Adelman, J., “‘Anger’s My Meat’: Feeding, Dependency, and Aggression in Coriolanus”. In Shakespeare: Pattern of Excelling Nature, eds. Bevington, David and Halio, Jay L. Newark: University of Delaware Press; London: Associated University Press, 1978, 108–24.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. Trans. E. F. N. Jephcott. London: Verso, 1978.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Negative Dialectics. Trans. E. B. Ashton. New York: Seabury Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Problems of Moral Philosophy. Ed. Schröder, Thomas. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Agamben, G., Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Trans. and Ed. Heller-Roazen, Daniel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Agamben, G., The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Trans. Patricia Dailey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle, , The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Bacon, F., The Major Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Badiou, A., Being and Event. Trans. Oliver Feltham. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar

Badiou, A., The Century. Trans. Alberto Toscano. Cambridge: Polity, 2007.Google Scholar

Badiou, A., In Praise of Love. Trans. Peter Bush. London: Serpent’s Tail, 2012.Google Scholar

Badiou, A., Metapolitics. Trans. Jason Barker. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar

Badiou, A., Plato’s Republic: A Dialogue in 16 Chapters. Trans. Susan Spitzer. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Badiou, B., “Rhapsody for the Theatre: A Short Philosophical Treatise”. Trans. Bruno Bosteels. Theatre Survey 49.2 (2008), 187–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badiou, A., Theory of the Subject. Trans. Bruno Bosteels. London: Continuum, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badiou, A., and Žižek, S., Philosophy in the Present. Ed. Engelmann, Peter. Trans. Peter Thomas and Alberto Toscano. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.Google Scholar

Bate, J., How the Classics Made Shakespeare. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Beckwith, S., Shakespeare and the Grammar of Forgiveness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, W., The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Trans. John Osborne. London: NLB, 1977.Google Scholar

Benjamin, W., Selected Writings. 4 vols. Ed. Jennings, Michael W.. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1996–2003.Google Scholar

Betteridge, T., Shakespearean Fantasy and Politics. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Bloom, H., Hamlet: Poem Unlimited. New York: Riverhead, 2003.Google Scholar

Bloom, H., Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. London: Fourth Estate, 1999.Google Scholar

Boitani, P., The Gospel According to Shakespeare. Trans. Vittorio Montemaggi and Rachel Jacoff. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.Google Scholar

The Book of Common Prayer: The Texts of 1549, 1559, and 1662. Ed. Cummings, Brian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Brecht, B., Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. Trans. John Willett. New York: Hill and Wang, 1964.Google Scholar

Buchanan, G., A Dialogue on the Law of Kingship among the Scots: A Critical Edition and Translation of George Buchan’s De Iure Regni apud Scotos Dialogus. Ed. Mason, Roger A. and Smith, Martin S.. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Burrow, C., Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Cartelli, T., “Jack Cade in the Garden: Class Consciousness and Class Conflict in 2 Henry VI”. In Enclosure Acts: Sexuality, Property, and Culture in Early Modern England, eds. Burt, Richard and Archer, John Michael. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994, 48–67.Google Scholar

Cavell, S., Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cobb, C. J., The Staging of Romance in Late Shakespeare: Text and Theatrical Technique. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Coleridge, S. T., Biographia Literaria. 2 vols. Eds. Engell, James and Bate, W. Jackson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, P., Sudden Shakespeare: The Shaping of Shakespeare’s Creative Thought. London: Athlone, 1996.Google Scholar

De Grazia, M., Hamlet without Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Derrida, J., The Gift of Death. Trans. David Wills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Derrida, J., Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

Dollimore, J., Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Reissued 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donne, J., Devotions upon Emergent Occasions. Ed. Raspa, Antony. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Donne, J., The Sermons of John Donne. 10 vols. Eds. Potter, George and Simpson, Evelyn. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1953–1962.Google Scholar

Doty, J. S., “Experiences of Authority in The Tempest”. In Fitter, Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners, 236–54.Google Scholar

Drakakis, J., “‘Fashion it thus’: Julius Caesar and the Politics of Theatrical Representation”. Shakespeare Survey 44 (1991), 65–74.Google Scholar

Duncombe, S., Ed., The Open Utopia. https://theopenutopia.org/full-text/introduction-open-utopia/ (accessed 14 September 2022).Google Scholar

Eckhart, M., Meister Eckhart: A Modern Translation. Trans. Raymond Bernard Blakney. New York: Harper Touchbooks, 1941.Google Scholar

Eckhart, M., Mesiter Eckhart: From Whom God Hid Nothing: Sermons, Writings and Sayings. Ed. O’Neal, David. Boston: Shambhala, 1996.Google Scholar

Elgendy, R., “Response to Martin Kavka”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elizabeth, I, Elizabeth I: Collected Works. Eds. Marcus, Leah S., Mueller, Janel, and Rose, Mary Beth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

The English Bible, King James Version: The New Testament and the Apocrypha. Eds. Hammond, Gerald and Busch, Austin. Norton Critical Editions. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.Google Scholar

The English Bible, King James Version: The Old Testament. Ed. Marks, Herbert. Norton Critical Editions. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.Google Scholar

