Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:05:19.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The look of Othello

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2009

Peter Holland
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

The heart of a man changeth his countenance.

Thomas Wright, The Passions of the Minde in Generall (1604)

Othello deals with the savage heart.

Queen Victoria in David Geary and Willie Davis, Manawa Taua / Savage Hearts

The 'rejection of color as a criterion for evaluating men' is highly paradoxical. It is based on a highly charged inside/outside distinction, a fall into constant reversals of black and white.

Christopher L. Miller, Blank Darkness

'Pigmentation,' explains the Duke in Charles Marowitz's An Othello, 'is the outward face of the inner soul - for just as clouds are white as they appear to the naked eye, so are they white in the inner soul or substance, and just as milk is white in its outer appearance, so is milk white in its inner soul or substance, and so, in a sense are all things white, if they are indeed white, and if black, perforce the same applies.' Marowitz's reworking of Othello was produced in 1972 as a direct response to the Civil Rights struggle in his native United States and to the emergence of Black Power separatism in the later phase of that upheaval. In a strategy of deliberate anachronism, Marowitz interrogates Shakespeare's Othello by juxtaposing modern idiomatic dialogue with passages lifted directly from the original text: thus, as the action unfolds, the Duke discards his antique eloquence to become a caricature of Southern white prejudice, suggesting a direct line of descent from Shakespeare's Venetians to twentieth-century segregationists. The Duke himself emerges as the intellectual descendant of Shakespeare's frequently quoted contemporary, George Best, for whom the 'black and loathsome' colour of 'all those Moors that are in Africa' was an indelible mark of reprobation, 'a spectacle of disobedience to all the world' visited upon them by God for the sin of their ancestor Ham.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey , pp. 104 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×