Prevailing Tastes
from Essays on Geoffrey Hill
Summary
In the 1802 version of his ‘Preface’ to Lyrical Ballads William Wordsworth remonstrated against ‘the language of men who speak of what they do not understand; who talk of Poetry as of a matter of amusement and idle pleasure; who will converse with us as gravely about a taste for Poetry, as they express it, as if it were a thing as indifferent as a taste for rope-dancing, or Frontiniac or Sherry’. For Geoffrey Hill, who cites these lines in his essay ‘Redeeming the Time’ (LL 95), the sentiment has lost none of its relevance. He is at one with Wordsworth in recognizing that an indifferently professed ‘taste for Poetry’ is pernicious for its very casualness. Equally to the point are the views conveyed by Coleridge in a letter to Thomas Poole of 28 January 1810 concerning regrettable tendencies in public reading habits, tendencies influenced by the output of a journal he nonetheless admired:
the Spectator itself has innocently contributed to the general taste for unconnected writing – just as if ‘Reading made easy’ should act to give men an aversion to words of more than two syllables, instead of drawing them thro' those words into the power of reading Books in general. – In the present age, whatever flatters the mind in it's [sic] ignorance of it's [sic] ignorance, tends to aggravate that ignorance – and I apprehend, does on the whole do more harm than good.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shades of AuthorityThe Poetry of Lowell, Hill and Heaney, pp. 82 - 105Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2007