“An Exhortation Concerning Good Order, and Obedience to Rulers and Magistrates”. Ed. Ian Lancashire. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1994; HTML version, The Anglican Library, 1999. Available at www.anglicanlibrary.org/homilies/bk2hom21.htm (accessed 24 November 2021).Google Scholar

Felperin, H., “Political Criticism at the Crossroads: The Utopian Historicism of The Tempest”. In The Tempest, ed. Wood, Nigel. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995, 29–66.Google Scholar

Fernie, E., Shakespeare for Freedom: Why the Plays Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernie, E., Shame in Shakespeare. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Fernie, E., ed., Spiritual Shakespeares. London: Routledge, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisch, H., The Biblical Presence in Shakespeare, Milton, and Blake. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitter, C., Majesty and the Masses in Shakespeare and Marlowe. New York: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar

Fitter, C., Radical Shakespeare: Politics and Stagecraft in the Early Career. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Fitter, C., ed., Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners: Digesting the New Social History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber, M., Shakespeare After All. New York: Anchor, 2004.Google Scholar

The Geneva Bible: A Facsimile of the 1560 Edition. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2021.Google Scholar

Gibson, A., Beckett and Badiou: The Pathos of Intermittency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Girard, R., A Theater of Envy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Goddard, H. C., The Meaning of Shakespeare. 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Goldberg, J., James I and the Politics of Literature: Jonson, Shakespeare, Donne, and their Contemporaries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S., Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S., “Murdering Peasants: Status, Genre, and the Representation of Rebellion”. Representations 1 (1983), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenblatt, S., Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurr, A., and Ichikawa, M., Staging in Shakespeare’s Theatres. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadfield, A., Shakespeare and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, A., Shakespeare and the Homilies: And Other Pieces of Research into the Elizabethan Drama. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1934.Google Scholar

Hazlitt, W., Characters of Shakespear’s Plays and Lectures on the English Poets. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. 2 vols. Trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., The Phenomenology of Mind. 2nd ed. Trans. J. B. Baillie. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1961.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hill, C., Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution Revisited. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, C., “The Many-Headed Monster in Late Tudor and Early Stuart Political Thinking”. In From the Renaissance to the Counter-Reformation: Essays in Honour of Garrett Mattingly, ed. Carter, Charles H.. London: Jonathan Cape, 1966, 296–324.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T., Hobbes: Leviathan: Revised Student Edition. Ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Höfele, A., No Hamlets: German Shakespeare from Nietzsche to Carl Schmitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holbrook, P., “The Left and King Lear”. Textual Practice 14.2 (2000), 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“An Homilie against Disobedience and Wilfull Rebellion”. Ed. Ian Lancashire. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1994; HTML version, The Anglican Library, 1999. Available at www.anglicanlibrary.org/homilies/bk2hom21.htm (accessed 24 November 2021).Google Scholar

Höpfl, H., Ed., Luther and Calvin on Secular Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hulme, P., Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean, 1492–1797. London: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar

Hutson, L., The Invention of Suspicion: Law and Mimesis in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutson, L., “Noises Off: Participatory Justice in 2 Henry VI”. In The Law in Shakespeare, eds. Jordan, Constance and Cunningham, Karen. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2007, 143–66.Google Scholar

James VI and I, King James VI and I: Political Writings. Ed. Sommerville, Johann P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Johnston, A., Badiou, Žižek, and Political Transformations: The Cadence of Change. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantorowicz, E., The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Kavka, M., “A Mystic Conception of History: Negative Political Theology in Jacob Taubes”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keats, J., Selected Letters of John Keats. Ed. Scott, Grant F.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S., Fear and Trembling and The Sickness unto Death. Trans. Walter Lowrie. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S., Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Trans. David F. Swenson and Walter Lowrie. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1941.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S., Philosophical Fragments, Johannes Climacus. Ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S., Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits. Ed. and trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Knight, G. W., The Imperial Theme: Further Interpretations of Shakespeare’s Tragedies Including the Roman Plays. 3rd ed. London: Methuen, 1951.Google Scholar

Knowles, R., “The Farce of History: Miracle, Combat, and Rebellion in 2 ‘Henry VI’”. Yearbook of English Studies 21 (1991), 168–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kojève, A., Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. Trans. James H. Nichols, Jr. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R., Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Trans. Keith Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Kuzner, J., Shakespeare as a Way of Life: Skeptical Practice and the Politics of Weakness. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Longstaffe, S., “The Plebeians Revise the Uprising: What the Actors Made of Shakespeare’s Jack Cade – Or, Laughing with the English Radical Tradition”. In Fitter, Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners, 124–45.Google Scholar

Luke, N., “Avoidance as Love: Evading Cavell on Dover Cliff”. Modern Philology 117.4 (2020), 445–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luke, N., “A Lawful Magic: New Worlds of Precedent in Mabo and The Winter’s Tale”. In Shakespeare Survey 73: Shakespeare and the City, ed. Smith, Emma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, 129–44.Google Scholar

