Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T18:46:31.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Nobody Is Gonna Rain on My Parade: Experiencing Salutaris’s Procession As a Ritual Event

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

By
Abigail Graham
Edited by
Blanka Misic  and
Abigail Graham
Blanka Misic
Affiliation:
Champlain College, Lennoxville
Abigail Graham
Affiliation:
Institute of Classical Studies, London
Get access

Summary

Processions were among the earliest ‘moving pictures’ in which the brain could develop the cognitive process of ‘reading’ a landscape and embedding a memory through sensory experiences. Salutaris’ foundation, a text inscribed outside the theatre at Ephesus which records the organization of a ritual procession for Artemis, tends to be treated as a factual guide by scholars, rather than as aspirational script for an event: repeated legal clauses, claims of control and permanency, and the white marble on which it was carved, underwrite the vivid sensual experience and transiency of a ritual event. This paper endeavors to contextualize Salutaris’ foundation by incorporating directives of the text together with an analysis of the procession as a practical event and an emotional experience. As a sensorial experience, one can explore aspects of the performance that could not be controlled: the weather, the attitude of the audience, and the behaviour of the performers. Did aspirational directives of ritual behavior come to fruition in a ritual event? How did the experience of an event shape its role and meaning? This cognitive approach provides insights to both the ritual event and the ways that processions could be read by the viewer.

