Book contents
- Skepticism in Early Modern English Literature
- Skepticism in Early Modern English Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Visionary, Interrupted
- Chapter 2 Fantasies of Private Language
- Chapter 3 Conformity / Neutrality in Lord Herbert of Cherbury
- Chapter 4 The Skeptical Fancies of Margaret Cavendish
- Chapter 5 The Enchantments of Andrew Marvell
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2021
Book contents
- Skepticism in Early Modern English Literature
- Skepticism in Early Modern English Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Visionary, Interrupted
- Chapter 2 Fantasies of Private Language
- Chapter 3 Conformity / Neutrality in Lord Herbert of Cherbury
- Chapter 4 The Skeptical Fancies of Margaret Cavendish
- Chapter 5 The Enchantments of Andrew Marvell
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Skepticism in Early Modern English LiteratureThe Problems and Pleasures of Doubt, pp. 235 - 262Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Adams, David. “Metaphors for Mankind: The Development of Hans Blumenberg’s Anthropological Metaphorology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 52.1 (1991): 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. “Intuitive Cognition, Certainty, and Scepticism in William Ockham.” Traditio 26 (1970): 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Ockham’s Nominalism and Unreal Entities.” The Philosophical Review 86.2 (1977): 144–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Thomas. A Commentary or, exposition upon the divine second epistle generall, written by the blessed apostle St. Peter. London: Richard Badger [and Felix Kyngston] for Iacob Bloome, 1633.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Adrichem, Christiaan van. Briefe description of Hierusalem and of the suburbs thereof, as it flourished in the time of Christ. Trans. Thomas Tymme. London: Thomas Wright, 1595.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. Infancy and History: The Destruction of Experience. Trans. Liz Heron. London and New York: Verso, 2007.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. The Man without Content. Trans. Georgia Albert. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. Taste. Trans. Cooper Francis. London, New York, Calcutta: Seagull Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Aggeler, Geoffrey. Nobler in the Mind: The Stoic–Skeptic Dialectic in English Renaissance Tragedy. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Allen, D. C. Doubt’s Boundless Sea: Skepticism and Faith in the Renaissance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Allen, D. C. “Some Theories of the Growth and Origin of Language in Milton’s Age.” Philological Quarterly 28 (1949): 5–16.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert J., ed. Addison and Steele: Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.Google Scholar
Altman, Joel. The Tudor Play of Mind: Rhetorical Inquiry and the Development of Elizabethan Drama. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Anderson, Judith H. “Mutability and Mortality,” in Celebrating Mutabilitie. Ed. Grogan, Jane. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010. 246–274.Google Scholar
Ankers, Neil. “Paradigms and Politics: Hobbes and Cavendish Contrasted,” in A Princely Brave Woman. Ed. Clucas, Stephen. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003. 242–254.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia, and Barnes, Jonathan. The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Assman, Aleida. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Augustine, Matthew. “‘Lillies without, roses within’: Marvell’s Poetics of Indeterminacy and ‘The Nymph Complaining.’” Criticism 50.2 (2008): 255–278.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Philosophical Papers. Ed. Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., and Rhees, R., “Symposium: Can There Be a Private Language?,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 28 (1954): 63–94.Google Scholar
Aylmer, G. E. “Collective Mentalities in Mid Seventeenth-Century England: IV. Cross Currents: Neutrals, Trimmers and Others.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 39 (1989): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Francis. A Selection of His Works. Ed. Warhaft, Sidney. New York: Odyssey Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Works of Francis Bacon. Ed. James Spedding et al. 14 vols. London: Longman, 1857–74.Google Scholar
Barbour, Reid. Literature and Religious Culture in Seventeenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Barbour, Reid. John Selden: Measures of the Holy Commonwealth in Seventeenth-Century England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bardle, Stephen. The Literary Underground in the 1660s. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Barkan, Leonard. “Ruins and Visions: Spenser, Pictures, Rome,” in Edmund Spenser: Essays on Culture and Allegory. Ed. Morrison, Jennifer Klein and Greenfield, Matthew. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2000. 9–36.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. “Mr. Locke’s Darling Notion.” Philosophical Quarterly 22 (1972): 193–214.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Language of Fashion. Trans. Andy Stafford. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Neutral. Trans. Rosalind E. Krauss and Denis Hollier. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Battigelli, Anna. Margaret Cavendish and the Exiles of the Mind. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1998.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard. More Reasons for the Christian Religion, and no reason against it … being… II. Some Animadversions on a tractate De veritate. London, 1672.Google Scholar
Bedford, R. D. The Defence of Truth: Herbert of Cherbury and the Seventeenth Century. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Bednarz, James P. “The Passionate Pilgrim and ‘The Phoenix and Turtle,’” in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s Poetry. Ed. Cheney, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 108–124.Google Scholar
Bednarz, James P. Shakespeare and the Truth of Love: The Mystery of “The Phoenix and Turtle.” New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel. “Return of the Sacred: The Argument about the Future of Religion,” in Progress and Its Discontents. Ed. Almond, G. A., Chodorow, M., and Pearce, R. H.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982. 501–523.Google Scholar
Bell, Millicent. Shakespeare’s Tragic Skepticism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Ed. Arendt, Hannah. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken, 1969.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bennett, Joan S. Reviving Liberty: Radical Christian Humanism in Milton’s Great Poems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Berger, Harry Jr.. Revisionary Play: Studies in the Spenserian Dynamics. Intro. Louis Adrian Montrose. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Berger, Harry Jr.. “The Mutabilitie Cantos: Archaism and Evolution in Retrospect,” in Spenser. Ed. Berger, Harry, Jr. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968. 146–176.Google Scholar
Biard, Joël. “Nominalism in the Later Middle Ages,” in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Ed. Pasnau, Robert and Dyke, Christina Van. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. II: 661–673.Google Scholar
Bieman, Elizabeth. Plato Baptized: Towards the Interpretation of Spenser’s Mimetic Fictions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bilgrami, Akeel. Secularism, Identity, and Enchantment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold, ed. Andrew Marvell: Modern Critical Views. New York and Philadelphia: Chelsea House, 1989.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. Care Crosses the River. 1987. Trans. Paul Fleming. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. 1966. Trans. Robert M. Wallace. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. Paradigms for a Metaphorology. Trans. Robert Savage. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. Shipwreck with Spectator: Paradigm of a Metaphor for Existence. Trans. Steven Rendall. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean. Method for the Easy Comprehension of History. Trans. Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Octagon Books, 1966.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. 1979. Trans. Richard Nice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1989.Google Scholar
Bredvold, Louis I. The Intellectual Milieu of John Dryden. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Broad, Jacqueline. “Margaret Cavendish and Joseph Glanvill: Science, Religion, and Witchcraft.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38.3 (2007): 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, James M. Intimacy and Sexuality in the Age of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Brooks, Christopher W. Law, Politics and Society in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, Richard Danson. “‘I would abate the sternenesse of my stile’: Diction and Poetic Subversion in Two Cantos of Mutabilitie,” in Celebrating Mutabilitie. Ed. Jane Grogan, . Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010. 275–294.Google Scholar
