Book contents
- Shakespeare on Screen: Romeo and Juliet
- Series page
- Shakespeare on Screen: Romeo and Juliet
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Introduction – From Canon to Queer: Romeo and Juliet on Screen
- Part I Revisiting the Canon
- Part II Extending Genre
- Part III Serial and Queer Romeo and Juliets
- Chapter 11 Romeo and Juliet, Again and Again: Star-Crossed Lovers Adapted to Serial Television
- Chapter 12 Romeo and Juliet in the Japanese Anime Candy Candy: The Balcony Scene between Tradition and Subversion
- Chapter 13 The (Un)Queering of Romeo and Juliet on Film
- Chapter 14 Romeo and Juliet and Queer Temporality in Three Twenty-first-century Streaming Web-Series
- Chapter 15 Reviving Juliet and Surviving Romeo in Shakespeare Web-Series
- Chapter 16 Romeo and Juliet on Screen: Select Film-bibliography
- Index
- References
Chapter 16 - Romeo and Juliet on Screen: Select Film-bibliography
from Part III - Serial and Queer Romeo and Juliets
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 October 2023
Book contents
- Shakespeare on Screen: Romeo and Juliet
- Series page
- Shakespeare on Screen: Romeo and Juliet
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Introduction – From Canon to Queer: Romeo and Juliet on Screen
- Part I Revisiting the Canon
- Part II Extending Genre
- Part III Serial and Queer Romeo and Juliets
- Chapter 11 Romeo and Juliet, Again and Again: Star-Crossed Lovers Adapted to Serial Television
- Chapter 12 Romeo and Juliet in the Japanese Anime Candy Candy: The Balcony Scene between Tradition and Subversion
- Chapter 13 The (Un)Queering of Romeo and Juliet on Film
- Chapter 14 Romeo and Juliet and Queer Temporality in Three Twenty-first-century Streaming Web-Series
- Chapter 15 Reviving Juliet and Surviving Romeo in Shakespeare Web-Series
- Chapter 16 Romeo and Juliet on Screen: Select Film-bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
The present chapter seeks to provide a selective reference guide to the screen adaptations of Romeo and Juliet up to 2021. This chapter is divided into three sections listing films, television adaptations as well as derivatives and citations. In each section, adaptations are classified in chronological order followed by an alphabetical list of relevant critical studies, and a system of cross-references has been designed for those entries making reference to two or more adaptations.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare on Screen: Romeo and Juliet , pp. 242 - 266Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Ball, Robert Hamilton, ‘What, All in Motion?: Shakespeare by Vitagraph (1908–1911)’, in his Shakespeare on Silent Film: A Strange Eventful History. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1968, 38–60.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Judith, ‘“An Excellent Dumb Discourse”: British and American Shakespeare Films, 1899–1916’, in her Shakespeare on Film. Harlow and New York: Pearson-Longman, 2005, 21–48.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Judith, ‘Corporate Authorship: The Shakespeare Films of the Vitagraph Company of America’, in her Shakespeare on Silent Film: An Excellent Dumb Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 105–46.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Ontological Shivers: The Cinematic Afterlives of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet’, in The Oxford Handbook of Shakespearean Tragedy, ed. Neill, Michael and Schalkwyk, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 556–71.Google Scholar
Burrows, Jon, ‘British “Films d’Art”: Theatre Stars in Transitional Cinema, 1908–1911’, in his Legitimate Cinema: Theatre Stars in Silent British Films, 1908–1918. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2003, 43–89.Google Scholar
Ball, Robert Hamilton, ‘Strange Motions: The Continent (1908–1911)’, in his Shakespeare on Silent Film: A Strange Eventful History. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1968, 90–134.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Judith, ‘“Wresting an Alphabet”: Continental European Shakespeare Films, 1907–1922’, in her Shakespeare on Film. Harlow and New York: Pearson-Longman, 2005, 49–70.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Silents’, in his Shakespeare in Space: Recent Shakespeare Productions on Screen. New York: Peter Lang, 2002, 95–111.Google Scholar
Ball, Robert Hamilton, ‘Cranks and Offices: Others American (1908–1911)’, in his Shakespeare on Silent Film: A Strange Eventful History. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1968, 61–73.Google Scholar
Anderegg, Michael, ‘The Challenges of Romeo and Juliet’, in his Cinematic Shakespeare. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, 54–85.Google Scholar
Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Shakespeare and the Screen Idol’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 51–72.Google Scholar
Cartmell, Deborah, ‘Sound Shakespeare’, in her Adaptations in the Sound Era: 1927–1937. New York and London: Bloomsbury, 2015, 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavecchi, Mariacristina, ‘Romeo and Juliet 2.1: “But soft, what light through yonder window breaks?”’, in The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare, ed. Smith, Bruce R., vol. 2: The World’s Shakespeare, 1660–Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, 1129–36.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Romeo and Juliet: A Beautiful Film for Beautiful People?’, in his Shakespeare in Production: Whose History? Athens: Ohio University Press, 1996, 28–53.Google Scholar
Davies, Anthony, ‘The Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet’. Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996): 153–62.Google Scholar
Jackson, Russell, ‘Visions of Renaissance Italy: 1. “More Stars than There Are in Heaven”: MGM’s Romeo and Juliet, 1936’, in his Shakespeare Films in the Making: Vision, Production and Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 128–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellar, Allison, ‘The Actor’s Aging Body: Norma Shearer as MGM’s Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 47.4 (Fall 2019): https://lfq.salisbury.edu/_issues/47_4/the_actors_aging_body_norma_shearer_as_mgms_juliet.html.Google Scholar
McJannet, Linda, ‘“A hall, a hall! Give room, and foot it, girls”: Realizing the Dance Scene in Romeo and Juliet on Film’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 10.2 (2017): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/272/541.Google Scholar
Patricia, Anthony Guy, ‘The Queer Director, Gay Spectatorship and Three Cinematic Productions of Shakespeare’s “Straightest” Play – Romeo and Juliet’, in his Queering the Shakespeare Film: Gender Trouble, Gay Spectatorship and Male Homoeroticism. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2017, 41–87.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Hollywood’s Four Seasons of Shakespeare’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 27–46.Google Scholar
