operator’: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(2), 201–22.Google Scholar

Aboud, Frances E., Clément, Richard, and Taylor, Donald M.. 1974. Evaluational reactions to discrepancies between social class and language. Sociometry 37(2), 239–50.Google Scholar

Addington, David W. 1968. The relationship of selected vocal characteristics to personality perception. Speech Monographs 35(4), 492–503.Google Scholar

Anisfeld, Moshe, Bogo, N., and Lambert, William E.. 1962. Evaluational reactions to accented English speech. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65(4), 223–31.Google Scholar

van Bezooijen, Reneé. 1995. Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech 38(3), 253–65.Google Scholar

Brekhus, Wayne. 1998. A sociology of the unmarked: Redirecting our focus. Sociological Theory 16(1), 34–51.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1), 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2011. Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech 86(1), 52–68.Google Scholar

Cole, Jennifer, Thomas, Erik R., Britt, Erica, and Coggshall, Elizabeth. 2001. Gender and ethnicity in intonation: A case study of North Carolina English. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Coleman, R.O. 1973. A comparison of the contributions of two vocal characteristics to the perception of maleness and femaleness in the voice. Speech, Music, and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report 14(2/3), 13–22.Google Scholar

Collins, Sarah A. 2000. Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour 60(6), 773–80.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. Language, situation, and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 185–210.Google Scholar

van Dommelen, Wim A., and Moxness, Bente H.. 1995. Acoustic parameters in speaker height and weight identification: Sex-specific behavior. Language and Speech 38(3), 267–87.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, Annette. 2016. Social Meaning in Linguistic Perception. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar

Drager, Katie, Salter, Carly, and Macinkowicz, Megan. 2010. Perceived style, sexuality, and pitch: An experimental approach. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 39. San Antonio, TX: University of Texas at San Antonio.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4), 453–76.Google Scholar

Fraccaro, Paul J., O’Connor, Jillian J. M., Re, Daniel E., Jones, Benedict C., DeBruine, Lisa M., and Feinberg, David R.. 2013. Faking it: Deliberately altered voice pitch and vocal attractiveness. Animal Behavior 85(1), 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaudio, Rudolf P. 1994. Sounding gay: Properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech 69(1), 30–57.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Francine Dove. 1993. Speaker ethnic identification: The roles of speech sample, fundamental frequency, speaker and listener variations. Ph.D. dissertation. College Park: University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Hearst, Marti A., and Rosner, Daniela. 2008. Tag clouds: Data analysis tool or social signaller? In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual: 160–70.Google Scholar

Hillenbrand, James M., and Clark, Michael J.. 2009. The role of f0 and formant frequencies in distinguishing the voices of men and women. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71(5), 1150–66.Google Scholar

Jurafsky, Dan, Ranganath, Rajesh, and McFarland, Dan. 2009. Extracting social meaning: Identifying interactional style in spoken conversation. Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL. Boulder, CO: Association for Computational Linguistics, 638–46.Google Scholar

Kirtley, M. Joelle. 2015. Language, identity, and non-binary gender in Hawai‘i. PhD dissertation. Mānoa: University of Hawai‘i.Google Scholar

Künzel, Hermann J. 1989. How well does average fundamental frequency correlate with speaker height and weight? Phonetica 46, 117–25.Google Scholar

Lass, Norman J., and Brown, William S.. 1978. Correlational study of speakers’ heights, weights, body surface areas, and speaking fundamental frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63(4), 1218–20.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez. 2006. Hearing ‘gay’: Prosody, interpretation, and the affective judgments of men’s speech. American Speech 81(1), 56–78.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez. 2007. Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society 36(4), 533–54.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez. 2014. Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society 43(5), 539–66.Google Scholar

Loveday, Leo. 1981. Pitch, politeness and sexual role: An exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Language and Speech 24(1), 71–89.Google Scholar

Moore, Emma. 2010. The interaction between social category and social practice: Explaining was/were variation. Language Variation and Change 22(3), 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, Emma, and Podesva, Robert. 2009. Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38(4), 447–85.Google Scholar

Munson, Benjamin, and Babel, Molly. 2007. Loose lips and silver tongues, or, projecting sexual orientation through speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5), 416–49.Google Scholar

