Allrath, G., Gymnich, M. and Surkamp, C., ‘Introduction: towards a narratology of TV series’, in Allrath, G. and Gymnich, M. (eds.), Narrative Strategies in Television Series (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 1–43.Google Scholar

Hibberd, J., ‘CW orders 3 new sci-fi shows’, Entertainment Weekly (9 May 2013), https://ew.com/article/2013/05/09/cw-sci-fi-shows.Google Scholar

Jensen, M., ‘“From the mind of David Simon”: a case for the showrunner approach’, Series 3.2 (2017): 31–42.Google Scholar

Joseph, C., ‘The CW Arrowverse and mythmaking, or the commodification of transmedia franchising’, Series 4.2 (2018): 27‒46.Google Scholar

Lanier, D. M., Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauzen, M. M., ‘Boxed in: women on screen and behind the scenes on broadcast and streaming television in 2020‒21’, Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film (14 September 2021), https://womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/2020-21_Boxed_In_Report.pdf.Google Scholar

Le Fèvre-Berthelot, A., ‘Gossip Girl and the CW: defining a new network (You’re nobody until you’re talked about)’, Series 4.2 (2018): 9‒18.Google Scholar

Pfister, M., ‘Juliet’s balcony: the balcony scenes from Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet across cultures and media’, in Cerdá, J. F., Delabastita, D. and Gregor, K. (eds.), Romeo and Juliet in European Culture (Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2017), 37‒59.Google Scholar

Taub, M., Still Star-Crossed (New York: Delacorte Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Vogt, T., ‘RIP Star-Crossed: creator Meredith Averill shares her thoughts on life after cancellation’, The TV Addict (24 May 2014), www.thetvaddict.com/2014/05/24/rip-star-crossed-creator-meredith-averill-shares-her-thoughts-on-life-after-cancellation.Google Scholar

Wells-Lassagne, S., Television and Serial Adaptation (New York and London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar

Albanese, D., Extramural Shakespeare (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar

Burt, R., Unspeakable ShaXXXespeares: Queer Theory and American Kiddie Culture (New York: St. Martin’s, 1998).Google Scholar

Butler, J., Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex (Abingdon and London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (London and New York: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Dyer, R., White (London and New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Hatchuel, S. and Ludot-Vlasak, R., ‘Shakespeare dans Candy : mais est-ce vraiment pour les enfants ?’, Actes des congrès de la Société Française Shakespeare (April 2016), https://shakespeare.revues.org/3632.Google Scholar

Lanier, D. M., Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Pieri, J.-E., ‘Goldorak occidentalisé?’ in Hatchuel, S. and Pruvost-Delaspre, M. (eds.), Goldorak: L’Aventure continue (Tours: Presses François Rabelais, 2018), 139–56.Google Scholar

Rothwell, K. S., A History of Shakespeare on Screen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Burt, R., ‘No Holes Bard: Homonormativity and the Gay and Lesbian Romance with Romeo and Juliet’, in Hedrick, D. and Reynolds, B. (eds.), Shakespeare Without Class: Misappropriations of Cultural Capital (New York: Palgrave, 2000), 153–86.Google Scholar

Burt, R., Unspeakable ShaXXXspeares: Queer Theory and American Kiddie Culture (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1998).Google Scholar

De Lauretis, T. (ed.), differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3 (1991).Google Scholar

Donaldson, P. S., ‘Let Lips Do What Hands Do: Male bonding, eros and loss in Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet’, Shakespearean Films/Shakespearean Directors (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1990), 145–88.Google Scholar

Halperin, D. M., Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Howard, J. E., ‘Crossdressing, the theatre and gender struggle in early modern England’, Shakespeare Quarterly 39 (1988): 418–40.Google Scholar

Levine, L., Men in Women’s Clothing: Anti-Theatricality and Effeminization, 1579–1642 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Orgel, S., Impersonations: The Performance of Gender in Shakespeare’s England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Patricia, A. G., Queering the Shakespeare Film: Gender Trouble, Gay Spectatorship and Male Homoeroticism (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).Google Scholar

Rackin, P., ‘Androgyny, Mimesis and the Marriage of the Boy Heroine on the English Renaissance Stage’, PMLA 102 (1987): 29–41.Google Scholar

Rich, A., ‘When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision’, On Lies, Secrets, and Silence: Selected Prose 1966–1978 (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1979), 33–50.Google Scholar

Rothwell, K. S., A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television, 2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Sanchez, M. E., Shakespeare and Queer Theory (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).Google Scholar

Targoff, R., Posthumous Love: Eros and the Afterlife in Renaissance England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Ue, T., ‘Private Romeo: a conversation with Alan Brown’, Film International, 4 May 2012, http://filmint.nu/?p=4653.Google Scholar

Van Watson, W. ‘Shakespeare, Zeffirelli and the homosexual gaze’, in Barker, D. and Kamps, I. (eds.), Shakespeare and Gender: A History (London and New York: Verso, 1995), 235–62.Google Scholar

Warner, M., Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Warner, M. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Balizet, A., Shakespeare and Girls’ Studies (New York: Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar

Bersani, L., ‘Is the rectum a grave?’, October 43 (1987): 197–222.Google Scholar

Cixous, H., ‘Tales of sexual difference’, in Segarra, M. (ed.), The Portable Cixous (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), 48–60.Google Scholar

Betancourt, M., Glitch Art in Theory and Practice (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar

Duggan, L., The Twilight of Equality? (Boston: Beacon Books: 2012 [2003]).Google Scholar

Hutcheon, L. and O’Flynn, S., A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd edition (Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 2013 [2006]).Google Scholar

Lanier, D. M., ‘Vlogging the bard: serialization, social media, Shakespeare’, in O’Neill, Stephen (ed.), Broadcast Your Shakespeare: Continuity and Change Across Media (London and New York: 2018), 185–206.Google Scholar

Menkman, R., ‘The glitch studies manifesto’, 2006–2011, in Lovink, G. and Niederer, S. (eds.), Network Notebooks (Amsterdam: Institute of Networked Cultures, 2011), www.networkcultures.org/networknotebooks.Google Scholar

Menon, M., Unhistorical Shakespeare (New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, D. H., Hoover, K. M., Agadzhanyan, K., Kuehn, J. C. and Castel, A. D., ‘Learning in double time: the effect of lecture video speed on immediate and delayed comprehension’, Applied Cognitive Psychology (2021): 1–14.Google Scholar

Nunes, M., ed., Error: Glitch, Noise and Jam in New Media Cultures (New York: Bloomsbury, 2011).Google Scholar

Obermayr, J., ‘Queering “web” families: cultural kinship through lesbian web series’, in Friedman, M. and Schultermandl, S. (eds.), Click and Kin: Transnational Identity and Quick Media (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016), 97–117.Google Scholar

Patricia, A. G., Queering the Shakespeare Film (London and New York: Bloomsbury: 2019).Google Scholar

Rainolds, J., Th’Overthrow of Stage-Plays (Middelburg, 1599), Early English Books Online, ProQuest.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. P. and Espelage, D. L., ‘Inequities in educational and psychological outcomes between LGBTQ and straight students in middle and high school’, Educational Researcher 40.7 (2011): 315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanchez, M., Shakespeare and Queer Theory (London and New York: Bloomsbury: 2019).Google Scholar

