Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-06T21:02:08.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Institutions and Collective Actors in the Provision of Training: Historical and Cross-National Comparisons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2009

Heike Solga
By
Pepper D. Culpepper  and
Kathleen Thelen
Edited by
Karl Ulrich Mayer
Heike Solga
Affiliation:
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
Pepper D. Culpepper
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Public Policy Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, US
Kathleen Thelen
Affiliation:
Professor of Political Science Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, US
Karl Ulrich Mayer
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

This chapter considers contributions from the political science literature to understanding the causes and consequences of cross-national diversity in training regimes across the most developed democracies. The recent surge of interest by political scientists in skills has developed as an offshoot of debates over distinctive varieties of capitalism. Although economists are mostly interested in the efficiency effects of different skill formation systems, and sociologists, often, in the effects of educational opportunities on social stratification, political scientists came to the topic of skills through an interest in understanding the political and institutional foundations of national political-economic systems associated with divergent political and distributive outcomes. In these debates, the skill systems that have attracted the most attention are those, such as the German one, that appear capable of reconciling high wages with high productivity via high skills and high value-added production (Streeck, 1991). In this chapter, therefore, we focus particular attention on Germany, while situating this case in the context of a broader comparative literature on the origins, operation, and future of distinctive skill regimes.

The chapter is divided into three main sections. The first section briefly considers a range of arguments by political scientists on the implications of different, nationally specific models of skill formation. It presents an overview of the various typologies that have been devised to characterize cross-national differences in training systems, and it links these to recent claims about how vocational education and training systems fit into broader national political-economic models.

Type
Chapter
Information
Skill Formation
Interdisciplinary and Cross-National Perspectives
 , pp. 21 - 49
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. (1998). Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 79–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. (1999). Beyond Becker: Training in imperfect labour markets. Economic Journal, 109, F112–F142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, M. (1993). Capitalism versus Capitalism. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (1994). The Japanese firm as a system of attributes: A survey and research agenda. In Aoki, M. & Dore, R. (Eds.), The Japanese Firm: Sources of Competitive Strength (pp. 11–40). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, D., & Green, F. (1996). Education, Training, and the Global Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Baethge, M. (1999). Glanz und Elend des deutschen Korporatismus in der Berufsausbildung. Die Mitbestimmung Online, 4, 15.Google Scholar
Beicht, U., & Walden, G. (2004). Kosten der Ausbildung. In Beicht, U., Walden, G., & Herget, H. (Eds.), Kosten und Nutzen der betrieblichen Berufsausbildung in Deutschland (pp. 21–168). Bonn, Germany: Bertelsmann Verlag.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. (1997). French statism at the crossroads. In Crouch, C. & Streeck, W. (Eds.), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence & Diversity (pp. 71–101). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, B. (2004). Zur Lage auf dem Lehrstellenmarkt in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Wirtschaft im Wandel, 3, 78–84.Google Scholar
Brosi, W. (2004). Ausbildungsbeteiligung der Jugendlichen und ein Versuch einer kurz- und mittelfristigen Vorausschätzung. In Der Ausbildungsmarkt und seine Einflussfaktoren (pp. 115–128). Results of Expert Workshop, Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, Bonn, Germany, July 1−2.Google Scholar
Brown, P., Green, A., & Lauder, H. (2001). High Skills: Globalization, Competitiveness, and Skill Formation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung (BIBB). (2005). Schaubilder zur Berufsbildung: Strukturen und Entwicklungen. Bonn, Germany: Author.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (1999). Berufsbildungsbericht. Bonn: Author.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2000). Berufsbildungsbericht. Berlin: Author.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2001). Berufsbildungsbericht. Berlin: Author.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2004). Berufsbildungsbericht. Berlin: Author.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2005a). Berufsbildungsbericht. Berlin: Author.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2005b). Reform der Berufsbildung. Available at: www.bmbf.de/de/1644.php.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2006). Berufsbildungsbericht. Berlin: Author.
Casper, S., & Hancké, B. (1999). Global quality norms within national production regimes: ISO 9000 standards in the French and German car industries. Organization Studies, 20(6), 961–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, P. D. (2002). Associations and non-market coordination in banking: France and Eastern Germany compared. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 8(2), 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, P. D. (2003). Creating Cooperation: How States Develop Human Capital in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Culpepper, P. D. (2007). Small states and skill specificity: Austria, Switzerland, and inter-employer cleavages in coordinated capitalism. Comparative Political Studies, 40(6), 611–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In Hall, A. & Soskice, D. (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (pp. 145–183). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Industrial Relations Observatory (EIRO). (2005). Gesamtmetall Proposes Reforms of Education System. Available at: www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/2005/05/feature/de0505105f.html.
Finegold, D., & Soskice, D. (1988). The failure of training in Britain: Analysis and prescription. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4(3):21–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finegold, D., & Wagner, K. (2002). Institutional determinants of firms' training decisions: The case of German bank apprenticeships. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55(4), July, 667–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (Ed.). (1984). Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. (1985). The Evolution of Labor Relations in Japan: Heavy Industry, 1853–1955. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. (2005). Capitalism, Democracy and Welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875–893.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kristensen, P. H. (1997). National systems of governance and managerial prerogatives in the evolution of work systems: England, German and Denmark compared. In Whitley, R. & Kristensen, P. H. (Eds.), Governance at Work: The Social Regulation of Economic Relations (pp. 3–48). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kristensen, P. H., & Sabel, C. F. (1997). The small-holder economy in Denmark: The exception as variation. In Sabel, C. F. & Zeitlin, J. (Eds.), World of Possibilities: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization (pp. 344–380). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauder, H. (2001). Innovation, Skill Diffusion, and Social Exclusion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, B., & Grünert, H. (1999). Evaluierung der Vorhaben zur Förderung der beruflichen Erstausbildung. Magdeburg, Germany: Ministerium fur Arbeit, Frauen, Gesundheit und Soziales des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt.Google Scholar
Mares, I. (2000). Strategic alliances and social policy reform: Unemployment insurance in comparative perspective. Politics & Society, 28(2), 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, B. (1997). Das Ausbildungsangebot der westdeutschen Betriebe 1995 − Ergebnisse des IAB-Betriebspanel. BWP, 26(2), 10–16.Google Scholar
Piore, M., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rehder, B. (2003). Betriebliche Bündnisse für Arbeit in Deutschland: Mitbestimmung und Flächentarif im Wandel. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, S. (1997). German unification and emerging divisions with German employers' associations: Cause or catalyst? Comparative Politics, 29, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. (2000). Warning over IT skills gap. Financial Times, March 7, 3.Google Scholar
Soskice, D. (1991). The institutional infrastructure for international competitiveness: A comparative analysis of the UK and Germany. In Atkinson, A. B. & Brunetta, R. (Eds.), The Economics of the New Europe (pp. 45–66). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Soskice, D. (1994). Reconciling markets and institutions: The German apprenticeship system. In Lynch, L. M. (Ed.), Training and the Private Sector: International Comparisons (pp. 25–60). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. (1991). On the institutional conditions of diversified quality production. In Matzner, E. & Streeck, W. (Eds.), Beyond Keynesianism (pp. 21–61). Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., Hilbert, J., Kevalaer, K.-H., Maier, F., & Weber, H. (1987). The Role of the Social Partners in Vocational Training and Further Training in the Federal Republic of Germany. Berlin: CEDEFOP.Google Scholar
Taira, K. (1978). Factory labour and the Industrial Revolution in Japan. In Mathias, P. (Ed.), The Cambridge Economic History of Europe: Volume VII, Part 2 (pp. 166–214). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2002). The political economy of business and labor in the developed democracies. In Katznelson, I. & Milner, H. V. (Eds.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline (pp. 371–397). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (2006). The Future of German Vocational Training, in Light of Its Past. Manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2007). Skill formation and training. In Jones, G. & Zeitlin, J. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History (pp. 558–580). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, K., & Wijnbergen, C. (2003). The paradox of globalization: Labor relations in Germany and beyond. Comparative Political Studies, 36(8), 859–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K., & Kume, I. (2006). Coordination as a political problem in coordinated market economies. Governance, 19(1), 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troltsch, K. (2004). Berufsbildung und Strukturwandel – Zum Einfluss wirtschaftsstruktureller Veränderungen auf das betriebliche Ausbildungsstellenangebot seit 1980. Ergebnisse des Experten-Workshops, Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, Bonn, Germany, July 1–2.Google Scholar
Wagner, K. (1999). The German apprenticeship system under strain. In Culpepper, P. D. & Finegold, D. (Eds.), The German Skills Machine: Sustaining Comparative Advantage in a Global Economy (pp. 37–76). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Werner, D. (2004). Ausbildung zwischen Strukturwandel und Investitionskalkül. In Der Ausbildungsmarkt und seine Einflussfaktoren (pp. 53–66). Results of Expert Workshop, Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, Bonn, Germany, July 1–2.Google Scholar
Zysman, J. (1983). Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×