
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study
- 3 Sex differences in the amount of antisocial behaviour: dimensional measures
- 4 Sex differences in the prevalence of antisocial behaviour: categorical diagnostic measures
- 5 Sex differences in physical violence and sex similarities in partner abuse
- 6 Sex and the developmental stability of antisocial behaviour
- 7 Sex and the age of onset of delinquency and conduct disorder
- 8 Sex effects in risk predictors for antisocial behaviour: are males more vulnerable than females to risk factors for antisocial behaviour?
- 9 Sex effects in risk predictors for antisocial behaviour: are males exposed to more risk factors for antisocial behaviour?
- 10 Can sex differences in personality traits help to explain sex differences in antisocial behaviour?
- 11 Sex and comorbidity: are there sex differences in the co-occurrence of conduct disorder and other disorders?
- 12 Do girls who develop antisocial behaviour surmount a higher threshold of risk than their male counterparts?
- 13 Sex differences in the effects of antisocial behaviour on young adult outcomes
- 14 Sex, antisocial behaviour, and mating: mate selection and early childbearing
- 15 Evaluating the recommendation to relax the criteria for diagnosing conduct disorder in girls
- 16 Life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial behaviour among males and females
- 17 Priorities for a research agenda
- References
- Index
13 - Sex differences in the effects of antisocial behaviour on young adult outcomes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study
- 3 Sex differences in the amount of antisocial behaviour: dimensional measures
- 4 Sex differences in the prevalence of antisocial behaviour: categorical diagnostic measures
- 5 Sex differences in physical violence and sex similarities in partner abuse
- 6 Sex and the developmental stability of antisocial behaviour
- 7 Sex and the age of onset of delinquency and conduct disorder
- 8 Sex effects in risk predictors for antisocial behaviour: are males more vulnerable than females to risk factors for antisocial behaviour?
- 9 Sex effects in risk predictors for antisocial behaviour: are males exposed to more risk factors for antisocial behaviour?
- 10 Can sex differences in personality traits help to explain sex differences in antisocial behaviour?
- 11 Sex and comorbidity: are there sex differences in the co-occurrence of conduct disorder and other disorders?
- 12 Do girls who develop antisocial behaviour surmount a higher threshold of risk than their male counterparts?
- 13 Sex differences in the effects of antisocial behaviour on young adult outcomes
- 14 Sex, antisocial behaviour, and mating: mate selection and early childbearing
- 15 Evaluating the recommendation to relax the criteria for diagnosing conduct disorder in girls
- 16 Life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial behaviour among males and females
- 17 Priorities for a research agenda
- References
- Index
Summary
In chapters 8 and 9 we saw evidence that the aetiology of adolescent antisocial behaviour may be more similar than different for males and females. But aetiological similarity does not preclude males and females, once they are involved in antisocial behaviour, from developing different outcomes. As one example of this divergence, chapter 11 showed that once involved in antisocial behaviour, females but not males are at risk for adult depression. In this chapter, we examine whether antisocial problems in boys and girls predict the same or different outcomes in adulthood.
One possibility is that a history of antisocial behaviour has fewer negative consequences for females than for males. A reason for this expectation has to do with the pressure of social norms. Evidence for the influence of sexrole norms on outcomes emerged from the Fels Research Institute studies (Kagan and Moss, 1962). A number of continuities were found from childhood to adulthood, but they were related to the sex of the individual and the sex-appropriateness of the behaviours being assessed. For example, passivity and dependency showed continuity for female subjects but not for male subjects, whereas aggression showed continuity for male subjects but not for female subjects. These findings suggest that individuals who deviate from socially and culturally expected patterns of behaviour are often disliked and are thus likely to be coerced into more modal patterns – what Cattell (1973) has called ‘coercion to the biosocial mean’.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sex Differences in Antisocial BehaviourConduct Disorder, Delinquency, and Violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study, pp. 159 - 183Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001
- 6
- Cited by