Bruns, Gerald L. Heidegger’s Estrangements: Language, Truth, and Poetry in the Later Writings. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryskett, Leonard. A Discourse of Civill Life in Literary Works. Ed. Pafford, J. H. P.. Farnborough: Gregg International Publishers, 1972.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. 1757. Ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. “Religion and Secularization,” in New Cambridge Modern History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. XIII: 293–317.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. “Tacitism, Scepticism, and Reason of State,” in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700. Ed. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 479–498.Google Scholar
Burrow, Colin. “Spenser and Classical Traditions,” in The Cambridge Companion to Spenser. Ed. Hadfield, Andrew D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 217–236.Google Scholar
Butler, John. Lord Herbert of Cherbury (1582–1648): An Intellectual Biography. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Melissa M. Skepticism and Belief in Early Modern England: The Reformation of Moral Value. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig, Juergensmeyer, Mark, and Antwerpen, Jonathan Van, eds. Rethinking Secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. The Institutes of Christian Religion. Ed. and trans. John Allen. Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian Board of Publications, 1921.Google Scholar
Carlini, Armando. Classe di scienzi morali, storiche, e filologiche. Firenze: Reale Accademia dei Lincei, 1917.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. 1932. Trans. Fritz C. A. Koelln and James P. Pettegrove. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence. Retrospectives. Ed. Kenny, Neil and Williams, Wes. London: Legenda, 2009.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Contesting Tears: The Hollywood Melodrama of the Unknown Woman. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “Excursus on Wittgenstein’s Vision of Language,” in The New Wittgenstein. Ed. Crary, Alice and Read, Rupert. London: Routledge, 2000. 21–37.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. In Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. A Pitch of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. The Blazing World and Other Writings. Ed. Lilley, Kate. London: Penguin, 1994.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. Life of William Cavendish, duke of Newcastle. Ed. C. H. Firth. London: Routledge, 1886.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. Observations on Experimental Philosophy. Ed. O’Neill, Eileen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. Paper Bodies: A Margaret Cavendish Reader. Ed. Bowerbank, Sylvia and Mendelson, Sara. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. Sociable Letters. Ed. Fitzmaurice, James. New York and London: Garland, 1997.Google Scholar
Chappuzeau, Samuel. The History of Jewels, and of the principal riches of the East and West taken from the relation of divers of the most famous travellers of our age: attended with fair discoveries conducing to the knowledge of the universe and trade. London: Hobart Kemp, 1671.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer. Ed. Benson, Larry D.. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1987.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick. English Authorship and the Early Modern Sublime: Spenser, Marlowe, Shakespeare, Jonson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick. “The Voice of the Author in ‘The Phoenix and Turtle’: Chaucer, Shakespeare, Spenser,” in Shakespeare and the Middle Ages. Ed. Perry, Curtis and Watkins, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 103–125.Google Scholar
Chernaik, Warren L., and Dzelzainis, Martin, eds. Marvell and Liberty. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Chibnall, Jennifer. “Something to the Purpose: Marvell’s Rhetorical Strategy in The Rehearsal Transpros’d (1672).” Prose Studies 9 (1986): 80–104.Google Scholar
Christian, Margaret. Spenserian Allegory and Elizabethan Biblical Exegesis. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Clark, Stuart. Vanities of the Eye: Vision in Early Modern Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Clucas, Stephen. “The Atomism of the Cavendish Circle: A Reappraisal.” The Seventeenth Century 9 (1994): 247–273.Google Scholar
“Variation, Irregularity and Probabilism,” in A Princely Brave Woman: Essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle. Ed. Clucas, Stephen. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003. 109–209.Google Scholar
Coldiron, A. E. B. “How Spenser Excavates Du Bellay’s Antiquitez.” JEGP 101.1 (2002): 41–67.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “Spenser’s Art” (1818), in Edmund Spenser’s Poetry: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Prescott, Anne Lake and Hadfield, Andrew D.. New York: Norton, 2014.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie. “My echoing song:” Andrew Marvell’s Poetry of Criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Conant, James. “Varieties of Scepticism,” in Wittgenstein and Scepticism. Ed. MacManus, Denis. London: Routledge, 2004. 97–136.Google Scholar
Conway, Anne. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Ed. Coudert, Allison P. and Corse, Taylor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudert, Allison P. ed. The Language of Adam / Die Sprache Adams. Wolfenbütteler Forschungen, Bd. 84. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1999.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. Covenant and Causality in Medieval Thought. London: Variorum Reprints, 1984.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. “In Search of Nominalism: Two Centuries of Historical Debate,” in Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought. Boston: Brill, 2008. 1–20.Google Scholar
Cox, Harvey. The Secular City: Secularization and Urbanization in Theological Perspective. New York: Macmillan, 1965.Google Scholar
Cox, John D. Seeming Knowledge: Shakespeare and Skeptical Faith. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto. Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistic. Trans. Ainslie, Douglas. New York: Noonday Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian. Mortal Thoughts: Religion, Secularity and Identity in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. “Skepticism and Toleration: The Case of Montaigne,” in Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Vol. 2. Ed. Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 1–34.Google Scholar
Darmon, Jean-Charles. “Questionnements sceptiques et politiques de la fable: les ‘autres mondes’ du libertinage érudit,” in Skepticism and Political Thought in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Ed. John Christian and Paganini, Gianni. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015. 83–112.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Park, Katherine. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathleen. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter. “From Truth to Disinterestedness in the Seventeenth Century.” Social Studies of Science 22.4 (1992): 619–631.Google Scholar
Demonet, Marie-Luce, and Legros, Alain, eds. L’Écriture du scepticisme chez Montaigne. Geneva: Droz, 2004.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Positions. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Detlefsen, Karen. “Atomism, Monism, and Causation in the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Vol. 3. Ed. Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. 199–240.Google Scholar
DiSanto, Michael. “Andrew Marvell’s Ambivalence Toward Adult Sexuality.” SEL 48 (2008): 165–182.Google Scholar
Dodds, Gregory D. Exploiting Erasmus: The Erasmian Legacy and Religious Change in Early Modern England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dodds, Lara. The Literary Invention of Margaret Cavendish. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Doran, Robert. The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Doyle, John P. “Another God, Chimerae, Goat-Stags and Man-Lions: A Seventeenth-Century Debate about Impossible Objects.” The Review of Metaphysics 48.4 (1995): 771–808.Google Scholar
Du Bellay, Joachim. Les regrets, Les antiquités de Rome, Ed. de Sacy, S.. Paris: Gallimard, 1967.Google Scholar
Dykstal, Timothy. The Luxury of Skepticism: Politics, Philosophy, and Dialogue in the English Public Sphere, 1660–1740. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. The Search for the Perfect Language. Trans. James Fentress. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar
Eden, Kathy. The Renaissance Rediscovery of Intimacy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Eggert, Katherine. Disknowledge: Literature, Alchemy, and the End of Humanism in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot. Ed. Kermode, Frank. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1975.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. H. Spain, Europe and the Wider World 1500–1800. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ellrodt, Robert. Seven Metaphysical Poets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, Lars. “Measure for Measure and Modernity: The Problem of the Skeptic's Authority,” in Shakespeare and Modernity. Ed. Grady, Hugh. London: Routledge, 2000. 85–104.Google Scholar
Evans, Joan. Magical Jewels of the Middle-Ages and the Renaissance, particularly in England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1922.Google Scholar
Everett, Barbara. “Set upon a golden bough to sing: Shakespeare’s Debt to Sidney in ‘The Phoenix and Turtle,’” Times Literary Supplement, 16 Feb. 2001, 13–15.Google Scholar
“The Shooting of the Bears,” in Andrew Marvell: Essays on the Tercentenary of His Death. Ed. Brett, R. L.. Hull and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979. 62–103.Google Scholar
Fallon, Stephen M. Milton among the Philosophers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc. Homo Aestheticus: The Invention of Taste in the Democratic Age. Trans. Robert de Loaiza. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “Question and Answer in Samson Agonistes.” Critical Quarterly 11 (1969): 237–264.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “Spectacle and Evidence in Samson Agonistes.” Critical Inquiry 15.3 (1989): 556–586.Google Scholar
Fleming, Paul, Campe, Rüdiger, and Wetters, Kirk. “Introduction.” Telos 158 (2012): 3–7.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Angus. Allegory: The Theory of a Symbolic Mode. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Angus. Colors of the Mind: Conjectures on Thinking in Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Floridi, Luciano. Sextus Empiricus: The Transmission and Recovery of Pyrrhonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J., and Knox, T. M., “The Library of Jesus College, Oxford: With an Appendix on the Books Bequeathed thereto by Lord Herbert of Cherbury,” Oxford Bibliographical Society, Proceedings and Papers 5 (1937): 49–115.Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia. A History of Language Philosophies. Trans. Gabriel Poole. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair. “Neoplatonic Order in The Faerie Queen,” in Spenser: The Faerie Queene, A Casebook. Ed. Bayley, Peter. London: Macmillan, 1977. 224–239.Google Scholar
Friedman, Donald M. “Rude Heaps and Decent Order,” in Marvell and Liberty. Ed. Chernaik, Warren and Dzelzainis, Martin. London: Macmillan, 1999. 123–144.Google Scholar
Fuller, Margaret. “The Two Herberts.” Papers on Literature and Art. New York: Wiley and Putnam, 1846.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos. “Scholasticism, Scepticism and Secular Theology,” in Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Ed. Richard H. Popkin, and Schmitt, Charles B.. Wolfenbütteler Forschungen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1987. 45–54.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos. Theology and Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. “Embracing the Absolute: The Politics of the Female Subject in Seventeenth-Century England.” Genders 1 (1988): 24–39.Google Scholar
Gardner, Helen, ed. John Donne: The Elegies and The Songs and Sonnets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Garganigo, Alex. “The Rehearsal Transpros’d and The Rehearsal Transpros’d: The Second Part” in The Oxford Handbook of Andrew Marvell. Ed. Martin Dzelzainis and Edward Holberton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 517–542.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. Opera omnia: Faksimile-Neudruck der Ausgabe von Lyons 1658… 6 vols. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: F. Frommann, 1964.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P. “Neoplatonic Epistemology: Knowledge, Truth and Intellection,” in The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism. Ed. Remes, Pauliina and Slaveva-Griffin, Svetla. London and New York: Routledge, 2014. 266–279.Google Scholar
Gigante, Denise. Taste: A Literary History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Gikandi, Simon. Slavery and the Culture of Taste. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Gil, Daniel Juan. Before Intimacy: Asocial Sexuality in Early Modern England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael Allen. The Theological Origins of Modernity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Giocanti, Silvia. Penser l’irrésolution: Montaigne, Pascal, La Mothe Le Vayer: trois itinéraires sceptiques. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2001.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph. Scepsis Scientifica: or, Confest Ignorance, the way to Science; in an Essay of The Vanity of Dogmatizing, and Confident Opinion. London, 1665.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip S. “Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ca. 1300 to 1700.” American Sociological Review 65.1 (2000): 138–167.Google Scholar
Graham, Gordon. The Re-enchantment of the World: Art Versus Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas. “Mutability and the Theme of Process,” in Edmund Spenser: Modern Critical Views. Ed. Bloom, Harold. New York: Chelsea House, 1986. 57–71.Google Scholar
Gregory, Brad S. The Unintended Reformation: How a Religious Revolution Secularized Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Griffioen, Sjoerd. “Modernity and the Problem of Its Christian Past: The Geistesgeschichten of Blumenberg, Berger, and Gauchet.” History and Theory 55 (2016): 185–209.Google Scholar
Grogan, Jane, ed. Celebrating Mutabilitie. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Grogan, Jane, Exemplary Spenser: Visual and Poetic Pedagogy in The Faerie Queene. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Gross, Kenneth. “‘Pardon me, mighty poet’: Versions of the Bard in Marvell’s ‘On Mr. Milton’s Paradise Lost’,” in Andrew Marvell: Modern Critical Views. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York and Philadelphia: Chelsea House, 1989. 169–185.Google Scholar
Gross, Kenneth. Spenserian Poetics: Idolatry, Iconoclasm, and Magic. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Grossman, Marshall. “Poetry and Belief in Paradise Regained, to which is added, Samson Agonistes.” Studies in Philology 110.2 (2013): 382–401.Google Scholar
Grossman, Marshall. The Story of All Things: Writing the Self in English Renaissance Narrative Poetry. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles B. Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1983.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. “Five Parables,” in Philosophy in History. Ed. Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 103–124.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew D. Spenser’s Irish Experience: Wilde Fruit and Salvage Soyl. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. The Veil of Isis. Trans. Michael Chase. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Halyburton, T. H. Natural Religion Insufficient: and Revealed Necessary to Man’s Happiness in his present State. 1714. Edinburgh and Leith, 1798.Google Scholar
Hamlin, William M. “A Lost Translation Found? An Edition of The Sceptick (c. 1590) Based on Extant Manuscripts [With Text].” ELR 31.1 (2001): 34–51.Google Scholar
Hamlin, William M. Montaigne’s English Journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hamlin, William M. Tragedy and Scepticism in Shakespeare’s England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Hammill, Graham, and Lupton, Julia Reinhard, eds. Political Theology and Early Modernity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hartlib, Samuel. The Hartlib Papers. Ed. Greengrass, Leslie M. and Hannon, M.. HRI On-line Publications, 2013. Web. August 28, 2014.Google Scholar
Hashhozheva, Galena. “The Christian Defense Against Classical Skepticism in Spenser’s Legend of Holiness.” ELR (2014): 193–220.Google Scholar
Haskins, Charles Homer. 1927. The Renaissance of the Twelfth Century. Cleveland, OH: Meridian, 1957.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. The Phenomenology of Mind. Trans. J. B. Baillie. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1967.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Albert Hofstadter. New York: HarperCollins, 1971.Google Scholar
Helfer, Rebeca. Spenser’s Ruins and The Art of Recollection. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hequembourg, Stephen. “The Dream of a Literal World: Wilkins, Hobbes, Marvell.” ELH 81.1 (2014): 83–113.Google Scholar
Cherbury, Herbert, Edward, . De Religione Laici. Trans. Harold R. Hutcheson. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Cherbury, Herbert, Edward, . De veritate. Trans. Meyrick H. Carré. 1937. London: Routledge/Thoemmes, 1992.Google Scholar
Cherbury, Herbert, Edward, . A Dialogue between a Tutor and his Pupil. New York: Garland, 1979.Google Scholar
Cherbury, Herbert, Edward, . Expedition to the Isle of Rhé. London: Whittingham, 1860.Google Scholar
Cherbury, Herbert, Edward, . The Life and Reign of King Henry VIII. London: Alexander Murray, 1870.Google Scholar