Schröter, J., ‘Four models of intermediality’, in Herzogenrath, B. (ed.), Travels in Intermedia[lity]: Reblurring the Boundaries (Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press: 2012), 15–36.Google Scholar

Stryker, S., ‘Transgender history, homonormativity and disciplinarity’, Radical History Review 100 (2008): 145–57.Google Scholar

Traub, V., ‘The new unhistoricism in queer studies’, PMLA 128.1 (2013): 21–39.Google Scholar

Uncapher, M. R., Lin, L., Rosen, L. D., Kirkorian, H. L., Baron, N. S., et al., ‘Media multitasking and cognitive, psychological, neural and learning differences’, Pediatrics 140, Supplement 2 (2017): S62-66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Balizet, A., Shakespeare and Girls’ Studies (New York: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Cartelli, T., Reenacting Shakespeare in the Shakespeare Aftermath: The Intermedial Turn and Turn to Embodiment (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Google Scholar

Dunkels, E., Interactive Media Use and Youth: Learning, Knowledge Exchange and Behavior (Hershey: Information Science Reference, 2011).Google Scholar

Hateley, E., ‘Antipodean impulses: making sense of Shakespearean girls in twenty-first-century Australia’, paper given during the seminar ‘Shakespeare and Global Girlhood’ at the Shakespeare 450 congress, Paris, France. 21–27 April 2014.Google Scholar

Hendershott-Kraetzer, K., ‘Juliet, I prosume? or Shakespeare and the social network’, Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 10.1 (2016), https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/283.Google Scholar

Hulbert, J. ‘“Adolescence, Thy Name is Ophelia”!: the Ophelia-ization of the contemporary teenage girl’, in Hulbert, J., Westmore, K. J., Jr. and York, R. L. (eds.), Shakespeare and Youth Culture (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar

Jenkins, H., Ford, S. and Green, J., Spreadable Media (New York: New York University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Lanier, D. M., ‘Vlogging the bard: serialization, social media, Shakespeare’, in O’Neill, S. (ed.), Broadcast your Shakespeare: Continuity and Change Across Media (London: Bloomsbury, 2017), 185–207.Google Scholar

Nash, I., American Sweethearts (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

O’Neill, S. Shakespeare and YouTube: New Media Forms of the Bard (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar

Pipher, M., Reviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1994).Google Scholar

Projansky, S., Spectacular Girls (New York: New York University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Reinhard Lupton, J. (ed.), ‘Introduction’, Romeo and Juliet: A Critical Reader (London: Bloomsbury, 2016), 1–18.Google Scholar

Williams, D., Shakespeare and the Performance of Girlhood (New York; London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar

Ball, Robert Hamilton, ‘What, All in Motion?: Shakespeare by Vitagraph (1908–1911)’, in his Shakespeare on Silent Film: A Strange Eventful History. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1968, 38–60.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Judith, ‘“An Excellent Dumb Discourse”: British and American Shakespeare Films, 1899–1916’, in her Shakespeare on Film. Harlow and New York: Pearson-Longman, 2005, 21–48.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Judith, ‘Corporate Authorship: The Shakespeare Films of the Vitagraph Company of America’, in her Shakespeare on Silent Film: An Excellent Dumb Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 105–46.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Ontological Shivers: The Cinematic Afterlives of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet’, in The Oxford Handbook of Shakespearean Tragedy, ed. Neill, Michael and Schalkwyk, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 556–71.Google Scholar

Burrows, Jon, ‘British “Films d’Art”: Theatre Stars in Transitional Cinema, 1908–1911’, in his Legitimate Cinema: Theatre Stars in Silent British Films, 1908–1918. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2003, 43–89.Google Scholar

Ball, Robert Hamilton, ‘Strange Motions: The Continent (1908–1911)’, in his Shakespeare on Silent Film: A Strange Eventful History. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1968, 90–134.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Judith, ‘“Wresting an Alphabet”: Continental European Shakespeare Films, 1907–1922’, in her Shakespeare on Film. Harlow and New York: Pearson-Longman, 2005, 49–70.Google Scholar

Coursen, H. R., ‘Silents’, in his Shakespeare in Space: Recent Shakespeare Productions on Screen. New York: Peter Lang, 2002, 95–111.Google Scholar

Ball, Robert Hamilton, ‘Cranks and Offices: Others American (1908–1911)’, in his Shakespeare on Silent Film: A Strange Eventful History. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1968, 61–73.Google Scholar

Anderegg, Michael, ‘The Challenges of Romeo and Juliet’, in his Cinematic Shakespeare. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, 54–85.Google Scholar

Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Shakespeare and the Screen Idol’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 51–72.Google Scholar

Cartmell, Deborah, ‘Sound Shakespeare’, in her Adaptations in the Sound Era: 1927–1937. New York and London: Bloomsbury, 2015, 23–53.Google Scholar

Cavecchi, Mariacristina, ‘Romeo and Juliet 2.1: “But soft, what light through yonder window breaks?”’, in The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare, ed. Smith, Bruce R., vol. 2: The World’s Shakespeare, 1660–Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, 1129–36.Google Scholar

Coursen, H. R., ‘Romeo and Juliet: A Beautiful Film for Beautiful People?’, in his Shakespeare in Production: Whose History? Athens: Ohio University Press, 1996, 28–53.Google Scholar

Davies, Anthony, ‘The Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet’. Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996): 153–62.Google Scholar

Jackson, Russell, ‘Visions of Renaissance Italy: 1. “More Stars than There Are in Heaven”: MGM’s Romeo and Juliet, 1936’, in his Shakespeare Films in the Making: Vision, Production and Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 128–61.Google Scholar

Kellar, Allison, ‘The Actor’s Aging Body: Norma Shearer as MGM’s Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 47.4 (Fall 2019): https://lfq.salisbury.edu/_issues/47_4/the_actors_aging_body_norma_shearer_as_mgms_juliet.html.Google Scholar

McJannet, Linda, ‘“A hall, a hall! Give room, and foot it, girls”: Realizing the Dance Scene in Romeo and Juliet on Film’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 10.2 (2017): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/272/541.Google Scholar

Patricia, Anthony Guy, ‘The Queer Director, Gay Spectatorship and Three Cinematic Productions of Shakespeare’s “Straightest” Play – Romeo and Juliet’, in his Queering the Shakespeare Film: Gender Trouble, Gay Spectatorship and Male Homoeroticism. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2017, 41–87.Google Scholar

Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Hollywood’s Four Seasons of Shakespeare’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 27–46.Google Scholar

Tatspaugh, Patricia, ‘The Tragedies of Love on Film’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, ed. Jackson, Russell. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 141–64.Google Scholar

White, R. S., ‘“Star-crossed lovers”: Romeo and Juliet and Romantic Tragedy’, in his Shakespeare’s Cinema of Love: A Study in Genre and Influence. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016, 178–222.Google Scholar

Willson, Robert F., Jr, ‘Love’s Monument: The Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Romeo and Juliet (1936)’, in his Shakespeare in Hollywood, 1929–1956. Madison and Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2000, 51–67.Google Scholar

Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Shakespeare the Filmmaker’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 73–94.Google Scholar

Costantini-Cornède, Anne-Marie, ‘Young Violence versus Institutional Duress: Questions of Authority and Challenge in Romeo and Juliet on Screen’, in Authority, Resistance and Woe: ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and Its Afterlife, ed. Calvi, Lisanna. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 2018, 135–52.Google Scholar

