Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Lists of illustrations and maps
- Acknowledgements
- Note on transliterations
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Shiism in the Ottoman Empire: between confessional ambiguity and administrative pragmatism
- 2 The invention of Lebanon: Ottoman governance in the coastal highlands, 1568–1636
- 3 Mount Lebanon under Shiite rule: the Hamada ‘emirate’, 1641–1685
- 4 The reshaping of authority: the Shiites and the state in crisis, 1685–1699
- 5 Jabal ‘Amil in the Ottoman period: the origins of ‘south Lebanon’, 1666–1781
- 6 From dependence to redundancy: the decline of Shiite rule in Tripoli and the Bekaa, 1699–1788
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization
3 - Mount Lebanon under Shiite rule: the Hamada ‘emirate’, 1641–1685
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Lists of illustrations and maps
- Acknowledgements
- Note on transliterations
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Shiism in the Ottoman Empire: between confessional ambiguity and administrative pragmatism
- 2 The invention of Lebanon: Ottoman governance in the coastal highlands, 1568–1636
- 3 Mount Lebanon under Shiite rule: the Hamada ‘emirate’, 1641–1685
- 4 The reshaping of authority: the Shiites and the state in crisis, 1685–1699
- 5 Jabal ‘Amil in the Ottoman period: the origins of ‘south Lebanon’, 1666–1781
- 6 From dependence to redundancy: the decline of Shiite rule in Tripoli and the Bekaa, 1699–1788
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization
Summary
The Shiite Hamadas of Mt Lebanon were never invested with a sancak-beğlik, nor were they referred to as ‘emirs’ in contemporary local sources. Yet for a time in the later seventeenth century, the family controlled a territory that stretched from Safita in modern-day Syria to the Futuh district in the mountains above Jubayl, south-east of Tripoli. They retained some of their tax farms until 1763, when they were evicted by the Druze emirs of Sidon, the Shihabis, and went with their affiliated clans into exile on the other side of Mt Lebanon in the Bekaa Valley. The Imami community has all but disappeared from the region of Tripoli today, and the Hamadas never became as renowned as the Harfush emirs of Baalbek or the scholar families of Jabal ‘Amil. Yet the archival and literary records of their rise to power, their regular contact with the state authorities and their turbulent rapport with their local subjects and rivals mark the history of the Hamada ‘emirate’ as the best documented of any Shiite group in the Ottoman Empire.
The Hamadas were probably the single most important feudal power in the coastal highlands between the demise of Fakhr al-Din ibn Ma‘n in 1633 and the rise of the Shihabis in 1697.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Shiites of Lebanon under Ottoman Rule, 1516–1788 , pp. 58 - 87Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010