Keywords

Epigraphyemotionslived experiencemonumental contextritual processionsmemorycognitionritual failureSalutarisEphesusArtemis.
Type
Chapter
Information
Senses, Cognition, and Ritual Experience in the Roman World , pp. 118 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beard, M. 2007. The Roman Triumph. London.Google Scholar
Campbell, V. 2021. ‘Pompa in Pompeii: experiencing a funeral procession in the ancient city’, Open Arts Journal 10(8): 145–59. https://openartsjournal.org/issue-10/Google Scholar
Capra, A. 2009. ‘“The (un)happy romance of Curleo and Liliet”: Xenophon of Ephesus, the Cyropaedia and the birth of the “anti-tragic” novel’, Ancient Novel 7: 29–50.Google Scholar
Casey, E. 2001. ‘Body, self and landscape: a geophilosophical inquiry into the place-world’, in Adams, P. C, Hoelscher, S. and Till, K. E., eds. Textures of Place: Exploring Humanist Geographies, 403–25. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 1997. ‘Theatricality beyond the theater: staging public life in the Hellenistic world’, in Le Guen, B., ed. De la scène aux gradins. Thêatre et représentations dramatiques après Alexandre le Grand dans les cités hellénistiques. Actes du Colloque, Pallas 47, 219–59. Toulouse.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2006. ‘Rituals between norms and emotions: rituals as shared experience and memory’, in Stavrianopoulou, E., ed. Rituals and Communication in the Graeco-Roman World, Kernos Supplement 16, 211–38. Liège.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2007. ‘Theatre rituals’, in Wilson, P., ed. The Greek Theatre and Festivals. Documentary Studies, 48–66. Oxford.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2011. ‘Introduction’, in Chaniotis, A., ed. Ritual Dynamics in the Ancient Mediterranean: Agency, Emotion, Gender, Representation, 9–16. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2012. ‘Moving stones: the study of emotions in Greek inscriptions’, in Chaniotis, A., ed. Unveiling Emotions: Sources and Methods for the Study of Emotions in the Greek World, 91–129. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2013. ‘Staging and feeling the presence of God: emotion and theatricality in religious celebrations in the Roman East’, in Bricault, L. and Bonnet, C., eds. Panthée: Religious Transformations in the Roman Empire, 169–89. New York.Google Scholar
Cottier, M., Crawford, M. H., Crowther, C. V., Ferrary, J.-L., Levick, B. M., Salomies, O. and Wörrle, M. Eds. 2008. The Customs Law of Asia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cresswell, T. 2015. Place: A Short Introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Crowther, C. 2007. ‘The Dionysia at Iasos: it’s artists, patrons and audience’, in Wilson, P., ed. The Greek Theatres and Festivals, Documentary studies, 294–334. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dignas, B. 2001. The Economy of the Sacred in Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dignas, B. and Smith, R. R. R. 2012. Eds. Historical and Religious Memory in the Ancient World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dillion, M., Eidinow, E. and Maurizio, L. Eds. 2016. Women’s Ritual Competence in the Greco-Roman Mediterranean. London.Google Scholar
Eck, W. 1997. ‘Der Euergetismus im Funktionszusammehang der Kaiserzeitlichen Städt’, in Christol, M. and Masson, O., eds. Actes du Xe congrès international d’épigraphie grecque et latine, Nîmes 4–9 octobre 1992, 305–31. Paris.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2007. Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text. Princeton.Google Scholar
Feuser, S. 2014. ‘A stroll along the sea: the processional way in Ephesus and the littoral’, CHS Research Bulletin 3(1), (Centre for Hellenic Studies, Harvard) e-article and video www.chs-fellows.org/author/sfeuser/.Google Scholar
Gager, J. 1992. Ed. Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gardiner, J. and Richardson-Klavehn, A. 2000. ‘Remembering and knowing’, in Craik Tulving, E. and Craik Tulving, F. I. M., eds. Oxford Handbook of Memory, 229–44. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gebhard, E. 1996. ‘The theatre and the city’, in Slater, W. J. ed. Roman Theater and Society: 113–27. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Graff, F. 2011. ‘Ritual restoration and innovation in the Greek cities of the Roman imperium’ in Chaniotis, A., ed. Ritual Dynamics in the Ancient Mediterranean: Agency, Emotion, Gender, Representation, 105–17. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Graff, F. 2015. Roman Festivals in the Greek East. From the Early Empire to the Middle Byzantine Era. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graham, A. 2021. ‘Reading visual cues on the so-called Archive Wall at Aphrodisias: a cognitive approach to monumental documents’, American Journal of Archaeology 125(4): 571–601.Google Scholar
Grimes, R. 1988. ‘Infelicitous performances and ritual criticism’, Semeia 43: 103–22.Google Scholar
Guettel Cole, S. 1993. ‘“The Sacred Identity of Ephesos: Foundation Myths of a Roman City” by Guy MacLean Rogers (pp. 589–590). Review by: Susan Guettel Cole’, American Journal of Archaeology 97: 589–90.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. and Theou, E. 2013. ‘Enacted multi-temporality: the archaeological site as a shared, performative space’, in Gonzalez-Ruibal, A., ed. Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity, 181–94. London.Google Scholar
Hin, S. 2007. ‘Class and society in the cities of the Greek East: education during the Ephebia’, Ancient Society 37: 141–66.Google Scholar
Hoag, G. G. 2015. Wealth in Ancient Ephesos: Fresh Insights from the Ephesiaca by Xenophon of Ephesos. Bulletin for Biblical Research Supplement. Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hofbauer, M. 2002. ‘Zum Theater von Ephesos. Eine kurze Darstellung der Grabungsgeschichte zwischen 1866 und 2001’, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen archäologischen Instituts 71: 177–87. Vienna.Google Scholar
Hüsken, U. 2007. ‘Ritual dynamics and ritual failure’, in Hüsken, U., ed. When Rituals Go Wrong: Mistakes, Failures, and the Dynamics of Ritual, 337–66. Leiden.Google Scholar
Knibbe, D. 1995. ‘Via Sacra Ephesiaca: new aspects of the Cult of Artemis’, in Koester, H., ed. Ephesos Metropoli of Asia: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Its Archaeology, Religion and Culture, Harvard Theological Studies 41: 141–56. Valley Forge, VA.Google Scholar
Knibbe, D. and Langmann, G. 1993. Via Sacra Ephesiaca.I. Berichte und Materialen 3, Österreichisches archäologisches Institut 3. Vienna.Google Scholar
Kokkinia, C. 2016. ‘The design of the “Archive Wall” at Aphrodisias’, Tekmeria 13: 9–55.Google Scholar
Kokkinia, C. 2019. ‘A Roman financier’s version of Euergetism: C. Gaius Vibius Salutaris and Ephesos’, Tekmeria 14: 215–52.Google Scholar
Krinzinger, F. and Ruggendorfer, P. 2017. Das Theater von Ephesos: Archäologischer Befund, Funde und Chronologie. Forschungen in Ephesos, Band II/1. Vienna.Google Scholar
Latham, J. A. 2016. Performance, Memory, and Processions in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. N. and Lawson, E. T. 2002. Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological Foundations of Cultural Forms. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1990. ‘Festivals, games and civic life in Roman Asia Minor’, Journal of Roman Studies 80: 183–93.Google Scholar
Moser, C. and Feldman, C. Eds. 2014. Locating the Sacred: Theoretical Approaches to the Emplacement of Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ng, D. Y. 2018. ‘The Salutaris Foundation: monumentality through periodic rehearsal’, in Longfellow, B. and Perry, E., eds. Roman Artists, Patrons and Public Consumption: Familiar Works Reconsidered, 63–87. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ng, D. Y. 2019. ‘Roman period theatres as distributed cognitive micro-ecologies’, in Anderson, M., Cairns, D. and Sprevak, M., eds. Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity, 117–31. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, J. N. 1995. Xenophon of Ephesus: His Compositional Technique and the Birth of the Novel. New York.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, C., Hamilakis, Y., Kyparissi-Apostolika, N., and Guardamino-Diaz, M. 2019. ‘Digital sensoriality: neolithic figurines from Koutrolou Magoula, Greece’, Cambridge Archaeology Journal 29(4): 625–52. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774319000271Google Scholar
Price, S. 1984. Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1987. ‘Discrimina Ordinum: the Lex Julia Theatralis’, Publications of the British School at Rome 55: 83–114.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. 1991. The Sacred Identity of Ephesos: Foundation Myths of a Roman City. London.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. 1992. ‘The assemblies of Imperial Ephesos’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 94: 222–8.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. 2012. The Mysteries of the Cult of Artemis: Cult, Polis and Change in the Graeco-Roman World. London.Google Scholar
Roueche, C. 1993. Performers and Partisans. London.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2016. On Roman Religion: Lived Religion and the Individual in Ancient Rome. IthacaGoogle Scholar
Schechner, R. 1988. Performance Theory, revised and expanded edition. London.Google Scholar
Scherrer, P. 2001. ‘The historical topography of Ephesos’, in Parrish, D., ed. Urbanism in Western Asia Minor. New Studies on Aphrodisias, Ephesos, Hierapolis, Pergamon, Perge and Xanthos, 57–93. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, E. 1985. ‘On failure and performance: throwing the medium out of the séance’, in Laderman, C. and Roseman, M., eds. The Performance of Healing, 59–90. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, E. 1998. ‘Problematising performance’, in Hughes-Freeland, F., ed. Ritual, Performance, Media, 194–207. New York.Google Scholar
Schulte, C. 1994. ‘Review of The Sacred Identity of Ephesos: Foundation Myths of a Roman City by G.M. Rogers 1991’, Klio 76: 518–21.Google Scholar
Small, D. B. 1987. ‘Social correlations to the Greek Cavea in the Roman period’, in Macreedy, S. and Thompson, F. H, eds. Roman Architecture in the Greek World, 185–93. London.Google Scholar
Smith, C. Z. 1987. To Take Place: Toward a Theory in Ritual. Chicago.Google Scholar
Sokolicek, A. 2009. ‘Zwischen Land und Stadt: Neues zum Magnesischen Tor in Ephesos. Erste Ergebnisse’, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen archäologischen Instituts 78: 321–47.Google Scholar
Sokolicek, A. 2010. ‘Chronologie und Nutzung des Magnesischen Tores von Ephesos’, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen archäologischen Instituts 79: 359–81.Google Scholar
Sokolicek, A. 2019. ‘The Magnesian Gate of Ephesos’, in Schowalter, D., Ladstätter, S., Friesen, S. J. and Thomas, C., eds. Religion in Ephesos Reconsidered: Archaeology of Spaces, Structures and Objects. Novum Testamentum Supplements 177, 108–22. Leiden.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A. 1992. ‘Review of The Sacred Identity of Ephesos: Foundation Myths of a Roman City by G.M. Rogers’ Classical Review 42: 383–84.Google Scholar
Stavrianopoulou, E. 2006. Ed. Rituals and Communication in the Graeco-Roman World, Kernos Supplement 16, 211–38. Liège.Google Scholar
Thür, H. 1995. ‘The processional way in Ephesos as a place of cult and burial’, in Koester, H., ed. Ephesos: Metropolis of Asia, Harvard Theological Studies 41. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thür, H. 1999. ‘Via Sacra Ephesiaca. Vor der Stadt und in der Stadt’, in Scherrer, P., Taeuber, H., and Thür, H., eds. Steine und Wege, Festschrift für Dieter Knibbe zum 65. Geburtstag. 163–72. Vienna.Google Scholar
Tuan, Y.-F. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M. and Malik, A. S. 2017. ‘The influences of emotions on learning and memory’, Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454Google Scholar
Van Bremen, R. 1993. ‘Review of G.M. Rogers The Sacred Identity of Ephesos: Foundation myths of a Roman City’, Journal of Roman Studies 83: 245–46.Google Scholar
Van der Graaff, I. and Poehler, E. 2021. ‘Tracing procession routes for the principal cults in Pompeii’, Open Arts Journal 10(7): 125–44. https://openartsjournal.org/issue-10/article–7/Google Scholar
Walbank, M. E. 1994. ‘Review of The Sacred Identity of Ephesos: Foundation Myths of a Roman City by G.M. Rogers’ Phoenix 48: 89–91.Google Scholar
Weiss, C. F. 2012. ‘Bodies in motion: civic ritual and place-making in Roman Ephesus’, in Totten, D. M. and Samuels, K. L., eds. Making Roman Places, Past and Present. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series Number 89. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
White, L. M. ‘Urban development and social change in Imperial Ephesos’, in Koester, H., ed. Ephesos Metropolis of Asia: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Its Archaeology, Religion and Culture. Harvard Theological Studies 41, 27–79. Valley Forge, VA.Google Scholar
Wilpinger., G. 2006. ‘Wasser für Ephesos, Stand der Erforschung der Wasserversorgung’, in Wiplinger, G., ed. Cura Aquarum in Ephesus. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on the History of Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering in the Mediterranean Region. BABesch Supplement 12, 23–39. Leiden.Google Scholar
Wood, J. T. 1877. Discoveries at Ephesus, Including the Site and Remains of the Great Temple of Diana. Boston.Google Scholar
Wörrle, M. 1988. Stadt und Fest im Kaiserzeitlichen Kleinasien: Studien zu einer agonistischen Stiftung aus Oinoanda. Munich.Google Scholar
Yegül, F. 2000. ‘Memory, metaphor and meaning in the cities of Asia Minor’, in Fentress, E. ed. Romanisation and the City: Creations, Transformations, and Failures. Proceedings of the Conference Held at the American Academy in Rome to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Excavations at Cosa 14–16th May 1998. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 38. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. 2009. Politics of Munificence in the Roman Empire: Citizens, Elites and Benefactors in Asia Minor. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×