Cherbury, Herbert, Edward, . The Life of Edward, First Lord Herbert of Cherbury written by himself. Ed. J. M. Shuttleworth, . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Cherbury, Herbert, Edward, . The Poems of Lord Herbert of Cherbury. 1665. Ed. Collins, John Churton. London: Chatto & Windus, 1881.Google Scholar
Cherbury, Herbert, Edward, . Works. Ed. Gawlick, Günter. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: F. Frommann / Günther Holzboog, 1966–71.Google Scholar
Herman, Peter C. Destabilizing Milton: “Paradise Lost” and the Poetics of Incertitude. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Herz, Judith Scherer. “Milton and Marvell: The Poet as Fit Reader.” MLQ 39.3 (1978): 239–263.Google Scholar
Hiley, David R. “The Politics of Skepticism: Reading Montaigne.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 9.4 (1992): 379–399.Google Scholar
Hill, Eugene D. Edward, Lord Herbert of Cherbury. Twayne’s English Authors Series. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall, 1987.Google Scholar
Hillman, David. Shakespeare’s Entrails: Belief, Scepticism and the Interior of the Body. New York: Palgrave / St. Martin’s Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek and Zwicker, Steven. Andrew Marvell, Orphan of the Hurricane. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek and Zwicker, Steven. “Marvell and the Lyrics of Undifference,” in The Oxford Handbook of Andrew Marvell. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 387–405.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek and Zwicker, Steven. The Cambridge Companion to Andrew Marvell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Holmes, Michael Morgan. Early Modern Metaphysical Literature: Nature, Custom, and Strange Desires. New York: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. “Montaigne and the Function of Skepticism,” in Between Philosophy and Social Science: Selected Early Writings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1993. 265–311.Google Scholar
Houston, Alan, and Pincus, Steve, eds. A Nation Transformed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hudson, Nicholas. “John Locke and the Tradition of Nominalism,” in Nominalism and Literary Discourse: New Perspectives. Ed. Hugo Keiper, Christoph Bode, , and Utz, Richard. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997. 283–299.Google Scholar
Hughes, Peter. “Painting the Ghost: Wittgenstein, Shakespeare, and Textual Representation.” New Literary History 19.2 (1988): 371–384.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah. Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah. “In Dialogue with Thomas Hobbes: Margaret Cavendish’s Natural Philosophy.” Women’s Writing 4 (1997): 421–432.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah. “Lord Herbert of Cherbury and the Cambridge Platonists,” in British Philosophy and the Age of Enlightenment. Ed. Brown, Stuart. Routledge History of Philosophy, Vol. 5. London: Routledge, 1996. 20–42.Google Scholar
Jackson, Christine. “‘It is unpossible to draw his Picture well who hath severall countenances’: Lord Herbert of Cherbury and The Life and Reign of King Henry VIII,” in Henry VIII and History. Ed. Betteridge, Thomas and Freeman, Thomas S.. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012. 135–149.Google Scholar
James, Susan. “The Philosophical Innovations of Margaret Cavendish.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7.2 (1999): 219–244.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. “Rev. of The Legitimacy of the Modern Age by Hans Blumenberg.” History and Theory 24.2 (1985): 183–196.Google Scholar
Johnson, Christopher D. “Blumenberg’s ‘huge field’: Metaphorology and Intellectual History.” Intellectual History Review 22.2 (2012): 289–292.Google Scholar
Johnson, Christopher D. Hyperboles: The Rhetoric of Excess in Baroque Literature and Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Johnson, Christopher D. Memory, Metaphor, and Aby Warburg’s Atlas of Images. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Jordan, W. K. The Development of Religious Toleration in England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1932–40.Google Scholar
Journal of the House of Lords. British History On-Line. www.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol5 (accessed October 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. “Aesthetics as Critique: Tragedy and Trauerspiel in Samson Agonistes,” in Reading Renaissance Ethics. Ed. Grossman, Marshall. New York: Routledge, 2007. 104–127.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. The Future of Illusion: Political Theology and Early Modern Texts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. “Political Theology and Reason of State in Samson Agonistes.” SAQ 95.4 (1996): 1065–1097.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. Rhetoric, Prudence, and Skepticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Karger, Elizabeth. “Ockham’s Misunderstood Theory of Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Ed. Paul, Spade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 204–226.Google Scholar
Kaske, Carol V. Spenser and Biblical Poetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Keiper, Hugo, Bode, Christoph, and Utz, Richard, eds. Nominalism and Literary Discourse: New Perspectives. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Amanda. “Pyrrhonist Uncertainty in Shakespeare’s Sonnets.” Shakespeare 11.4 (2015): 408–424.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula, and Hall, Alexander, eds. The Demonic Temptations of Medieval Nominalism. Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics, Vol. 9. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2011.Google Scholar
Knapp, James A. Image Ethics in Shakespeare and Spenser. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Knight, Stephen. “Chaucer – A Modern Writer?” Balcony: The Sydney Review 2 (1965): 37–43.Google Scholar
Korab-Karpowicz, W. J. “Martin Heidegger.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu/heidegge/#H5 (accessed September 27, 2019).Google Scholar
Kranidas, Thomas. Milton and the Rhetoric of Zeal. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Krier, Theresa M. Gazing on Secret Sights: Spenser, Classical Imitation, and the Decorums of Vision. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kuzner, James. Shakespeare as a Way of Life: Skeptical Practice and the Politics of Weakness. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
LaBreche, Ben, and Kerr, Jason A., eds. “The Varieties of Political Theology.” Journal of Early Modern Cultural Studies 18.2 (2018).Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. “A History of Skepticism in the Middle Ages,” in Rethinking the History of Skepticism. Lagerlund, Ed.. 1–28.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. ed. Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. ed. Rethinking the History of Skepticism: The Missing Medieval Background. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Langer, Ullrich. Divine and Poetic Freedom in the Renaissance: Nominalist Theology and Literature in France and Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Largier, Niklaus. “Mysticism, Modernity, and the Invention of Aesthetic Experience.” Representations 105 (2009): 37–60.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. “Scepticism,” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Eds. Garber, Daniel, Ayers, Michael, et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 1145–1192.Google Scholar
Laursen, John Christian. The Politics of Skepticism in the Ancients, Montaigne, Hume, and Kant. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar
Laursen, John Christian, and Paganini, Gianni, eds. Skepticism and Political Thought in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lee, Sidney G., ed. Autobiography of Edward, Lord Herbert of Cherbury. London: William W. Gibbings, 1892.Google Scholar
Leff, Gordon. The Dissolution of the Medieval Outlook. New York: New York University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Leff, Gordon. William of Ockham: The Metamorphosis of Scholastic Discourse. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Leo, Russ. Tragedy as Philosophy in the Reformation World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Leslie, Marina. “Gender, Genre and the Utopian Body in Margaret Cavendish’s Blazing World.” Utopian Studies 7.1 (1996): 6–24.Google Scholar
Levine, Alan, ed. Early Modern Skepticism and the Origins of Toleration. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer. “Milton’s Samson and the ‘New Acquist of True [Political] Experience.” Milton Studies 24 (1988): 233–251.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer. “Milton: Divine Revelation and the Poetics of Experience.” Milton Studies 28 (1992): 3–21.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer. A Discourse of Constancy: In Two Books. Trans. Richard Goodridge. London: Humphrey Moseley, 1654.Google Scholar
Lobsien, Verena Olejniczak. Transparency and Dissimulation: Configurations of Neoplatonism in Early Modern English Literature. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2010.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, David. Milton and the Drama of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, David. Representing Revolution in Milton and his Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Lom, Petr. The Limits of Doubt: The Moral and Political Implications of Skepticism. Binghamton: State University of New York Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Long, Michael. Marvell, Nabokov: Childhood and Arcadia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Long, Seth. “Excavating the Memory Palace: An Account of the Disappearance of Mnemonic Imagery from English Rhetoric, 1550–1650.” Rhetoric Review 36.2 (2017): 122–138.Google Scholar
Longinus, . On the Sublime. Trans. James A. Arieti and John M. Crossett. New York and Toronto: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Carus, Lucretius, Titus, . De Rerum Natura. Trans. W. H. D. Rouse and Martin Ferguson Smith. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy. Trans. Jeremy Gaines and Doris L. Jones. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia Reinhard. Thinking with Shakespeare. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Maley, Willy. “Spenser’s Languages: Writing in the Ruins of English,” in The Cambridge Companion to Spenser. Ed. Hadfield, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 162–179.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. The Politics of Mirth: Jonson, Herrick, Milton and Marvell and the Defense of Old Holiday Pastimes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. “Donne and ‘The Extasie,’” in The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry from Wyatt to Milton. Ed. Sloan, Thomas O. and Waddington, Raymond B.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974. 140–173.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. The Frame of Art: Fictions of Aesthetic Experience, 1750–1815. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Martin, Catherine Gimelli. “The Erotology of Donne’s ‘Extasie’ and the Secret History of Voluptuous Rationalism.” SEL 44.1 (2004): 121–147.Google Scholar
Martz, Louis L. “Andrew Marvell: The Mind’s Happiness,” in Andrew Marvell: Modern Critical Views. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York and Philadelphia: Chelsea House, 1989. 49–75.Google Scholar
Marvell, Andrew. The Letters of Andrew Marvell. Ed. Margoliouth, H. M.. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Marvell, Andrew. The Poems of Andrew Marvell. Ed. Smith, Nigel. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2007.Google Scholar
Marvell, Andrew. Prose Works. Ed. Patterson, Annabel et al. 2 vols. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Matchett, William H. The Phoenix and the Turtle: Shakespeare’s Poem and Chester’s “Loves Martyr.” The Hague: Mouton, 1965.Google Scholar
Matytsin, Anton M. The Specter of Skepticism in the Age of Enlightenment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Mazzeo, J. A. Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Studies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
McCabe, Richard. The Pillars of Eternity: Time and Providence in The Faerie Queene. Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar
McCoy, Richard C. “Love’s Martyrs: Shakespeare’s ‘Phoenix and Turtle’ and the Sacrificial Sonnets,” in Religion and Culture in Renaissance England. Ed. McEachern, Claire and Shuger, Debora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 188–208.Google Scholar
McDougall, Derek. “Wittgenstein’s Remarks on William Shakespeare.” Philosophy and Literature 40.1 (2016): 297–308.Google Scholar
McDowell, Nicholas. Poetry and Allegiance in the English Civil Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
McGrath, Alister E. The Intellectual Origins of the European Reformation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
McGrath, S. J. The Early Heidegger and Medieval Philosophy. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Marvell, Andrew. The Origins of the English Novel 1600–1740. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Marvell, Andrew. “Pastoralism, Puritanism, Imperialism, Scientism: Andrew Marvell and the Problem of Mediation.” The Yearbook of English Studies 13 (1983): 46–65.Google Scholar
Merchant, W. Moelwyn. “Lord Herbert of Cherbury and Seventeenth-Century Historical Writing.” Transactions of the Honourable Society of Cymmodorion (1956): 47–63.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. “Cézanne’s Doubt,” in The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader. Ed. Johnson, Galen A.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993. 59–75.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin. Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne. Ed. Cornelis de Waard et al. 17 vols. Paris: Beauchesne, 1932–88.Google Scholar
Michaelian, Kourken. “Margaret Cavendish’s Epistemology.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17.1 (2009): 31–53.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Complete Poems and Major Prose. Ed. Hughes, Merritt Y.. Indianapolis, IN: Odyssey Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Complete Prose Works of John Milton. Ed. Wolfe, Don M.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Milward, Peter. “‘Double Nature’s Single Name’: A Response to Christiane Gillham.” Connotations 3.1 (1993): 60–63.Google Scholar
Minazzoli, Agnès. “Formes de penser, manières d’écrire: existe-t-il un style sceptique?” Papers on French Seventeenth Century Literature 25.49 (1998): 381–396.Google Scholar
Minor, Vernon Hyde. The Death of the Baroque and the Rhetoric of Good Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mintz, Samuel I. “The Duchess of Newcastle’s Visit to the Royal Society.” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 51.2 (1952): 168–176.Google Scholar
Monk, Samuel Holt. The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-century England. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1935.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. The Complete Essays of Montaigne. Trans. Donald M. Frame. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Moriarty, Michael. Taste and Ideology in 17th-Century France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Most, Glenn W. “After the Sublime: Stations in the Career of an Emotion.” The Yale Review 90.2 (2002): 101–120.Google Scholar
Most, Glenn W. “The Sublime, Today?,” in Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 239–266.Google Scholar
Motherwell, Robert. The Writings of Robert Motherwell. Ed. Ashton, Dore and Banach, Joan. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. Wittgenstein’s Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations, §§ 243–315. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Müller-Sievers, Helmut. “Kyklophorology: Hans Blumenberg and the Intellectual History of Technics.” Telos 158 (2012): 155–170.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kathryn, and Traninger, Anita, eds. The Emergence of Impartiality. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Nauta, Lodi. “A Weak Chapter in the Book of Nature: Hans Blumenberg on Medieval Thought,” in The Book of Nature in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Ed. Vanderjagt, Arjo and van Berkel, Klaas. Leuven: Peeters, 2005. 135–150.Google Scholar
Nelson, Holly Faith, and Aker, Sharon. “Memory, Monuments, and Melancholic Genius in Margaret Cavendish’s Bell in Campo.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 21.1 (2008): 13–35.Google Scholar
Neto, José R. Maia, and Paganini, Gianni, eds. Renaissance Scepticisms. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Netzley, Ryan. “Reading Events: The Value of Reading and the Possibilities of Political Action and Criticism in ‘Samson Agonistes.’” Criticism 48.4 (2006): 509–533.Google Scholar
Nicols, Thomas. Arcula Gemmea. A Lapidary: or, the History of Pretious Stones: with cautions for the undeceiving of all those that deal with Pretious Stones. Cambridge: Thomas Buck, 1652.Google Scholar
Noggle, James. The Skeptical Sublime: Aesthetic Ideology in Pope and the Tory Satirists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Noggle, James. The Temporality of Taste in Eighteenth-Century British Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Noggle, James. “The Wittgensteinian Sublime.” New Literary History 27.4 (1996): 605–619.Google Scholar
Nohrnberg, James. The Analogy of The Faerie Queene. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. “Marvell’s ‘Horatian Ode’ and the Politics of Genre,” in Literature and the English Civil War. Ed. Healy, Thomas and Sawday, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 147–169.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. “Milton, Lucy Hutchinson and the Lucretian Sublime: The Sublime Object.” Tate Papers 13 (2010): online at www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate- papers/13/milton-lucy-hutchinson-and-the-lucretian-sublime.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. “Republican Occasions in Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes.” Milton Studies 42 (2003): 122–148.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. Writing the English Republic: Poetry, Rhetoric and Politics, 1627–1660. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Future Contingents,” in The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Ed. Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, Jan Pinborg, and Eleonore Stump. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. 358–381.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Nominalism,” in The Routledge Companion to Sixteenth-Century Philosophy. Ed. Lagerlund, Henrik and Hill, Benjamin. New York: Routledge, 2017. 121–136.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G. “Ockham on Mental Language,” in Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science. Ed. Smith, J- C.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990. 53–70.Google Scholar
Novarr, David. “‘The Extasie’: Donne’s Address on the States of Union,” in Just So Much Honor. Ed. Fiore, Peter Amadeus. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1972. 219–243.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1989.Google Scholar
Nuttall, A. D. “Spenser and Elizabethan Alienation.” Essays in Criticism 55.3 (2005): 209–225.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A. The Harvest of Medieval Theology: Gabriel Biel and Late Medieval Nominalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A. Luther. 1982. Trans. Eileen Walliser-Schwarzbart. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A. “The Shape of Late Medieval Thought: The Birthpangs of the Modern Era,” in The Pursuit of Holiness in Late Medieval and Renaissance Religion. Ed. Trinkaus, Charles and Oberman, Heiko A.. Leiden: Brill, 1974. 3–25.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A. “Some Notes on the Theology of Nominalism: With Attention to Its Relation to the Renaissance.” The Harvard Theological Review 53.1 (1960): 47–76.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A. “Via Antiqua and Via Moderna: Late Medieval Prolegomena to Early Reformation Thought.” Journal of the History of Ideas 48.1 (1987): 23–40.Google Scholar
Ockham, William of. Ockham: Philosophical Writings. Ed. and trans. Boehner, Philotheus. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964.Google Scholar
Ockham, William of. Ockham’s Theory of Terms: Part 1 of the Summa Logicae. Trans. Michael J. Loux. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen, and Strong, Roy. Inigo Jones: The Theatre of the Stuart Court. 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Ormsby-Lennon, Hugh. “Rosicrucian Linguistics: Twilight of a Renaissance Tradition,” in Hermeticism and the Renaissance. Ed. Merkel, Ingrid and Debus, Allen G.. Washington, DC: Folger Books, 1988. 311–341.Google Scholar
Ozment, Steven. “Mysticism, Nominalism and Dissent,” in The Pursuit of Holiness in Late Medieval and Renaissance Religion. Ed. Trinkhaus, Charles Edward and Oberman, Heiko Augustinus. Leiden: Brill, 1974. 67–92.Google Scholar
Pailin, David A. “Should Herbert of Cherbury Be Regarded as a ‘Deist’?” Journal of Theological Studies 51 (2000): 113–149.Google Scholar
Palmer, Ada. “Humanist Lives of Classical Philosophers and the Idea of Renaissance Secularization: Virtue, Rhetoric, and the Orthodox Sources of Unbelief.” Renaissance Quarterly 70.3 (2017): 935–976.Google Scholar
Pankakoski, Timo. “Reoccupying Secularization: Schmitt and Koselleck on Blumenberg’s Challenge.” History and Theory 52 (May 2013): 214–245.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Semantics and Mental Language,” in The Cambridge Companion to William of Ockham. Ed., Paul Spade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 53–75.Google Scholar
Parageau, Sandrine. Les Ruses de l’ignorance: La contribution des femmes à l’avènement de la science moderne en Angleterre. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle, 2010.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. “Abstract Truth in Thomas Aquinas,” in Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy. Ed. Henrik Lagerlund. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006. 33–61.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. ed., Mind and Knowledge. The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel M. Marvell and the Civic Crown. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel M. Pastoral and Ideology: Virgil to Valéry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Pavesich, Vida. “Hans Blumenberg’s Philosophical Anthropology after Heidegger and Cassirer.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46.3 (2008): 421–448.Google Scholar
Peck, Russell A. “Chaucer and the Nominalist Questions.” Speculum 53.4 (1978): 745–760.Google Scholar
Penn, Stephen. “Literary Nominalism and Medieval Sign Theory: Problems and Perspectives,” in Nominalism and Literary Discourse: New Perspectives. Ed. Hugo Keiper, Bode, Christoph, and Utz., Richard Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997. 157–189.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. “Does God Deceive Us? Skeptical Hypotheses in Late Medieval Epistemology,” in Rethinking the History of Skepticism: The Missing Medieval Background. Ed. Henrik Lagerlund. Leiden: Brill, 2009. 171–192.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. “Skepticism,” in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Ed. Robert Pasnau, and Dyke, Christina Van. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 1: 384–396.Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie. “Wittgenstein’s Shakespeare.” Wittgenstein-Studien 5.1 (2014): 259–272.Google Scholar
Picciotto, Joanna. Labors of Innocence in Early Modern England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Pierce, Robert B. “Shakespeare and the Ten Modes of Scepticism.” Shakespeare Survey 46 (1993): 145–158.Google Scholar
Pigman, G. W. Grief and English Renaissance Elegy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. “Blumenberg and the Modernity Problem.” Review of Metaphysics 40 (1987): 535–557.Google Scholar
Poole, Kristen. “Naming, Paradise Lost, and the Gendered Discourse of Perfect Language Schemes.” English Literary Renaissance 38.3 (2008): 535–559.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H., and Schmitt, Charles B., eds. Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Wolfenbütteler Forschungen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1987.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. The Sublime in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Povey, Thomas. The Moderator expecting Sudden Peace, or Certaine Ruine. Directed by Reason, Arising out of the Consideration of what hath already happened, Our present Condition, and the most likely Consequents of these. London, 1642.Google Scholar
Prakas, Tessie. “‘A World of her own Invention’: The Realm of Fancy in Margaret Cavendish’s The Description of a New World, called the Blazing World.” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 16.1 (2016): 123–145.Google Scholar
Prescott, Anne Lake. “Spenser (Re)Reading du Bellay: Chronology and Literary Response,” in Spenser’s Life and the Subject of Biography. Ed. Judith H. Anderson, Donald Cheney, , and Richardson, David A.. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1996. 131–145.Google Scholar
Price, Bronwen. “Journeys Beyond Frontiers: Knowledge, Subjectivity and Outer Space in Margaret Cavendish’s The Blazing World.” Literature and History 7.2 (1998): 21–50.Google Scholar
Radley, C. Perrin. “Margaret Cavendish’s Cabbala: The Empress and the Spirits in The Blazing World,” in God and Nature in the Thought of Margaret Cavendish. Ed. Siegfried, Brandie R. and Sarasohn, Lisa T.. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2014. 161–170.Google Scholar
Rajan, Balachandra. “The Aesthetics of Inconclusiveness,” in Approaches to Marvell. Ed. C. A. Patrides. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978. 155–173.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, Ayesha. “Edmund Spenser, Lucretian Neoplatonist: Cosmology in the Fowre Hymnes.” Spenser Studies 24 (2009): 373–411.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, Ayesha. “Mutabilitie’s Lucretian Metaphysics: Scepticism and Cosmic Process in Spenser’s Cantos,” in Celebrating Mutabilitie. Ed. Jane Grogan. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010. 220–245.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, Ayesha. The Worldmakers: Global Imagining in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. The Names of History: On the Poetics of Knowledge. 1992. Trans. Hassan Melehy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Literature. 2006. Trans. Julie Rose. Cambridge: Polity, 2011.Google Scholar
Randall, Michael. Building Resemblance: Analogical Imagery in the Early French Renaissance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Read, Rupert. “Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations as a War Book.” New Literary History 41.3 (2010): 593–612.Google Scholar
Rees, Emma. Margaret Cavendish: Gender, Genre, Exile. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Reid, Jasper. “The Common Consent Argument from Herbert to Hume.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53.3 (2015): 401–434.Google Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J. Knowledge, Discovery and Imagination in Early Modern Europe: The Rise of Aesthetic Rationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rhetorica ad Herennium. Trans. Harry Caplan. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Richter, Gerhard. Thought-Images: Frankfurt School Writers’ Reflections from a Damaged Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dunstan. “‘Abundantly replenisht with Books of his own purchasing and choyce’: Lord Herbert of Cherbury’s Library at Montgomery Castle.” Library and Information History 31.2 (2015): 117–136.Google Scholar
Robertson, Kellie. Nature Speaks: Medieval Literature and Aristotelian Philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Robertson, Lauren. “Spectacular Skepticism: Visual Contradiction on the Early Modern English Stage.” Washington University in St. Louis. Dissertation, 2016.Google Scholar
Rogers, John. The Matter of Revolution: Science, Poetry, and Politics in the Age of Milton. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Rosin, Robert. Reformers, The Preacher, and Skepticism. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern, 1997.Google Scholar
Rossi, Mario M. La vita, le opere, i tempi di Edoardo Herbert di Chirbury. 3 vols. Firenze: Sansoni, 1947.Google Scholar
Rothko, Mark. The Artist’s Reality: Philosophies of Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Rumrich, John P., and Chaplin, Gregory, eds. Seventeenth-Century British Poetry: 1603–1660. New York: Norton, 2006.Google Scholar
Rusch, Pierre. “Hans Blumenberg et la grammaire historique des idées,” in Hans Blumenberg: Anthropologie philosophique. Ed. Denis Trierweiler. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2010. 141–163.Google Scholar
Rushdy, Ashraf H. A. “‘In Dubious Battle’: Skepticism and Fideism in Paradise Regained.” HLQ 53.2 (1990): 95–118.Google Scholar
Saint Girons, Baldine. “La Peinture et la Nuit,” in Du visible à l’intelligible: Lumière et ténèbres de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance. Ed. Trottmann, Christian Vasiliu, et Anca. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2004. 281–299.Google Scholar
Saler, Michael T. As If: Modern Enchantment and the Literary Prehistory of Virtual Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T. “Leviathan and the Lady: Cavendish’s Critique of Hobbes in the Philosophical Letters,” in Authorial Conquests. Ed. Cottegnies, Line and Weitz, Nancy. Teaneck, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2003. 40–58.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T. The Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish: Reason and Fancy During the Scientific Revolution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, Lisa T. “A Science Turned Upside Down: Feminism and the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish.” Huntington Library Quarterly 47 (1984): 289–307.Google Scholar
Saunders, John Turk, and Henze, Donald F.. The Private Language Problem: A Philosophical Dialogue. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar
Schalkwyk, David. Literature and the Touch of the Real. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Schalkwyk, David. Speech and Performance in Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. 1922/1934. Trans. George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. Cicero Scepticus: A Study of the Influence of the Academica in the Renaissance. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. “The Development of the Historiography of Scepticism: From the Renaissance to Brucker,” in Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Ed. Popkin, Richard H. and Schmitt., Charles B. Wolfenbütteler Forschungen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1987. 185–200.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schoenfeldt, Michael. “Marvell and the Designs of Art,” in The Cambridge Companion to Andrew Marvell. Ed. Hirst, Derek and Zwicker, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 87–101.Google Scholar
Searle, John. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5.1 (1976): 1–23.Google Scholar
Sedley, David L. Sublimity and Skepticism in Montaigne and Milton. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Semler, L. E. “Marvell’s Mannerist Scepticism: A Reading of ‘Mourning.’” English 44.180 (1995): 214–228.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W. “Herbert of Cherbury Before Deism: The Early Reception of the De veritate.” Seventeenth Century 16.2 (2001): 217–238.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus. Outlines of Scepticism. Trans. Julia Anna and Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shagan, Ethan. “Beyond Good and Evil: Thinking with Moderates in Early Modern England.” Journal of British Studies 49.3 (2010): 488–513.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. Evans, G. Blakemore. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1974.Google Scholar
Shami, Jeanne. John Donne and Conformity in Crisis in the Late Jacobean Pulpit. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2003.Google Scholar
Shanahan, John. “The Indecorous Virtuoso: Margaret Cavendish’s Experimental Spaces.” Genre 35 (2002): 221–252.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Kevin. The Personal Rule of Charles I. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sherman, Anita Gilman. “Poland in the Cultural Imaginary of Early Modern England.” Journal of Early Modern Cultural Studies 15.1 (2015): 55–89.Google Scholar
Sherman, Anita Gilman. “The Sceptic’s Surrender: Believing Partly,” in The Routledge Companion to Shakespeare and Philosophy. Ed. Bourne, Craig and Bourne, Emily Caddick. London: Routledge, 2019. 350–359.Google Scholar
Sherman, Anita Gilman. Skepticism and Memory in Shakespeare and Donne. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Shore, Daniel. Milton and the Art of Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Silver, Victoria. “Liberal Theology and Sir Thomas Browne’s ‘Soft and Flexible’ Discourse.” ELR 20 (1990): 69–105.Google Scholar
Silver, Victoria. “The Obscure Script of Regicide: Ambivalence and Little Girls in Marvell’s Pastorals.” ELH 68.1 (2001): 29–55.Google Scholar
Sim, Stuart. Empires of Belief: Why We Need More Scepticism and Doubt in the Twenty-First Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Simon, David Carroll. “Andrew Marvell and the Epistemology of Carelessness.” ELH 82.2 (2015): 553–588.Google Scholar
Skelton, John. The Book of The Laurel. Ed. Brownlow, F. W.. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Skulsky, Harold. “Spenser’s Despair Episode and the Theology of Doubt.” Modern Philology 78.3 (1981): 227–242.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Thomas P., ed. Ideology and Politics on the Eve of Restoration: Newcastle’s Advice to Charles II. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society, 1984.Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, Peter. The Art of Philosophy. Trans. Karen Margolis. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Smith, Hilda L. “‘A General War amongst the Men but None amongst the Women’: Political Differences between Margaret and William Cavendish,” in Politics and the Political Imagination in Later Stuart Britain. Ed. Howard Nenner. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 1997. 143–160.Google Scholar
Smith, Nigel. Andrew Marvell: The Chameleon. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Smith, Nigel. “The Charge of Atheism and the Language of Radical Speculation, 1640–1660,” in Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment. Ed. Hunter, Michael and Wootton, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. 131–158.Google Scholar
Smith, Plínio Junqueira, and Charles, Sébastien, eds. Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
Sommerville, C. John. The Secularization of Early Modern England: From Religious Culture to Religious Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul, ed. The Cambridge Companion to William of Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. The Works of Edmund Spenser: A Variorum Edition. Ed. Greenlaw, Edwin, et al. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. The Yale Edition of the Shorter Poems of Edmund Spenser. Ed. Oram, William A., Bjorvand, Einar, Bond, Ronald, Cain, Thomas H., Dunlop, Alexander, and Schell, Richard. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo. “Linguistic Perspectivism in the Don Quijote,” in Linguistics and Literary History: Essays in Stylistics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1948. 41–86.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Michael. Metaphor and Musical Thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Ellen. Satisfying Skepticism: Embodied Knowledge in the Early Modern World. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2001.Google Scholar
Spruit, Leen. Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Srigley, Michael. The Probe of Doubt: Scepticism and Illusion in Shakespeare’s Plays. Vol. 113 of Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Upsala: Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia, 2000.Google Scholar
Stark, Ryan J. “From Mysticism to Skepticism: Stylistic Reform in Seventeenth-Century British Philosophy and Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34.4 (2001): 322–334.Google Scholar
Stephens, Walter. Demon Lovers: Witchcraft, Sex, and the Crisis of Belief. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Jane. “Women and the Cultural Politics of Printing.” The Seventeenth Century 24.2 (2009): 205–237.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Jay. “The Mechanist-Vitalist Soul of Margaret Cavendish.” Studies in English Literature 36.3 (1996): 527–543.Google Scholar
Stocker, Margarita. Apocalyptic Marvell: The Second Coming in Seventeenth-Century Poetry. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Stoll, Abraham. Milton and Monotheism. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stoll, Abraham. “Milton Stages Cherbury: Revelation and Polytheism in Samson Agonistes,” in Altering Eyes: New Perspectives on Samson Agonistes. Ed. Kelley, Mark R. and Wittreich, Joseph. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2002. 281–306.Google Scholar
Strier, Richard. “Shakespeare and the Skeptics.” Religion and Literature 32.2 (2000): 171–195.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “The Mechanisms of Cognition: Ockham on Mediating Species,” in The Cambridge Companion to William of Ockham. Ed. Paul Spade, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 168–203.Google Scholar
Sugimura, Noel K. “Marvell’s Mind and the Glow-worms of Extinction.” The Review of English Studies ns 62.254 (2010): 241–260.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Mihoko. “The Essay Form as Critique: Reading Cavendish’s The World’s Olio through Montaigne and Bacon (and Adorno).” Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism 22.3 (1999): 1–16.Google Scholar
Tachau, Katherine H. “The Problem of the species in medio at Oxford in the Generation after Ockham.” Mediaeval Studies 44.1 (1982): 394–443.Google Scholar
Targoff, Ramie. John Donne, Body and Soul. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Tartamella, Suzanne M. Rethinking Shakespeare’s Skepticism. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Teskey, Gordon. “‘And therefore as a stranger give it welcome’: Courtesy and Thinking.” Spenser Studies 18 (2003): 343–359.Google Scholar
Teskey, Gordon. “Thinking Moments in The Faerie Queene.” Spenser Studies 22 (2007): 103–125.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. “Heidegger’s Aesthetics,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019. plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger-aesthetics/ (accessed September 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. University Records and Life in the Middle Ages. New York: Columbia University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Townsend, Dabney. Aesthetic Objects and Works of Art. Wolfeboro, NH: Longwood Academic, 1989.Google Scholar
Trierweiler, Denis, ed. Hans Blumenberg: Anthropologie philosophique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2010.Google Scholar
Trinkaus, Charles Edward, and Oberman, Heiko Augustinus. The Pursuit of Holiness in Late Medieval and Renaissance Religion. Leiden: Brill, 1974.Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Rachel. “The Reenchantment of Utopia and the Female Monarchical Self: Margaret Cavendish’s Blazing World.” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 11.2 (1992): 229–245.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. “Scepticism and Toleration in the Seventeenth Century,” in Justifying Toleration: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives. Ed. Mendus, Susan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 21–35.Google Scholar
Utz, Richard J. Literary Nominalism and the Theory of Rereading Late Medieval Texts. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Utz, Richard J. “Negotiating the Paradigm: Literary Nominalism and the Theory and Practice of Rereading Late Medieval Texts,” in Literary Nominalism and The Theory of Rereading Late Medieval Texts: A New Research Paradigm. Ed. Utz, Richard J.. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1995. 1–30.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Henry G. The Problem of Certainty in English Thought, 1630–1690. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1963.Google Scholar
Vergil, . The Aeneid. Trans. Ruden, Sarah. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Von Maltzahn, Nicholas. “The War in Heaven and the Miltonic Sublime,” in A Nation Transformed. Ed. Houston, Alan and Pincus, Steve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 154–179.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P. The Ancient Theology: Studies in Christian Platonism from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Walker, Julia M. “John Donne’s ‘The Extasie’ as an Alchemical Process.” ELN 20.1 (1982): 1–8.Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra. “The Reformation and ‘The Disenchantment of the World’ Reassessed.” The Historical Journal 51.2 (2008): 497–528.Google Scholar
Walters, Lisa. Margaret Cavendish: Gender, Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Walwyn, William. The Writings of William Walwyn. Ed. McMichael, Jack R. and Taft, Barbara. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. The Revolution of the Saints: A Study in the Origins of Radical Politics. New York: Atheneum, 1974.Google Scholar
Warnke, Frank. “The Meadow-sequence in Upon Appleton House: Questions of Tone and Meaning,” in Approaches to Marvell. Ed. Patrides, C. A.. London: Routledge, 1978. 234–250.Google Scholar
Watson, Robert N. Back to Nature: The Green and the Real in the Late Renaissance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Watson, Robert N. The way to true happiness leading to the gate of knowledge. London, 1610.Google Scholar
Weaver, Richard M. Ideas Have Consequences. 1948. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Trans. and Ed. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Werhane, Patricia H. Skepticism, Rules, and Private Languages. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Katie. Mad Madge: Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle, Royalist, Writer & Romantic. New York: Basic Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Wiley, Margaret L. The Subtle Knot: Creative Scepticism in Seventeenth-Century England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bryan R. Religion in Secular Society: Fifty Years On. Ed. Bruce, Steve. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. “Two Opponents of Material Atomism: Cavendish and Leibniz,” in Leibniz and the English-Speaking World. Ed. Phemister, Pauline and Brown, Stuart. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. 35–50.Google Scholar
Wilson, Miranda. “Building a Perfect Silence: The Use of Renaissance Architecture in Margaret Cavendish’s Bell in Campo.” 1650–1850: Ideas, Aesthetics, and Inquiries in the Early Modern Era 10 (2004): 245–264.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. On Certainty. Trans. Denis Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Harper, 1972.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., and Schulte, Joachim. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Zettel. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph. “On Mr. Milton’s Paradise Lost,” in Approaches to Marvell. Ed. C. A. Patrides. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978. 280–305.Google Scholar
Wittreich, Joseph. Shifting Contexts: Reinterpreting Samson Agonistes. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wittwer, Roland. “Sextus Empiricus’ Outlines of Pyrrhonism in the Middle Ages.” Vivarium 54.4 (2016): 255–285.Google Scholar
Wood, Andy. The Politics of Social Conflict: The Peak Country, 1520–1770. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. The Essays of Virginia Woolf. Ed. Clarke, Stuart N.. Vol. VI. London: The Hogarth Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. Literature and Politics in Cromwellian England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. “The Question of Secularization,” in A Nation Transformed. Ed. Houston, Alan and Pincus, Steve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 20–40.Google Scholar
Worsley, Lucy. Cavalier: A Tale of Chivalry, Passion and Great Houses. New York: Bloomsbury, 2007.Google Scholar
Yoshinaka, Takashi. Marvell’s Ambivalence: Religion and the Politics of Imagination in Mid-Seventeenth-Century England. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2011.Google Scholar
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. “William Ockham and Mental Language,” in Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy. Ed. Henrik Lagerlund, . Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2006. 101–116.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Zerba, Michelle. Doubt and Skepticism in Antiquity and the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Zukofsky, Louis. Bottom: On Shakespeare. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Zweig, Stefan. The Right to Heresy: Castellio against Calvin. Trans. Eden and Cedar Paul. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1951.Google Scholar