Tatspaugh, Patricia, ‘The Tragedies of Love on Film’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, ed. Jackson, Russell. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 141–64.Google Scholar
White, R. S., ‘“Star-crossed lovers”: Romeo and Juliet and Romantic Tragedy’, in his Shakespeare’s Cinema of Love: A Study in Genre and Influence. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016, 178–222.Google Scholar
Willson, Robert F., Jr, ‘Love’s Monument: The Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Romeo and Juliet (1936)’, in his Shakespeare in Hollywood, 1929–1956. Madison and Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2000, 51–67.Google Scholar
Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Shakespeare the Filmmaker’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 73–94.Google Scholar
Costantini-Cornède, Anne-Marie, ‘Young Violence versus Institutional Duress: Questions of Authority and Challenge in Romeo and Juliet on Screen’, in Authority, Resistance and Woe: ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and Its Afterlife, ed. Calvi, Lisanna. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 2018, 135–52.Google Scholar
Geal, Robert, ‘“Fainomaic” Adaptation from the Verbal to the Visual’, in his Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation: A Case Study of Shakespearean Films. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 103–55.Google Scholar
Jackson, Russell, ‘Visions of Renaissance Italy: 2. Realism and Romance: Renato Castellani’s Giulietta e Romeo, 1954’, in his Shakespeare Films in the Making: Vision, Production and Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 161–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Spectacle and Song in Castellani and Zeffirelli’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 119–35.Google Scholar
Bladen, Victoria, ‘Two Tragedies of Love: Romeo and Juliet and Othello’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Screen, ed. Jackson, Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, 92–104.Google Scholar
Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Transgressive, in Theory’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 125–56.Google Scholar
Cartmell, Deborah, ‘Shakespeare, Film and Sexuality: Politically Correct Sexuality in Film Adaptations of Romeo and Juliet and Much Ado about Nothing’, in her Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 39–66.Google Scholar
Cartmell, Deborah, ‘Franco Zeffirelli and Shakespeare’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, ed. Jackson, Russell. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 216–25.Google Scholar
Cirillo, Albert R., ‘The Art of Franco Zeffirelli and Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet’. TriQuarterly 16 (Fall 1969): 68–93.Google Scholar
Daileader, Celia R., ‘Nude Shakespeare in Film and Nineties Popular Feminism’, in Shakespeare and Sexuality, ed. Alexander, Catherine M. S. and Wells, Stanley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 183–200.Google Scholar
Deats, Sarah M., ‘Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet: Shakespeare for the Sixties’. Studies in Popular Culture 6 (1983): 60–9.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter S., ‘“Let Lips Do What Hands Do”: Male Bonding, Eros, and Loss in Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet’, in his Shakespearean Films/Shakespearean Directors. Boston and London: Unwin Hyman, 1990, 145–88.Google Scholar
Grindley, James Carl, ‘The Plague in Filmed Versions of Romeo and Juliet and Twelfth Night’, in Apocalyptic Shakespeare: Essays on Visions of Chaos and Revelation in Recent Film Adaptations, ed. Croteau, Melissa and Jess-Cooke, Carolyn. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2009, 148–65.Google Scholar
Grindley, Carl James, ‘“We’re everyone you depend on”: Filming Shakespeare’s Peasants’, in Shakespeare and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Performance and Adaptation of the Plays with Medieval Sources or Settings, ed. Driver, Martha W. and Ray, Sid. Jefferson: McFarland, 2009, 89–104.Google Scholar
Hapgood, Robert, ‘Popularizing Shakespeare: The Artistry of Franco Zeffirelli’, in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video, ed. Boose, Lynda E. and Burt, Richard. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, 80–94.Google Scholar
Holderness, Graham, ‘Romeo and Juliet (1991)’, in his Visual Shakespeares: Essays in Film and Television. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2002, 151–82.Google Scholar
Holmer, Joan Ozark, ‘The Poetics of Paradox: Shakespeare’s versus Zeffirelli’s Cultures of Violence’. Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996): 163–79.Google Scholar
Jackson, Russell, ‘Visions of Renaissance Italy: 3. Shakespeare’s “Dream of Italy” and the Generation Gap: Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet, 1968’, in his Shakespeare Films in the Making: Vision, Production and Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgens, Jack J., ‘Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet’, in his Shakespeare on Film. 1977, rpt, Lanham and London: University Press of America, 1991, 79–91.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Shakespeare with a View: Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 134–66.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet: Then and Now’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 222–32.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jill L., ‘Translation, 1960–1968: Franco Zeffirelli’, in her Romeo and Juliet. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987, 82–123.Google Scholar
Pilkington, Ace G., ‘Zeffirelli’s Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television, ed. Davies, Anthony and Wells, Stanley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 163–79.Google Scholar
Pursell, Michael, ‘Zeffirelli’s Shakespeare: The Visual Realization of Tone and Theme’. Literature/Film Quarterly 8 (1980): 210–18.Google Scholar
Pursell, Michael, ‘Artifice and Authenticity in Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 14 (1986): 173–8.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet: Words into Picture and Music’. Literature/Film Quarterly 5 (1977): 326–31.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Classic Film Versions of Shakespeare’s Tragedies: A Mirror for the Times’, in The Tragedies. Vol. 1 of A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E.. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 241–61.Google Scholar
Scott, Lindsey, ‘“Closed in a Dead Man’s Tomb”: Juliet, Space, and the Body in Franco Zeffirelli’s and Baz Luhrmann’s Films of Romeo and Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 36 (2008): 137–46.Google Scholar
