Book contents
- Sharing Freedom
- Sharing Freedom
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Editions, Translations, and Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Plural Beginnings
- 2 Rousseau’s Proposal
- 3 Revolutionary Republicanisms
- 4 The Paradox of Republican Emancipation
- 5 The Paradox of National Universalism
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
1 - Plural Beginnings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2024
- Sharing Freedom
- Sharing Freedom
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Editions, Translations, and Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Plural Beginnings
- 2 Rousseau’s Proposal
- 3 Revolutionary Republicanisms
- 4 The Paradox of Republican Emancipation
- 5 The Paradox of National Universalism
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 1 presents the debate about republicanism before the French Revolution. Montesquieu played an important part in this debate as he formulated the influential “scale thesis” according to which republicanism could not be adequate for a large country. Montesquieu raised a set of challenges to would-be republicans in France (the “motivation,” “unity,” and “epistemic” challenges). The rest of the chapter presents theoretical resources in different republican traditions (notably Italian, English, American) that informed the French republicans on key issues (conquest, freedom, commerce, institutions). This chapter retraces the context in which the myth of outdated republicanism was born, but also how the elitist and martial dimensions of the republican tradition shaped French republicanism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sharing FreedomRepublicanism and Exclusion in Revolutionary France, pp. 31 - 74Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024