Book contents
- Shakespeare and Virtue
- Shakespeare and Virtue
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Shakespeare and Virtue Ethics
- Part II Shakespeare’s Virtues
- Part III Shakespeare and Global Virtue Traditions
- Chapter 28 Shakespeare’s Rabbinic Virtues
- Chapter 29 Islamic Virtues
- Chapter 30 Persian Virtues
- Chapter 31 Buddhist Virtues
- Chapter 32 The Virtues in Black Theology
- Chapter 33 Virtue on Robben Island
- Chapter 34 Globability
- Part IV Virtuous Performances
- Works Cited
- Index
Chapter 33 - Virtue on Robben Island
from Part III - Shakespeare and Global Virtue Traditions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2023
- Shakespeare and Virtue
- Shakespeare and Virtue
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Shakespeare and Virtue Ethics
- Part II Shakespeare’s Virtues
- Part III Shakespeare and Global Virtue Traditions
- Chapter 28 Shakespeare’s Rabbinic Virtues
- Chapter 29 Islamic Virtues
- Chapter 30 Persian Virtues
- Chapter 31 Buddhist Virtues
- Chapter 32 The Virtues in Black Theology
- Chapter 33 Virtue on Robben Island
- Chapter 34 Globability
- Part IV Virtuous Performances
- Works Cited
- Index
Summary
This short chapter examines the degree to which the communal experiences of political prisoners on what Irving Goffman calls a “total institution” like South Africa’s Robben Island Prison might paradoxically exemplify the kind of community that Aristotle requires for the exercise of virtue proper: a sense of communal friendship built on trust and the virtues celebrated by Nelson Mandela: “Honesty, sincerity, simplicity, humility, pure generosity, absence of vanity, readiness to serve others”. But at the same time, it complicates that utopian vision with the fact that such communities tend to establish their sense of identity on the exclusion of others, regarded as alien, different, or threatening, a tendency present on Robben Island. The chapter consequently opposes the Aristotelean notion of communal virtue with a very different concept of ethics derived from Levinas: in which no community may be established in opposition to another, but in which the ethical imperative is to be open to otherness, beyond to bounds of the Aristotelian polis. It argues that the prisoner’s signing their names against their favourite passage from Shakespeare, in Sonny Venkatrathnam’s copy of Shakespeare’s complete works, is an exemplum of such openness to the stranger.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare and VirtueA Handbook, pp. 325 - 333Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023