Luke, N., Shakespearean Arrivals: The Birth of Character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machiavelli, N., Discourses on Livy. Trans. Julia Conaway Bondanella and Peter Bondanella. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N., The Prince. Trans. Tim Parks. N.p.: Penguin Classics, 2014.Google Scholar

Marshall, C., Last Things and Late Plays: Shakespearean Eschatology. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Montaigne, M., Essays. 3 vols. Trans. John Florio. London: Dent, 1980.Google Scholar

Mooney, E. F., “The Intimate Agency of Death”. In Kierkegaard and Death, ed. Stokes, Patrick and Buben, Adam J. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011, 133–49.Google Scholar

More, T., Utopia. In Three Early Modern Utopias: Utopia, New Atlantis, and The Isle of Pines. Ed. Bruce, Susan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Mullaney, S., The Reformation of Emotions in the Age of Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munro, I., The Figure of the Crowd in Early Modern England. New York: Palgrave, 2005.Google Scholar

Nancy, J., The Ground of the Image. Trans. Jeff Fort. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Newheiser, D., “Desacralizing Political Theology: Dionysius the Areopagite and Giorgio Agamben”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newheiser, D., Hope in a Secular Age: Deconstruction, Negative Theology, and the Future of Faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newheiser, D., “Why the World Needs Negative Political Theology”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norbrook, D., “Rehearsing the Plebeians: Coriolanus and the Reading of Roman History”. In Fitter, Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners, 180–216.Google Scholar

Palfrey, S., Late Shakespeare: A New World of Words. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.Google Scholar

Palfrey, S., and Stern, T., Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, B. L., “‘A Thing Unfirm’: Plato’s Republic and Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar”. Shakespeare Quarterly 44.1 (1993), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, A., Shakespeare and the Popular Voice. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Plato, Plato: Complete Works. Ed. Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar

Plutarch, Plutarch: Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. Ed. Clough, Arthur Hugh. Oxford: Benediction Classics, 2015.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagite, The Divine Names and Mystical Theology. Trans. John D. Jones. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Rollison, D., “Shakespeare’s Commonwealth”. In Fitter, Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners, 64–83.Google Scholar

Ryan, K., “Shakespearean Comedy and Romance: The Utopian Imagination”. In Shakespeare’s Romances, ed. Thorne, Alison. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2003, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, K., Shakespearean Tragedy. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, K., “Shakespeare’s Inhumanity”. Shakespeare Survey 66 (2013), 220–31.Google Scholar

Sawday, J., Engines of the Imagination: Renaissance Culture and the Rise of the Machine. London: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schalkwyk, D., Shakespeare, Love and Service. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, S., Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaheen, N., Biblical References in Shakespeare’s Plays. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, W., Henry VI: Part Two. Ed. Warren, Roger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, W., The Norton Shakespeare. 3rd ed. Ed. Greenblatt, Stephen et al. New York: W. W. Norton, 2016.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, W., The Tempest. Ed. Orgel, Stephen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Sidney, P., The Major Works. Ed. Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Smith, T., De Republica Anglorum. Ed. Deward, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Ambrose, St, Ambrose: De Officiis. Trans. and ed. Davidson, Ivor J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Online edition.Google Scholar

States, B. O., Great Reckonings in Little Rooms: On the Phenomenology of Theater. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stirling, B., “Shakespeare’s Mob Scenes: A Reinterpretation”. Huntington Library Quarterly 8.3 (1945), 213–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strier, R., “Faithful Servants: Shakespeare’s Praise of Disobedience”. In The Historical Renaissance: New Essays on Tudor and Stuart Literature and Culture, ed. Dubrow, Heather and Strier, Richard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988, 104–33.Google Scholar

Strier, R., “King Lear and Social Security”. Raritan 40.2 (Fall 2020), 63–72.Google Scholar

Strong, T. B., “Seeing the Sovereign: Theatricality and Representation in Hobbes”. In Letting Be: Fred Dallmayr’s Cosmopolitical Vision, ed. Schneck, Stephen F.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006, 33–54.Google Scholar

Tillyard, E. M. W., The Elizabethan World Picture. New York: Macmillan, 1950.Google Scholar

Tupper, F., Jr., “The Shaksperean Mob”. PMLA, 27.4 (1912), 486–523.Google Scholar

Weil, S., Gravity and Grace. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Weil, S., Simone Weil: An Anthology. Ed. Miles, Siân. London: Penguin, 2005.Google Scholar

Wiegandt, K., Crowd and Rumour in Shakespeare. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar

Williams, R., “Response to Amy Hollywood”. Modern Theology 36.1 (2020), 53–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, R., “‘Is this a Holiday?’: Shakespeare’s Roman Carnival”. ELH 54.1 (1987), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witmore, M., Shakespearean Metaphysics. London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar

Wolin, R., Walter Benjamin: An Aesthetic of Redemption. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, C., “Event or Exception?: Disentangling Badiou from Schmitt, or, Towards a Politics of the Void”. Theory and Event 11.2 (2008).Google ScholarPubMed

Žižek, S., In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso, 2008.Google Scholar

Žižek, S., The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Žižek, S., Violence. New York: Picador, 2008.Google Scholar