‘Shakespeare in the Cinema: A Film Directors’ Symposium with Peter Brook, Sir Peter Hall, Richard Loncraine, Baz Luhrmann, Trevor Nunn, Oliver Parker, Roman Polanski and Franco Zeffirelli’. Cineaste 24.1 (1998): 48–55.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, Robert, ‘Romeo and Juliet: The Rock and Roll Years’, in Remaking Shakespeare: Performance across Media, Genres and Cultures, ed. Aebischer, Pascale, Esche, Edward J. and Wheale, Nigel. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, 172–89.Google Scholar
Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie, ‘Zeffirelli’s Shakespearean Motion Pictures: Living Monuments’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Screen, ed. Jackson, Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, 213–23.Google Scholar
Van Watson, William, ‘Shakespeare, Zeffirelli and the Homosexual Gaze’. Literature/Film Quarterly 20 (1992): 308–25.Google Scholar
Willson, Robert F., Jr, ‘Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet and the Uses of Cultural Translation’. Upstart Crow 16 (1996): 101–7.Google Scholar
Wray, Ramona, ‘Franco Zeffirelli’, in Welles, Kurosawa, Kozintsev, Zeffirelli, by Burnett, Mark Thornton, Lehmann, Courtney, Rippy, Marguerite H. and Wray, Ramona. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2013, 141–84.Google Scholar
Abbate, Alessandro, ‘The Text within the Text, the Screen within the Screen: Multi-Layered Representations in Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet and Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’, in The Play within the Play: The Performance of Meta-Theatre and Self-Reflection, ed. Fischer, Gerhard and Greiner, Bernhard. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2007, 377–91.Google Scholar
Albanese, Denise, ‘The Shakespeare Film, the Market and the Americanization of Culture’, in her Extramural Shakespeare. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, 95–117.Google Scholar
Anderegg, Michael, ‘James Dean Meets the Pirate’s Daughter: Passion and Parody in William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet and Shakespeare in Love’ in Shakespeare, the Movie, II: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, Video, and DVD, ed. Burt, Richard and Boose, Lynda E.. London and New York: Routledge, 2003, 56–71.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Philip, ‘Shakespeare’s Sex’, in his Shakespeare in Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge, 2001, 181–224.Google Scholar
Balizet, Ariane M., ‘Teen Scenes: Recognizing Shakespeare in Teen Film’, in Almost Shakespeare: Reinventing His Works for Cinema and Television, ed. Keller, James R. and Stratyner, Leslie. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2004, 122–36.Google Scholar
Balizet, Ariane M., ‘The End(s) of Girlhood: Film’, in her Shakespeare and Girls’ Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 2020, 24–60.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Judith, ‘Leaves of Brass and Gads of Steel: Cinema as Subject in Shakespeare Films, 1991–2000’, in her Shakespeare on Film. Harlow and New York: Pearson-Longman, 2005, 220–60.Google Scholar
Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Contemporary Film Versions of the Tragedies’, in The Tragedies. Vol. 1 of A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E.. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 262–83.Google Scholar
Cieślak, Magdalena, ‘Shakespeare’s Camp City’, in Images of the City, ed. Rasmus, Agnieszka and Magdalena, Cieślak. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009, 124–34.Google Scholar
Cook, Pam, ‘William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet (1996)’, in her Baz Luhrmann. London: British Film Institute, 2010, 58–82.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Two Tragedies of Wrong Conclusions: Parker’s Othello and Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’, in his Shakespeare: The Two Traditions. Madison and Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1999, 174–97.Google Scholar
Crowl, Samuel, ‘Shooting Stars: Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in his Shakespeare at the Cineplex: The Kenneth Branagh Era. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2003, 119–34.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter, ‘“All which it inherit”: Shakespeare, Globes and Global Media’. Shakespeare Survey 52 (1999): 183–200.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter S., ‘“In Fair Verona”: Media, Spectacle, and Performance in William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in Shakespeare after Mass Media, ed. Burt, Richard. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002, 59–82.Google Scholar
Downing, Crystal, ‘Misshapen Chaos of Well-Seeming Form: Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 28 (2000): 125–31.Google Scholar
Eschenbaum, Natalie K., ‘Juliet’s Narcissism’, in Shakespeare 450: A Jubilee in Paris, ed. Dominique Goy-Blanquet and Laetitia Sansonetti. Paris: Société Française Shakespeare, 2015, 1–11. https://journals.openedition.org/shakespeare/3600.Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A., ‘Plays and Movies: Richard III and Romeo and Juliet’, in his Shakespeare and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 61–82.Google Scholar
Ford, John R., ‘Pursuing the Story: Piecing out Conventions in Loncraine’s Richard III, Luhrmann’s Romeo & Juliet, and Pacino’s Looking for Richard’. Shakespeare and the Classroom 6.1 (Spring 1998): 62–9.Google Scholar
French, Emma, ‘Hollywood Teen Shakespeare Movies’, in her Selling Shakespeare to Hollywood: The Marketing of Filmed Shakespeare Adaptations from 1989 into the New Millennium. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2006, 101–32.Google Scholar
Geal, Robert, ‘“Állagmic” Adaptation from Shakespearean to Non-(/Less-)Shakespearean Settings’, in his Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation: A Case Study of Shakespearean Films. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 157–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geal, Robert, ‘The Drama of Foreknowledge’, in his Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation: A Case Study of Shakespearean Films. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 183–206.Google Scholar
Georgopoulou, Xenia, ‘Parting “totally sucks”: Filming Romeo and Juliet for Generation X’. Gramma: Journal of Theory and Criticism 15 (2007): 211–26.Google Scholar
Guenther, Leah, ‘Luhrmann’s Top 40 Shakespeare and the Crisis of Shakespearean Consumption’. Journal of American Culture 22.1 (Spring 1999): 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guneratne, Anthony R., ‘Six Authors in Search of a Text: The Shakespeares of Van Sant, Branagh, Godard, Pasolini, Greenaway, and Luhrmann’, in his Shakespeare, Film Studies, and the Visual Cultures of Modernity. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, 211–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Lucy, ‘Baz vs. the Bardolaters, Or Why William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet Deserves Another Look’. Literature/Film Quarterly 28 (2000): 118–24.Google Scholar
