Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- List of sign language abbreviations
- Notational conventions
- 1 Introduction
- I HISTORY AND TRANSMISSION
- II SHARED CROSSLINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS
- 8 Notation systems
- 9 Verb agreement in sign language morphology
- 10 Functional markers in sign languages
- 11 Clause structure
- 12 Factors that form classifier signs
- 13 Handshape contrasts in sign language phonology
- 14 Syllable structure in sign language phonology
- 15 Grammaticalization in sign languages
- 16 The semantics–phonology interface
- 17 Nonmanuals: their grammatical and prosodic roles
- III VARIATION AND CHANGE
- Notes
- References
- Index
9 - Verb agreement in sign language morphology
from II - SHARED CROSSLINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- List of sign language abbreviations
- Notational conventions
- 1 Introduction
- I HISTORY AND TRANSMISSION
- II SHARED CROSSLINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS
- 8 Notation systems
- 9 Verb agreement in sign language morphology
- 10 Functional markers in sign languages
- 11 Clause structure
- 12 Factors that form classifier signs
- 13 Handshape contrasts in sign language phonology
- 14 Syllable structure in sign language phonology
- 15 Grammaticalization in sign languages
- 16 The semantics–phonology interface
- 17 Nonmanuals: their grammatical and prosodic roles
- III VARIATION AND CHANGE
- Notes
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Verb agreement is a topic that has received much attention in the sign language literature. Figure 9.1 shows what is often called “verb agreement” in the literature. This phenomenon has been noted in many signed languages.
The two signs, taken from American Sign Language (ASL), both describe a person asking another person. The difference lies in which of the two persons is asking the other. In the absence of prior context, the first sign means I asked someone while the second sign means someone asked me. They differ only in the orientation and direction of movement; in the first example, the hand is oriented and moves away from the signer's body, and in the other, it is oriented and moves in the opposite direction, toward the body. Such changes in the orientation and direction of movement are linked to the change in meaning described above. The phenomenon has several properties in almost all of the sign languages documented to date that make it look different from verb agreement in spoken languages.
For a working definition of agreement, the chapter follows Corbett's (2006) criteria for canonical agreement. He starts with a broad definition from Steele (1978: 610): “the term agreement commonly refers to some systematic covariance between a semantic or formal property of one element and a formal property of another.” Then, he distinguishes four necessary aspects of agreement – controller, target, domain and feature – and defines each as follows:
(1) Corbett's (2006: 4) definitions of aspects of agreement
controller: “element which determines agreement”
target: “element whose form is determined by agreement”
domain: “syntactic environment in which agreement occurs”
feature: “respect in which there is agreement”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sign Languages , pp. 173 - 196Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
- 34
- Cited by