Munson, Benjamin, McDonald, Elizabeth C., DeBoe, Nancy L., and White, Aubrey R.. 2006. The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men’s sexual orientation from read speech. Journal of Phonetics 34(2), 202–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, Gordon E., and Barney, Harold L.. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(2), 175–84.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert J. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4), 478–504.Google Scholar

Purnell, T., Idsardi, W., and Baugh, J.. 1999. Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1), 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puts, David A. 2010. Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 31(3), 157–75.Google Scholar

Puts, David Andrew, Hodges, Carolyn R., Cárdena, Rodrigo A., and Gaulin, Steven J.C.. 2007. Men’s voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior 28, 340–4.Google Scholar

Reischer, Erica, and Koo, Kathryn S.. 2004. The body beautiful: Symbolism and agency in the social world. Annual Review of Anthropology 33, 297–317.Google Scholar

Riggs, Damien W., and Selby, Jane M. 2003. Setting the seen: Whiteness as unmarked category in psychologists’ writings on race in Australia. In Katsikitis, M. (ed.), Proceedings of the 38th Australian Psychological Society Annual Conference. Melbourne, AU, 190–4.Google Scholar

Sakoda, Kent, and Siegel, Jeff. 2003. Pidgin Grammar: An Introduction to the Creole Language of Hawai‘i. Honolulu, HI: Bess Press.Google Scholar

Sato, Charlene. 1985. Linguistic inequality in Hawaii: The post-creole dilemma. In Wolfson, N. and Manes, J. (eds.), Language of Inequality. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 255–72.Google Scholar

Sato, Charlene. 1993. Language change in a creole continuum: Decreolization? In Hyltenstam, K. and Viberg, A. (eds.), Progression and Regression in Language: Sociocultural, Neuropsychological, and Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 122–43.Google Scholar

Saxton, Tamsin K., Mackey, Lauren L., McCarthy, Kristofor, and Neave, Nick. 2016. A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair. Behavioral Ecology 27(2), 512–9.Google Scholar

Schnoebelen, Tyler, and Drager, Katie. 2014. The perception of social types: Using LDA to analyze open-response answers. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology 14. Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3), 193–229.Google Scholar

Smyth, Ron, Jacobs, Greg, and Rogers, Henry. 2003. Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society 32(3), 329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szakay, Anita. 2006. Rhythm and pitch as markers of ethnicity in New Zealand English. Proceedings of the 11th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology. Aukland, NZ: Australian Speech Science & Technology Association, 421–6.Google Scholar

Szakay, Anita. 2012. Voice quality as a marker of ethnicity in New Zealand: From acoustics to perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(3), 382–97.Google Scholar

Taniguchi, Angela S., and Linda, Heidenreich. 2005. Rethinking the Use of Hapa in Mixed-race Asian/Pacific Islander American Community Organizing. WSU McNair Journal, 135–46.Google Scholar

Thakerar, Jitendra N., and Giles, Howard. 1981. They are – so they spoke: Noncontent speech stereotypes. Language & Communication 1(2/3), 255–61.Google Scholar

Thomas, Erik R. 2002. Sociophonetic applications of speech perception experiments. American Speech 77(2), 115–47.Google Scholar

Thomas, Erik R., and Reaser, Jeffrey. 2004. Delimiting perceptual cues used for the ethnic labeling of African American and European American voices. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1), 54–87.Google Scholar

Waksler, R. 2001. Pitch range and women’s sexual orientation. Word 52(1), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, Julie H., and Orlikoff, Robert F.. 1994. Speaker race identification from acoustic cues in the vocal signal. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37(4), 738–45.Google Scholar

Wilson, William H. 1998. I ka ʻōlelo Hawaiʻi ke ola, ‘Life is found in the Hawaiian language’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 132, 123–37.Google Scholar

Zhang, Qing. 2005. A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34(3), 431–66.Google Scholar

Zimman, Lal. 2017. Gender as stylistic bricolage: Transmasculine voices and the relationship between fundamental frequency and /s/. Language in Society 46(3), 339–70.Google Scholar

Anderson, Anne H., Clark, Aileen, and Mullin, James. 1991. Introducing information in dialogues: How young speakers refer and how young listeners respond. Journal of Child Language 18, 663–87.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary. 2001. The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11, 84–100.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2008. I’ll be the judge of that: Diversity of social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37(5), 637–59.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2001. Style and social meaning. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 119–26.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4), 453–76.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41, 87–100.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2016a. Third wave variationism. Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.27.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2016b. Variation, meaning and social change. In Coupland, N. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 68–85.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2017. The most perfect of signs: Iconicity in variation. Linguistics 55(5), 1197–207.Google Scholar

Hansen, Gert Foget, and Pharao, Nicolai. 2010. Prosody in the Copenhagen multiethnolect. In Quist, P. and Svendsen, B. A. (eds.), Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 79–95.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Jens Normann, Karrebæk, Martha, Madsen, Lian Malai, and Møller, Janus Spindler. 2016. Polylanguaging in superdiversity. In Arnaut, K., Blommaert, J., Rampton, B. and Spotti, M. (eds.), Language and Superdiversity. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 137–54.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez. 2007. Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society 36(4), 533–54.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez. 2014. Categories, stereotypes and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society 43(5), 539–66.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez, Maegaard, Marie, and Pharao, Nicolai. 2017. Introduction: Tracing the origin of /s/ variation. Linguistics 55(5), 979–92.Google Scholar

Lillelund-Holst, , Culap, Aleksandra, Pharao, Nicolai & Maegaard, Marie. 2019, “Not from a ‘Danish’ home; typical of trying to sound ‘tough’: Indexical meanings of variation in /s/ and /t/ in the speech of adolescent girls in Copenhagen, Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 27(4), 1701–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maegaard, Marie. 2007. Udtalevariation og -forandring i københavnsk: En etnografisk undersøgelse af sprogbrug, sociale kategorier og social praksis blandt unge på en københavnsk folkeskole. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag. Danske talesprog, Nr. 8.Google Scholar

Maegaard, Marie. 2010. Linguistic practice and stereotypes among Copenhagen adolescents. In Quist, P. and Svendsen, B. A. (eds.), Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 189–206.Google Scholar

Maegaard, Marie, and Pharao, Nicolai. 2016. /s/ variation and perceptions of male sexuality in Denmark. In Levon, E. and Mendes, R. B. (eds.), Language, Sexuality and Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 88–104.Google Scholar

Moore, Emma. 2004. Sociolinguistic style: A multidimensional resource for shared identity creation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 49, 375–96.Google Scholar

Møller, Janus Spindler and Jørgensen, Jens Normann. 2013. Organizations of language among adolescents in superdiverse Copenhagen. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 6(1), 23–42.Google Scholar

Pharao, Nicolai, Maegaard, Marie, Møller, Janus Spindler, and Kristiansen, Tore. 2014. Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pharao, Nicolai, and Maegaard, Marie. 2017. On the influence of coronal sibilants and stops on the perceptions of social meaning in Copenhagen Danish. Linguistics 55(5), 1141–67.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert J. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4), 478–504.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert J. 2008. Three sources of stylistic meaning. Texas Linguistic Forum 51: Proceedings of the Symposium about Language and Society – Austin 15, 134–43.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert J., Reynolds, Jermay, Callier, Patrick, and Baptiste, Jessica. 2015. Constraints on the social meaning of released /t/: A production and perception study of U.S. politicians. Language Variation and Change 27(1), 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quist, Pia. 2000. Ny københavnsk ‘multietnolekt’. Om sprogrug blandt unge i sprogligt og kulturelt heterogene miljøer. Danske Talesprog 1, 143–211.Google Scholar

Quist, Pia. 2008. Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice. International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2), 43–61.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23, 193–229.Google Scholar

Stæhr, Andreas. 2010. ‘Rappen reddede os’: Et studie af senmoderne storbydrenges identitetsarbejde i fritids- og skolemiljøer. Københavnerstudier i Tosprogethed 54.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication 23(3), 231–73.Google Scholar

Amara, Muhammad. 2002. The place of Arabic in Israel. International Journal of The Sociology of Language 158, 53–68.Google Scholar

Benor, Sarah Bunin. 2010. Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(2), 159–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Rafael, Eliezer. 2013. Jewish Ethnicities in Israel. In Dieckhoff, A. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Modern Israel. New York: Routledge, 96–104.Google Scholar