Hendricks, Margo, ‘Gestures of Performance: Rethinking Race in Contemporary Shakespeare’, in Colorblind Shakespeare: New Perspectives on Race and Performance, ed. Thompson, Ayanna. New York and London: Routledge, 2006, 187–203.Google Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara, ‘William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet: Everything’s Nice in America?’ Shakespeare Survey 52 (1999): 88–98.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Lisa, ‘The West Coast: William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet and Clueless’, in her Relocating Shakespeare and Austen on Screen. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 24–52.Google Scholar
Jess-Cooke, Carolyn, ‘Film Style’, in her Shakespeare on Film: Such Things as Dreams Are Made of. London: Wallflower Press, 2007, 55–81.Google Scholar
Johae, Antony, ‘“Thy drugs are quick”: Postmodern Dissolution in Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’. Literature/Film Quarterly 44 (2016): 106–19.Google Scholar
Keam, Angela, ‘The “Shakesteen” Genre: Claire Danes’s Star-Body, Teen Female Fans, and the Pluralization of Authorship’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 2.1 (2006): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/37.Google Scholar
Lanier, Douglas, ‘Will of the People: Recent Shakespeare Film Parody and the Politics of Popularization’, in A Concise Companion to Shakespeare on Screen, ed. Henderson, Diana E.. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 176–96.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Strictly Shakespeare?: Dead Letters, Ghostly Fathers, and the Cultural Pathology of Authorship in Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in her Shakespeare Remains: Theater to Film, Early Modern to Postmodern. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2002, 130–60.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet: A Cinematic Detour through the Play’s Textual Origins’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 167–206.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Romeo + Juliet Takes the “A” Train’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 233–48.Google Scholar
Leyva Pizano, Arturo, ‘Speaking without Words: Luhrmann’s Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet’. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 21 (2019): 532–58.Google Scholar
Lindroth, Mary, ‘The Prince and the Newscaster: Baz Luhrmann Updates Shakespeare for a Y2K Audience’. Studies in Popular Culture 22.3 (1999): 55–68.Google Scholar
Loehlin, James N., ‘“These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends”: Baz Luhrmann’s Millennial Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, ed. Burnett, Mark Thornton and Wray, Ramona. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 121–36.Google Scholar
Malone, Toby, ‘Behind the Red Curtain of Verona Beach: Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’. Shakespeare Survey 65 (2012): 398–412.Google Scholar
Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘(Un)Doing the Book “without Verona walls”: A View from the Receiving End of Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in Spectacular Shakespeare: Critical Theory and Popular Cinema, ed. Lehmann, Courtney and Starks, Lisa S.. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2002, 62–85.Google Scholar
Patricia, Anthony Guy, ‘The Visual Poetics of Gender Trouble in Trevor Nunn’s Twelfth Night, Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet and Michael Hoffman’s William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream’, in his Queering the Shakespeare Film: Gender Trouble, Gay Spectatorship and Male Homoeroticism. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2017, 89–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popescu, Veronica, ‘Montagues and Capulets, Star-Crossed Lovers and 20th-Century Veronas’, in Shakespeare in Europe: Nation(s) and Boundaries, ed. Blumenfeld, Odette and Popescu, Veronica. Iaşi: Editura Universităţii Alexandru Ioan Cuza, 2011, 205–22.Google Scholar
Radel, Nicholas F., ‘The Ethiop’s Ear: Race, Sexuality, and Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’. Upstart Crow 28 (2009): 17–34.Google Scholar
Rokison, Abigail, ‘Shakespeare on Film: Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet (1996), Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet (2000) and Christine Edzard’s The Children’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream (2001)’, in her Shakespeare for Young People: Productions, Versions and Adaptations. London: Bloomsbury, 2013, 38–59.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘The Renaissance of Shakespeare in Moving Images’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 219–47.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Melissa E., ‘The Politics of Form: Queer Shakespearean Film’, in her Shakespeare and Queer Theory. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2019, 143–71.Google Scholar
Sanders, Julie, ‘“You know the movie song”: Contemporary and Hybrid Film Scores’, in her Shakespeare and Music: Afterlives and Borrowings. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2007, 159–81.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Philippa, ‘Latino Elements in Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’, in Latin American Shakespeares, ed. Kliman, Bernice W. and Santos, Rick J.. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005, 242–62.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Philippa, ‘The Drive to Realism in Shakespearean Adaptation to Film’, in her Devouring Time: Nostalgia in Contemporary Shakespearean Screen Adaptations. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017, 57–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, Philippa, ‘Death Rituals in Shakespeare, Almereyda, and Luhrmann’, in her Devouring Time: Nostalgia in Contemporary Shakespearean Screen Adaptations. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017, 153–76.Google Scholar
Swanigan, Pamela, ‘Music as Facing-Page Translation in Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 7.2 (2012): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/116.Google Scholar
Vela, Richard, ‘Post-Apocalyptic Spaces in Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in Apocalyptic Shakespeare: Essays on Visions of Chaos and Revelation in Recent Film Adaptations, ed. Croteau, Melissa and Jess-Cooke, Carolyn. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2009, 90–109.Google Scholar
Walker, Elsie, ‘Pop Goes the Shakespeare: Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet’, in The Literature/Film Reader: Issues of Adaptation, ed. Welsh, James M. and Lev, Peter. Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2007, 125–48.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B., ‘Shakespearean Geographies’, in his Shakespeare and the Force of Modern Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 117–68.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B., ‘Fond Records: Remembering Theatre in the Digital Age’, in Shakespeare, Memory and Performance, ed. Holland, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 281–304.Google Scholar
Lan, Yong Li, ‘Returning to Naples: Seeing the End in Shakespeare Film Adaptation’. Literature/Film Quarterly 29 (2001): 128–34.Google Scholar
York, Robert L., ‘“Smells like Teen Shakespirit” Or, the Shakespearean Films of Julia Stiles’, in Shakespeare and Youth Culture, ed. Jennifer Hulbert, Kevin J. Wetmore, Jr and York, Robert L.. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, 57–115.Google Scholar
Kliman, Bernice W., ‘Romeo and Juliet Variations on Television’, in Shakespeare on Screen: Television Shakespeare: Essays in Honour of Michèle Willems, ed. Hatchuel, Sarah and Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Presses universitaires de Rouen et du Havre, 2008, 61–77.Google Scholar
Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie, ‘Colour and Horror: Claude Barma’s 1973 Romeo and Juliet’, in Shakespeare on Screen in Francophonia: The Shakscreen Collection 5, ed. Dorval, Patricia and Vienne-Guerrin., Nathalie Montpellier: Université Paul-Valéry/Montpellier 3, 2021. http://shakscreen.org/analysis/vienne-guerrin_2021/.Google Scholar
Wrigley, Amanda, ‘Space and Place in Joan Kemp-Welch’s Television Productions of Theatre Plays’. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 34 (2014): 405–19.Google Scholar
Anderegg, Michael, ‘Electronic Shakespeares: Televisual Histories’, in his Cinematic Shakespeare. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, 148–76.Google Scholar
Willis, Susan, ‘A Study in Diversity: The Televised Shakespeare Canon’, in her The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1991, 187–225.Google Scholar
Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Documentary Shakespeare’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 33–49.Google Scholar
Buckley, Thea, ‘“Singing Is Such Sweet Sorrow”: Ambikapathy, Hollywood Shakespeare and Tamil Cinema’s Hybrid Heritage’, in Shakespeare and Indian Cinemas: ‘Local Habitations’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam and Chakravarti, Paromita. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 200–17.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter, ‘Spinach and Tobacco: Making Shakespearian Unoriginals’. Shakespeare Survey 68 (2015): 197–209.Google Scholar
Darragi, Rafik, ‘The Perfect, Impossible Love: Three Egyptian Film Adaptations of Romeo and Juliet’. Critical Survey 28.3 (Winter 2016): 175–80.Google Scholar
Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘Cantinflas’s Romeo y Julieta: The Rogue and Will’, in Latin American Shakespeares, ed. Kliman, Bernice W. and Santos, Rick J.. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005, 219–41.Google Scholar
Vela, Richard, ‘Shakespeare, Hollywood and Mexico: The Cantinflas Romeo y Julieta’. Literature/Film Quarterly 30 (2002): 231–6.Google Scholar
Kingsley-Smith, Jane E., ‘Shakespearean Authorship in Popular British Cinema’. Literature/Film Quarterly 30 (2002): 158–65.Google Scholar
Lanier, Douglas M., ‘Love in the Ruins: Les Amants de Vérone and “Authentic” Shakespeare Adaptation’, in Shakespeare on Screen in Francophonia: The Shakscreen Collection 4, ed. Croteau, Melissa. Montpellier: Université Paul-Valéry/Montpellier 3, 2016.www.shakscreen.org/analysis/love_in_ruins/.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Now Showing: West Side Story’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 103–33.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘West Side Sucess’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’: The Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010, 207–21.Google Scholar
Sanders, Julie, ‘“Shakespeare with a contemporary musical twist”’, in her Shakespeare and Music: Afterlives and Borrowings. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2007, 73–95.Google Scholar
Lee, Adele, ‘“Chop-Socky Shakespeare”?!: The Bard Onscreen in Hong Kong’. Shakespeare Bulletin 28 (2010): 459–79.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Nandi, ‘Multiple Mediations of “Shakespeare”’, in her Acts of Authority/Acts of Resistance: Theater and Politics in Colonial and Postcolonial India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004, 51–75.Google Scholar
Burt, Richard, ‘All That Remains of Shakespeare in Indian Film’, in Shakespeare in Asia: Contemporary Performance, ed. Kennedy, Dennis and Li Lan, Yong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 73–108.Google Scholar
Chui, Jane Yeang, Wong, ‘Reconsidering Empire as Metaphor in Shakespeare Wallah’, in Shakespeare and Asia, ed. Hart, Jonathan Locke. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 201–12.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Lisa, ‘Across the Ocean: Shakespeare Wallah and Shakespearean Performance; and Bride and Prejudice (2004)’, in her Relocating Shakespeare and Austen on Screen. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 105–29.Google Scholar
Kapadia, Parmita, ‘Bollywood Battles the Bard: The Evolving Relationship between Film and Theater in Shakespeare Wallah’, in Bollywood Shakespeares, ed. Dionne, Craig and Kapadia, Parmita. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 45–60.Google Scholar
Wayne, Valerie, ‘Shakespeare Wallah and Colonial Specularity’, in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video, ed. Boose, Lynda E. and Burt, Richard. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, 95–102.Google Scholar
Christopher, Brandon, ‘Star Trek’s Shakespeare Problem’, in Shakespeare on Stage and off, ed. Graham, Kenneth and Kolentsis, Alysia. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2019, 230–40.Google Scholar
Hatchuel, Sarah, ‘Shakespeare’s Humanizing Language in Films and TV Series’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 12.2 (2019): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/233.Google Scholar
Delord, Frédéric, ‘André Téchiné’s “Shakespearean Trilogy”, in Shakespeare on Screen: ‘Hamlet’, ed. Hatchuel, Sarah and Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Presses universitaires de Rouen et du Havre, 2011, 277–90.Google Scholar
Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Romeo and Juliet’, in his Shakespeare and World Cinema. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 195–231.Google Scholar
García-Periago, Rosa M., ‘In Search of a Happy Ending: The Afterlife of Romeo and Juliet on the Asian Screen’. Atlantis (Spain) 38 (2016): 185–200.Google Scholar
