Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T21:45:25.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Self-efficacy in career choice and development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Albert Bandura
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

There are few other decisions that exert as profound an influence on people's lives as the choice of a field of work or career. Not only do most people spend considerably more time on the job than in any other single activity (save, arguably, sleep), but choice of occupation significantly affects one's lifestyle. Work adjustment is intimately associated with mental health and physical well-being.

– Hackett & Betz, in press.

This chapter addresses the role of efficacy beliefs in the important area of human functioning concerning career decision making and career development.

Theories of career development

Some psychologists have always been concerned with work. However, career development has received less attention in the mainstream literature (Osipow, 1986). Career development, as opposed to training for job skills (e.g., vocational education), can be defined as the preparation for, choice of, entry into, and adjustment to work throughout the life span (Super, 1990). Although the demand for career guidance has long been high among adolescents and young adults, career counseling has not received the attention it warrants from most applied psychologists (Hackett, 1993; Spokane, 1991). In today's rapidly changing job markets the need for career services is only likely to increase.

The earliest forms of vocational guidance, now commonly termed career counseling or career intervention, were rooted in differential psychology (Crites, 1981). The approaches to career counseling based on trait and factor or “matching men [sic] and jobs” models, historically atheoretical, have now been reconceptualized in the form of “person-environment (P-E) fit” theories (Hackett, Lent, & Greenhaus, 1991).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×