Bentolila, Yaakov. 2002. Linguistic variation across generations in Israel. In Izre’el, S. (ed.), Speaking Hebrew: Studies in the Spoken Language and in Linguistic Variation in Israel. (Te’uda 18). Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, 131–40.Google Scholar

Blanc, Haim. 1968. The Israeli Koine as an emergent national standard. In Fishman, J. A., Ferguson, C. A. and Das Gupta, J. (eds.), Language Problems of Developing Nations. New York: Wiley, 237–51.Google Scholar

Cohen, Yinon, Haberfeld, Yitchak, and Kristal, Tali. 2007. Ethnicity and mixed ethnicity: Educational gaps among Israeli-born Jews. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(5), 896–17.Google Scholar

Cohen, Yinon, Lewin-Epstein, Noah, and Lazarus, Amit. 2019. Mizrahi-Ashkenazi educational gaps in the third generation. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 2, 25–33.Google Scholar

Dahan, Momi, Mironichev, Natalie, Dvir, Eyal, and Shye, Shmuel. 2003. Have the gaps in education narrowed? On factors determining eligibility for the Israeli Matriculation Certificate. Israeli Economic Review 2, 37–69.Google Scholar

Davis, Lawrence M. 1984. The pharyngeals in Hebrew: Linguistic change in apparent time. Folia Linguistica Historica 5(1), 25–32.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 1989. The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1(3), 245–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4), 453–76.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41, 87–100.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2016. Variation, meaning, and social change. In Coupland, N. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gafter, Roey J. 2014. The Most Beautiful and Correct Hebrew: Authenticity, Ethnic Identity and Linguistic Variation in the Greater Tel Aviv Area. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar

Gafter, Roey J. 2016a. Pharyngeal beauty and depharyngealized geek: Performing ethnicity on Israeli reality TV. In Alim, H. S., Rickford, J. R. and Ball, A. F. (eds.), Raciolinguistics: How Language Shapes our Ideas About Race. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 185–201.Google Scholar

Gafter, Roey J. 2016b. What’s a stigmatized variant doing in the word list? Authenticity in reading styles and the Hebrew pharyngeals. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(1), 31–58.Google Scholar

Gafter, Roey J., and Horesh, Uri. 2020. Two languages, one variable? Pharyngeal realizations among Arabic–Hebrew bilinguals. Journal of Sociolinguistics 24, 369–87.Google Scholar

Gafter, Roey J., and Milani, Tommaso M.. 2020. Affective trouble: A Jewish/Palestinian heterosexual wedding threatening the Israeli nation-state? Social Semiotics DOI:10.1080/10350330.2020.1810555.Google Scholar

Halutz, Doron. 2009. A generation of Israeli Arabs nurtured on Jewish Chutzpah. Haaretz Online. www.haaretz.com/a-generation-of-israeli-arabs-nurtured-on-jewish-chutzpah-1.279267. Accessed on August 2017.Google Scholar

Henkin-Roitfarb, Roni. 2011. Hebrew and Arabic in asymmetric contact in Israel. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 7, 61–100.Google Scholar

Horesh, Uri. 2020. Palestinian dialects and identities shifting across physical and virtual borders. Multilingua, published online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020–0104.Google Scholar

Izre’el, Shlomo. 2003. The emergence of spoken Israeli Hebrew. In Hary, B. H. (ed.), Corpus Linguistics and Modern Hebrew: Towards the Compilation of The Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH). Tel Aviv, IL: Tel Aviv University, 85–104.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972a. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972b. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefkowitz, Daniel. 2004. Words and Stones: The Politics of Language and Identity in Israel. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez, and Gafter, Roey J.. 2019. ‘This is not Europe’: Sexuality, ethnicity and the (re)enactment of Israeli authenticity. Discourse, Context & Media 30, 100287. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211695818302447.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron, and Schiff, Leora. 2005. Spoken Israeli Hebrew revisited: Structures and variation. Studia Semitica: Journal of Semitic Studies Supplement 16, 145–91.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Observing and Analysing Natural Language. Malden, MA, and Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mizrachi, Nissim, and Herzog, Hanna. 2012. Participatory destigmatization strategies among Palestinian citizens, Ethiopian Jews and Mizrahi Jews in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies 35, 418–35.Google Scholar

Morag, Shelomo. 1990. Modern Hebrew: Some sociolinguistic aspects. Cathedra 56, 70–92.Google Scholar