Geal, Robert, ‘“Fainomaic” Adaptation from the Verbal to the Visual’, in his Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation: A Case Study of Shakespearean Films. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 103–55.Google Scholar

Jackson, Russell, ‘Visions of Renaissance Italy: 2. Realism and Romance: Renato Castellani’s Giulietta e Romeo, 1954’, in his Shakespeare Films in the Making: Vision, Production and Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 161–91.Google Scholar

Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Spectacle and Song in Castellani and Zeffirelli’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 119–35.Google Scholar

Bladen, Victoria, ‘Two Tragedies of Love: Romeo and Juliet and Othello’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Screen, ed. Jackson, Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, 92–104.Google Scholar

Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Transgressive, in Theory’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 125–56.Google Scholar

Cartmell, Deborah, ‘Shakespeare, Film and Sexuality: Politically Correct Sexuality in Film Adaptations of Romeo and Juliet and Much Ado about Nothing’, in her Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 39–66.Google Scholar

Cartmell, Deborah, ‘Franco Zeffirelli and Shakespeare’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, ed. Jackson, Russell. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 216–25.Google Scholar

Cirillo, Albert R., ‘The Art of Franco Zeffirelli and Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet’. TriQuarterly 16 (Fall 1969): 68–93.Google Scholar

Daileader, Celia R., ‘Nude Shakespeare in Film and Nineties Popular Feminism’, in Shakespeare and Sexuality, ed. Alexander, Catherine M. S. and Wells, Stanley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 183–200.Google Scholar

Deats, Sarah M., ‘Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet: Shakespeare for the Sixties’. Studies in Popular Culture 6 (1983): 60–9.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Peter S., ‘“Let Lips Do What Hands Do”: Male Bonding, Eros, and Loss in Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet’, in his Shakespearean Films/Shakespearean Directors. Boston and London: Unwin Hyman, 1990, 145–88.Google Scholar

Grindley, James Carl, ‘The Plague in Filmed Versions of Romeo and Juliet and Twelfth Night’, in Apocalyptic Shakespeare: Essays on Visions of Chaos and Revelation in Recent Film Adaptations, ed. Croteau, Melissa and Jess-Cooke, Carolyn. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2009, 148–65.Google Scholar

Grindley, Carl James, ‘“We’re everyone you depend on”: Filming Shakespeare’s Peasants’, in Shakespeare and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Performance and Adaptation of the Plays with Medieval Sources or Settings, ed. Driver, Martha W. and Ray, Sid. Jefferson: McFarland, 2009, 89–104.Google Scholar

Hapgood, Robert, ‘Popularizing Shakespeare: The Artistry of Franco Zeffirelli’, in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video, ed. Boose, Lynda E. and Burt, Richard. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, 80–94.Google Scholar

Holderness, Graham, ‘Romeo and Juliet (1991)’, in his Visual Shakespeares: Essays in Film and Television. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2002, 151–82.Google Scholar

Holmer, Joan Ozark, ‘The Poetics of Paradox: Shakespeare’s versus Zeffirelli’s Cultures of Violence’. Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996): 163–79.Google Scholar

Jackson, Russell, ‘Visions of Renaissance Italy: 3. Shakespeare’s “Dream of Italy” and the Generation Gap: Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet, 1968’, in his Shakespeare Films in the Making: Vision, Production and Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 191–221.Google Scholar

Jorgens, Jack J., ‘Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet’, in his Shakespeare on Film. 1977, rpt, Lanham and London: University Press of America, 1991, 79–91.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Shakespeare with a View: Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 134–66.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet: Then and Now’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 222–32.Google Scholar

Levenson, Jill L., ‘Translation, 1960–1968: Franco Zeffirelli’, in her Romeo and Juliet. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987, 82–123.Google Scholar

Pilkington, Ace G., ‘Zeffirelli’s Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television, ed. Davies, Anthony and Wells, Stanley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 163–79.Google Scholar

Pursell, Michael, ‘Zeffirelli’s Shakespeare: The Visual Realization of Tone and Theme’. Literature/Film Quarterly 8 (1980): 210–18.Google Scholar

Pursell, Michael, ‘Artifice and Authenticity in Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 14 (1986): 173–8.Google Scholar

Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet: Words into Picture and Music’. Literature/Film Quarterly 5 (1977): 326–31.Google Scholar

Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Classic Film Versions of Shakespeare’s Tragedies: A Mirror for the Times’, in The Tragedies. Vol. 1 of A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E.. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 241–61.Google Scholar

Scott, Lindsey, ‘“Closed in a Dead Man’s Tomb”: Juliet, Space, and the Body in Franco Zeffirelli’s and Baz Luhrmann’s Films of Romeo and Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 36 (2008): 137–46.Google Scholar

‘Shakespeare in the Cinema: A Film Directors’ Symposium with Peter Brook, Sir Peter Hall, Richard Loncraine, Baz Luhrmann, Trevor Nunn, Oliver Parker, Roman Polanski and Franco Zeffirelli’. Cineaste 24.1 (1998): 48–55.Google Scholar

Shaughnessy, Robert, ‘Romeo and Juliet: The Rock and Roll Years’, in Remaking Shakespeare: Performance across Media, Genres and Cultures, ed. Aebischer, Pascale, Esche, Edward J. and Wheale, Nigel. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, 172–89.Google Scholar

Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie, ‘Zeffirelli’s Shakespearean Motion Pictures: Living Monuments’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Screen, ed. Jackson, Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, 213–23.Google Scholar

Van Watson, William, ‘Shakespeare, Zeffirelli and the Homosexual Gaze’. Literature/Film Quarterly 20 (1992): 308–25.Google Scholar

Willson, Robert F., Jr, ‘Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet and the Uses of Cultural Translation’. Upstart Crow 16 (1996): 101–7.Google Scholar

Wray, Ramona, ‘Franco Zeffirelli’, in Welles, Kurosawa, Kozintsev, Zeffirelli, by Burnett, Mark Thornton, Lehmann, Courtney, Rippy, Marguerite H. and Wray, Ramona. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2013, 141–84.Google Scholar

Abbate, Alessandro, ‘The Text within the Text, the Screen within the Screen: Multi-Layered Representations in Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet and Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’, in The Play within the Play: The Performance of Meta-Theatre and Self-Reflection, ed. Fischer, Gerhard and Greiner, Bernhard. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2007, 377–91.Google Scholar

Albanese, Denise, ‘The Shakespeare Film, the Market and the Americanization of Culture’, in her Extramural Shakespeare. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, 95–117.Google Scholar

Anderegg, Michael, ‘James Dean Meets the Pirate’s Daughter: Passion and Parody in William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet and Shakespeare in Love’ in Shakespeare, the Movie, II: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, Video, and DVD, ed. Burt, Richard and Boose, Lynda E.. London and New York: Routledge, 2003, 56–71.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Philip, ‘Shakespeare’s Sex’, in his Shakespeare in Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge, 2001, 181–224.Google Scholar

Balizet, Ariane M., ‘Teen Scenes: Recognizing Shakespeare in Teen Film’, in Almost Shakespeare: Reinventing His Works for Cinema and Television, ed. Keller, James R. and Stratyner, Leslie. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2004, 122–36.Google Scholar

