Book contents
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Altars of the Lares Augusti
- 3 Modelling the Emperor
- 4 Publica numina
- 5 Roman Emperors, Conquest, and Violence
- 6 Court Politics and Imperial Imagery in the Roman Principate
- 7 Local Aspirations and Statues of Emperors in Roman North Africa
- 8 The Altar of P. Perelius Hedulus in Carthage and the Social Aspects of Provincial Image-Making
- 9 Imagines et tituli
- 10 The Imperial Image in Media of Mechanical Reproduction
- 11 When Was an Imperial Image?
- Index
- References
4 - Publica numina
Conspicuously Consuming the Imperial Image at Tomis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2020
Book contents
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Altars of the Lares Augusti
- 3 Modelling the Emperor
- 4 Publica numina
- 5 Roman Emperors, Conquest, and Violence
- 6 Court Politics and Imperial Imagery in the Roman Principate
- 7 Local Aspirations and Statues of Emperors in Roman North Africa
- 8 The Altar of P. Perelius Hedulus in Carthage and the Social Aspects of Provincial Image-Making
- 9 Imagines et tituli
- 10 The Imperial Image in Media of Mechanical Reproduction
- 11 When Was an Imperial Image?
- Index
- References
Summary
Ovid’s Epistulae ex Ponto 2.8 commemorates the exiled poet’s receipt of a gift of silver images of the Caesars from Rome. This paper argues, with reference to Augustan coinage and Marx’s theory of commodity fetishism, that the poem deconstructs Romans’ self-subjugation to imperial iconography and highlights their role in vesting it with power. Through comic deployment of the pathetic fallacy via a naïve narrative persona, Ovid shows how, from a provincial perspective, the emperor's numen might really appear to reside in his image, placing the emperor literally in his subjects’ hands. Pont. 2.8 therefore comments more generally on the interpretive possibilities, social practices, and psychology surrounding Roman imperial images, locating their power in plural, subjective, democratic acts of creative consumption.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Social Dynamics of Roman Imperial Imagery , pp. 76 - 99Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Appadurai, A. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Beacham, R. C. 2005. ‘The emperor as impresario’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 151–74.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2009 (reprint). The Roman Triumph (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 2003. Ovid and the Monuments: A Poet’s Rome. Ramus Monographs 4 (Bendigo, Victoria: Aureal Publications).Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. 1999. ‘“Let the trumpets roar!” The Roman triumph’, in Bergmann, B. and Kondoleon, C. (eds.), The Art of Ancient Spectacle (Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art), 221–9.Google Scholar
Cary, E. 1914–27. Cassius Dio: Roman History. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Casali, S. 1996. ‘Quaerenti plura legendum: on the necessity of “reading more” in Ovid’s exile poetry’, Ramus 26: 80–112.Google Scholar
Detweiler, R. 1970. ‘Historical perspectives on the death of Agrippa Postumus’, CJ 65: 289–95.Google Scholar
Dowling, M. B. 2006. Clemency and Cruelty in the Roman World (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. 2003. ‘Cosmopolis: Rome the world city’, in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–20.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1998. Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph: The Art of the Roman Empire ad 100–450 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Evans, H. B. 1983. Publica Carmina: Ovid’s Books from Exile (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).Google Scholar
Favro, D. 2005. ‘Making Rome a world city’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 234–63.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. 1929. Publii Ovidii Nasonis Fastorum Libri Sex: The Fasti of Ovid. Vol. 2: A Commentary on Books I and II (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Gibson, B. 1999. ‘Ovid on reading: reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid Tristia II’, JRS 89: 19–37.Google Scholar
Greene, K. 2008. ‘Learning to consume: consumption and consumerism in the Roman Empire’, JRA 21: 64–82.Google Scholar
Gregory, A. P. 1994. ‘“Powerful images”: responses to portraits and the political uses of images in Rome’, JRA 7: 80–99.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 2002. ‘Ovid and empire’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ovid (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 46–61.Google Scholar
Hekster, O. 2011. ‘Imagining power: reality gaps in the Roman Empire’, BABesch 86: 111–24.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2002. ‘A doo-dah-doo-dah-dey at the races: Ovid Amores 3.2 and the personal politics of the Circus Maximus’, ClAnt 21: 41–65.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 1988. ‘Generalizing about Ovid’, in Boyle, A. J. (ed.), The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, to Juvenal through Ovid (Victoria, Australia: Aureal), 4–31.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (ed.) 1977. Ovid: Ars Amatoria, Book 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Howgego, C., Heuchert, V., and Burnett, A. 2005. Coinage and Identity in the Roman Provinces (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Huet, V. 1996. ‘Stories one might tell of Roman art: reading Trajan’s Column and the Tiberius Cup’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 8–31.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. 2009. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. H. 1958. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kleiner, F. 1997. Review of A. Kuttner, Dynasty and Empire in the Age of Augustus: The Case of the Boscoreale Cups, JRA 10: 377–80.Google Scholar
Kleiner, F. 2010. A History of Roman Art, Enhanced Edition (Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning).Google Scholar
Künzl, E. 1989. ‘Der Kniefall des Tiberius: zu den beiden Kaiserbechern von Boscoreale’, AArchHung 41: 73–9.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. L. 1995. Dynasty and Empire in the Age of Augustus: The Case of the Boscoreale Cups (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Little, D. A. 1990. ‘Ovid’s last poems: cry of pain from exile or literary frolic in Rome?’ Prudentia 21: 23–39.Google Scholar
Lott, J. B. 2012. Death and Dynasty in Early Imperial Rome: Key Sources with Text, Translation and Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
McGowan, M. M. 2009. Ovid in Exile: Power and Poetic Redress in the Tristia and Epistulae Ex Ponto (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Millar, F. 1982. ‘Emperors, frontiers, and foreign relations, 31 b.c. to a.d. 378’, Britannia 13: 1–23.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2004. Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. 2005. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Morley, N. 2007. Trade in Classical Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Nugent, G. 1990. ‘Tristia 2: Ovid and Augustus’, in Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate (Berkeley: University of California Press), 239–57.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1997. ‘Return to sender: the rhetoric of nomina in Ovid’s Tristia’, Ramus 26: 172–93.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 2004. ‘The power of image-makers: representation and revenge in Ovid, Metamorphoses 6 and Tristia 4’, ClAnt 23: 285–321.Google Scholar
Östenberg, I. 2009. Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, S. G. 1984 [1915]. P. Ovidi Nasonis Tristium libri quinque, ex Ponto libri quattuor, Halieutica fragmenta. Oxford Classical Texts (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2011. Empire of the Imagination: The Power of Public Fictions in Ovid’s Reader Response to Augustan Rome. PhD Diss., Berkeley.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2013. ‘Caesar’s comet, the Julian star, and the invention of Augustus’, TAPhA 143: 405–49.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2018. The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome: Latin Poetic Responses to Early Imperial Iconography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2020. ‘Ovid on the res publica: public figures, information access, and interpretive liberty in Ancient Rome and modern America’, in Nelsestuen, G. and D. Kapust (eds.), From Polis to Urbs: Contemporary Directions in Roman Political Thought. Polis 37: 123–44.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. 2012. From Republic to Empire: Rhetoric, Religion, and Power in the Visual Culture of Ancient Rome (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).Google Scholar
Ray, N. 2009. Household Consumption in Ancient Economies: Pompeii and the Wider Roman World. PhD Diss., Leicester.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J. C. (trans.) 1913–14. Suetonius: The Lives of the Twelve Caesars (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1988. ‘Conduct without belief and works of art without viewers’, trans. J. Ferguson, Diogenes 36: 1–22.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 2002. ‘Lisibilité des images, propaganda et apparat monarchique dans l’Empire romain’, RH 304.1: 3–30.Google Scholar
Waites, M. C. 1920. ‘The nature of the lares and their representation in Roman art’, AJA 24: 241–61.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1982. ‘Civilis princeps: between citizen and king’, JRS 72: 32–48.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1986. ‘Image and authority in the coinage of Augustus’, JRS 76: 66–87.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. 2014. Consumerism in the Ancient World: Imports and Identity Construction (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1994. Banished Voices: Readings in Ovid’s Exile Poetry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, G. 2002. ‘Ovid’s exile poetry: Tristia, Epistulae ex Ponto, and Ibis’, in Hardie, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ovid (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 233–45.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 1998. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Woytek, B. 2015. ‘“Hominem te memento!”: der mahnende Sklave im römischen Triumph und seine Ikonographie’, Tyche 30: 193–209.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1990. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, trans. Shapiro, A. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by