Joubin, Alexa Alice, ‘“Our toil shall strive to mend”: Politics of Remediation’, in her Shakespeare and East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 63–105.Google Scholar
Lee, Adele, ‘One Husband Too Many and the Problem of Postcolonial Hong Kong’, in Shakespeare in Hollywood, Asia and Cyberspace, ed. Huang, Alexander C. Y. and Ross, Charles S.. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2009, 195–204.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Koel, ‘“Where art thou Muse that thou forget’st so long,/To speak of that which gives thee all thy might?”: Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak (1988) – A Neglected Shakespeare Film’, in Shakespeare and Indian Cinemas: ‘Local Habitations’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam and Chakravarti, Paromita. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 93–110.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Koel, ‘Indian Shakespeare Cinema and the Active Audience’, in Shakespeare’s Audiences, ed. Pangallo, Matteo and Kirwan, Peter. New York and London: Routledge, 2021, 102–18.Google Scholar
Harris, Jonathan Gil, ‘Act Two Scene Four: Masala Lovers (Romeo and Juliet)’, in his Masala Shakespeare: How a Firangi Writer Became Indian. New Delhi: Aleph Book Company, 2018, 72–90.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Joyce Green, ‘Uncrossed Lovers: Remembering Race in Romeo and Juliet and Mississippi Masala’, in her Shakespearean Adaptation, Race and Memory in the New World. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, 47–75.Google Scholar
Andreas, James R., ‘The Canning of a Classic: Shakespeare, The Animated Tales’. Shakespeare Yearbook 11 (2000): 96–117.Google Scholar
Boguszak, Jakub, ‘The Poetics of Shakespearean Animation’. Shakespeare Bulletin 32 (2014): 159–83.Google Scholar
Osborne, Laurie E., ‘Poetry in Motion: Animating Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video, ed. Boose, Lynda E. and Burt, Richard. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, 103–20.Google Scholar
Rokison, Abigail, ‘Shakespeare: The Animated Tales’, in her Shakespeare for Young People: Productions, Versions and Adaptations. London: Bloomsbury, 2013, 128–44.Google Scholar
Hedrick, Donald and Reynolds, Bryan, ‘Shakespace and Transversal Power’, in Shakespeare without Class: Misappropriations of Cultural Capital. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000, 3–47.Google Scholar
Kidnie, Margaret Jane, ‘“The Way the World Is Now”: Love in the Troma Zone’, in Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, ed. Burnett, Mark Thornton and Wray, Ramona. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 102–20.Google Scholar
Semenza, Greg M. Colón, ‘Tromeo & Juliet, Teen Films, and the Cinematic Aesthetic of Un-Cuteness’. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 16.3 (Summer 2016): 13–29.Google Scholar
Mallin, Eric S., ‘Titanic’s Doomed Lovers as Shakespearean Avatars’, in his Reading Shakespeare in the Movies: Non-Adaptations and Their Meaning. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 85–138.Google Scholar
Anderegg, Michael, ‘Finding the Playwright on Film’, in his Cinematic Shakespeare. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, 27–53.Google Scholar
Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Conclusion: The Next Century of Shakespeare’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 179–93.Google Scholar
Burt, Richard, ‘Shakespeare in Love and the End of the Shakespearean: Academic and Mass Culture Constructions of Literary Authorship’, in Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, ed. Burnett, Mark Thornton and Wray, Ramona. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 203–31.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘The Use and Misuse of History: Two Recent Films’, in his Shakespeare in Space: Recent Shakespeare Productions on Screen. New York: Peter Lang, 2002, 71–94.Google Scholar
Davis, Todd F. and Womack, Kenneth, ‘Reading (and Writing) the Ethics of Authorship: Shakespeare in Love as Postmodern Metanarrative’. Literature/Film Quarterly 32 (2004): 153–62.Google Scholar
DiPietro, Cary, ‘Sex, Lies and Videotape: Representing the Past in Shakespeare in Love, Mapping a Future for Presentism’. Shakespeare (British Shakespeare Association) 3 (2007): 40–62.Google Scholar
Földváry, Kinga, ‘Will, Bill and the Earl: Versions of the Author in Contemporary Biopics’, in her Cowboy Hamlets and Zombie Romeos: Shakespeare in Genre Film. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020, 247–84.Google Scholar
Franssen, Paul J. C. M., ‘Shakespeare’s Life on Film and Television: Shakespeare in Love and A Waste of Shame’, in Adaptation, Intermediality and the British Celebrity Biopic, ed. Minier, Márta and Pennacchia, Maddalena. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014, 101–13.Google Scholar
French, Emma, ‘Shakespeare in Love’, in her Selling Shakespeare to Hollywood: The Marketing of Filmed Shakespeare Adaptations from 1989 into the New Millennium. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2006, 133–68.Google Scholar
Geal, Robert, ‘The Drama of the Diegetic Author’, in his Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation: A Case Study of Shakespearean Films. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 207–19.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Sujata, ‘Shakespeare in HeteroLove’. Literature/Film Quarterly 29 (2001): 122–7.Google Scholar
Jeffers, Jennifer M., ‘Shakespeare’s Counterfeit Signature: Shakespeare in Love’, in her Britain Colonized: Hollywood’s Appropriation of British Literature. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, 207–26.Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter, ‘“You have no voice!”: Constructing Reputation through Contemporaries in the Shakespeare Biopic’. Shakespeare Bulletin 32 (2014): 11–26.Google Scholar
Klett, Elizabeth, ‘Shakespeare in Love and the End(s) of History’, in Retrovisions: Reinventing the Past in Film and Fiction, ed. Cartmell, Deborah, Hunter, I. Q. and Whelehan, Imelda. London and Sterling: Pluto Press, 2001, 25–40.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Shakespeare in Love: Sex, Capitalism, and the Authorial Body-in-Pleasure’, in her Shakespeare Remains: Theater to Film, Early Modern to Postmodern. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2002, 213–33.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Dancing in a (Cyber) Net: “Renaissance Women”, Systems Theory, and the War of the Cinemas’. Renaissance Drama ns 34 (2005): 121–61.Google Scholar
Mayo, Sarah, ‘“A Shakespeare for the People?”: Negotiating the Popular in Shakespeare in Love and Michael Hoffman’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream’. Textual Practice 17 (2003): 295–315.Google Scholar
Nicholls, Mark, ‘Brush up Your Shakespeare: Performance Anxieties in Shakespeare in Love’. Journal of Film and Video 54.4 (Winter 2002): 3–15.Google Scholar
Shachar, Hila, ‘Heritage and the Literary Biopic “Template”: Shakespeare, Austen, Wilde, and the Author as Product’, in her Screening the Author: The Literary Biopic. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 23–62.Google Scholar
Shapiro, James, ‘1998: Adultery and Same-Sex Love’, in his Shakespeare in a Divided America. London: Faber & Faber, 2020, 201–25.Google Scholar
Starks, Lisa S., ‘Screening Will and Jane: Sexuality and the Gendered Author in Shakespeare and Austen Biopics’, in Jane Austen and William Shakespeare: A Love Affair in Literature, Film and Performance, ed. Cano, Marina and García-Periago, Rosa. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 291–310.Google Scholar
Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Shakespeare, Cinema, Asia’, in his Shakespeare and World Cinema. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 125–59.Google Scholar
Joubin, Alexa Alice, ‘“Divided in three our kingdom”: Multilingualism and Diaspora’, in her Shakespeare and East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 142–85.Google Scholar
Joubin, Alexa Alice, ‘Screening Social Justice: Performing Reparative Shakespeare against Vocal Disability’. Adaptation 14 (2021): 187–205.Google Scholar
Lan, Yong Li, ‘Romeos and Juliets, Local/Global’, in Shakespeare’s Local Habitations, ed. Courtney, Krystyna Kujawińska and White, R. S.. Łódź: Łódź University Press, 2007, 135–54.Google Scholar
Kim, James, ‘The Legend of the White-and-Yellow Black Man: Global Containment and Triangulated Racial Desire in Romeo Must Die’. Camera Obscura 19.1 (55) (2004): 151–79.Google Scholar
Calbi, Maurizio, ‘“This Is My Home, Too”: Migration, Spectrality, and Hospitality in Roberta Torre’s Sud Side Stori, in his Spectral Shakespeares: Media Adaptations in the Twenty-First Century. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 81–98.Google Scholar
Cavecchi, Mariacristina, ‘Shakespeare in Vucciria: “Fair Verona” in Roberta Torre’s Sud Side Stori’, in Crossing Time and Space: Shakespeare Translations in Present-Day Europe, ed. Dente, Carla and Soncini, Sara. Pisa: Edizioni Plus, 2008, 89–106.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Shakespearean Reverberations: From Religion to Responsibility in Roberta Torre’s Sud Side Stori’, in Shakespearean Echoes, ed. Hansen, Adam and Wetmore, Kevin J., Jr. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2015, 97–107.Google Scholar
Klett, Elizabeth, ‘Reviving Viola: Comic and Tragic Teen Film Adaptations of Twelfth Night’. Shakespeare Bulletin 26.2 (Summer 2008): 69–87.Google Scholar
Silverstone, Catherine, ‘Shakespeare, Cinema and Queer Adolescents: Unhappy Endings and Heartfelt Conclusions’. Shakespeare (British Shakespeare Association) 10 (2014): 309–27.Google Scholar
Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘Looking for Mr GoodWill in “Rancho Grande” and beyond: The “Ghostly” Presence of Shakespeare in Mexican Cinema’. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 25 (2012): 97–112.Google Scholar
Burt, Richard, ‘Mobilizing Foreign Shakespeares in Media’, in Shakespeare in Hollywood, Asia, and Cyberspace, ed. Huang, Alexander C. Y. and Ross, Charles S.. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2009, 231–8.Google Scholar
Burt, Richard, ‘Alluding to Shakespeare in L’Appartement, The King Is Alive, Wicker Park, A Time to Love, and University of Laughs: Digital Film, Asianization, and the Transnational Film Remake’. Shakespeare Yearbook 17 (2010): 45–78.Google Scholar
Alcantara, Christiane F. de, ‘Representations of Shakespearean Women in Contemporary Brazilian Media’. Forum for World Literature Studies 2 (2010): 215–26.Google Scholar
Yang, Lingui, ‘Shakespeare’s Uses in Chinese Media and Trans-Sphere’, in Asian Interventions in Global Shakespeare: ‘All the World’s His Stage’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam, Chakravarti, Paromita and Motohashi, Ted. New York and London: Routledge, 2021, 129–45.Google Scholar
Harrison, Keith, ‘Romeo and Juliet, Polyglossia, and the Romantic Politics of Deepa Mehta’s Water’, in his Shakespeare, Bakhtin, and Film: A Dialogic Lens. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 209–26.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘“An élan of the soul”?: Counter-cinema and Deepa Mehta’s Water’. Shakespeare Bulletin 34 (2016): 433–50.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Gender, Adaptation, and Justice’. Literature/Film Quarterly 45.2 (Spring 2017): https://lfq.salisbury.edu/_issues/first/gender_adaptation_and_justice.html.Google Scholar
Calbi, Maurizio, ‘The Boundaries of Citation and Allusion: Shakespeare in Davide Ferrario’s Tutta colpa di Giuda (2008), Alfredo Peyretti’s Moana (2009), and Connie Macatuno’s Rome and Juliet (2006)’. Textus 31.3 (September–December 2018): 51–72.Google Scholar
Burt, Richard and Yates, Julian, ‘Romeo and Juliet Is for Zombies’, in their What’s the Worst Thing You Can Do to Shakespeare? New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 47–74.Google Scholar
Calbi, Maurizio, ‘Chasing Shakespeare: The Impurity of the “Not Quite” in Norry Niven’s From Above and Abbas Kiarostami’s Where Is My Romeo’, in Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare, ed. Desmet, Christy, Loper, Natalie and Casey, Jim. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 43–58.Google Scholar
Ludot-Vlasak, Ronan, ‘“What’s in a Name?”: The Circulation of Romeo and Juliet in Cold Case’. Literature/Film Quarterly 42 (2014): 451–60.Google Scholar
Casey, Jim, ‘HypeRomeo & Juliet: Postmodern Adaptation and Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare, ed. Desmet, Christy, Loper, Natalie and Casey, Jim. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 59–75.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, Dani, ‘Romance Meets Revolution: Romeo x Juliet’, in her Anime and the Art of Adaptation: Eight Famous Works from Page to Screen. Jefferson: McFarland, 2010, 99–127.Google Scholar
Minami, Ryuta, ‘Hello Sha-kitty-peare?: Shakespeares Cutified in Japanese Anime Imagination’. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 16.3 (Summer 2016): 116–37.Google Scholar
Minami, Ryuta, ‘“The Very Basics for All of Us”: Fragments of Shakespeare in Japanese Anime and Manga’, in Shakespeare’s Asian Journeys: Critical Encounters, Cultural Geographies, and the Politics of Travel, ed. Lei, Bi-qi Beatrice, Ick, Judy Celine and Trivedi, Poonam. New York and London: Routledge, 2017, 239–54.Google Scholar
Yoshihara, Yukari, ‘Tacky “Shakespeares” in Japan’. Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance 10 (25) (Dec. 2013): 83–97.Google Scholar
Yoshihara, Yukari, ‘Bardolators and Bardoclasts: Shakespeare in Manga/Anime and Cosplay’, in Asian Interventions in Global Shakespeare: ‘All the World’s His Stage’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam, Chakravarti, Paromita and Motohashi, Ted. New York and London: Routledge, 2021, 146–59.Google Scholar
Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘Cliché “By any other name … ” Or Romeo and Juliet, the Telenovela’, in Shakespearean Echoes, ed. Hansen, Adam and Wetmore, Kevin J., Jr. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2015, 80–96.Google Scholar
Keinänen, Nely, ‘What’s Global about Global Shakespeare? The Case of Perttu Leppä’s 8 päivää ensi-iltaan (8 Days to Premiere)’. Shakespeare (British Shakespeare Association) 9 (2013): 330–8.Google Scholar
Semenza, Greg M. Colón, ‘Echoes of Romeo and Juliet in Let the Right One in and Let Me in’, in Shakespearean Echoes, ed. Hansen, Adam and Wetmore, Kevin J., Jr. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, 56–67.Google Scholar
Botha, Chandré and Broodryk, Chris, ‘A South African Romeo and Juliet: Gender Identity in Minky Schlesinger’s Gugu and Andile’. Shakespeare in Southern Africa 30 (2017): 56–69.Google Scholar
Seeff, Adele, ‘Inheriting the Past, Surviving the Future’, in The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Global Appropriation, ed. Desmet, Christy, Iyengar, Sujata and Jacobson, Miriam. London and New York: Routledge, 2020, 161–70.Google Scholar
Földváry, Kinga, ‘Shakespeare the Undead: A Renaissance of Vampires and Zombies’, in her Cowboy Hamlets and Zombie Romeos: Shakespeare in Genre Film. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020, 211–46.Google Scholar
Forker, Charles R., ‘From Romeo and Juliet to Letters to Juliet: Elizabethan Tragedy Re-envisioned as Romantic Comedy’. Shakespeare Newsletter 60 (2010): 105–10, 112.Google Scholar
Crouau, Nathalie, ‘Searching for the Lubitsch Touch: Hazanavicius Puts a Twist on Shakespeare in OSS 117: Lost in Rio (2009) and The Artist (2011)’, in Shakespeare on Screen in Francophonia: The Shakscreen Collection 3, ed. Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie and Dorval, Patricia. Montpellier: Université Paul-Valéry/Montpellier 3, 2014. www.shakscreen.org/analysis/crouau_2014/.Google Scholar
Kleij, Sonja, ‘“What’s in a Gnome?”: Gender, Intertextuality, and Irreverence in Gnomeo and Juliet’, in Playfulness in Shakespearean Adaptations, ed. Gerzic, Marina and Norrie, Aidan. New York and London: Routledge, 2020, 231–47.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, Paromita, ‘Ishaqzaade, dir. by Habib Faisal, and Issaq, dir. by Manish Tiwary and Goliyon Ki Raasleela: Ram-Leela, dir. by Sanjay Leela Bhansali’. Shakespeare Bulletin 33 (2015): 666–70.Google Scholar
Harris, Jonathan Gil, ‘Telmah Thel: The Hustle-Bustle of a Hindi Romeo and Juliet’. Critical Survey 26.3 (Dec. 2014): 29–38.Google Scholar
Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Shakespeare and Keraliyatha: Romeo and Juliet, Adaptation and South Indian Cinemas’. Cahiers Élisabéthains 105 (July 2021): 41–59.Google Scholar
Michel Modenessi, Alfredo, ‘“Both Alike in Dignity”: Havana and Mexico City Play Romeo and Juliet’. Shakespeare Survey 71 (2018): 51–8.Google Scholar
García-Periago, Rosa, ‘Localizing Romeo and Juliet: Ram-Leela, Female Agency, and Indian Politics’. Adaptation 14 (2021): 349–66.Google Scholar
Panjwani, Varsha, ‘Juliet in Ram-Leela: A Passionate Sita’. Shakespeare Studies 46 (2018): 110–19.Google Scholar
Sayed, Asma, ‘Adaptation as Translation: The Bard in Bombay’, in Shakespeare and Asia, ed. Hart, Jonathan Locke. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 213–28.Google Scholar
Balizet, Ariane M., ‘The Big Bad Bard: Television and Small Screens’, in her Shakespeare and Girls’ Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 2020, 61–92.Google Scholar
Croteau, Melissa, ‘Surfing with Juliet: The Shakespearean Dialectics of Disney’s Teen Beach Movie’, in Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare, ed. Desmet, Christy, Loper, Natalie and Casey, Jim. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 241–58.Google Scholar
Desmet, Christy, ‘Dramas of Recognition: Pan’s Labyrinth and Warm Bodies as Accidental Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare, ed. Desmet, Christy, Loper, Natalie and Casey, Jim. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 275–91.Google Scholar
Klomp, Neal Robert, ‘Warm Bodies in Plague and Shakespeare’s “Womb of Death”’, in Object Oriented Environs, ed. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome and Yates, Julian. Earth: punctum books, 2016, 47–56.Google Scholar
Földváry, Kinga, ‘Serial Shakespeare: The Case of Star-Crossed (2014)’. Between: Rivista dell’Associazione di Teoria e Storia Comparata della Letteratura 6.11 (May 2016): 1–22. https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/between/article/view/2073.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, Paromita, ‘Interview with Aparna Sen’, in Shakespeare and Indian Cinemas: ‘Local Habitations’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam and Chakravarti, Paromita. New York and London: Routledge, 2019, 304–16.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, Paromita, ‘Globalising the City: Kolkata Films and the Millennial Bard’, in Asian Interventions in Global Shakespeare: ‘All the World’s His Stage’, ed. Trivedi, Poonam, Chakravarti, Paromita and Motohashi, Ted. New York and London: Routledge, 2021, 109–27.Google Scholar
Mookherjee, Taarini, ‘Theorizing the Neighbor: Arshinagar and Romeo and Juliet’. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 12.2 (2019): https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/230.Google Scholar
Panja, Shormishtha, ‘Critiquing Globalization: Transnational Technologies in Arshinagar, Aparna Sen’s Bengali Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet’. Shakespeare Bulletin 38 (2020): 573–92.Google Scholar
Sánchez-García, Inmaculada N., ‘War-Crossed Lovers: Strangers across Borders in The High Sun’. Shakespeare Jahrbuch 155 (2019): 99–115.Google Scholar
Balizet, Ariane M., ‘Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Girls: Web Series’, in her Shakespeare and Girls’ Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 2020, 130–52.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Richard, ‘The Bard-Baiting Model in Upstart Crow and Something Rotten’, in Shakespeare & His Biographical Afterlives, ed. Franssen, Paul and Edmonson, Paul. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2020, 150–72.Google Scholar
Starks, Lisa S., ‘Queering Will and Kit: Slash and the Shakespeare Biopic’, in Shakespeare on Stage and off, ed. Graham, Kenneth and Kolentsis, Alysia. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2019, 212–29.Google Scholar
Votava, Jennie M., ‘The Ethiop’s Jewel Meets Euphoria’s Jules: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in an HBO Appropriation of Shakespeare’. Shakespeare Bulletin 38 (2020): 593–614.Google Scholar