Balizet, Ariane M., ‘The End(s) of Girlhood: Film’, in her Shakespeare and Girls’ Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 2020, 24–60.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Judith, ‘Leaves of Brass and Gads of Steel: Cinema as Subject in Shakespeare Films, 1991–2000’, in her Shakespeare on Film. Harlow and New York: Pearson-Longman, 2005, 220–60.Google Scholar

Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Contemporary Film Versions of the Tragedies’, in The Tragedies. Vol. 1 of A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E.. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 262–83.Google Scholar

Cieślak, Magdalena, ‘Shakespeare’s Camp City’, in Images of the City, ed. Rasmus, Agnieszka and Magdalena, Cieślak. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009, 124–34.Google Scholar

Cook, Pam, ‘William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet (1996)’, in her Baz Luhrmann. London: British Film Institute, 2010, 58–82.Google Scholar

Coursen, H. R., ‘Two Tragedies of Wrong Conclusions: Parker’s Othello and Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’, in his Shakespeare: The Two Traditions. Madison and Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1999, 174–97.Google Scholar

Crowl, Samuel, ‘Shooting Stars: Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in his Shakespeare at the Cineplex: The Kenneth Branagh Era. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2003, 119–34.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Peter, ‘“All which it inherit”: Shakespeare, Globes and Global Media’. Shakespeare Survey 52 (1999): 183–200.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Peter S., ‘“In Fair Verona”: Media, Spectacle, and Performance in William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in Shakespeare after Mass Media, ed. Burt, Richard. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002, 59–82.Google Scholar

Downing, Crystal, ‘Misshapen Chaos of Well-Seeming Form: Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 28 (2000): 125–31.Google Scholar

Eschenbaum, Natalie K., ‘Juliet’s Narcissism’, in Shakespeare 450: A Jubilee in Paris, ed. Dominique Goy-Blanquet and Laetitia Sansonetti. Paris: Société Française Shakespeare, 2015, 1–11. https://journals.openedition.org/shakespeare/3600.Google Scholar

Foakes, R. A., ‘Plays and Movies: Richard III and Romeo and Juliet’, in his Shakespeare and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 61–82.Google Scholar

Ford, John R., ‘Pursuing the Story: Piecing out Conventions in Loncraine’s Richard III, Luhrmann’s Romeo & Juliet, and Pacino’s Looking for Richard’. Shakespeare and the Classroom 6.1 (Spring 1998): 62–9.Google Scholar

French, Emma, ‘Hollywood Teen Shakespeare Movies’, in her Selling Shakespeare to Hollywood: The Marketing of Filmed Shakespeare Adaptations from 1989 into the New Millennium. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2006, 101–32.Google Scholar

Geal, Robert, ‘“Állagmic” Adaptation from Shakespearean to Non-(/Less-)Shakespearean Settings’, in his Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation: A Case Study of Shakespearean Films. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 157–82.Google Scholar

Geal, Robert, ‘The Drama of Foreknowledge’, in his Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation: A Case Study of Shakespearean Films. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 183–206.Google Scholar

Georgopoulou, Xenia, ‘Parting “totally sucks”: Filming Romeo and Juliet for Generation X’. Gramma: Journal of Theory and Criticism 15 (2007): 211–26.Google Scholar

Guenther, Leah, ‘Luhrmann’s Top 40 Shakespeare and the Crisis of Shakespearean Consumption’. Journal of American Culture 22.1 (Spring 1999): 17–23.Google Scholar

Guneratne, Anthony R., ‘Six Authors in Search of a Text: The Shakespeares of Van Sant, Branagh, Godard, Pasolini, Greenaway, and Luhrmann’, in his Shakespeare, Film Studies, and the Visual Cultures of Modernity. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, 211–49.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Lucy, ‘Baz vs. the Bardolaters, Or Why William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet Deserves Another Look’. Literature/Film Quarterly 28 (2000): 118–24.Google Scholar

Hendricks, Margo, ‘Gestures of Performance: Rethinking Race in Contemporary Shakespeare’, in Colorblind Shakespeare: New Perspectives on Race and Performance, ed. Thompson, Ayanna. New York and London: Routledge, 2006, 187–203.Google Scholar

Hodgdon, Barbara, ‘William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet: Everything’s Nice in America?’ Shakespeare Survey 52 (1999): 88–98.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Lisa, ‘The West Coast: William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet and Clueless’, in her Relocating Shakespeare and Austen on Screen. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 24–52.Google Scholar

Jess-Cooke, Carolyn, ‘Film Style’, in her Shakespeare on Film: Such Things as Dreams Are Made of. London: Wallflower Press, 2007, 55–81.Google Scholar

Johae, Antony, ‘“Thy drugs are quick”: Postmodern Dissolution in Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 44 (2016): 106–19.Google Scholar

Keam, Angela, ‘The “Shakesteen” Genre: Claire Danes’s Star-Body, Teen Female Fans, and the Pluralization of Authorship’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 2.1 (2006): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/37.Google Scholar

Lanier, Douglas, ‘Will of the People: Recent Shakespeare Film Parody and the Politics of Popularization’, in A Concise Companion to Shakespeare on Screen, ed. Henderson, Diana E.. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 176–96.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Strictly Shakespeare?: Dead Letters, Ghostly Fathers, and the Cultural Pathology of Authorship in Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in her Shakespeare Remains: Theater to Film, Early Modern to Postmodern. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2002, 130–60.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet: A Cinematic Detour through the Play’s Textual Origins’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 167–206.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Romeo + Juliet Takes the “A” Train’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 233–48.Google Scholar

Leyva Pizano, Arturo, ‘Speaking without Words: Luhrmann’s Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet’. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 21 (2019): 532–58.Google Scholar

Lindroth, Mary, ‘The Prince and the Newscaster: Baz Luhrmann Updates Shakespeare for a Y2K Audience’. Studies in Popular Culture 22.3 (1999): 55–68.Google Scholar

Loehlin, James N., ‘“These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends”: Baz Luhrmann’s Millennial Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, ed. Burnett, Mark Thornton and Wray, Ramona. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 121–36.Google Scholar

Malone, Toby, ‘Behind the Red Curtain of Verona Beach: Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’. Shakespeare Survey 65 (2012): 398–412.Google Scholar

Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘(Un)Doing the Book “without Verona walls”: A View from the Receiving End of Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in Spectacular Shakespeare: Critical Theory and Popular Cinema, ed. Lehmann, Courtney and Starks, Lisa S.. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2002, 62–85.Google Scholar

Patricia, Anthony Guy, ‘The Visual Poetics of Gender Trouble in Trevor Nunn’s Twelfth Night, Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet and Michael Hoffman’s William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream’, in his Queering the Shakespeare Film: Gender Trouble, Gay Spectatorship and Male Homoeroticism. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2017, 89–133.Google Scholar

Popescu, Veronica, ‘Montagues and Capulets, Star-Crossed Lovers and 20th-Century Veronas’, in Shakespeare in Europe: Nation(s) and Boundaries, ed. Blumenfeld, Odette and Popescu, Veronica. Iaşi: Editura Universităţii Alexandru Ioan Cuza, 2011, 205–22.Google Scholar

Radel, Nicholas F., ‘The Ethiop’s Ear: Race, Sexuality, and Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’. Upstart Crow 28 (2009): 17–34.Google Scholar