Myhill, John. 2004. A parameterized view of the concept of ‘correctness’. Multilingua 23, 389–416.Google Scholar

Ravid, Dorit Diskin. 1995. Language Change in Child and Adult Hebrew: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. Oxford, UK, and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sasson-Levy, Orna. 2013. A different kind of whiteness: Marking and unmarking of social boundaries in the construction of hegemonic ethnicity. Sociological Forum 28, 42–75.Google Scholar

Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2008. Stylistic variation and the sociolinguistic interview: A reconsideration. In Monroy, R. and Sánchez, A. (eds.), 25 Años de Lingüística Aplicada en España: Hitos y Retos. Murcia, ES: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia, 971–86.Google Scholar

Shalom Chertit, Sami. 2010. Intra-Jewish Conflict in Israel: White Jews, Black Jews. London, UK, and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shohat, Ella. 1989. Israeli Cinema: East/West and the Politics of Representation. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Shohat, Ella. 2010. Israeli Cinema: East/West and the Politics of Representation. Revised New ed. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23, 193–229.Google Scholar

Smooha, Sami. 2003. Jewish ethnicity in Israel as a Persistent real phenomenon. Iyunim Bitkumat Israel 13, 413–25.Google Scholar

Swirski, Shlomo. 1981. Not Disadvantaged but Disenfranchized: Mizrahis and Ashkenazis in Israel. Haifa, IL: maxbarot le-mexkar ve-bikoret.Google Scholar

Swirski, Shlomo, Connor-Atias, Eti, and Abu-Hala, Hala. 2008. Israel: A Social Report 1998–2007. Jerusalem, IL: Adva Center.Google Scholar

Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 1988. The influence of changing group vitality on convergence toward a dominant norm: An Israeli example. Language & Communication 8, 285–305.Google Scholar

Younis, R. 2015. In the democracy according to Lucy only Arabs like her are allowed to speak. Sixa Mekomit. www.mekomit.co.il/בדמוקרטיה-על-פי-לוסי-אהריש-רק-לערבים-כמ/. Accessed on August 2017.Google Scholar

Zuckermann, Ghil’ad. 2005. Abba, why was Professor Higgins trying to teach Eliza to speak like our cleaning lady?: Mizrahim, Ashkenazim, prescriptivism and the real sounds of the Israeli language. Australian Journal of Jewish Studies 19, 210–31.Google Scholar

Abel, Jennifer, and Babel, Molly. 2017. Cognitive load reduces perceived linguistic convergence between dyads. Language and Speech 20(3), 479–502.Google Scholar

Babel, Anna (ed.). 2016. Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2), 145–204.Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 2001. Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 139–69.Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Steven C.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Susan, and Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2), 151–96.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 1980. Style shifting in a Cardiff work setting. Language in Society 9(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 1985. ‘Hark, hark, the lark’: Social motivations for phonological style-shifting. Language & Communication 5(3), 153–71.Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The Stance Triangle. In Englebretson, R. (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 139–82.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 1997. Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 151–67.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2001. Style and social meaning. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 119–26.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008a. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4), 453–76.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008b. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1), 25–42.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41, 87–100.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Susan, and Romaniuk, Tanya. 2013. Discourse analysis. In Podesva, R. and Sharma, D. (eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press, 466–99.Google Scholar

Fox, Sue, and Torgersen, Eivind. 2009. The acquisition of Multicultural London English: A case study. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE) 5. Copenhagen, DK: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Gasiorek, Jessica. 2016. The ‘dark side’ of CAT. In Giles, H. (ed.), Communication Accommodation Theory: Negotiating Personal Relationships and Social Identities across Contexts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giles, Howard, Coupland, Nikolas, and Coupland, Justine. 1991. Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, N., and Coupland, J. (eds.), The Contexts of Accommodation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–68.Google Scholar

Gilles, Peter. 1999. Dialektausgleich im Letzebuergeschen: Zur phonetisch-phonologischen Fokussierung einer Nationalsprache. Tubingen, DE: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1964. Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American Anthropologist 66(6), 137–53.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1976. The sociolinguistic significance of conversational code-switching. In Cook Gumperz, J. and Gumperz, J. J. (eds.), Papers on Language and Context. Berkeley, CA: Language Behavior Research Laboratory, Working paper 46.Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory, and Cutler, Cecilia. 2011. Speech style and authenticity: Quantitative evidence for the performance of identity. Language Variation and Change 23(1), 139–62.Google Scholar

Hall-Lew, Lauren L., Starr, Rebecca, and Coppock, Elizabeth. 2012. Style-Shifting in the U.S. Congress: The vowels of ‘Iraq(i)’. In Hernandez-Campoy, J. M., and Cutillas-Espinosa, J. A. (eds.), Style-Shifting in Public: New Perspectives on Stylistic Variation. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 45–63.Google Scholar

Hart, Rod, Carlson, Robert, and Eadie, William. 1980. Attitudes toward communication and the assessment of rhetorical sensitivity. Speech Monographs (March), 1–22.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 1999. Lingual biography and linguistic variation. Language Sciences 21, 313–21.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2009. Stance, style and the linguistic individual. In Jaffe, A. (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 29–52.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara, and Kiesling, Scott F.. 2008. Indexicality and experience: Variation and identity in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1), 5–33.Google Scholar

Kendall, Tyler. 2009. Speech Rate, Pause, and Linguistic Variation: An Examination Through the Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project. Ph.D. dissertation. Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul. 1994. Dialects Converging: Rural Speech in Urban Norway. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kirkham, Sam, and Moore, Emma. 2016. Constructing social meaning in political discourse: Phonetic variation and verb processes in Ed Miliband’s speeches. Language in Society 45(1), 87–111.Google Scholar

Kockelman, Paul. 2004. Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2), 127–50.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. The anatomy of style-shifting. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 85–108.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2013. The Language of Life and Death: The Transformation of Experience in Oral Narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Le Page, Robert B., and Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Local, John. 1992. Continuing and restarting. In Auer, P. and Di Luzio, Aldo (eds.), The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 273–96.Google Scholar

Modaressi-Tehrani, Yahya. 1978. A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Modern Persian. Ph.D. dissertation. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Nycz, Jennifer. 2015. Second dialect acquisition: A sociophonetic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass 9(11), 469–82.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert J., Jamsu, Jermay, and Callier, Patrick. 2015. Constraints on the social meaning of released /t/: A production and perception study of U.S. politicians. Language Variation and Change 27(1), 59–87Google Scholar

Rickford, John R., and Price, Mackenzie. 2013. Girlz II women: Age-grading, language change and stylistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2), 143–79.Google Scholar

Roelofs, Ardi, and Piai, Vitória. 2011. Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology 2(307), 1–14.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian. 2018. Language change across the lifespan. Annual Review of Linguistics 4, 297–316.Google Scholar

Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2004. Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(2), 163–95.Google Scholar

Selting, Margret. 1985. Levels of style-shifting exemplified in the interaction strategies of a moderator in a listener participation programme. Journal of Pragmatics 9(2–3), 179–97.Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani. 2016. Changing ethnicities: The evolving speech styles of Punjabi Londoners. In Samy Alim, H., Rickford, J., and Ball, A.. (eds.). Raciolinguistics: How Language Shapes Our Thoughts about Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 221–37.Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani. 2018. Style dominance: Attention, audience, and the ‘real me’. Language in Society 47(1), 1–31.Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani, and Rampton, Ben. 2015. Lectal focusing in interaction: A new methodology for the study of style variation. Journal of English Linguistics 43(1), 3–35.Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani, and McCarthy, Kathleen. 2018. Cognitive load and style control. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 24(2), Article 15.Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani, and Sankaran, Lavanya. 2011. Cognitive and social factors in dialect shift: Gradual change in London Asian speech. Language Variation and Change 23(3), 399–428.Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. 2018. Solidarity, stance, and class identities. Language in Society 47(5), 665–91.Google Scholar

Soukup, Barbara. 2009. Dialect Use as Interaction Strategy: A Sociolinguistic Study of Contextualization, Speech Perception, and Language Attitudes in Austria. Vienna, AT: Braumüller.Google Scholar

Thakerar, Jitendra, Giles, Howard, andCheshire, Jenny. 1982. Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In Giles, H. and Clair, R. St. (eds.), Advances in the Social Psychology of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 205–55.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Marvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press, 95–188.Google Scholar

Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English, Vol. 2 (The British Isles). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 1998. American English: Dialects and Variation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar