Adelman, Janet. The Common Liar: An Essay on “Antony and Cleopatra.” New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Adelman, Janet. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays from Hamlet to The Tempest. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. Aesthetic Theory. Translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. Translated by E. F. N. Jephcott. London: New Left Books, 1974.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor. Negative Dialectics. Translated by E. B. Ashton. New York: Continuum, 1983.Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Alpers, Paul. What Is Pastoral? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. For Marx. Translated by Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis, with Balibar, Étienne. Reading Capital. Translated by Ben Brewster. London: Verso, 1979.Google Scholar

Ariès, Philippe. Western Attitudes toward Death: From the Middle Ages to the Present. Translated by Patricia M. Ranum. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Poetics. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard. New York: Random House, 1941.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Eric. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, New Edition. Translated by Willard R. Trask. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Translated by Helene Iswolsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968. Translation of Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable. Moscow: Khudozhestvennia literatura, 1965.Google Scholar

Barber, C. L. “The Family in Shakespeare’s Development: Tragedy and Sacredness.” In Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays, edited by Schwartz, Murray M. and Kahn, Coppélia, 188–202. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Barber, C. L. Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy: A Study of Dramatic Form and Its Relation to Social Custom (1959). Reprinted Cleveland, OH: Meridian, 1963.Google Scholar

Barroll, J. Leeds. “Shakespeare and Roman History.” Modern Language Review 53, no. 3 (July 1958): 327–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bate, Jonathan. How the Classics Made Shakespeare. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. The Arcades Project. Translated by Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. “On the Concept of History.” In Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, edited by Eiland, Howard and Jennings, Michael W., vol. 4, 1938–1940, 389–400. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Translated by John Osborne. London: New Left Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ernst. “Ideas as Transformed Material in Human Minds, or Problems of an Ideological Superstructure (Cultural Heritage).” In The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays, translated by Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg, 18–71. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ernst. A Philosophy of the Future. Translated by John Cumming. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ernst. The Principle of Hope. 3 vols. Translated by Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986. Translation of Das Prinzip Hoffnung, 1954–59.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ernst, and Adorno, Theodor. “Something’s Missing: A Discussion between Ernst Bloch and Theodor W. Adorno on the Contradictions of Utopian Longing,” moderated by Horst Krüger. In The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays, translated by Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg, 1–17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ernst. The Spirit of Utopia (1918). Translated by Anthony A. Nassar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ernst. The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays. Translated by Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold. “An Essay by Harold Bloom.” In William Shakespeare: Antony and Cleopatra, edited by Raffel, Burton, 201–06. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Boggs, Carl. Gramsci’s Marxism. London: Pluto, 1976.Google Scholar

Bono, Barbara. Literary Transvaluation: From Vergilian Epic to Shakespearean Tragicomedy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Bristol, Michael. Carnival and Theater: Plebeian Culture and the Structure of Authority in Renaissance England. New York: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar

Bristol, Michael. “In Search of the Bear: Spatiotemporal Form and the Heterogeneity of Economies in The Winter’s Tale.” Shakespeare Quarterly 42, no. 2 (Summer 1991): 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buck-Morss, Susan. The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Buck-Morss, Susan. The Origins of Negative Dialectics: Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, and the Frankfurt Institute. New York: Free Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, Jacob. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. Translated by S. C. G. Middlemore. London: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar

Burton, Robert. The Anatomy of Melancholy. 6 vols. Edited by Faulkner, Thomas C., Kiessling, Nicolas K., and Blair, Rhonda L.. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989–2003.Google Scholar

Carroll, Antony J. “Disenchantment, Rationality and the Modernity of Max Weber.” Forum Philosophicum 16, no. 1 (Spring 2011): 117–37.Google Scholar

Carroll, William C., ed. William Shakespeare, Macbeth: Texts and Contexts. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1999.Google Scholar

Casey, Jim. “Dying Like a Man: Masculinity and Violence in Macbeth.” In Macbeth: Critical Insights, edited by Weber, William W., 130–45. Ipswich, MA: Grey House, 2017.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. Disowning Knowledge: In Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Chalk, Darryl. “‘Make Me Not Sighted Like the Basilisk’: Vision and Contagion in The Winter’s Tale.” In Embodied Cognition and Shakespeare’s Theatre: The Early Modern Body–Mind, edited by Johnson, Laurie, Sutton, John, and Tribble, Evelyn, 111–32. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Charnes, Linda. “What’s Love Got to Do With It? Reading the Liberal Humanist Romance in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra.” Textual Practice 6, no. 1 (Spring 1992): 1–16.Google Scholar

Charney, Maurice. “Style in the Roman Plays.” In Twentieth Century Interpretations of “Antony and Cleopatra”: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Rose, Mark, 15–22. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar

Cheney, Patrick. “Perdita, Pastorella, and the Romance of Literary Form: Shakespeare’s Counter-Spenserian Authorship.” In Shakespeare and Spenser: Attractive Opposites, edited by Lethbridge, J. B., 121–42. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Clark, Sandra, and Mason, Pamela. Introduction to Macbeth, by William Shakespeare. The Arden Shakespeare Third Series. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

Crignon-De Oliveira, Claire. “Is There a Melancholic Gaze? From Visual Distemper to Visionary Fancy.” Journal of European Studies 33, no. 3–4 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0047244103040415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crum, Maddie. “Nude, All-Women Production of Shakespeare’s ‘The Tempest’ Honors Free Expression.” Huffpost. Huffpost, May 20, 2016. www.huffpost.com/entry/nude-all-women-shakespeare_n_573f78a1e4b045cc9a710e0c.Google Scholar

Danby, John. “The Shakespearean Dialectic: An Aspect of ‘Antony and Cleopatra.’” Scrutiny 16 (1949): 196–213.Google Scholar

Deats, Sara Munson, ed. “Antony and Cleopatra”: New Critical Essays. New York: Routledge, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deats, Sara Munson. “Shakespeare’s Anamorphic Drama: A Survey of Antony and Cleopatra in Criticism, on Stage, and on Screen.” In “Antony and Cleopatra”: New Critical Essays, edited by Sara Munson Deats, 1–93. New York: Routledge, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Quincey, Thomas. “On the Knocking on the Gate in Macbeth.” In The Collected Works of Thomas De Quincey, edited by David Masson. Vol. 10: 389–95.Google Scholar

Diehl, Huston. “Horrid Image, Sorry Sight, Fatal Vision: The Visual Rhetoric of Macbeth.” Shakespeare Studies 16 (1983): 191–203.Google Scholar

DiGangi, Mario. Introduction to The Winter’s Tale: Texts and Contexts, edited by DiGangi, Mario. Boston: Bedford/St/ Martin’s, 2008.Google Scholar

Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. 3rd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Donne, John. The First Anniversary: An Anatomie of the World. Vol. 6 of The Variorum Edition of the Poetry of John Donne, gen ed. Stringer, Gary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Donne, John. “The Sunne Rising.” In John Donne: Poetry and Prose, edited by Warnke, Frank, 10–11. New York: Modern Library, 1967.Google Scholar

Dowden, Edward. Shakspere: A Critical Study of His Mind and Art (1872). Reprinted New York: Capricorn, 1962.Google Scholar

Dowden, Edward Shakspere. New York: American Book Co., n.d. [1890?].Google Scholar

Drakakis, John, ed. Antony and Cleopatra: New Casebooks. New York: St. Martin’s, 1994.Google Scholar

Drakakis, John. Introduction to Antony and Cleopatra, edited by John Drakakis, 1–32. New York: St. Martin’s, 1994.Google Scholar

Drummonds, William. “Ben Jonson’s Literary Table-Talk (1619).” In English Renaissance Literary Criticism, edited by Brian Vickers, 528–36. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. William Shakespeare. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar

Empson, William. Some Versions of Pastoral. New York: New Directions, 1968.Google Scholar

Engels, Friedrich. “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (1892).” In The Marx-Engels Reader, edited by Tucker, Robert C., 605–39. New York: Norton, 1972.Google Scholar

Engle, Lars. “Montaigne’s Shakespeare: The Tempest as Test-Case.” In Shakespeare and Montaigne, edited by Engle, Lars, Gray, Patrick, and Hamlin, William. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Ewbank, Inga-Stina. “The Tragedy of Macbeth: A Genetic Text.” In The Collected Works, by Middleton, Thomas, edited by Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John, 1165–69. Oxford: Clarendon, 2007.Google Scholar

Fernie, Ewan. The Demonic: Literature and Experience. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Fitz, Linda. “Egyptian Queens and Male Reviewers: Sexist Attitudes in ‘Antony and Cleopatra’ Criticism.” Shakespeare Quarterly 28 (Summer 1977): 297–316.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan. New York: Harper Colophon, 1972.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, 1: An Introduction. Translated by Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage, 1990.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents. Translated by James Strachey. New York: Norton, 1962.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (1957). Reprinted New York: Atheneum, 1968.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International, 1992.Google Scholar

Gillies, John. Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Gracián, Baltasar. Agudeza y arte de ingenio (1642, 1648), edited by Correa Calderón, Evaristo. 2 vols. Madrid: Clásicos Castalia, 1969.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Jonathan. James I and the Politics of Literature: Jonson, Shakespeare, Donne, and Their Contemporaries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Jonathan. “Speculations: Macbeth and Source.” In Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology, edited by Howard, Jean E. and O’Connor, Marion F., 242–64. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar

Gordon, Colby. “‘A Diversity of Sounds, All Horrible’: The Political Aesthetics of Soundscapes in The Tempest.” In Political Aesthetics in the Era of Shakespeare, edited by Pye, Christopher, 241–65. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Gowland, Angus. “Melancholy, Imagination, and Dreaming in Renaissance Learning.” In Diseases of the Imagination and Imaginary Disease in the Early Modern Period, edited by Haskell, Yasmin, 53–102. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grady, Hugh. “Falstaff: Subjectivity between the Carnival and the Aesthetic.” Modern Language Review (UK) 96, no. 3 (July 2001): 609–23.Google Scholar

Grady, Hugh. John Donne and Baroque Allegory: The Aesthetics of Fragmentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grady, Hugh. “Moral Agency and Its Problems in Julius Caesar: Political Power, Choice, and History.” In Shakespeare and Moral Agency, edited by Bristol, Michael, 5–28. New York: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar

Grady, Hugh. “The Political, the Aesthetic, and the Utopian in The Tempest: A Shakespearean Dialectic Unfolded.” In Political Aesthetics in the Era of Shakespeare, edited by Pye, Christopher, 219–40. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Grady, Hugh. “Political Approaches to Shakespeare.” In The Shakespearean World, edited by Levenson, Jill L. and Ormsby, Robert, 527–41. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Grady, Hugh. “Rhetoric, Wit, and Art in Gracián’s Agudeza.” Modern Language Quarterly 41 (March 1980): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grady, Hugh, Shakespeare and Impure Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Grady, Hugh. “Shakespeare and Renaissance Aesthetics.” In The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare, edited by Smith, Bruce R., vol. 1, Shakespeare’s World, 1500–1660, 1021–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Grady, Hugh. Shakespeare, Machiavelli, and Montaigne: Power and Subjectivity from Richard II to Hamlet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Grady, Hugh. Shakespeare’s Universal Wolf: Studies in Early Modern Reification. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grady, Hugh. “Theory ‘After Theory’: Christopher Pye’s Reading of Othello.” Shakespeare Quarterly 60, no. 4 (Winter 2009): 453–59.Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio. “The Modern Prince.” In Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith, 125–205. New York: International, 1971.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen. Introduction to Macbeth, in The Norton Shakespeare, 3rd ed., 2714–17. New York: Norton, 2016.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen. Tyrant: Shakespeare on Politics. New York: Norton, 2018.Google Scholar

Greene, Roland. Five Words: Critical Semantics in the Age of Shakespeare and Cervantes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. On Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Hadfield, Andrew. Shakespeare and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Hall, Kim F. Things of Darkness: Economies of Race and Gender in Early Modern England. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Halpern, Richard. “The King’s Two Buckets: Kantorowicz, Richard II, and Fiscal Trauerspiel.” Representations 106, no. 1 (2009): 67–76.Google Scholar

Hammill, Graham, and Lupton, Julia Reinhard, eds. Political Theology and Early Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hanssen, Beatrice. Walter Benjamin’s Other History: Of Stones, Animals, Human Beings, and Angels. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Harris, Jonathan Gil. Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hawkes, Terence. “Telmah.” In That Shakespeherian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process, by Terence Hawkes, 92–119. London: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit (1807). Translated by J. B. Baillie. New York: Harper, 1967.Google Scholar

Heinemann, Margot. “‘Let Rome in Tiber Melt’: Order and Disorder in ‘Antony and Cleopatra.’” In Antony and Cleopatra, edited by John Drakakis, 166–81. New York: St. Martin’s, 1994.Google Scholar

Heller, Agnes. The Time Is Out of Joint: Shakespeare as Philosopher of History. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar

Herodotus. An Account of Egypt. Translated by G. C. Macauley. Project Gutenberg, 2006. www.gutenberg.org/files/2131/2131-h/2131-h.htm.Google Scholar

Höffele, Andreas. “Hamlet in Blettenberg: Carl Schmitt’s Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Survey 65 (2013): 378–97.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W.. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Translated by John Cumming. Boston: Seabury, 1972.Google Scholar

Howard, Jean. Introduction to Antony and Cleopatra, in The Norton Shakespeare, edited by Greenblatt, Stephen et al., 2633–42. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 2008.Google Scholar

Hulme, Peter. Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492–1797 (1986). Reprinted London and New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Sujata. Shades of Difference: Mythologies of Skin Color in Early Modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.Google Scholar

James, Heather. “The Politics of Display and the Anamorphic Subjects of Antony and Cleopatra.” In Shakespeare’s Late Tragedies: A Collection of Critical Essay., edited by Wofford, Susan, 208–34. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. Allegory and Ideology. London: Verso, 2019.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. “An American Utopia.” In An American Utopia: Dual Power and the Universal Army, edited by Zizek, Slovoj, 1–97. London: Verso, 2016.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. “Introduction/Prospectus: To Reconsider the Relationship of Marxism to Utopian Thought.” Minnesota Review 6 (1976): 53–58.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. Marxism and Form: Twentieth-Century Dialectical Theories of Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. “Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture.” Social Text 1 (Winter 1979): 130–48.Google Scholar

Jay, Martin. Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukács to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Jensen, Phebe. “Singing Psalms to Horn-Pipes: Festivity, Iconoclasm, and Catholicism in The Winter’s Tale.” Shakespeare Quarterly 55, no. 3 (Autumn 2004): 279–306.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben. Induction to Bartholomew Fair, edited by Hibbard, G. R.. New Mermaids. New York: Norton, 1996.Google Scholar

Joughin, John. “Shakespeare, Modernity, and the Aesthetic: Art, Truth and Judgement in The Winter’s Tale.” In Shakespeare and Modernity: Early Modern to Millennium, edited by Grady, Hugh, 61–84. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

Joughin, John, and Malpas, Simon, eds. The New Aestheticism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kahn, Coppélia. Roman Shakespeare: Warriors, Wounds, and Women. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Kahn, Victoria. “Hamlet or Hecuba: Carl Schmitt’s Decision.” Representations 83 (2003): 67–96.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, Ernst. The King’s Two Bodies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, James. “Shakespeare in Ideology.” In Alternative Shakespeares, edited by Drakakis, John, 144–65. London: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar

Knapp, James A. “Visual and Ethical Truth in The Winter’s Tale.” Shakespeare Quarterly 55, no. 3 (Fall 2004): 253–78.Google Scholar

Knight, G. Wilson. The Imperial Theme: Further Interpretations of Shakespeare’s Tragedies. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1931.Google Scholar

Krieger, Elliot. A Marxist Study of Shakespeare’s Comedies. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1979.Google Scholar

Lambert, Gregg. The Return of the Baroque in Modern Culture. New York: Continuum, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laroche, Rebecca, and Munroe, Jennifer. Shakespeare and Ecofeminist Theory. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2017.Google Scholar

Laroque, François. “‘Nature’s Bastards’: The Hybridity of The Winter’s Tale.” Shakespeare Studies (Japan) 55 (2017): 1–12.Google Scholar

Laroque, François. Shakespeare’s Festive World: Elizabethan Seasonal Entertainment and the Professional Stage. Translated by Janet Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Lewis, Wyndham. The Lion and the Fox: The Role of the Hero in the Plays of Shakespeare. London: G. Richard, 1927.Google Scholar

Logan, Sandra. Shakespeare’s Foreign Queens: Drama, Politics, and the Enemy Within. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar

Loomba, Ania. “‘Travelling Thoughts’: Theatre and the Space of the Other.” In Gender, Race, Renaissance Drama, by Ania Loomba, 119–42. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989. Reprinted in Antony and Cleopatra, edited by John Drakakis, 279–307. New York: St. Martin’s, 1994.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Philip. The Tears of Sovereignty: Perspectives of Power in Renaissance Drama. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Lupton, Julia. Citizen-Saints: Shakespeare and Political Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Lupton, Julia. “Creature Caliban.” Shakespeare Quarterly 51, no. 1 (Spring 2000): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupton, Julia Reinhard. “Shakespeare’s Sturm, Caliban’s Drang: Walter Benjamin and The Tempest.” In Political Aesthetics in the Era of Shakespeare, edited by Pye, Christopher, 267–86. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Macfie, Pamela Royston. “Interpreting the Weird Sisters: Page, Stage, and Screen.” In “Macbeth”: Critical Insights, edited by Weber, William W., 84–88. Ipswich, MA: Grey House, 2017.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince and Other Writings. Translated by Wayne A. Rebhorn. New York: Barnes and Noble, 2003.Google Scholar

Manheim, Michael. The Weak King Dilemma in the Shakespearean History Play. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Marcus, Leah. The Politics of Mirth: Jonson, Herrick, Milton, Marvell, and the Defense of Old Holiday Pastimes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. An Essay on Liberation. Boston: Beacon, 1969.Google Scholar

Markels, Julian. The Pillar of the World: “Antony and Cleopatra” in Shakespeare’s Development. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production, edited by Engels, Frederick. Translated by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. Vol. 1. New York: International, 1967.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International, 1963.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. The Communist Manifesto (1848). New York: Modern Reader Paperback, 1968.Google Scholar

McDowell, Sean. “The View from the Interior: The New Body Scholarship in Renaissance/Early Modern Studies.” Literature Compass 3, no. 4 (July 2006): 779–91.Google Scholar

McLuskie, Kathleen. “Macbeth, the Present, and the Past.” In The Tragedies, edited by Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E., 393–410. Vol. 1 of A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.Google Scholar

McLuskie, Kathleen. “The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure.” In Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism, edited by Dollimore, Jonathan and Sinfield, Alan, 88–108. Cornell, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Méndez, Sigmund. “Shakespeare’s Knowledge of Imagination.” Complutense Journal of English Studies 24 (2016): 61–87.Google Scholar

Middleton, Thomas. The Collected Works, edited by Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John. Oxford: Clarendon, 2007.Google Scholar

Miller, Nichole E. Violence and Grace: Exceptional Life Between Shakespeare and Modernity. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Montaigne, Michel de. “Chapter 30: Of the Caniballes.” Montaigne’s Essays. Translated by John Florio. Vol. 1. Renascence Editions, 1998. http://luminarium.org/renascence-editions/montaigne/1xxx.htm.Google Scholar

Montrose, Louis A. “Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture.” In The New Historicism, edited by Aram Veeser, H., 15–36. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Morley, Neville. The Roman Empire: Roots of Imperialism. London: Pluto, 2010.Google Scholar

Moses, Stéphane. “Walter Benjamin and Franz Rosenzweig.” In Benjamin: Philosophy, Aesthetics, History, edited by Smith, Gary, 228–46. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Mullaney, Steven. The Place of the Stage: License, Play and Power in Renaissance England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Neill, Michael. Introduction to Anthony and Cleopatra, by William Shakespeare. In The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Orgel, Stephen. The Illusion of Power: Political Theater in the English Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Orgel, Stephen. Introduction to The Tempest, by William Shakespeare, edited by Orgel, Stephen. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Orgel, Stephen. Introduction to The Winter’s Tale, by William Shakespeare, edited by Orgel, Stephen. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Orgel, Stephen. “The Poetics of Incomprehensibility.” Shakespeare Quarterly 42 (Winter 1991): 431–37.Google Scholar

Ornstein, Robert. “The Ethic of the Imagination: Love and Art in Antony and Cleopatra.” In Later Shakespeare, edited by Brown, John Russell and Harris, Bernard, 31–46. Stratford-upon-Avon Studies 8. London, 1966.Google Scholar

Ovid, , The Metamorphose. Translated by A. S. Kline. http://ovid.lib.virginia.edu/trans/Metamorph15.htm. Accessed 5 March, 2019.Google Scholar

Pascucci, Margherita. Philosophical Readings of Shakespeare: “Thou Art the Thing Itself.” London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar

Paster, Gail Kern. The Body Embarrassed: Drama and the Disciplines of Shame in Early Modern England. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Paster, Gail Kern. Humoring the Body: Emotions and the Shakespearean Stage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Pitcher, John. Introduction to The Winter’s Tale, by William Shakespeare, edited by Pitcher, John, 1–143. 3rd Series. London: The Arden Shakespeare, 2010.Google Scholar

Plutarch. “Parallel Lives, the Life of Marcus Antonius.” Translated by Thomas North (1579). In Shakespeare and His Sources, edited by Satin, Joseph, 575–611. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966.Google Scholar

Purkiss, Diane. The Witch in History: Early Modern and Twentieth-Century Representations. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Pye, Christopher, ed. Political Aesthetics in the Era of Shakespeare. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Pye, Christopher. “Against Schmitt: Law, Aesthetics, and Absolutism in Shakespeare’s Winter’s Tale.” South Atlantic Quarterly 108, no. 1 (2009): 197–217.Google Scholar

Pye, Christopher. “Introduction: Early Modern Political Aesthetics.” In Political Aesthetics in the Era of Shakespeare, edited by Pye, Christopher, 1–23. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Pye, Christopher. The Storm at Sea: Political Aesthetics in the Time of Shakespeare. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Rackin, Phyllis. “Shakespeare’s Boy Cleopatra, the Decorum of Nature and the Golden World of Poetry.” PMLA (March 1972), 201–12. Reprinted in Antony and Cleopatra, edited by John Drakakis, 78–100. New York: St. Martin’s, 1994.Google Scholar

Rancière, Jacques. Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Translated by Steven Corcoran. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Rancière, Jacques. Aisthesis: Scenes from the Aesthetic Regime of Art. Translated by Zakir Paul. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar

Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Translated by Gabriel Rockhill. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

Rebhorn, Wayne. “The Crisis of the Aristocracy in Julius Caesar.” Renaissance Quarterly 43 (1990): 75–111.Google Scholar

Ribner, Irving. “Political Issues in ‘Julius Caesar.’” Journal of English and German Philology 61, no. 1 (January 1957): 10–22.Google Scholar

Rochlitz, Rainer. The Disenchantment of Art: The Philosophy of Walter Benjamin. Translated by Jane Marie Todd. New York: Guilford, 1996.Google Scholar

Rokem, Freddie. “‘But a Storm Is Blowing from Paradise’/‘Aber ein Sturm weht vom Paradiese her’: Walter Benjamin and Shakespeare’s The Tempest.” Paper presented at the Conference on Shakespeare and Benjamin, University of London and Warburg Institute, London, November 2018.Google Scholar

Rollins, Lauren Leigh. “‘Republicans’ Behaving Badly: Anachronism, Monarchy, and the English Imperial Model in Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra.” Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 30 (2017): 165–80.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, Franz. The Star of Redemption. Translated by William H. White. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Ryan, Kiernan. Shakespeare. 3rd ed. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.Google Scholar

Ryan, Kiernan. Shakespeare’s Comedies. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar

Ryan, Kiernan. Shakespeare: The Last Plays. London: Longman,1999.Google Scholar

Ryan, Kiernan. Shakespeare’s Universality: Here’s Fine Revolution. London: Arden Shakespeare Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

Scaliger, Julius Caesar. Poetices Libri Septem. Excerpted and translated, Universidad de Zaragoza. Departamento filogia inglesa. www.unizar.es/departamentos/filologia_inglesa/garciala/hypercritica/03.Renaissance/Renaissance.3.2.html. Accessed 5 June, 2020.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations.” Translated by Matthias Konzett and John P. McCormick. Telos 96 (1993): 130–42.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Hamlet or Hecuba: The Intrusion of Time Into the Play. Translated by David Pan and Jennifer R. Rust. New York: Telos Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (1922; revised 1934). Translated by George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Schleifer, Ronald. A.J. Greimas and the Nature of Meaning: Linguistics, Semiotics and Discourse Theory. Routledge Library Editions: Literary Theory, v. 23 (1987). Reprint New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Segal, Hanna. “A Psychoanalytic Approach to Aesthetics.” In The Work of Hanna Segal: A Kleinian Approach to Clinical Practice, 185–206. New York: Jason Aronson, 1981.Google Scholar

Segarra, Santiago, Eisen, Mark, Egan, Gabriel, and Ribeiro, Alejandro. “Attributing the Authorship of the Henry VI Plays by Word Frequency.” Shakespeare Quarterly 67, no. 2 (Summer 2016): 232–56.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. Antony and Cleopatra, edited by Wilders, John. The Arden Shakespeare Third Series. London: Arden/Bloomsbury, 1995.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar, edited by David Hadfield, Andrew. New York: Barnes and Noble Shakespeare, 2007.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. Macbeth, edited by Clark, Sandra and Mason, Pamela. The Arden Shakespeare Third Series. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. The Norton Facsimile: The First Folio of Shakespeare. New York: Norton, 1996.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare: Based on the Oxford Edition, edited by Greenblatt, Stephen et al. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 2008.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare, edited by Greenblatt, Stephen et al. 3rd ed. New York: Norton, 2016.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Macbeth [adapted by Thomas Middleton for the King’s Men at the Blackfriars]. In The Collected Works, by Thomas Middleton, edited by Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John, 1170–99. Oxford: Clarendon, 2007.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. The Tempest, edited by Stephen Orgel. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. The Winter’s Tale, edited by Pitcher, John. The Arden Shakespeare Third Series. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2010.Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Victor. “Art as Technique.” In Literary Theory: An Anthology, edited by Rivkin, Julie and Ryan, Michael, 15–21. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Sidney, Philip. “A Defence of Poetry” (1595). In English Renaissance Literary Criticism, edited by Vickers, Brian, 336–91. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999.Google Scholar

Sinfield, Alan. “Macbeth: History, Ideology and Intellectuals.” Critical Quarterly 28, nos. 1–2 (Spring/Summer 1986): 63–77. Reprinted in New Historicism and Renaissance Drama, edited by Richard Wilson and Richard Dutton, 167–80. London: Longman, 1992.Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce R. “Resexing Lady Macbeth’s Gender – and Ours.” In Presentism, Gender, and Sexuality in Shakespeare, edited by Gajowski, Evelyn, 25–48. New York: Palgrave, 2009.Google Scholar

Solomon, Maynard. General Introduction to “Marxism and Utopia.” In Marxism and Art: Essays Classic and Contemporary, edited by Solomon, Maynard, 457–67. New York: Vintage, 1974.Google Scholar

Solomon, Maynard, ed. Marxism and Art: Essays Classic and Contemporary. New York: Vintage, 1974.Google Scholar

Sprengnether, Madelon Gohlke. “‘I Wooed Thee with My Sword’: Shakespeare’s Tragic Paradigms.” In Shakespeare’s Late Tragedies: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Wofford, Susanne, 46–60. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar

Stallybrass, Peter, and White, Allon. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Stanton, Kay. “The Heroic Tragedy of Cleopatra, the ‘Prostitute Queen.’” In The Female Tragic Hero in English Renaissance Drama, edited by Liebler, Naomi Conn, 93–118. New York: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar

Stanton, Kay. Shakespeare’s “Whores”: Erotics, Politics, and Poetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

Starks, Lisa A. “‘Immortal Longings’: The Erotics of Death in Antony and Cleopatra.” In “Antony and Cleopatra”: New Critical Essays, edited by Sara Munson Deats, 243–58. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Stevens, Wallace. “Sunday Morning.” In Modern Poems: A Norton Introduction, edited by Ellman, Richard and O’Clair, Robert. 2nd ed. New York: Norton: 1989.Google Scholar

Stoll, E. E. “Shakespeare, Marston, and the Malcontent Type.” Modern Philology 3, no. 3 (January 1906): 281–303.Google Scholar

Stone, Alison. “Adorno and the Disenchantment of Nature.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 32, no. 2 (March 2006): 231–53.Google Scholar

Styrt, Philip Goldfarb. “‘Continual Factions’: Politics, Friendship and History in Julius Caesar.” Shakespeare Quarterly 66, no. 3 (Fall 2015): 286–307.Google Scholar

Sypher, Wylie. Four Stages of Renaissance Style: Transformations in Art and Literature 1400–1700. New York: Doubleday, 1955. Reprinted Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1978.Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary. “Empirical Middleton: Macbeth, Adaptation, and Microauthorship.” Shakespeare Quarterly 65, no. 3 (Fall 2014): 239–72.Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History 1642–1986. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989.Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary and Egan, Gabriel, eds. The Authorship Companion. Oxford Scholarly Editions Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. www.newoxfordshakespeare.com.Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary, and Lavagnino, John, eds. The Tragedy of Macbeth, by William Shakespeare, adapted by Thomas Middleton. In The Collected Works, by Thomas Middleton, 1170–201. Oxford: Clarendon, 2007.Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John, Bourus, Terry, and Egan, Gabriel, eds. The New Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works, by Shakespeare, William. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Tennenhouse, Leonard. Power on Display: The Politics of Shakespeare’s Genres. New York: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar

Tillyard, E. M. W. Shakespeare’s History Plays (1944). Reprinted New York: Macmillan, 1946.Google Scholar

Traversi, D. A. An Approach to Shakespeare, 2nd ed. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1958.Google Scholar

Vaughan, Virginia Mason. Shakespeare and the Gods. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2019.Google Scholar

Vincent, Barbara C. “‘Antony and Cleopatra’ and the Rise of Comedy.” English Literary Renaissance (1982): 53–86. Reprinted in Antony and Cleopatra, edited by John Drakakis, 212–47. New York: St. Martin’s, 1994.Google Scholar

Ward, David. “Affection, Intention, and Dream in The Winter’s Tale.” Modern Language Review 82 (1987): 545–54.Google Scholar

Warnke, Frank J. Versions of Baroque: European Literature in the Seventeenth Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Watson, Robert N. Back to Nature: The Green and the Real in the Late Renaissance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Weil, Simone. Simone Weil’s The Iliad or The Poem of Force: A Critical Edition, edited and translated by Holoka, James P.. New York: Peter Lang, 2003.Google Scholar

Weimann, Robert. Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater: Studies in the Social Dimension of Dramatic Form and Function, edited by Schwartz, Robert. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Wellek, René. “The Concept of the Baroque in Literary Scholarship.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 5, no. 2 (December 1946): 77–109.Google Scholar

Wells, Stanley, and Taylor, Gary. William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. New York: Norton, 1997.Google Scholar

Wells, Susan. Robert Burton’s Rhetoric: An Anatomy of Early Modern Knowledge. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Whitaker, Virgil K. “Julius Caesar and Tragedy of Moral Choice.” In Shakespeare’s Use of Learning: An Inquiry into the Growth of His Mind and Art, by Whitaker, Virgil K., 224–50. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1953.Google Scholar

White, R. S. Natural Law in English Renaissance Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Whitney, Charles. “Festivity and Topicality in the Coventry Scene of 1 Henry IV.” English Literary Renaissance 24, no. 2 (Spring 1994): 438–39.Google Scholar

Wilders, John. Introduction to Antony and Cleopatra, by William Shakespeare, edited by Wilders, John. The Arden Shakespeare Third Series. London: Arden/ Bloomsbury, 1995.Google Scholar

Wills, Gary. Witches and Jesuits: Shakespeare’s “Macbeth.” New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Wilson, Richard. “The Exception: Force of Argument in Terry Eagleton’s William Shakespeare.” Shakespeare 8, nos. 1–4 (April–December 2012): 1–12.Google Scholar

Wimsatt, William K., and Brooks, Cleanth. Literary Criticism: A Short History. New York: Vintage, 1957.Google Scholar

Yachnin, Paul. “Shakespeare’s Politics of Loyalty: Sovereignty and Subjectivity in Antony and Cleopatra.” SEL 32, no. 2 (Spring 1993): 343–63.Google Scholar

Young, David. The Heart’s Forest: A Study of Shakespeare’s Pastoral Plays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Zipes, Jack. “Introduction: Toward a Realization of Anticipatory Illumination.” In Ernst Bloch The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays, translated by Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg, xi–xliii. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar