Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of legislative measures
- Table of cases
- 1 An introduction to English sentencing
- 2 Sentencing and the constitution
- 3 Sentencing aims, principles and policies
- 4 Elements of proportionality
- 5 Aggravation and mitigation
- 6 Persistence, prevention and prediction
- 7 Equality before the law
- 8 Multiple offenders
- 9 Custodial sentencing
- 10 Non-custodial sentencing
- 11 Procedural issues and ancillary orders
- 12 Special sentencing powers
- 13 Conclusions
- Appendix: The Sentencing Council: provisions in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of legislative measures
- Table of cases
- 1 An introduction to English sentencing
- 2 Sentencing and the constitution
- 3 Sentencing aims, principles and policies
- 4 Elements of proportionality
- 5 Aggravation and mitigation
- 6 Persistence, prevention and prediction
- 7 Equality before the law
- 8 Multiple offenders
- 9 Custodial sentencing
- 10 Non-custodial sentencing
- 11 Procedural issues and ancillary orders
- 12 Special sentencing powers
- 13 Conclusions
- Appendix: The Sentencing Council: provisions in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sentencing and Criminal Justice , pp. 430 - 449Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(2005) ‘Punishing Parents for the Crimes of their Children’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44: 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002b), ‘Rights, Responsibilities and Restorative Justice’, British Journal of Criminology, 42: 578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Sentencing and Sensitivity’, in and (eds.), The Criminological Foundations of Penal Policy: Essays in Honour of Roger Hood, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Social Control and Anti-Social Behaviour: The Subversion of Human Rights?’, Law Quarterly Review, 120: 263.Google Scholar
and (1998), ‘Sentencing, Equal Treatment and the Impact of Sanctions’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (forthcoming 2010), The Criminal Process, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997), ‘Recognising Elephants: The Problem of the Custody Threshold’, Criminal Law Review, 187.Google Scholar
and (2008), ‘Defending the Criminal Law: Reflections on the Changing Character of Crime, Procedure and Sanctions’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2: 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(2006), Same Crime, Same Time: Sentencing of Federal Offenders, ALRC No. 103, Sydney: Law Reform Commission.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Is Asset Really an Asset?’, in and (eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
(1980), ‘Why the Prison Population Has Grown Larger and Younger’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 19: 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1978), ‘Sentencing Problems Raised by Guilty Pleas’, Modern Law Review, 41: 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘A Significant Move towards Restorative Justice, or a Recipe for Unintended Consequences?’, Criminal Law Review, 211.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Youth Justice? Half a Century of Responses to Youth Offending’, Criminal Law Review, 167.Google Scholar
and (1998), ‘Some Ethical Issues in Defending and Prosecuting Criminal Cases’, Criminal Law Review, 16.Google Scholar
et al. (1986), Criminal Careers and Career Criminals, Washington: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
(2009), ‘The Remains of the Day – Whole Life Sentences after Bieber’, Journal of Criminal Law, 73: 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1973), ‘The Efficacy of the Fine: The Case for Agnosticism’, Criminal Law Review, 543.Google Scholar
(1974), ‘On the Decriminalisation of the Juvenile Court’, in (ed.), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
(1981), ‘The Suspended Sentence in England’, British Journal of Criminology, 21: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987), ‘Limiting Prison Use: Experience in England and Wales’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 26: 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), ‘The Place of the Probation Service’, The Madingley Papers, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
(1995), ‘The Philosophy and Politics of Punishment and Sentencing’, in and (eds.), The Politics of Sentencing Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Five Puzzles in von Hirsch's Theory of Punishment’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Empirical Research Relevant to Sentencing Frameworks’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘The Community Dimension of Community Penalties’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47: 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1982), ‘The Dangerousness Debate after the Floud Report’, British Journal of Criminology, 22: 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), ‘Youth Justice in Great Britain’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31: 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), ‘How Did We Get Here?’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
, et al. (2004), ‘Towards Desistance: Theoretical Underpinnings for an Empirical Study’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), ‘Attitudes to Crime in Two High-Crime Communities’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
(2009), Report on People with Mental Health Problems or Learning Disabilities in the Criminal Justice System, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
(1978), Report of the Working Party on Judicial Studies and Information, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
and (1981), Taking Offenders out of Circulation, Home Office Research Study 64, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
, , and (1996), ‘Point Prevalence of Mental Disorder in Unconvicted Male Prisoners’, British Medical Journal, 313: 1524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (eds.) (2000), Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order, London: Routledge.
(2004), ‘The Statutory Charging Scheme in England and Wales’, Criminal Law Review, 896.Google Scholar
(1994), Recidivism and Imprisonment, Home Office Research Bulletin 36: 19.
and (2004), ‘Joined-Up Services to Tackle Youth Crime: A Case-Study in England’, British Journal of Criminology, 44: 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), ‘So Prison Works, Does It?’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006), ‘The Kindness of Prisoners: Strengths-Based Resettlement in Theory and Practice’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6: 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008), ‘Do We Need a Naughty Step? Rethinking the Parenting Order after 10 Years’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47: 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders: Finding a Focus for Diversion’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 34: 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987), Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach, Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘Pre-Sentence Reports: The Effects of Legislation and National Standards’, British Journal of Criminology, 37: 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), ‘Diverting Mentally Disordered Offenders from Custody’, in and (eds.), Managing People Nobody Owns, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Victim Impact Statement: Can Work, Do Work (for those who bother to make them)’, Criminal Law Review, 360.Google Scholar
, , and (1996), Fine Impositions and Enforcement Following the Criminal Justice Act 1993, Home Office Research Findings 36, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
, and (2002), Attitudes to Date Rape and Relationship Rape, Guildford: Department of Sociology, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
and (eds.) (1993), Racism and Criminology, London: Sage.
(1987), ‘The Practical Problems of the Sentencer’, in and (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing, Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Magistrates’ and Court Clerks' Sentencing Behaviour: An Experimental Study', in and (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing, Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.Google Scholar
and (1986), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2004), Crime, Courts and Confidence: Report of an Independent Inquiry into Alternatives to Prison, London: Esmee Fairbairn Foundation.Google Scholar
(1976), Alternative Measures to Imprisonment, Recommendation R (76) 10, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
(1984), Convention on Compensation for the Victims of Violent Crime, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
(1992), European Rules on Community Sanctions and Measures, Recommendation No. R (92) 16, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
(1993), Consistency in Sentencing, Recommendation R (92) 17, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
(2001), European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Punishment, Report of Inspection of English Prisons, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Crime Prevention and Community Safety’, in , and (eds), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), Code for Crown Prosecutors, www.cps.gov.uk
(2008), Annual Report 2007–08, www.cps.gov.uk
(2007), ‘Punishing Drivers who Kill: Putting Road Safety First?’, Legal Studies, 27: 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Mind the Gap: Restorative Justice in Theory and Practice’, in , et al. (eds.), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
(1997a), ‘An Essay on the Importance and Neglect of the Magistracy’, Criminal Law Review, 627.Google Scholar
(1997b), ‘For the New Lord Chancellor – Some Causes for Concern about Magistrates’, Criminal Law Review, 861.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘The Mischief of Plea Bargaining and Sentence Rewards’, Criminal Law Review, 894.Google Scholar
and (2003), ‘“Filling in the Gaps” – A Study of Judicial Culture’, Criminal Law Review, 243.Google Scholar
(1981), ‘Exploring Sources of Sentencing Disparity’, in (ed.), The Trial Process, New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
and (2008), ‘Determining the Impact of Intoxication in a Desert-Based Sentencing Framework’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8: 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004), Crime in England and Wales 2003/2004, Statistical Bulletin 10/04, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (2003), ‘Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting the Null Hypothesis’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 30: 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997), ‘The Sentencing of Men and Women’, in and (eds.), Understanding the Sentencing of Women, Home Office Research Study 170, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (2007), ‘No Turning Back: The Politics of Law and Order into the Millenium’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Dangerous Waters: Taking Account of Impact in Sentencing’, Criminal Law Review, 105.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘An Ambiguous Participant: The Victim and the Criminal Justice System’, British Journal of Criminology, 44: 967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999), Community Penalties for Fine Default and Persistent Petty Offending, Home Office Research Findings 98, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (2007), Human Rights and Criminal Justice, 2nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
(1997), ‘Human Development and Criminal Careers’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Childhood Risk Factors and Risk-Based Prevention’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (1992), ‘Changes in Crime and Punishment in England and America in the 1980s’, Justice Quarterly, 9: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1983), ‘Sex, Sentencing and Reconvictions’, British Journal of Criminology, 23: 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), Women and Justice: Third Annual Review of the Commission on Women and the Criminal Justice System, London: Fawcett Society.Google Scholar
and (2003), Minority Ethnic Young People in the Youth Justice System, London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar
(1990), Trends in Crime and their Interpretation, Home Office Research Study 119, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Practice Cultures and the “New” Youth Justice in (England and) Wales’, British Journal of Criminology, 47: 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), Ethnic Minorities and the Criminal Justice System, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study 21, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
and (1986), The Psychology of Judicial Sentencing, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
and (1998), Sentencing Practice: An Examination of Decisions in Magistrates' Courts and the Crown Court in the mid-1990s, Home Office Research Study 180, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (1999), Sentencing: State and Federal Law in Victoria, 2nd edn, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Limiting Retributivism’, in (ed.), The Future of Imprisonment, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘State Sentencing Guidelines: Diversity, Consensus, and Unresolved Policy Issues’, Columbia Law Review, 105: 1190.Google Scholar
and (eds.) (2008), Penal Populism, Sentencing Councils and Sentencing Policy, Cullompton: Willan.
(2008), Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales: An Evolutionary Approach, London: Sentencing Commission Working Group.Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Regulating Pre-Trial Decisions’, in (ed.), Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Crime: In Proportion and in Perspective’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2000), ‘The Wrongness of Rape’, in (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Fourth Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (1997), ‘Magistrates’ Explanations of Sentencing Decisions', in and (eds.), Understanding the Sentencing of Women, Home Office Research Study 170, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (2002), ‘Women's Imprisonment in England and Wales’, Criminal Justice, 2: 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995), ‘Quality and Effectiveness in Probation Officers’ Reports', British Journal of Criminology, 35: 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), ‘The Judicial Studies Board’, in and (eds.), Sentencing, Judicial Discretion and Judicial Training, London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
and (eds.) (2009), New Directions in Surveillance and Privacy, Cullompton: Willan.
(1998), ‘The Unit Fine: Monetary Sanctions Apportioned to Income’, in and (eds.), Principled Sentencing, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
, and (1995), ‘Sentencing and EU Law’, in et al., Criminal Justice in Europe: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1991), ‘Treatment Needs of Prisoners with Psychiatric Diagnoses’, British Medical Journal, 303: 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Making Punishments Work: Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Rational-Choice Gun Use in Armed Robbery’, Criminal Law Forum, 1: 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005), The Impact of Corrections on Offending: A Review of ‘What Works’, Home Office Research Study 291, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (1999), A Question of Evidence? Investigating and Prosecuting Rape in the 1990s, Home Office Research Study 196, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Community Punishment or Community Rehabilitation: Which Is the Highest in the Sentencing Tariff?’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45: 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), Punishment and Responsibility, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990), The Effect of Defendants' Demeanour on Sentencing in Magistrates' Courts, Home Office Research Bulletin 29, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (1997), Understanding the Sentencing of Women, Home Office Research Study 170, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (1994), Does the Criminal Justice System Treat Men and Women Differently? Home Office Research Findings 10, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (1992), Magistrates' Courts or Crown Courts? Mode of Trial Decisions and Sentencing, Home Office Research Study 125, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
and (2007), ‘Gender and Crime’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991), Sentencing Principles and Magistrates' Sentencing Behaviour, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Causing Death by Driving and other Offences: A Question of Balance’, Criminal Law Review, 339.Google Scholar
(2003), Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons, Report 2002–03, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(2004), Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons, Report 2003–04, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(2009), Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons, Report 2007–08, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(1996), Protecting the Public: The Government's Strategy on Crime, Cm 3190, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
(1997), No More Excuses: A New Approach to Tackling Youth Crime in England and Wales, Cm 3089, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(1999), Digest 4: Information on the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2003), Respect and Responsibility: Taking a Stand against Anti-Social Behaviour, Cm 5778, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(1994), Monitoring of the Criminal Justice Acts 1991 and 1993, Statistical Bulletin 20/94, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (2008) The Death Penalty: A World Wide Perspective, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996), ‘Protecting the Public: Automatic Life Sentences, Parole and High Risk Offenders’, Criminal Law Review, 788.Google Scholar
, , and (2002), ‘Sex Offenders Emerging from Long-Term Imprisonment’, British Journal of Criminology, 42: 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Ethnic Minorities in the Criminal Courts: Perceptions of Fairness, Oxford: Centre for Criminology.Google Scholar
and (2008), Creating a Sentencing Commission for England and Wales, London: Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
, and (2003), The Decision to Imprison: Sentencing and the Prison Population, London: Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
and (1998), Attitudes to Punishment: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study 179, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
, et al. (2009), Public Attitudes to the Principles of Sentencing, London: Sentencing Guidelines Secretariat.Google Scholar
(2004), Draft Sentencing Guidelines 1 and 2, Home Affairs Committee, Fifth Report of Session 2003–04, HC 1207, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(2008), Towards Effective Sentencing, Report of the Justice Committee, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(2003), Criminal Justice Bill, Select Committee on the Constitution, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
et al. (1998), Evaluation of the One-Stop Shop and Victim Statement Pilots, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (2003), ‘New, Improved, Police-Led Restorative Justice?’, in , et al. (eds.), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
and (2007), ‘Victims, Victimization and Criminal Justice’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1995), ‘Beyond Proportionate Punishment: Difficult Cases’, Crime, Law and Social Change, 22: 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Doing Justice to Difference’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2005), ‘Assessing the “Other”: Constructions of “Asianness” in Risk Assessments by Probation Officers’, British Journal of Criminology, 45: 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), ‘Vehicles of Desistance: The Impact of Electronically Monitored Curfew Orders’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8: 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), ‘Sentencing in Scotland’, in and (eds.), Criminal Justice in Scotland, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
and (2007), Mitigation: The Role of Personal Factors in Sentencing, London: The Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
(1995), ‘The Swedish Sentencing Reform’, in and (eds.), The Politics of Sentencing Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Why Bulk Discounts in Multiple Sentencing?’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2008), ‘Dealing with Juvenile Offenders in the Criminal Justice System’, European Journal of Criminal Policy Research, 14: 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Streets Ahead – A Joint Inspection of the Street Crime Initiative, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2004), Joint Inspection Report into Persistent and Prolific Offenders, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘The Halliday Report and Persistent Offenders’, in and (eds.), Reform and Punishment: The Future of Sentencing, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
(2004), Annual Report of the Judicial Studies Board 2003–04, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(2007), ASBOs: A Guide for the Judiciary, www.jsboard.co.uk
(2008), Annual Report of the Judicial Studies Board 2007–08, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
and (2006), ‘Exploring Residual Career Length and Residual Number of Offenses for Two Generations of Repeat Offenders’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43: 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Constricted Rationality and the Limits of General Deterrence’, in and (eds.), Punishment and Social Control, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘The Hardness of Hard Treatment’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘The Rise and Fall of Proportionality: The Failure of the Criminal Justice Act 1991’, Criminal Law Review, 281.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Restorative and Community Justice in the United States’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 26: 355.Google Scholar
(2008), The Prisoners' Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), ‘Diversion of Mentally Disordered Offenders: Victim and Offender Perspectives’, Criminal Law Review, 805.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Sentencing and Punishment in Finland’, in and (eds.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2004), ‘Slopping Out in Scotland: The Limits of Degradation and Respect’, European Human Rights Law Review, 645.Google Scholar
(1974), ‘Training, Personality and Attitudes as Determinants of Magistrates’ Sentencing', British Journal of Criminology, 14: 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), ‘Organized Crime and Terrorism’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1994), Explaining Reconviction Rates, Home Office Research Study 135, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Home Secretary and Lord Chancellor: Clear Message on Sentencing’, press notice 194/02, 14 June.
(1997), The Framework of Judicial Sentencing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Sentencing the Multiple Offender: Judicial Practice and Legal Principle, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
and (1998), ‘Sovereign States and Vengeful Victims’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications for, the ASBO’, Criminal Law Review, 791.Google Scholar
and (2000), ‘The Operation of Section 48 of the Mental Health Act 1983’, British Journal of Criminology, 40: 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘The Desistance Paradigm for Offender Management’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6: 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Magistrates' Courts' Sentencing Guidelines, London: The Magistrates' Association.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘The Crime Reduction Programme in England and Wales: Reflections on the Vision and the Reality’, Criminal Justice, 4: 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Diversionary and Non-Supervisory Approaches to Dealing with Offenders’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
and (1997), Offenders on Probation, Home Office Research Study 167, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (2009), The Community Order and the Suspended Sentence Order Three Years On, London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
, et al. (2008), Sentencing and Penal Policy in Canada, 2nd edn, Toronto: Emond Montgomery.Google Scholar
(1979), ‘New Findings, New Views: A Note of Caution Regarding Sentencing Reform’, Hofstra Law Review, 7: 242.Google Scholar
et al. (1974), ‘What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform’, The Public Interest, 22.Google Scholar
(2001), Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives, Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), The Illicit Drug Trade in the United Kingdom, Home Office Online Report 20/7, www.homeoffice.gov.uk
(2004), ‘Assessment Tools in Probation’, in and (eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Rebuilding Lives: Operation and Policy Issues in the Compensation of Victims of Violent and Terrorist Crimes’, Criminal Law Review, 695.Google Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Borderline Sentencing: A Comparison of Sentencers’ Decision-Making in England and Wales, and Scotland', Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7: 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008b), Offender Management Caseload Statistics 2007, England and Wales, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
(2008c), Punishment and Reform: Our Approach to Managing Offenders, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Public Perceptions of Homicide and Criminal Justice’, British Journal of Criminology, 38: 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘The Future of Violence Risk Management’, in (ed.), The Future of Imprisonment, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(1988), ‘The Moral Worth of Retribution’, in (ed.), Responsibility, Character and the Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘The Use of Financial Penalties and the Amounts Imposed: The Need for a New Approach’, Criminal Law Review, 13.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘The Methods for Enforcing Financial Penalties: The Need for a Multi-Dimensional Approach’, Criminal Law Review, 728.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Thinking about the Demand for Probation Services’, Probation Journal, 50: 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007), ‘Imprisonment: An Expanding Scene’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2007), ‘Youth Justice’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2000), ‘Restorative Conferencing’, in and (eds.), Restorative and Community Justice, Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing.Google Scholar
, and (1993), ‘Giving Victims a Voice: The New Zealand Experience’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 32: 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘Deprivation and Desert’, in and (eds.), From Social Justice to Criminal Justice, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (1997), Electronic Monitoring in Practice, Home Office Research Study 177, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
, and (1999), Making the Tag Fit, Home Office Research Findings 105, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(1988), Sentencing Practice in the Crown Court, Home Office Research Study 103, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘The Role of Sentencing Policy’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
, and (1990), Unit Fines: Experiments in Four Courts, Research and Planning Unit Paper 59, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
and (1996), Imprisonment for Fine Default, Home Office Research Findings 35, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(1992), ‘Judicial Independence and Judicial Functions’, in and (eds.), Sentencing, Judicial Discretion and Judicial Training, London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
and (2002), Rape and Sexual Assault of Women, Home Office Research Study 237, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the 21st Century’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 23: 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), ‘Appropriate Responses and Preventive Benefits: Justifying Censure and Hard Treatment in Legal Punishment’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 13: 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), National Probation Service: The Supervision of Community Orders in England and Wales, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
, et al. (2002), The Introduction of Referral Orders into the Youth Justice System, Home Office Research Study 242, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2007), National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders, www.justice.gov.uk
and (1994), ‘Changes in the Use of Imprisonment in England and Wales’, Criminal Law Review, 316.Google Scholar
, and (2008), ‘Recidivism in the Republic of Ireland’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984), Sentencing in the Crown Court: Report of an Exploratory Study, by , , , and , Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Criminology.Google Scholar
(2008), Text and Materials on the Criminal Justice Process, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009), ‘Parole and Early Release: The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 Changes in Context’, Criminal Law Review, 166.Google Scholar
and (2006), ‘The Revolving Door at the Prison Gate’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6: 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988), The Seriousness of Offences: Findings from the 1988 British Crime Survey, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders, Mental Health and Crime’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Ethnicities, Racism, Crime and Justice’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Should Impact Constitute Mitigation? Structured Discretion versus Mercy’, Criminal Law Review, 141.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘The Reduction of Women's Imprisonment in England and Wales’, Punishment and Society, 7: 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979), ‘Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Standards’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1980), ‘Incapacitating the Habitual Criminal: The English Experience’, Michigan Law Review, 1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986), The Emergence of Penal Policy in Victorian and Edwardian England, London: Stevens.Google Scholar
, and (2004), ‘Financial Penalties: Who Pays, Who Doesn't, and Why Not?’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1994), ‘An Analysis of a Guideline Case as Applied to Rape’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 33: 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Rehabilitative and Reintegrative Approaches’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Community Penalties: Probation, “What Works” and Offender Management’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘The New Constitutional Conundrum: Policy and Constitutional Law at Cross-Purposes’, Columbia Law Review, 105: 1082.Google Scholar
(2004), Rethinking Crime and Punishment: The Report, London: Esmee Fairbairn Foundation.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Applying Desert Principles to Community Sentences’, Criminal Law Review, 381.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Beyond Cognitive-Behaviouralism? Reflections on the Effectiveness Literature’, in , and (eds.), Community Penalties: Change and Challenges, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
, , and (2003), Accrediting Offender Programmes, Home Office Research Study 273, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(1999), Review of the Mental Health Act 1983: Report of the Expert Committee, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
(1985), ‘Drinking Drivers: The Limits to Deterrence’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24: 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1988), Triable-Either-Way Cases: Crown Court or Magistrates' Court, Home Office Research Study 98, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Offending Behaviour Programmes: Emerging Evidence and Implications for Practice’, in and (eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Evaluating the Pluses and Minuses of Custody’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42: 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008b), ‘Aggravating and Mitigating Factors at Sentencing: Towards Greater Consistency of Application’, Criminal Law Review, 264.Google Scholar
(2009), ‘Revisiting the Recidivist Sentencing Premium’, in , and (eds.), Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy, 3rd edn, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
and (2004), ‘Communication in Sentencing: Exploring the Expressive Function of Victim Impact Statements’, International Review of Victimology, 10: 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, et al. (2008), ‘Public Attitudes to the Sentencing of Offences Involving Death by Driving’, Criminal Law Review, 525.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Late-Modern Rehabilitation: The Evolution of a Penal Strategy’, Punishment and Society, 8: 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008), ‘Reducing Recidivism: A Task for Restorative Justice’, British Journal of Criminology, 48: 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Dealing with Substance-Misusing Offenders in the Community’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Victim Participation in an Exclusionary Criminal Justice System’, in and (eds.), New Visions of Crime Victims, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
et al. (2001), ‘Victim Impact Statements: Don't Work, Can't Work’, Criminal Law Review, 447.Google Scholar
(2008), Crown Court Sentencing Survey, Sentencing Commission Working Group, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
(1980), ‘Is Mens Rea a Component of Perceived Offense Seriousness?’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), ‘Dangerous Liaisons: Personality Disorder and the Politics of Risk’, Punishment and Society, 8: 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008), The Community Order and the Mental Health Treatment Requirement, London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘Monetary Penalties and Imprisonment’, in and (eds.), Paying for Crime, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
and (eds.) (1985), Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
, and (1998), Psychiatric Morbidity among Prisoners in England and Wales, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Crime and the Life Course’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002), How Do Judges Decide? The Search for Fairness and Justice in Punishment, London: Sage.Google Scholar
(2008), A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure, 12th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993), The Independence of the Judiciary: The View from the Lord Chancellor's Office, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
and (2006), ‘Football Banning Orders, Proportionality and Public Order Policing’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45: 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1960), Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on the Business of the Criminal Courts, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
(1998), The Restricted Hospital Order, Home Office Research Study 186, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Factors Contributing to the Rising Imprisonment Figures in Germany’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42: 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘Tactical Reasons for Recommending Trials rather than Guilty Pleas in the Crown Court’, Criminal Law Review, 23.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Barristers’ Selfish Incentives in Counselling Defendants over Choice of Plea', Criminal Law Review, 3.Google Scholar
(1979), Sentencing Practice in Magistrates' Courts, Home Office Research Study 56, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Sentencing Practice in Magistrates’ Courts Revisited', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45: 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Conceptions and Representations of the Sentencing Decision Process’, Journal of Law and Society, 24: 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al. (2008), ‘Assisting and Advising the Sentencing Decision Process: The Pursuit of “Quality” in Pre-Sentence Reports’, British Journal of Criminology, 48: 835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), ‘Continuity and Change in the Criminal Law’, King's College Law Journal, 7: 1.Google Scholar
, and (2004), Blackstone's Guide to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1974), ‘The Control of Discretion in the Administration of Criminal Justice’, in (ed.), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘Sentencing Legislation – The Case for Consolidation’, Criminal Law Review, 406.Google Scholar
and (2006), ‘Denying Responsibility: Sentencers’ Accounts of their Decisions to Imprison', British Journal of Criminology, 46: 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Proportionality, Parsimony and Interchangeability of Punishments’, in et al., Penal Theory and Practice, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
(1995), Malign Neglect: Race, Crime and Punishment in America, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1990), The United Nations and Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
(2008), Report on United Kingdom, www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/CRC.C.GBR.CO.4.pdf
and (2004), ‘Disproportionate Sentences as Human Rights Violations’, Modern Law Review, 67: 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998), ‘Effective Interventions with Offenders’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2009), ‘The Discount Approach: Progressive Loss of Mitigation’, in , and (eds.), Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy, 3rd edn, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
and (eds.) (1998), Principled Sentencing, 2nd edn, Oxford: Hart.
, and (eds.) (2009) Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy, 3rd edn, Oxford: Hart.
, and (2000), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situation Crime Prevention, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
and (1991), ‘Gauging Criminal Harm: A Living Standard Analysis’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 11: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982), ‘Unscientific, Unwise, Unprofitable or Unjust?’, British Journal of Criminology, 22: 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), ‘Mandatory Sentencing and the Role of the Academic’, Criminal Law Forum, 18: 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985), ‘The Grant of an Absolute Discharge’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 5: 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘Sentencing in Homicide’, in and (eds.), Rethinking English Homicide Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales – State of the Art?’, Criminal Law Review, 253.Google Scholar
and (1988), ‘Non-Custodial Penalties and the Principles of Desert’, Criminal Law Review, 555.Google Scholar
and (1997), ‘Civil Disqualifications Attending Conviction’, Cambridge Law Journal, 599.Google Scholar
(1992), Sentencing for Multiple Offences in Western Australia, Perth: University of Western Australia Crime Research Centre.Google Scholar
and (1997), Enforcing Financial Penalties, Home Office Research Study 165, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Evaluating Evidence for the Effectiveness of the Reasoning and Rehabilitation Programme’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44: 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1963), Deterrents and Incentives to Crime among Youths Aged 15–21 Years, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
(1988), ‘Dangerous Offenders and the Morality of Protective Sentencing’, Criminal Law Review, 424.Google Scholar
and (1993), Crown Court Study, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study 19, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘Reparation and Retribution: Are They Reconcilable?’, Modern Law Review, 57: 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Sentencing Young Offenders’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Dangers of Dystopias in Criminal Theory’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22: 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘The Concept of Security: An Agenda for Comparative Analysis’, Legal Studies, 23: 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1977), ‘The Search for Sentencing Equity’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 881.Google Scholar
and (1995), Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2001), Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar