
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 La France Profonde? News and Political Information in the Village
- 2 From Émotion Populaire to Seditious Words: Rural Protest in the Ancien Régime
- 3 Bringing Them into the Fold: The Struggle against Ignorance and Dissent in the French Revolution
- 4 “Long Live Louis XVII”: The Prosecution of Seditious Speech during the French Revolution
- 5 Tricksters, Dupes, and Drunkards: Truth and Untruth in the Search for Rural Political Opinion
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - Tricksters, Dupes, and Drunkards: Truth and Untruth in the Search for Rural Political Opinion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 La France Profonde? News and Political Information in the Village
- 2 From Émotion Populaire to Seditious Words: Rural Protest in the Ancien Régime
- 3 Bringing Them into the Fold: The Struggle against Ignorance and Dissent in the French Revolution
- 4 “Long Live Louis XVII”: The Prosecution of Seditious Speech during the French Revolution
- 5 Tricksters, Dupes, and Drunkards: Truth and Untruth in the Search for Rural Political Opinion
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
A skeptic might well ask at this point how we can presume to know, on the basis of the public transcript alone, whether this performance is genuine or not. … The answer is, surely, that we cannot know how contrived or imposed the performance is unless we can speak, as it were, to the performer offstage, out of this particular power-laden context, or unless the performer suddenly declares openly, on stage, that the performances we have previously observed were just a pose.
James Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden TranscriptsCriminal records can never be simple windows into the past.
Edward Muir and Guido Ruggiero, History from CrimeFaced with reports of verbal dissent emanating from all points of the nation, revolutionary authorities responded by specifying the circumstances under which counterrevolutionary talk could be prosecuted in the courts. Initially, and long before the fall of the monarchy, legislators simply substituted the concept of nation for that of king in the crime of lèse-majesté, creating a supreme court, the Haute Cour nationale, to deal with a form of treason now referred to as lèse-nation. The concept was in fact not new: a form of lèse-majesté against the public good had been described in earlier centuries, but the Haute Cour was not designed to deal with the volume and variety of dissent that would emerge in the months and years that followed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Show of Hands for the RepublicOpinion, Information, and Repression in Eighteenth-Century Rural France, pp. 172 - 206Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2014