Rokison, Abigail, ‘Shakespeare on Film: Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet (1996), Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet (2000) and Christine Edzard’s The Children’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream (2001)’, in her Shakespeare for Young People: Productions, Versions and Adaptations. London: Bloomsbury, 2013, 38–59.Google Scholar

Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘The Renaissance of Shakespeare in Moving Images’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 219–47.Google Scholar

Sanchez, Melissa E., ‘The Politics of Form: Queer Shakespearean Film’, in her Shakespeare and Queer Theory. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2019, 143–71.Google Scholar

Sanders, Julie, ‘“You know the movie song”: Contemporary and Hybrid Film Scores’, in her Shakespeare and Music: Afterlives and Borrowings. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2007, 159–81.Google Scholar

Sheppard, Philippa, ‘Latino Elements in Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’, in Latin American Shakespeares, ed. Kliman, Bernice W. and Santos, Rick J.. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005, 242–62.Google Scholar

Sheppard, Philippa, ‘The Drive to Realism in Shakespearean Adaptation to Film’, in her Devouring Time: Nostalgia in Contemporary Shakespearean Screen Adaptations. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017, 57–99.Google Scholar

Sheppard, Philippa, ‘Death Rituals in Shakespeare, Almereyda, and Luhrmann’, in her Devouring Time: Nostalgia in Contemporary Shakespearean Screen Adaptations. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017, 153–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swanigan, Pamela, ‘Music as Facing-Page Translation in Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 7.2 (2012): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/116.Google Scholar

Vela, Richard, ‘Post-Apocalyptic Spaces in Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in Apocalyptic Shakespeare: Essays on Visions of Chaos and Revelation in Recent Film Adaptations, ed. Croteau, Melissa and Jess-Cooke, Carolyn. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2009, 90–109.Google Scholar

Walker, Elsie, ‘Pop Goes the Shakespeare: Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in The Literature/Film Reader: Issues of Adaptation, ed. Welsh, James M. and Lev, Peter. Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2007, 125–48.Google Scholar

Witmore, Michael, ‘Shakespeare’s Inner Music’. Upstart Crow 29 (2010): 72–80.Google Scholar

Worthen, W. B., ‘Shakespearean Geographies’, in his Shakespeare and the Force of Modern Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 117–68.Google Scholar

Worthen, W. B., ‘Fond Records: Remembering Theatre in the Digital Age’, in Shakespeare, Memory and Performance, ed. Holland, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 281–304.Google Scholar

Lan, Yong Li, ‘Returning to Naples: Seeing the End in Shakespeare Film Adaptation’. Literature/Film Quarterly 29 (2001): 128–34.Google Scholar

York, Robert L., ‘“Smells like Teen Shakespirit” Or, the Shakespearean Films of Julia Stiles’, in Shakespeare and Youth Culture, ed. Jennifer Hulbert, Kevin J. Wetmore, Jr and York, Robert L.. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, 57–115.Google Scholar

Kliman, Bernice W., ‘Romeo and Juliet Variations on Television’, in Shakespeare on Screen: Television Shakespeare: Essays in Honour of Michèle Willems, ed. Hatchuel, Sarah and Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Presses universitaires de Rouen et du Havre, 2008, 61–77.Google Scholar

Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie, ‘Colour and Horror: Claude Barma’s 1973 Romeo and Juliet’, in Shakespeare on Screen in Francophonia: The Shakscreen Collection 5, ed. Dorval, Patricia and Vienne-Guerrin., Nathalie Montpellier: Université Paul-Valéry/Montpellier 3, 2021. http://shakscreen.org/analysis/vienne-guerrin_2021/.Google Scholar

Wrigley, Amanda, ‘Space and Place in Joan Kemp-Welch’s Television Productions of Theatre Plays’. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 34 (2014): 405–19.Google Scholar

Anderegg, Michael, ‘Electronic Shakespeares: Televisual Histories’, in his Cinematic Shakespeare. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, 148–76.Google Scholar

Willis, Susan, ‘A Study in Diversity: The Televised Shakespeare Canon’, in her The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1991, 187–225.Google Scholar

Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Documentary Shakespeare’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 33–49.Google Scholar

Buckley, Thea, ‘“Singing Is Such Sweet Sorrow”: Ambikapathy, Hollywood Shakespeare and Tamil Cinema’s Hybrid Heritage’, in Shakespeare and Indian Cinemas: ‘Local Habitations’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam and Chakravarti, Paromita. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 200–17.Google Scholar

Holland, Peter, ‘Spinach and Tobacco: Making Shakespearian Unoriginals’. Shakespeare Survey 68 (2015): 197–209.Google Scholar

Darragi, Rafik, ‘The Perfect, Impossible Love: Three Egyptian Film Adaptations of Romeo and Juliet’. Critical Survey 28.3 (Winter 2016): 175–80.Google Scholar

Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘Cantinflas’s Romeo y Julieta: The Rogue and Will’, in Latin American Shakespeares, ed. Kliman, Bernice W. and Santos, Rick J.. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005, 219–41.Google Scholar

Vela, Richard, ‘Shakespeare, Hollywood and Mexico: The Cantinflas Romeo y Julieta’. Literature/Film Quarterly 30 (2002): 231–6.Google Scholar

Kingsley-Smith, Jane E., ‘Shakespearean Authorship in Popular British Cinema’. Literature/Film Quarterly 30 (2002): 158–65.Google Scholar

Lanier, Douglas M., ‘Love in the Ruins: Les Amants de Vérone and “Authentic” Shakespeare Adaptation’, in Shakespeare on Screen in Francophonia: The Shakscreen Collection 4, ed. Croteau, Melissa. Montpellier: Université Paul-Valéry/Montpellier 3, 2016.www.shakscreen.org/analysis/love_in_ruins/.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Now Showing: West Side Story’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 103–33.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘West Side Sucess’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 207–21.Google Scholar

Sanders, Julie, ‘“Shakespeare with a contemporary musical twist”’, in her Shakespeare and Music: Afterlives and Borrowings. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2007, 73–95.Google Scholar

Lee, Adele, ‘“Chop-Socky Shakespeare”?!: The Bard Onscreen in Hong Kong’. Shakespeare Bulletin 28 (2010): 459–79.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Nandi, ‘Multiple Mediations of “Shakespeare”’, in her Acts of Authority/Acts of Resistance: Theater and Politics in Colonial and Postcolonial India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004, 51–75.Google Scholar

Burt, Richard, ‘All That Remains of Shakespeare in Indian Film’, in Shakespeare in Asia: Contemporary Performance, ed. Kennedy, Dennis and Li Lan, Yong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 73–108.Google Scholar

Chui, Jane Yeang, Wong, ‘Reconsidering Empire as Metaphor in Shakespeare Wallah’, in Shakespeare and Asia, ed. Hart, Jonathan Locke. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 201–12.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Lisa, ‘Across the Ocean: Shakespeare Wallah and Shakespearean Performance; and Bride and Prejudice (2004)’, in her Relocating Shakespeare and Austen on Screen. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 105–29.Google Scholar

Kapadia, Parmita, ‘Bollywood Battles the Bard: The Evolving Relationship between Film and Theater in Shakespeare Wallah’, in Bollywood Shakespeares, ed. Dionne, Craig and Kapadia, Parmita. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 45–60.Google Scholar

Wayne, Valerie, ‘Shakespeare Wallah and Colonial Specularity’, in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video, ed. Boose, Lynda E. and Burt, Richard. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, 95–102.Google Scholar

Christopher, Brandon, ‘Star Trek’s Shakespeare Problem’, in Shakespeare on Stage and off, ed. Graham, Kenneth and Kolentsis, Alysia. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2019, 230–40.Google Scholar

Hatchuel, Sarah, ‘Shakespeare’s Humanizing Language in Films and TV Series’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 12.2 (2019): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/233.Google Scholar

Delord, Frédéric, ‘André Téchiné’s “Shakespearean Trilogy”, in Shakespeare on Screen: ‘Hamlet’, ed. Hatchuel, Sarah and Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Presses universitaires de Rouen et du Havre, 2011, 277–90.Google Scholar

Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Romeo and Juliet’, in his Shakespeare and World Cinema. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 195–231.Google Scholar

García-Periago, Rosa M., ‘In Search of a Happy Ending: The Afterlife of Romeo and Juliet on the Asian Screen’. Atlantis (Spain) 38 (2016): 185–200.Google Scholar

Joubin, Alexa Alice, ‘“Our toil shall strive to mend”: Politics of Remediation’, in her Shakespeare and East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 63–105.Google Scholar

Lee, Adele, ‘One Husband Too Many and the Problem of Postcolonial Hong Kong’, in Shakespeare in Hollywood, Asia and Cyberspace, ed. Huang, Alexander C. Y. and Ross, Charles S.. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2009, 195–204.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Koel, ‘“Where art thou Muse that thou forget’st so long,/To speak of that which gives thee all thy might?”: Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak (1988) – A Neglected Shakespeare Film’, in Shakespeare and Indian Cinemas: ‘Local Habitations’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam and Chakravarti, Paromita. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 93–110.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Koel, ‘Indian Shakespeare Cinema and the Active Audience’, in Shakespeare’s Audiences, ed. Pangallo, Matteo and Kirwan, Peter. New York and London: Routledge, 2021, 102–18.Google Scholar

Harris, Jonathan Gil, ‘Act Two Scene Four: Masala Lovers (Romeo and Juliet)’, in his Masala Shakespeare: How a Firangi Writer Became Indian. New Delhi: Aleph Book Company, 2018, 72–90.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Joyce Green, ‘Uncrossed Lovers: Remembering Race in Romeo and Juliet and Mississippi Masala’, in her Shakespearean Adaptation, Race and Memory in the New World. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, 47–75.Google Scholar

Andreas, James R., ‘The Canning of a Classic: Shakespeare, The Animated Tales’. Shakespeare Yearbook 11 (2000): 96–117.Google Scholar

Boguszak, Jakub, ‘The Poetics of Shakespearean Animation’. Shakespeare Bulletin 32 (2014): 159–83.Google Scholar

Osborne, Laurie E., ‘Poetry in Motion: Animating Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video, ed. Boose, Lynda E. and Burt, Richard. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, 103–20.Google Scholar

Rokison, Abigail, ‘Shakespeare: The Animated Tales’, in her Shakespeare for Young People: Productions, Versions and Adaptations. London: Bloomsbury, 2013, 128–44.Google Scholar

Hedrick, Donald and Reynolds, Bryan, ‘Shakespace and Transversal Power’, in Shakespeare without Class: Misappropriations of Cultural Capital. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000, 3–47.Google Scholar

Kidnie, Margaret Jane, ‘“The Way the World Is Now”: Love in the Troma Zone’, in Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, ed. Burnett, Mark Thornton and Wray, Ramona. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 102–20.Google Scholar

Semenza, Greg M. Colón, ‘Tromeo & Juliet, Teen Films, and the Cinematic Aesthetic of Un-Cuteness’. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 16.3 (Summer 2016): 13–29.Google Scholar

Mallin, Eric S., ‘Titanic’s Doomed Lovers as Shakespearean Avatars’, in his Reading Shakespeare in the Movies: Non-Adaptations and Their Meaning. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 85–138.Google Scholar

Anderegg, Michael, ‘Finding the Playwright on Film’, in his Cinematic Shakespeare. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, 27–53.Google Scholar

Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Conclusion: The Next Century of Shakespeare’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 179–93.Google Scholar

Burt, Richard, ‘Shakespeare in Love and the End of the Shakespearean: Academic and Mass Culture Constructions of Literary Authorship’, in Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, ed. Burnett, Mark Thornton and Wray, Ramona. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 203–31.Google Scholar

Coursen, H. R., ‘The Use and Misuse of History: Two Recent Films’, in his Shakespeare in Space: Recent Shakespeare Productions on Screen. New York: Peter Lang, 2002, 71–94.Google Scholar

Davis, Todd F. and Womack, Kenneth, ‘Reading (and Writing) the Ethics of Authorship: Shakespeare in Love as Postmodern Metanarrative’. Literature/Film Quarterly 32 (2004): 153–62.Google Scholar

DiPietro, Cary, ‘Sex, Lies and Videotape: Representing the Past in Shakespeare in Love, Mapping a Future for Presentism’. Shakespeare (British Shakespeare Association) 3 (2007): 40–62.Google Scholar

Földváry, Kinga, ‘Will, Bill and the Earl: Versions of the Author in Contemporary Biopics’, in her Cowboy Hamlets and Zombie Romeos: Shakespeare in Genre Film. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020, 247–84.Google Scholar

Franssen, Paul J. C. M., ‘Shakespeare’s Life on Film and Television: Shakespeare in Love and A Waste of Shame’, in Adaptation, Intermediality and the British Celebrity Biopic, ed. Minier, Márta and Pennacchia, Maddalena. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014, 101–13.Google Scholar

French, Emma, ‘Shakespeare in Love’, in her Selling Shakespeare to Hollywood: The Marketing of Filmed Shakespeare Adaptations from 1989 into the New Millennium. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2006, 133–68.Google Scholar

Geal, Robert, ‘The Drama of the Diegetic Author’, in his Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation: A Case Study of Shakespearean Films. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 207–19.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Sujata, ‘Shakespeare in HeteroLove’. Literature/Film Quarterly 29 (2001): 122–7.Google Scholar

Jeffers, Jennifer M., ‘Shakespeare’s Counterfeit Signature: Shakespeare in Love’, in her Britain Colonized: Hollywood’s Appropriation of British Literature. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, 207–26.Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, ‘“You have no voice!”: Constructing Reputation through Contemporaries in the Shakespeare Biopic’. Shakespeare Bulletin 32 (2014): 11–26.Google Scholar

Klett, Elizabeth, ‘Shakespeare in Love and the End(s) of History’, in Retrovisions: Reinventing the Past in Film and Fiction, ed. Cartmell, Deborah, Hunter, I. Q. and Whelehan, Imelda. London and Sterling: Pluto Press, 2001, 25–40.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Shakespeare in Love: Sex, Capitalism, and the Authorial Body-in-Pleasure’, in her Shakespeare Remains: Theater to Film, Early Modern to Postmodern. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2002, 213–33.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Dancing in a (Cyber) Net: “Renaissance Women”, Systems Theory, and the War of the Cinemas’. Renaissance Drama ns 34 (2005): 121–61.Google Scholar

Mayo, Sarah, ‘“A Shakespeare for the People?”: Negotiating the Popular in Shakespeare in Love and Michael Hoffman’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream’. Textual Practice 17 (2003): 295–315.Google Scholar

Nicholls, Mark, ‘Brush up Your Shakespeare: Performance Anxieties in Shakespeare in Love’. Journal of Film and Video 54.4 (Winter 2002): 3–15.Google Scholar

Shachar, Hila, ‘Heritage and the Literary Biopic “Template”: Shakespeare, Austen, Wilde, and the Author as Product’, in her Screening the Author: The Literary Biopic. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 23–62.Google Scholar

Shapiro, James, ‘1998: Adultery and Same-Sex Love’, in his Shakespeare in a Divided America. London: Faber & Faber, 2020, 201–25.Google Scholar

Starks, Lisa S., ‘Screening Will and Jane: Sexuality and the Gendered Author in Shakespeare and Austen Biopics’, in Jane Austen and William Shakespeare: A Love Affair in Literature, Film and Performance, ed. Cano, Marina and García-Periago, Rosa. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 291–310.Google Scholar

Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Shakespeare, Cinema, Asia’, in his Shakespeare and World Cinema. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 125–59.Google Scholar

Joubin, Alexa Alice, ‘“Divided in three our kingdom”: Multilingualism and Diaspora’, in her Shakespeare and East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 142–85.Google Scholar

Joubin, Alexa Alice, ‘Screening Social Justice: Performing Reparative Shakespeare against Vocal Disability’. Adaptation 14 (2021): 187–205.Google Scholar

Lan, Yong Li, ‘Romeos and Juliets, Local/Global’, in Shakespeare’s Local Habitations, ed. Courtney, Krystyna Kujawińska and White, R. S.. Łódź: Łódź University Press, 2007, 135–54.Google Scholar

Kim, James, ‘The Legend of the White-and-Yellow Black Man: Global Containment and Triangulated Racial Desire in Romeo Must Die’. Camera Obscura 19.1 (55) (2004): 151–79.Google Scholar

Calbi, Maurizio, ‘“This Is My Home, Too”: Migration, Spectrality, and Hospitality in Roberta Torre’s Sud Side Stori, in his Spectral Shakespeares: Media Adaptations in the Twenty-First Century. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 81–98.Google Scholar

Cavecchi, Mariacristina, ‘Shakespeare in Vucciria: “Fair Verona” in Roberta Torre’s Sud Side Stori’, in Crossing Time and Space: Shakespeare Translations in Present-Day Europe, ed. Dente, Carla and Soncini, Sara. Pisa: Edizioni Plus, 2008, 89–106.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Shakespearean Reverberations: From Religion to Responsibility in Roberta Torre’s Sud Side Stori’, in Shakespearean Echoes, ed. Hansen, Adam and Wetmore, Kevin J., Jr. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2015, 97–107.Google Scholar

Klett, Elizabeth, ‘Reviving Viola: Comic and Tragic Teen Film Adaptations of Twelfth Night’. Shakespeare Bulletin 26.2 (Summer 2008): 69–87.Google Scholar

Silverstone, Catherine, ‘Shakespeare, Cinema and Queer Adolescents: Unhappy Endings and Heartfelt Conclusions’. Shakespeare (British Shakespeare Association) 10 (2014): 309–27.Google Scholar

Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘Looking for Mr GoodWill in “Rancho Grande” and beyond: The “Ghostly” Presence of Shakespeare in Mexican Cinema’. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 25 (2012): 97–112.Google Scholar

Burt, Richard, ‘Mobilizing Foreign Shakespeares in Media’, in Shakespeare in Hollywood, Asia, and Cyberspace, ed. Huang, Alexander C. Y. and Ross, Charles S.. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2009, 231–8.Google Scholar

Burt, Richard, ‘Alluding to Shakespeare in L’Appartement, The King Is Alive, Wicker Park, A Time to Love, and University of Laughs: Digital Film, Asianization, and the Transnational Film Remake’. Shakespeare Yearbook 17 (2010): 45–78.Google Scholar

Alcantara, Christiane F. de, ‘Representations of Shakespearean Women in Contemporary Brazilian Media’. Forum for World Literature Studies 2 (2010): 215–26.Google Scholar

Yang, Lingui, ‘Shakespeare’s Uses in Chinese Media and Trans-Sphere’, in Asian Interventions in Global Shakespeare: ‘All the World’s His Stage’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam, Chakravarti, Paromita and Motohashi, Ted. New York and London: Routledge, 2021, 129–45.Google Scholar

Harrison, Keith, ‘Romeo and Juliet, Polyglossia, and the Romantic Politics of Deepa Mehta’s Water’, in his Shakespeare, Bakhtin, and Film: A Dialogic Lens. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 209–26.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘“An élan of the soul”?: Counter-cinema and Deepa Mehta’s Water’. Shakespeare Bulletin 34 (2016): 433–50.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Gender, Adaptation, and Justice’. Literature/Film Quarterly 45.2 (Spring 2017): https://lfq.salisbury.edu/_issues/first/gender_adaptation_and_justice.html.Google Scholar

Calbi, Maurizio, ‘The Boundaries of Citation and Allusion: Shakespeare in Davide Ferrario’s Tutta colpa di Giuda (2008), Alfredo Peyretti’s Moana (2009), and Connie Macatuno’s Rome and Juliet (2006)’. Textus 31.3 (September–December 2018): 51–72.Google Scholar

Burt, Richard and Yates, Julian, ‘Romeo and Juliet Is for Zombies’, in their What’s the Worst Thing You Can Do to Shakespeare? New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 47–74.Google Scholar

Calbi, Maurizio, ‘Chasing Shakespeare: The Impurity of the “Not Quite” in Norry Niven’s From Above and Abbas Kiarostami’s Where Is My Romeo’, in Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare, ed. Desmet, Christy, Loper, Natalie and Casey, Jim. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 43–58.Google Scholar

Ludot-Vlasak, Ronan, ‘“What’s in a Name?”: The Circulation of Romeo and Juliet in Cold Case’. Literature/Film Quarterly 42 (2014): 451–60.Google Scholar

Casey, Jim, ‘HypeRomeo & Juliet: Postmodern Adaptation and Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare, ed. Desmet, Christy, Loper, Natalie and Casey, Jim. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 59–75.Google Scholar

Cavallaro, Dani, ‘Romance Meets Revolution: Romeo x Juliet’, in her Anime and the Art of Adaptation: Eight Famous Works from Page to Screen. Jefferson: McFarland, 2010, 99–127.Google Scholar

Minami, Ryuta, ‘Hello Sha-kitty-peare?: Shakespeares Cutified in Japanese Anime Imagination’. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 16.3 (Summer 2016): 116–37.Google Scholar

Minami, Ryuta, ‘“The Very Basics for All of Us”: Fragments of Shakespeare in Japanese Anime and Manga’, in Shakespeare’s Asian Journeys: Critical Encounters, Cultural Geographies, and the Politics of Travel, ed. Lei, Bi-qi Beatrice, Ick, Judy Celine and Trivedi, Poonam. New York and London: Routledge, 2017, 239–54.Google Scholar

Yoshihara, Yukari, ‘Tacky “Shakespeares” in Japan’. Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance 10 (25) (Dec. 2013): 83–97.Google Scholar

Yoshihara, Yukari, ‘Bardolators and Bardoclasts: Shakespeare in Manga/Anime and Cosplay’, in Asian Interventions in Global Shakespeare: ‘All the World’s His Stage’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam, Chakravarti, Paromita and Motohashi, Ted. New York and London: Routledge, 2021, 146–59.Google Scholar

Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘Cliché “By any other name … ” Or Romeo and Juliet, the Telenovela’, in Shakespearean Echoes, ed. Hansen, Adam and Wetmore, Kevin J., Jr. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2015, 80–96.Google Scholar

Keinänen, Nely, ‘What’s Global about Global Shakespeare? The Case of Perttu Leppä’s 8 päivää ensi-iltaan (8 Days to Premiere)’. Shakespeare (British Shakespeare Association) 9 (2013): 330–8.Google Scholar

Semenza, Greg M. Colón, ‘Echoes of Romeo and Juliet in Let the Right One in and Let Me in’, in Shakespearean Echoes, ed. Hansen, Adam and Wetmore, Kevin J., Jr. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, 56–67.Google Scholar

Botha, Chandré and Broodryk, Chris, ‘A South African Romeo and Juliet: Gender Identity in Minky Schlesinger’s Gugu and Andile’. Shakespeare in Southern Africa 30 (2017): 56–69.Google Scholar

Seeff, Adele, ‘Inheriting the Past, Surviving the Future’, in The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Global Appropriation, ed. Desmet, Christy, Iyengar, Sujata and Jacobson, Miriam. London and New York: Routledge, 2020, 161–70.Google Scholar

Földváry, Kinga, ‘Shakespeare the Undead: A Renaissance of Vampires and Zombies’, in her Cowboy Hamlets and Zombie Romeos: Shakespeare in Genre Film. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020, 211–46.Google Scholar

Forker, Charles R., ‘From Romeo and Juliet to Letters to Juliet: Elizabethan Tragedy Re-envisioned as Romantic Comedy’. Shakespeare Newsletter 60 (2010): 105–10, 112.Google Scholar

Crouau, Nathalie, ‘Searching for the Lubitsch Touch: Hazanavicius Puts a Twist on Shakespeare in OSS 117: Lost in Rio (2009) and The Artist (2011)’, in Shakespeare on Screen in Francophonia: The Shakscreen Collection 3, ed. Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie and Dorval, Patricia. Montpellier: Université Paul-Valéry/Montpellier 3, 2014. www.shakscreen.org/analysis/crouau_2014/.Google Scholar

Kleij, Sonja, ‘“What’s in a Gnome?”: Gender, Intertextuality, and Irreverence in Gnomeo and Juliet’, in Playfulness in Shakespearean Adaptations, ed. Gerzic, Marina and Norrie, Aidan. New York and London: Routledge, 2020, 231–47.Google Scholar

Chakravarti, Paromita, ‘Ishaqzaade, dir. by Habib Faisal, and Issaq, dir. by Manish Tiwary and Goliyon Ki Raasleela: Ram-Leela, dir. by Sanjay Leela Bhansali’. Shakespeare Bulletin 33 (2015): 666–70.Google Scholar

Harris, Jonathan Gil, ‘Telmah Thel: The Hustle-Bustle of a Hindi Romeo and Juliet’. Critical Survey 26.3 (Dec. 2014): 29–38.Google Scholar

Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Shakespeare and Keraliyatha: Romeo and Juliet, Adaptation and South Indian Cinemas’. Cahiers Élisabéthains 105 (July 2021): 41–59.Google Scholar

Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘“Both Alike in Dignity”: Havana and Mexico City Play Romeo and Juliet’. Shakespeare Survey 71 (2018): 51–8.Google Scholar

García-Periago, Rosa, ‘Localizing Romeo and Juliet: Ram-Leela, Female Agency, and Indian Politics’. Adaptation 14 (2021): 349–66.Google Scholar

Panjwani, Varsha, ‘Juliet in Ram-Leela: A Passionate Sita’. Shakespeare Studies 46 (2018): 110–19.Google Scholar

Sayed, Asma, ‘Adaptation as Translation: The Bard in Bombay’, in Shakespeare and Asia, ed. Hart, Jonathan Locke. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 213–28.Google Scholar

Balizet, Ariane M., ‘The Big Bad Bard: Television and Small Screens’, in her Shakespeare and Girls’ Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 2020, 61–92.Google Scholar

Croteau, Melissa, ‘Surfing with Juliet: The Shakespearean Dialectics of Disney’s Teen Beach Movie’, in Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare, ed. Desmet, Christy, Loper, Natalie and Casey, Jim. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 241–58.Google Scholar

Desmet, Christy, ‘Dramas of Recognition: Pan’s Labyrinth and Warm Bodies as Accidental Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare, ed. Desmet, Christy, Loper, Natalie and Casey, Jim. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 275–91.Google Scholar

Klomp, Neal Robert, ‘Warm Bodies in Plague and Shakespeare’s “Womb of Death”’, in Object Oriented Environs, ed. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome and Yates, Julian. Earth: punctum books, 2016, 47–56.Google Scholar

Földváry, Kinga, ‘Serial Shakespeare: The Case of Star-Crossed (2014)’. Between: Rivista dell’Associazione di Teoria e Storia Comparata della Letteratura 6.11 (May 2016): 1–22. https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/between/article/view/2073.Google Scholar

Chakravarti, Paromita, ‘Interview with Aparna Sen’, in Shakespeare and Indian Cinemas: ‘Local Habitations’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam and Chakravarti, Paromita. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 304–16.Google Scholar

Chakravarti, Paromita, ‘Globalising the City: Kolkata Films and the Millennial Bard’, in Asian Interventions in Global Shakespeare: ‘All the World’s His Stage’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam, Chakravarti, Paromita and Motohashi, Ted. New York and London: Routledge, 2021, 109–27.Google Scholar

Mookherjee, Taarini, ‘Theorizing the Neighbor: Arshinagar and Romeo and Juliet’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 12.2 (2019): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/230.Google Scholar

Panja, Shormishtha, ‘Critiquing Globalization: Transnational Technologies in Arshinagar, Aparna Sen’s Bengali Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet’. Shakespeare Bulletin 38 (2020): 573–92.Google Scholar

Sánchez-García, Inmaculada N., ‘War-Crossed Lovers: Strangers across Borders in The High Sun’. Shakespeare Jahrbuch 155 (2019): 99–115.Google Scholar

Balizet, Ariane M., ‘Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Girls: Web Series’, in her Shakespeare and Girls’ Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 2020, 130–52.Google Scholar

Alsop, James, ‘Upstart Crow Series 2’. Shakespeare Bulletin 36 (2018): 350–4.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Richard, ‘The Bard-Baiting Model in Upstart Crow and Something Rotten’, in Shakespeare & His Biographical Afterlives, ed. Franssen, Paul and Edmonson, Paul. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2020, 150–72.Google Scholar

Starks, Lisa S., ‘Queering Will and Kit: Slash and the Shakespeare Biopic’, in Shakespeare on Stage and off, ed. Graham, Kenneth and Kolentsis, Alysia. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2019, 212–29.Google Scholar

Votava, Jennie M., ‘The Ethiop’s Jewel Meets Euphoria’s Jules: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in an HBO Appropriation of Shakespeare’. Shakespeare Bulletin 38 (2020): 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar